@ JohnShaw!
All of Libmans stuff is under old names. Good luck finding it if you're just a casual user.
Of course it all is. But again, I guess that only proves my point.
I guess no one will believe it unless a bunch of people who have run afoul of him chime in.
Whatever.
I totally agree, I'm just saying the average denizen of the BBS will see him as nothing more than an interesting radical who is, in fact, worth defending as evidenced in this thread.
I noticed he's been busy - deleted a bunch of convo in the trash heap. I think more than anything that tells volumes about his so-called beliefs. I can understand pruning a thread when you get angry at it being derailed. But if the topic is general pointless bullshit, destroying it is kinda weird. That means all the people who each spent a few minutes contemplating and responding to your strange little pet-concept de'jour have no value, regardless of the fact they may have made a relevant and thoughtful contribution.
Personally, I find it more than a little annoying that whenever someone mentions food or other casual activities, he will interrupt with masturbatory comments that belittle their contributions. Its very disruptive to the continuity of the topic and it crushes spontaneous participation. Its very disappointing to scroll past his disruption and find the convo has taken a foul turn and quickly peters out.
I would like nothing better around here than for the general forum participant to ignore him manually or mentally, and continue their discussion as if unfazed by a petulant child.