 
|
This board is closed to new users and new posts. Thank you to all our great mods and users over the years. Details here.
|
|
The Free Talk Live BBS
Profile of CertainQuirk
Show Posts Topics
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
1
The Show / Why do you continue to pursue the "conpiracy theory" vendetta?
« on: November 01, 2012, 08:34:40 AM »
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/15/us/secret-army-chemical-tests-did-not-harm-health-report-says.html
http://www.mccaskill.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=1724
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/03/army-secret-chemical-testing-in-st-louis-neighborhoods-during-cold-war-raising/print\
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience
Listening to the FTL AMP pod this morning (Oct 31st show), Nemi begins with a story about the Feds investigating and charging Meridan, MS with a school to prison story. No one questions Nemi's beliefs. No one attacks her personally or the story's credibility.
Then the first caller, Matt from Ohio (if I remember correctly) suggests that chemtrailing could be done easily if the agents were slipped into gasoline. The reponse? Ian personally attacks Matt by asking (paraphrasing) "Why even bother to call in about something you don't believe?" and says to the audience (again, paraphrasing) "At least call about something you believe." To Mark's credit, he slips in a reaffirmation FTL's motto of calling in about anything. However, the damage is done by now. The caller's credibility is in question because he dares to mention chemtrails.
I have to question that unreasonable and condescending reaction. It causes me to doubt the show's integrity and intentions. I've linked 4 source stories here, two quite recent, one of which is from Senator McCaskill's Missouri Senate office. All reveal unquestionable evidence of chemtrailing. Four links. Proof positive. No argument. In fact, I dare anyone to deny them.
So, if there's a litany of creepy government behaviour (not to mention it being FTL's primary source of bread and butter) why is the response is always the same? Always, the caller is a kook and there's no proof, etc etc. Hmm.
At this point, chemtrails become secondary to FTL's (Ian's) behaviour. "The Emporer (Ian) has no clothes" seems most fitting, because for all that he and FTL claim to be--rational and fair, etc., this is a glaring prejudice. An apparent vendetta.
Or is it something else? What then? It stirs a great deal of doubt.
What is it Ian? FTL? Read those 4 stories and answer these questions:
1. Are the stories legitimate?
2. Do they describe chemtrailing?
If you answered these with "yes" then:
3. Why do you continue to pursue the "conspiracy theory" vendetta?
If you answered the first 2 questions with "no" then you're full of it and you're dismissed.
Repost on Twitter: @certainquirk
Edit: Emperor is the correct spelling, of course.
http://www.mccaskill.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=1724
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/03/army-secret-chemical-testing-in-st-louis-neighborhoods-during-cold-war-raising/print\
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience
Listening to the FTL AMP pod this morning (Oct 31st show), Nemi begins with a story about the Feds investigating and charging Meridan, MS with a school to prison story. No one questions Nemi's beliefs. No one attacks her personally or the story's credibility.
Then the first caller, Matt from Ohio (if I remember correctly) suggests that chemtrailing could be done easily if the agents were slipped into gasoline. The reponse? Ian personally attacks Matt by asking (paraphrasing) "Why even bother to call in about something you don't believe?" and says to the audience (again, paraphrasing) "At least call about something you believe." To Mark's credit, he slips in a reaffirmation FTL's motto of calling in about anything. However, the damage is done by now. The caller's credibility is in question because he dares to mention chemtrails.
I have to question that unreasonable and condescending reaction. It causes me to doubt the show's integrity and intentions. I've linked 4 source stories here, two quite recent, one of which is from Senator McCaskill's Missouri Senate office. All reveal unquestionable evidence of chemtrailing. Four links. Proof positive. No argument. In fact, I dare anyone to deny them.
So, if there's a litany of creepy government behaviour (not to mention it being FTL's primary source of bread and butter) why is the response is always the same? Always, the caller is a kook and there's no proof, etc etc. Hmm.
At this point, chemtrails become secondary to FTL's (Ian's) behaviour. "The Emporer (Ian) has no clothes" seems most fitting, because for all that he and FTL claim to be--rational and fair, etc., this is a glaring prejudice. An apparent vendetta.
Or is it something else? What then? It stirs a great deal of doubt.
What is it Ian? FTL? Read those 4 stories and answer these questions:
1. Are the stories legitimate?
2. Do they describe chemtrailing?
If you answered these with "yes" then:
3. Why do you continue to pursue the "conspiracy theory" vendetta?
If you answered the first 2 questions with "no" then you're full of it and you're dismissed.
Repost on Twitter: @certainquirk
Edit: Emperor is the correct spelling, of course.
Pages: [1]