Things would have been so simple if this "God" would have just made the Bible with his/her own hands and created it to be indestructible and shiny and pretty. But no. I can take a Bible, take out a page or two, type up my own rendition of Mark, or John, and have a little party afterwards. Hell, I can make a whole Bible just for ME, and call myself a MORMON or something...
And have lots of wives.
WHOA.
Why would an infallible being trust fallible creatures to preserve his 'word' when he knew they were just going to muck it up and cause disbelief?
But if he wanted his divine word to be spread out among the masses and believed, shouldn't he have taken a little more time and care with the work? He's insured a lot of people a place in hell because of how unbelievable the Bible tends to be.
I'd love to get in on this, as Bible criticism is one of my favorite subjects, but I just don't agree with either side here.
From my perspective, God didn't want his message preserved in a botched cut and paste job, so he sent a final revelation in his own words, which confirmed all that was true, and corrected all that was false of what man kind had brought. He preserves it himself, as he says, "Surely I have brought this book and surely I will preserve it." It has been unchanged, and it even has a shiny cover... usually.
It even challenges people to imitate the perfection of it's prose... which no one has ever done. This is proven mathematically. So you couldn't rip out a page and write your own.
The only criticisms I've ever heard from the Quran were from people who didn't like the rules... and usually didn't even have them right. People who found contradictions, at least all that I've seen, were the result of a poor understanding of Arabic grammar.
Oh, yeah, Caveman, you never answered whether you thought my conclusions were rational.