If you post something illegal - You'll be banned. Happy?
Troll away.
If you post something illegal - You'll be banned. Happy?
Troll away.
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa170/almttr4/illegals.jpg)
A) Reposting copyrighted images without permission is illegal.
#!/usr/bin/perl
s''$/=\2048;while(<>){G=29;R=142;if((@a=unqT="C*",_)[20]&48){D=89;_=unqb24,qT,@
b=map{ord qB8,unqb8,qT,_^$a[--D]}@INC;s/...$/1$&/;Q=unqV,qb25,_;H=73;O=$b[4]<<9
|256|$b[3];Q=Q>>8^(P=(E=255)&(Q>>12^Q>>4^Q/8^Q))<<17,O=O>>8^(E&(F=(S=O>>14&7^O)
^S*8^S<<6))<<9,_=(map{U=_%16orE^=R^=110&(S=(unqT,"\xb\ntd\xbz\x14d")[_/16%8]);E
^=(72,@z=(64,72,G^=12*(U-2?0:S&17)),H^=_%64?12:0,@z)[_%8]}(16..271))[_]^((D>>=8
)+=P+(~F&E))for@a[128..$#a]}print+qT,@a}';s/[D-HO-U_]/\$$&/g;s/q/pack+/g;eval
QuoteA) Reposting copyrighted images without permission is illegal.
False.
Creating hyperlinks to images hosted in the internet is not illegal.
Many people write to ask me about whether it can be a copyright violation to link to a web page against the explicit wishes of the owner of that web page. This is not a suitable subject for the copyright myths article because this is not at all a decided subject...
Inlining
The quesiton of inlining, may, as noted, be treated differently from linking. Inlining involves writing HTML to insert an image that is fetched from another server. Thus when people view your web page, they see the image from the other site and the other site actually does the work of serving it.
Inlining is strange because in some ways the law might treat it as a lesser offence than copying the image from the other site onto your server and using it there. In that case, you would be engaged in a very straightforward copyright violation. With inlining, the original image owner's site does the work of copying the image to the user viewing it.
However, that seems backward, since the effect is the same, and to add injury to insult, not only are you seeming to use their image without permission, you're making them do the work. They're getting the bill for web service -- and images are the bulk of web traffic at most servers.
The doctrine of contributory infringement might apply more strongly here because you've now set up an automatic mechanism to cause users to copy the picture in a way not approved by the copyright holder. They don't even know it's happening, it's so automatic. It might be akin to you placing a photocopier on the street with a copyrighted photo in it, and a sign saying "press this button for a free picture." And sending the bill for the copying to the copyright holder of the picture to boot. You don't make any copies yourself, but it certainly seems to be even worse, from the copyright holder's viewpoint, than if you had done so.
Copying them is if it's specifically stated on the site that they don't give you rights to do so. However, I believe that many court cases have ruled that posting an image on the internet without a copyright notice of some kind indicates that the image is generally up for grabs.
See #11 by your fella...
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html
Also
This stuff was written in like... 1996-2000...
Got anything recent?
Also of interest:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Copyright#Linking_to_copyrighted_works
The latest revision was in October 2008.
(http://www.nhunderground.com/wiki/show_image.php?id=3146&scalesize=0&nocount=y)
If you post something illegal - You'll be banned. Happy?
Troll away.
Shitheads ARE allowed to post new threads in this forum.
IM GONNA POST SHITLOADS OF CP
(http://www.nationalcorridors.org/df/df06072004c.jpg)
#!/usr/bin/perl |
If you post something illegal - You'll be banned. Happy?
Troll away.
Shitheads ARE allowed to post new threads in this forum.
If tomorrow all the things were gone I'd worked for all my life,
And I had to start again with just my children and my wife,
I'd thank my lucky stars to be living here today,
'Cause the flag still stands for freedom
and they can't take that away.
I'm proud to be an American where at least I know I'm free,
And I won't forget the men who died who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you and defend her still today,
'Cause there ain't no doubt I love this land God Bless the U.S.A.
From the lakes of Minnesota to the hills of Tennessee,
Across the plains of Texas from sea to shining sea.
From Detroit down to Houston and New York to L.A.,
There's pride in every American heart
and it's time we stand and say:
I'm proud to be an American where at least I know I'm free,
And I won't forget the men who died who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you and defend her still today,
'Cause there ain't no doubt I love this land God Bless the U.S.A.
I find it FUCKING Funny that you would have a rule on here that says if its Illegal then you will be banned.
When the entire god dam show is about, saying fuck you to police government and laws.
what a bunch of PUSSYS.
My friends are not going to come running to my aid at 2AM in the morning.no surpises there
not really a problem if you're well armed
Next time someone is breaking into your house resisits the urge to call the cops on priniciple
Now how about if an ex-girl friend comes to your door at 2am in the morning then what are you going to do....
What if it was a year old child who was harassing you at 2AM what would you do....
jag off
Sorry if I offended you with too many music posts. Nothing in the rules says that would happen and all my posts today have been deleted. Oh well - I'll try to get along but it doesn't have the same feel dudes!
Bill
Sorry if I offended you with too many music posts. Nothing in the rules says that would happen and all my posts today have been deleted. Oh well - I'll try to get along but it doesn't have the same feel dudes!
Bill
Wow, read the first post of this topic. Thats true until John Shaw doesnt like what you have to say.
Rules for this Board
« on: October 24, 2008, 09:02:28 PM »
NEW TOS
« on: October 21, 2011, 12:42:00 AM »