Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 02, 2010, 11:20:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Shop Amazon.com through the banner above or just goto amazon.freetalklive.com and a percentage of your purchases go to Free Talk Live!
543835 Posts in 30530 Topics by 9663 Members
Latest Member: jeniktamere
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  The Free Talk Live BBS
|-+  Free Talk Live
| |-+  General
| | |-+  Molyneux vs. Badnarik debate is online
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Molyneux vs. Badnarik debate is online  (Read 894 times)
M83

Offline Offline


View Profile

Ignore
« on: July 12, 2009, 12:19:37 PM »

A version of the Molyneux vs. Badnarik debate of anarchy vs. minarchy is online for those of you who've been waiting like I have.  The sound is kind of bad but it's listenable if you're tolerant.  I feel sorry for Michael Badnarik as he didn't seem to be aware of what he was actually going to be debating.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae88LDbQPgw

UPDATE: As noted below, the video was removed, but Stefan uploaded the audio which you can get from http://www.fdrurl.com/phillyaudio
« Last Edit: July 27, 2009, 11:47:18 PM by M83 » Logged
YixilTesiphon
FTL AMPlifier Silver
*
Offline Offline



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2009, 03:43:14 PM »

Why would anybody want to hear the two of them arguing?
Logged

And their kids were hippie chicks - all hypocrites.
AbstractVagabond
Mind Navigator

Offline Offline


He sees you.


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2009, 04:34:45 PM »

Sound is kind of bad?? I don't hear anything.

Also, I'd rather hear those two debate than hear Obama speak. I have a certain favoritism going on with Badnarik. He was the gateway to my present form of thinking.
Logged

dot dot dot
H. Rearden

Offline Offline


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2009, 08:38:21 PM »


It has been removed.
Logged

$
BonerJoe
Guest

« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2009, 08:47:23 PM »

Aww, I wanted to finish watching it.
Logged
joels344

Offline Offline


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2009, 09:35:32 PM »

Crap, it's been removed already. I was wanting to watch it.
Logged
M83

Offline Offline


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: July 27, 2009, 11:48:36 PM »

<singular bump>
Logged
MacFall
Agorist
FTL AMPlifier Silver
*
Offline Offline


No king but Christ; no law but liberty!


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: July 27, 2009, 11:57:07 PM »

I've never actually heard Badnarik speak. Back when he was the big thing in Libertarian circles, I was a neocon who thought libertarians were just liberals who liked Milton Friedman. This will be interesting, as I'm sure I'll agree with Molyneux, but I really don't like him personally.
Logged

I am an anarchist! HOOGA BOOGA BOOGA!!
Alex Libman 14
Guest

« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2009, 05:40:09 AM »

Great, yet another "regular cars vs flying cars" debate ...

Minarchist politics are useful today.  AnCap is a long-term ivory-tower vision.  The former eventually leads to the latter.  I'm a big fan of both.
Logged
BobRobertson

Offline Offline



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2009, 12:36:54 PM »

...I'm sure I'll agree with Molyneux, but I really don't like him personally.

It's hard sometimes to remember that someone can be obnoxious, and still be right on a particular subject.

My favorite Molyneux quote so far, "You can read all the diet books in the world, but some day you have to put down the Twinkie."

This really sums up the minarchist vs. anarchist argument. It's fine to talk about how much better voluntary interaction is, but it's just talk until or unless coercion is finally dropped as a legitimate means of personal interaction.
Logged

"I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of 1776 to acquire self-government and happiness to their country is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it."
-- Thomas Jefferson, April 26th 1820
Alex Libman 15
Guest

« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2009, 07:36:34 PM »

Yaay, yet another debate comparing today to tomorrow!

Next up: what is better, Toyota built in 2005 vs Toyota built in 2050?

The first one can be bought today!  The second one flies!  How do we choose?!
Logged
BobRobertson

Offline Offline



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #11 on: September 01, 2009, 05:14:02 PM »

The first one can be bought today!  The second one flies!  How do we choose?!

So, Libman J.E., where's the principled minarchy that you say "can be bought today"?

That's one major fault of the minarchists. They talk like minarchy is more practicable than a completely voluntary society, but are just as completely unable to produce one as the voluntaryists.

What puts voluntary interaction ahead is, in my opinion, the ability to create entirely voluntary interactions TODAY. Like this web site for instance, or Free Talk Live, the Free State Project, the Rotarians, etc etc etc.

Today. Not tomorrow.
Logged

"I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of 1776 to acquire self-government and happiness to their country is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it."
-- Thomas Jefferson, April 26th 1820
Alex Libman 15
Guest

« Reply #12 on: September 02, 2009, 01:15:06 AM »

Minarchy isn't principled, it's pragmatic.  Bob Barr is better than McBama.  Ron Paul is better than Bob Barr.  Mary Ruwart is better than Ron Paul.  Etc.  Supporting the lesser evil is what minarchy is all about.
Logged
BobRobertson

Offline Offline



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #13 on: September 02, 2009, 07:45:27 PM »

Supporting the lesser evil is what minarchy is all about.

I have yet to see a rational argument for supporting evil.
Logged

"I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves by the generation of 1776 to acquire self-government and happiness to their country is to be thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it."
-- Thomas Jefferson, April 26th 1820
blackie
Guest

« Reply #14 on: September 02, 2009, 09:09:17 PM »

I have yet to see a rational argument for supporting evil.
Really?

Do you pay any taxes?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 17 queries.