The Free Talk Live BBS

Free Talk Live => General => Topic started by: Rillion on January 28, 2009, 05:41:46 PM

Title: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 28, 2009, 05:41:46 PM
This is a thread for anybody to ask questions to which they want answers, and for anybody to answer those questions.   

I'm going to start off with two questions of my own:

1.  What is a mother-in-law suite?

2.  What's the quickest way to soothe a sore throat?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 28, 2009, 06:39:57 PM
Mother in law suite is a separate apartment in your house with complete kitchen, bath, living space and bedroom and a private, separate entrance. 

Since you mentioned house hunting a while back, this is an excellent feature.  Its a great place for a guy to have his 'own space'.  Or you, whatever, you know what I mean.  Furnish it with the basics, let a friend crash there for a week while they're in town, etc. 


Sore throat = warm salt water gargle, and lozenges with benzocaine.  Cepocol or Cepostat, check the ingredients.  One has it, the other doesn't. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on January 28, 2009, 06:40:11 PM
1.  What is a mother-in-law suite?

A small apartment with kitchen on a separate floor of the house or over the garage.

2.  What's the quickest way to soothe a sore throat?

Tea with lemon and honey.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 28, 2009, 06:41:55 PM


1.  What is a mother-in-law suite?


Basically a self contained part of a house that has a bedroom bath and kitchen all of its own. That way grandma does not have to go near your ass if she does not want to. But is still close enough to watch the kids.

Shown in the upper right corner of floor plan.

(http://www.architecturaldesigns.com/plans/5906ndf1.gif)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 28, 2009, 06:42:53 PM
What does Rillion look like?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 28, 2009, 06:59:14 PM
What is a "Rillon" and why do Chupacabra's only suck the blood from goats?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 28, 2009, 07:15:23 PM

How did Janine Turner turn into such a fuckin wreck?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 28, 2009, 07:16:15 PM
What is a "Rillon" and why do Chupacabra's only suck the blood from goats?

Chupacabras do not just suck the blood of goats, they will suck the blood out of any type of livestock or small animal.

They especially like kids. *rimshot*
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: WallyC33 on January 29, 2009, 03:11:52 AM
This is a thread for anybody to ask questions to which they want answers, and for anybody to answer those questions.   

I'm going to start off with two questions of my own:

1.  What is a mother-in-law suite?

2.  What's the quickest way to soothe a sore throat?

Huge man-loads
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 29, 2009, 03:43:02 AM
How is is possible that the massive Sun stays stationary in space?

I actually think it is moving (if the universe is expanding, that is), but that has nothing to do with its size. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 29, 2009, 03:49:50 AM
What does Rillion look like?

(http://www.bullshido.org/w/images/thumb/a/a3/Rillion_Gracie.jpg/150px-Rillion_Gracie.jpg)
http://www.bullshido.org/Rillion_Gracie (http://www.bullshido.org/Rillion_Gracie)

That's not me, though.  I had no knowledge of that guy's existence when I picked the name oh these many years ago.  I am kind of annoyed that he has the balls to be born with my screen name, but I'm sure not going to say that to his face because he'd probably kick my ass. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 29, 2009, 08:24:36 AM
For a sore throat, I always did a combo punch to make it go away - this is before, when I had to sing a lot.  There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.  It's not the greatest tasting stuff, but you can get it at GNC, Vitamin World, any health food store, and even most regular grocery stores.  The lemon variety that is a bit better tasting is a little harder to find.  It's wacky, but it helps.  Also, the Cepacol lozenges or spray, or Chloraseptic (same thing), since they contain a local anesthetic and numb the area.  Also, if you stick to room-temperature and warmer beverages it will feel better.  I hated that part, because I looove massive amounts of cold water, but it does help.  And finally, if you have a humidifier, use it.  If not, stay in a hot, steamy bathroom for a while. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on January 29, 2009, 08:29:31 AM
For a sore throat, I always did a combo punch to make it go away - this is before, when I had to sing a lot.  There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.  It's not the greatest tasting stuff, but you can get it at GNC, Vitamin World, any health food store, and even most regular grocery stores.  The lemon variety that is a bit better tasting is a little harder to find.  It's wacky, but it helps.  Also, the Cepacol lozenges or spray, or Chloraseptic (same thing), since they contain a local anesthetic and numb the area.  Also, if you stick to room-temperature and warmer beverages it will feel better.  I hated that part, because I looove massive amounts of cold water, but it does help.  And finally, if you have a humidifier, use it.  If not, stay in a hot, steamy bathroom for a while. 

I always imagined you would have a good singing voice, you just have that look :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 29, 2009, 08:35:01 AM
For a sore throat, I always did a combo punch to make it go away - this is before, when I had to sing a lot.  There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.  It's not the greatest tasting stuff, but you can get it at GNC, Vitamin World, any health food store, and even most regular grocery stores.  The lemon variety that is a bit better tasting is a little harder to find.  It's wacky, but it helps.  Also, the Cepacol lozenges or spray, or Chloraseptic (same thing), since they contain a local anesthetic and numb the area.  Also, if you stick to room-temperature and warmer beverages it will feel better.  I hated that part, because I looove massive amounts of cold water, but it does help.  And finally, if you have a humidifier, use it.  If not, stay in a hot, steamy bathroom for a while. 

I always imagined you would have a good singing voice, you just have that look :)

Haha.  I'm not too bad.  I sang at Carnegie Hall once with strep throat.  That fucking blew.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on January 29, 2009, 08:39:59 AM
For a sore throat, I always did a combo punch to make it go away - this is before, when I had to sing a lot.  There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.  It's not the greatest tasting stuff, but you can get it at GNC, Vitamin World, any health food store, and even most regular grocery stores.  The lemon variety that is a bit better tasting is a little harder to find.  It's wacky, but it helps.  Also, the Cepacol lozenges or spray, or Chloraseptic (same thing), since they contain a local anesthetic and numb the area.  Also, if you stick to room-temperature and warmer beverages it will feel better.  I hated that part, because I looove massive amounts of cold water, but it does help.  And finally, if you have a humidifier, use it.  If not, stay in a hot, steamy bathroom for a while. 

I always imagined you would have a good singing voice, you just have that look :)

Haha.  I'm not too bad.  I sang at Carnegie Hall once with strep throat.  That fucking blew.   :lol:

Oh sheet mang, that's awes0me. I wanna hear you sing!!!

I think I can sing, so try...and fail miserably.

My mom once asked me if I could lip synch because I was giving her a migraine.

Bitch.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Porcupine_in_MA on January 29, 2009, 08:49:36 AM
Huge man-loads

I've heard there is some truth to this..but salt water gargle is the best that I know of.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 29, 2009, 08:51:18 AM
Huge man-loads

I've heard there is some truth to this..but salt water gargle is the best that I know of.

This also works too.  It's disgusting, though.  Also, antiseptic Listerine or other similar mouthwash is somewhat effective as well, for those who refuse the salt water. 

For a sore throat, I always did a combo punch to make it go away - this is before, when I had to sing a lot.  There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.  It's not the greatest tasting stuff, but you can get it at GNC, Vitamin World, any health food store, and even most regular grocery stores.  The lemon variety that is a bit better tasting is a little harder to find.  It's wacky, but it helps.  Also, the Cepacol lozenges or spray, or Chloraseptic (same thing), since they contain a local anesthetic and numb the area.  Also, if you stick to room-temperature and warmer beverages it will feel better.  I hated that part, because I looove massive amounts of cold water, but it does help.  And finally, if you have a humidifier, use it.  If not, stay in a hot, steamy bathroom for a while. 

I always imagined you would have a good singing voice, you just have that look :)

Haha.  I'm not too bad.  I sang at Carnegie Hall once with strep throat.  That fucking blew.   :lol:

Oh sheet mang, that's awes0me. I wanna hear you sing!!!

I think I can sing, so try...and fail miserably.

My mom once asked me if I could lip synch because I was giving her a migraine.

Bitch.


Hahahahaha, that sucks.   :(
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 29, 2009, 12:19:52 PM
How is is possible that the massive Sun stays stationary in space?

I actually think it is moving (if the universe is expanding, that is), but that has nothing to do with its size. 

^She's right.

In addition, the Sun is orbiting around our galaxy's center of mass, as the universe expands.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on January 29, 2009, 12:21:23 PM
(http://www.adherents.com/lit/comics/img/q/Question.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on January 29, 2009, 04:51:37 PM
1: mother-in-law sweet

a hot middle-aged milf, who happens to be your wife's mother, and she lets you fuck her when her daughter's not aro.....
oh, s-u-i-t-e....as in "room".....never mind

2: sore throat

 1-1/2 oz. whiskey +  1 oz. honey + 1/2 squeezed lemon....heat in micro fo 20 sec.


sooo glad i could hep.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on January 29, 2009, 05:59:57 PM
     I know redistribution of wealth is frowned on by a Libertarian.  I heard Ian say FSP had 655 members, so it may be awhile til New Hampshire is set free.  Meanwhile in the U.S.A. Bruce Williams overnight suggested any stimulus payments to the American people should be made in the form of a prepaid debit card w/ 6-mo. expiration.  He believes this would be the fastest way to get commerce moving.  Done in this way people could not save the cash or pay down existing debt.  thoughts?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 29, 2009, 07:21:00 PM
There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.   

I cannot stand this stuff, but Mr. Joy swears by it. Alternates between mugs of Throat Coat and Cold Care when he gets sick. I stick with the Cold Care tea with a touch of honey. Or hot lemonade.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 29, 2009, 08:32:12 PM
There's a tea called Throat Coat that soothes for me really well.   

I cannot stand this stuff, but Mr. Joy swears by it. Alternates between mugs of Throat Coat and Cold Care when he gets sick. I stick with the Cold Care tea with a touch of honey. Or hot lemonade.

I have not tried Cold Care.  The throat coat IS kind of...unique.  I know there's another lemon variety in addition to the original, but I've not seen it anywhere else besides Vitamin World and the internet.  I didn't get it the one time I saw it because I felt fine.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: MasterShake on January 30, 2009, 04:34:05 PM
Why do you never find relish on a relish tray?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 30, 2009, 04:44:18 PM
Anyone know anything about Dave Henderson or Lawrence Samuels in California?

I just had coffee with Lawrence and wanted to know if anyone knew anything about either one of these guys.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 30, 2009, 08:30:32 PM
For immediate relief of a sore throat, use Chloraseptic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloraseptic).  The only problem with it is that it is imprecise, numbs anything it touches, and doesn't last as long as I would like.  Ricola cough drops are my favorite (honey lemon...I eat those things like candy when I have sore throats).  Tea is also good.

If you have a doctor friend, you can also get yourself a prescription for steroids.  That's more for if you've got something long-term like Mono.  I only know that because I did this when I got Mono while I was in a musical.  Strangely, a very low fever and the sore throat from hell were my only symptoms.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 30, 2009, 11:22:11 PM
Why do you never find relish on a relish tray?

You'd have to eat it like poi. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 30, 2009, 11:45:56 PM
For immediate relief of a sore throat, use Chloraseptic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloraseptic).  The only problem with it is that it is imprecise, numbs anything it touches, and doesn't last as long as I would like.  Ricola cough drops are my favorite (honey lemon...I eat those things like candy when I have sore throats).  Tea is also good.

If you have a doctor friend, you can also get yourself a prescription for steroids.  That's more for if you've got something long-term like Mono.  I only know that because I did this when I got Mono while I was in a musical.  Strangely, a very low fever and the sore throat from hell were my only symptoms.

I sang at Carnegie Hall once with strep throat.  That sucked.  The doctor wanted to give me steroids, but I declined on account that I'm hairy enough.  That and he made them out to be way scary.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 30, 2009, 11:59:20 PM
For immediate relief of a sore throat, use Chloraseptic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloraseptic).  The only problem with it is that it is imprecise, numbs anything it touches, and doesn't last as long as I would like.  Ricola cough drops are my favorite (honey lemon...I eat those things like candy when I have sore throats).  Tea is also good.

If you have a doctor friend, you can also get yourself a prescription for steroids.  That's more for if you've got something long-term like Mono.  I only know that because I did this when I got Mono while I was in a musical.  Strangely, a very low fever and the sore throat from hell were my only symptoms.

I sang at Carnegie Hall once with strep throat.  That sucked.  The doctor wanted to give me steroids, but I declined on account that I'm hairy enough.  That and he made them out to be way scary.   :lol:

I saw no ill effects from taking the prescribed steroids.  I had a month-long course I think.  Sure, if I'd taken them for years it probably wouldn't be great, and I'm sure you can get higher doses than what I had.  Despite what they tell you in DARE, steroids will not magically turn you into a stupid, violent, sweaty ape.

I used to get strep throat a lot in Middle School--multiple times in a year.  Without fail, 24 hours after starting antibiotics I was fine.  Of course, I tend to be disease-resistant in the first place.  I never had much more than a sore throat and low fever with strep (sometimes almost no fever at all...I think I built up a pretty high resistance to it).  I'm still somewhat conditioned to get a strep test at the first signs of a sore throat.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 31, 2009, 12:03:24 AM
This isn't a question, but a rant (taken from today's LJ).  Hopefully it will prevent people from doing stupid things when trading stocks.  If anyone isn't sure what I mean in the following, feel free to ask :P

Quote
Today was an odd day for my company's stock, and I'm a bit embarrassed by the stupidity of a trade by one of my fellow, low-level coworkers. There were 0 trades all day until almost the end of the day (which is particularly strange, we usually have over 10k trades in a day). Asks were around $4, bids must've been around, oh, $3.02. Well, someone, I'm not sure who, decided to sell his or her Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares from Q4...all 114 of them (I'm almost certain it was a coworker who bough shares through the ESPP because 114*$2.20, the strike price for Q4 shares under the ESPP, is $250...nice and round). This trade, while stupid for many reasons (seriously, you paid a $13 commision on a $344 trade? ...and you either asked $3.02 or put in "market price" without checking volume and bid/ask?), singlehandedly dropped the stock $0.10 for the day (a bit over 3%) to $3.02.

Now ask is $5.73 and bid is $1.01. It's almost comical. Scratch that, it is comical. I guess we'll see what happens when earnings are released. My guess is the person who sold today will not be too happy.

Idiot.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 31, 2009, 05:12:32 AM
If you have a doctor friend, you can also get yourself a prescription for steroids.  That's more for if you've got something long-term like Mono.  I only know that because I did this when I got Mono while I was in a musical.  Strangely, a very low fever and the sore throat from hell were my only symptoms.

You are one lucky guy, then.  I got mono in college and was bed-bound for days....felt like death had warmed over. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: NHArticleTen on January 31, 2009, 06:35:12 AM
This isn't a question, but a rant (taken from today's LJ).  Hopefully it will prevent people from doing stupid things when trading stocks.  If anyone isn't sure what I mean in the following, feel free to ask :P

Quote
Today was an odd day for my company's stock, and I'm a bit embarrassed by the stupidity of a trade by one of my fellow, low-level coworkers. There were 0 trades all day until almost the end of the day (which is particularly strange, we usually have over 10k trades in a day). Asks were around $4, bids must've been around, oh, $3.02. Well, someone, I'm not sure who, decided to sell his or her Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares from Q4...all 114 of them (I'm almost certain it was a coworker who bough shares through the ESPP because 114*$2.20, the strike price for Q4 shares under the ESPP, is $250...nice and round). This trade, while stupid for many reasons (seriously, you paid a $13 commision on a $344 trade? ...and you either asked $3.02 or put in "market price" without checking volume and bid/ask?), singlehandedly dropped the stock $0.10 for the day (a bit over 3%) to $3.02.

Now ask is $5.73 and bid is $1.01. It's almost comical. Scratch that, it is comical. I guess we'll see what happens when earnings are released. My guess is the person who sold today will not be too happy.

Idiot.

this "someone" decided for themselves when to "get out"...no shame in making that call for yourself...a person must know his or her limitations...

what if the stock dies...or lies at a few cents for a year or two...then this person's decision becomes more "acceptable"...

your assertion that their choice to sell at a buyer's price has shown that the stock was/is over-valued is correct...


it's called the free-market...


and for those who are "into" over-valued "anything"...some will get "bailed-out"...some will get fucked...

guess your co-worker didn't want to get fucked anymore...

go figure...

enjoy!

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on January 31, 2009, 07:56:48 AM
Anyone know anything about Dave Henderson or Lawrence Samuels in California?

I just had coffee with Lawrence and wanted to know if anyone knew anything about either one of these guys.

one's a magician, the other's a fag.
not sure which is which, tho.
hope i was helpful.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on January 31, 2009, 08:04:20 AM
This isn't a question, but a rant (taken from today's LJ).  Hopefully it will prevent people from doing stupid things when trading stocks.  If anyone isn't sure what I mean in the following, feel free to ask :P

Quote
Today was an odd day for my company's stock, and I'm a bit embarrassed by the stupidity of a trade by one of my fellow, low-level coworkers. There were 0 trades all day until almost the end of the day (which is particularly strange, we usually have over 10k trades in a day). Asks were around $4, bids must've been around, oh, $3.02. Well, someone, I'm not sure who, decided to sell his or her Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares from Q4...all 114 of them (I'm almost certain it was a coworker who bough shares through the ESPP because 114*$2.20, the strike price for Q4 shares under the ESPP, is $250...nice and round). This trade, while stupid for many reasons (seriously, you paid a $13 commision on a $344 trade? ...and you either asked $3.02 or put in "market price" without checking volume and bid/ask?), singlehandedly dropped the stock $0.10 for the day (a bit over 3%) to $3.02.

Now ask is $5.73 and bid is $1.01. It's almost comical. Scratch that, it is comical. I guess we'll see what happens when earnings are released. My guess is the person who sold today will not be too happy.

Idiot.

this "someone" decided for themselves when to "get out"...no shame in making that call for yourself...a person must know his or her limitations...

what if the stock dies...or lies at a few cents for a year or two...then this person's decision becomes more "acceptable"...

your assertion that their choice to sell at a buyer's price has shown that the stock was/is over-valued is correct...


it's called the free-market...


and for those who are "into" over-valued "anything"...some will get "bailed-out"...some will get fucked...

guess your co-worker didn't want to get fucked anymore...

go figure...

enjoy!




"WHEN E.F. HUTTON RAD-ROB TALKS, PEOPLE LISTEN."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 31, 2009, 08:11:39 AM
What the fuck is the purpose of canned potatoes?  Seriously. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: NHArticleTen on January 31, 2009, 08:16:19 AM
What the fuck is the purpose of canned potatoes?  Seriously. 

ever tried to store a raw potato for a few years?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 31, 2009, 08:17:23 AM
What the fuck is the purpose of canned potatoes?  Seriously. 

ever tried to store a raw potato for a few years?



Why would one need to  store a raw potato for years?  Canned potatoes cannot possibly taste good.  I'm sure they have a completely different texture, making them unusable in a lot of standard potato recipes. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 31, 2009, 10:39:19 AM
Canned potatoes work just fine when making a small pot of soup or stew.  I usually keep the following on a shelf to make soup.  1 can each of potatoes, green beans, corn, sliced carrots, diced tomatoes.  A thingy of beef bullion, and a chunk of beef in the freezer.  Thats a fresh pot of beef veggie soup on a saturday without leaving the house.  Whole thing costs maybe $9. 

The potatoes are no different than what you'd get in a can of soup. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mikehz on January 31, 2009, 10:44:59 AM
     I know redistribution of wealth is frowned on by a Libertarian. 

Wherever did you get that idea? I redistribute my wealth all the time. Tomorrow, I'll be redistributing some of it at Costco. There's nothing wrong with passing your wealth around--so long as it's YOU doing the distributing, and you're doing it of your own accord.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 31, 2009, 05:47:18 PM
This isn't a question, but a rant (taken from today's LJ).  Hopefully it will prevent people from doing stupid things when trading stocks.  If anyone isn't sure what I mean in the following, feel free to ask :P

Quote
Today was an odd day for my company's stock, and I'm a bit embarrassed by the stupidity of a trade by one of my fellow, low-level coworkers. There were 0 trades all day until almost the end of the day (which is particularly strange, we usually have over 10k trades in a day). Asks were around $4, bids must've been around, oh, $3.02. Well, someone, I'm not sure who, decided to sell his or her Employee Stock Purchase Plan shares from Q4...all 114 of them (I'm almost certain it was a coworker who bough shares through the ESPP because 114*$2.20, the strike price for Q4 shares under the ESPP, is $250...nice and round). This trade, while stupid for many reasons (seriously, you paid a $13 commision on a $344 trade? ...and you either asked $3.02 or put in "market price" without checking volume and bid/ask?), singlehandedly dropped the stock $0.10 for the day (a bit over 3%) to $3.02.

Now ask is $5.73 and bid is $1.01. It's almost comical. Scratch that, it is comical. I guess we'll see what happens when earnings are released. My guess is the person who sold today will not be too happy.

Idiot.

this "someone" decided for themselves when to "get out"...no shame in making that call for yourself...a person must know his or her limitations...

what if the stock dies...or lies at a few cents for a year or two...then this person's decision becomes more "acceptable"...

your assertion that their choice to sell at a buyer's price has shown that the stock was/is over-valued is correct...


it's called the free-market...


and for those who are "into" over-valued "anything"...some will get "bailed-out"...some will get fucked...

guess your co-worker didn't want to get fucked anymore...

go figure...

enjoy!



I'm not sure what your point is.  Our stock has done quite well since the beginning of the year when those shares were purchased (currently 37% higher than the purchase price).  This person only go screwed by his or her lack of knowledge of how to trade.  Even if you want to dump a stock, there's a smart and a stupid way to do it.  This was the stupid way...unless s/he was absolutely desperate.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 31, 2009, 06:52:54 PM
Canned potatoes work just fine when making a small pot of soup or stew.  I usually keep the following on a shelf to make soup.  1 can each of potatoes, green beans, corn, sliced carrots, diced tomatoes.  A thingy of beef bullion, and a chunk of beef in the freezer.  Thats a fresh pot of beef veggie soup on a saturday without leaving the house.  Whole thing costs maybe $9. 

The potatoes are no different than what you'd get in a can of soup. 

Thank you for the best answer I have received in many years. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on January 31, 2009, 07:23:34 PM
2.  What's the quickest way to soothe a sore throat?

Ibuprofen suspension, 100mg per 5ml. Gargle two to three teaspoons for thirty seconds to one minute, then spit out (or swallow, as long as you haven't taken a bunch more ibuprofen that day.)

And for one of my own.

What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on January 31, 2009, 08:06:43 PM
What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)

(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/3687/thoughtsfy4.png)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on January 31, 2009, 08:13:43 PM
HAHA!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on January 31, 2009, 08:15:43 PM
How is is possible that the massive Sun stays stationary in space?

It doesn't. The universe is hurtling apart, and the sun is traveling at millions of miles per hour as part of one of the massive rotating arms of the milky way galaxy. The relative motion of bodies in space is similar to how you can sit in a car going 80 MPH and feel stationary relative to the driver but not the road signs.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on January 31, 2009, 08:19:42 PM
     I know redistribution of wealth is frowned on by a Libertarian.  I heard Ian say FSP had 655 members, so it may be awhile til New Hampshire is set free.  Meanwhile in the U.S.A. Bruce Williams overnight suggested any stimulus payments to the American people should be made in the form of a prepaid debit card w/ 6-mo. expiration.  He believes this would be the fastest way to get commerce moving.  Done in this way people could not save the cash or pay down existing debt.  thoughts?

I would immediately by a gun. Just sayin'...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 31, 2009, 10:39:21 PM
     I know redistribution of wealth is frowned on by a Libertarian.  I heard Ian say FSP had 655 members, so it may be awhile til New Hampshire is set free.  Meanwhile in the U.S.A. Bruce Williams overnight suggested any stimulus payments to the American people should be made in the form of a prepaid debit card w/ 6-mo. expiration.  He believes this would be the fastest way to get commerce moving.  Done in this way people could not save the cash or pay down existing debt.  thoughts?

I would immediately by a gun. Just sayin'...

Good choice.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 01, 2009, 05:02:02 AM
And for one of my own.

What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)

Find something about her to compliment-- something you actually like, so you don't have to fake it.  But don't do it right after meeting her; wait a little bit.  That way it won't look like a blatant attempt to get in her good graces.

Also, this is going to sound weird, but reading about biases suggests to me that it might work: ask her for a favor.  To borrow a book, or something.  You would think that giving somebody something or doing something for them would be the more promising way to get them to like you, but actually people can come to like you because of something they  did for you.  The reason it works is because people like to justify their own actions in their head.  If she did something for you (her mind will say), that must be because you deserve it because you're somebody she cares about. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 01, 2009, 05:19:53 AM
Have you seen Jessica Simpson lately?   portly.

          (http://inlinethumb40.webshots.com/44199/2186709120103321708S600x600Q85.jpg) (http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2186709120103321708LiNHRp)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 01, 2009, 09:59:01 AM
Have you seen Jessica Simpson lately?   portly.

          (http://inlinethumb40.webshots.com/44199/2186709120103321708S600x600Q85.jpg) (http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2186709120103321708LiNHRp)

She is not portly at all.  She's just wearing REALLY ugly clothes.  The grandma jeans, and the fug belt cut her off in the middle.  It's horrendous. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 01, 2009, 10:03:19 AM
Yeah, I wouldn't say she's fat.  She's just wearing some incredibly unflattering clothes and she's not thin.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 01, 2009, 10:23:36 AM
Yeah, I wouldn't say she's fat.  She's just wearing some incredibly unflattering clothes and she's not thin.

This. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on February 01, 2009, 10:28:03 AM
And for one of my own.

What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)

Find something about her to compliment-- something you actually like, so you don't have to fake it.  But don't do it right after meeting her; wait a little bit.  That way it won't look like a blatant attempt to get in her good graces.

Also, this is going to sound weird, but reading about biases suggests to me that it might work: ask her for a favor.  To borrow a book, or something.  You would think that giving somebody something or doing something for them would be the more promising way to get them to like you, but actually people can come to like you because of something they  did for you.  The reason it works is because people like to justify their own actions in their head.  If she did something for you (her mind will say), that must be because you deserve it because you're somebody she cares about. 

Thanks, those are some very good ideas. I appreciate it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 02, 2009, 11:17:01 AM
Sara Jean Underwood: What not to do when meeting her parents

                              http://www.spike.com/video/what-not-to-do-when/3058873
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 02, 2009, 12:50:55 PM
I would immediately by a gun. Just sayin'...

I wouldn't get the card cuz I don't file but if I did, gun.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 02, 2009, 07:26:00 PM
And for one of my own.

What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)

Find something about her to compliment-- something you actually like, so you don't have to fake it.  But don't do it right after meeting her; wait a little bit.  That way it won't look like a blatant attempt to get in her good graces.

Also, this is going to sound weird, but reading about biases suggests to me that it might work: ask her for a favor.  To borrow a book, or something.  You would think that giving somebody something or doing something for them would be the more promising way to get them to like you, but actually people can come to like you because of something they  did for you.  The reason it works is because people like to justify their own actions in their head.  If she did something for you (her mind will say), that must be because you deserve it because you're somebody she cares about. 

Thanks, those are some very good ideas. I appreciate it.

If Josh takes you over there for dinner or something, and you like something she makes for dinner you could ask her for a recipe.  That could work too. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 02, 2009, 07:55:17 PM
And for one of my own.

What's a sure-fire way to make a good impression on a future mother-in-law? (I have a record with boyfriends' mothers reaching epic disaster level.)

Find something about her to compliment-- something you actually like, so you don't have to fake it.  But don't do it right after meeting her; wait a little bit.  That way it won't look like a blatant attempt to get in her good graces.

Also, this is going to sound weird, but reading about biases suggests to me that it might work: ask her for a favor.  To borrow a book, or something.  You would think that giving somebody something or doing something for them would be the more promising way to get them to like you, but actually people can come to like you because of something they  did for you.  The reason it works is because people like to justify their own actions in their head.  If she did something for you (her mind will say), that must be because you deserve it because you're somebody she cares about. 

My 2c. 

Do not pander to a mom.  It sounds extremely basic, but be yourself.  Relax a LOT.  If she thinks you're trying to put on a show, her radar will go off.  Put a little "Hey, how ya doin'?"  into your game.  That'll make the dad think you're cool, too.  Most men like a woman who has a slight 'one of the guys' streak in her, like a chick who is comfortable wearing a blazer casually instead of girly shit.  Girly-girls are high maintenance, and that worries the folks bigtime.  You strike me as that sort anyway, so roll with it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 02, 2009, 10:25:55 PM
Have you seen Jessica Simpson lately?   portly.

          (http://inlinethumb40.webshots.com/44199/2186709120103321708S600x600Q85.jpg) (http://good-times.webshots.com/photo/2186709120103321708LiNHRp)


Holy crap! Is this a picture of her Thanksgiving Day parade balloon?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 02, 2009, 11:33:42 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 02, 2009, 11:42:29 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.

THANK YOU. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 02, 2009, 11:43:26 PM
How much body fat does one have to have before being correctly categorized as fat?

When did white guys start finding big Jennifer Lopez type butts pleasing to the eye? 1992, 1993, or later?

What caused the shift, in societal terms, for male caucasian's desire for big butts?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 02, 2009, 11:47:36 PM
How much body fat does one have to have before being correctly categorized as fat?

When did white guys start finding big Jennifer Lopez type butts pleasing to the eye? 1992, 1993, or later?

What caused the shift, in societal terms, for male caucasian's desire for big butts?

I still don't digg the big butts.  round firm athletic butts = good.  Large for it's own sake?  no

Also, to be considered 'fat' one must be noticeably fatter than me.  I'm about 13% over my ideal weight.  My ideal weight isn't ideal on a height/weight chart but is the next lower Judo weight class and about 4 lbs under where I naturally sit with a regular running regimen.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 03, 2009, 05:13:51 AM
Do not pander to a mom.  It sounds extremely basic, but be yourself.  Relax a LOT.  If she thinks you're trying to put on a show, her radar will go off.  Put a little "Hey, how ya doin'?"  into your game.  That'll make the dad think you're cool, too.  Most men like a woman who has a slight 'one of the guys' streak in her, like a chick who is comfortable wearing a blazer casually instead of girly shit.  Girly-girls are high maintenance, and that worries the folks bigtime.  You strike me as that sort anyway, so roll with it. 

This.  Except for the blazer thing-- this is not the early 90's. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 03, 2009, 06:28:10 AM

     Is Judd Gregg departure from Senate good or bad for New Hampshire?

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/02/01/Judd%20Gregg%20at%20Capitol.jpg

Does it matter?  Either way, he's an alien.   :shock:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 03, 2009, 12:57:09 PM
Do not pander to a mom.  It sounds extremely basic, but be yourself.  Relax a LOT.  If she thinks you're trying to put on a show, her radar will go off.  Put a little "Hey, how ya doin'?"  into your game.  That'll make the dad think you're cool, too.  Most men like a woman who has a slight 'one of the guys' streak in her, like a chick who is comfortable wearing a blazer casually instead of girly shit.  Girly-girls are high maintenance, and that worries the folks bigtime.  You strike me as that sort anyway, so roll with it. 

This.  Except for the blazer thing-- this is not the early 90's. 

Really?  I see this pretty often.  I guess I just don't speak the fashion language, y'all are calling 'em pant suits nowadays. 

(http://womensfashion365.com/uploaded_images/Women%27s-business-fashion-750455.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 03, 2009, 01:11:37 PM
Do not pander to a mom.  It sounds extremely basic, but be yourself.  Relax a LOT.  If she thinks you're trying to put on a show, her radar will go off.  Put a little "Hey, how ya doin'?"  into your game.  That'll make the dad think you're cool, too.  Most men like a woman who has a slight 'one of the guys' streak in her, like a chick who is comfortable wearing a blazer casually instead of girly shit.  Girly-girls are high maintenance, and that worries the folks bigtime.  You strike me as that sort anyway, so roll with it. 

This.  Except for the blazer thing-- this is not the early 90's. 

Really?  I see this pretty often.  I guess I just don't speak the fashion language, y'all are calling 'em pant suits nowadays. 

(http://womensfashion365.com/uploaded_images/Women%27s-business-fashion-750455.jpg)

Sooo... did you type 'pantsuits' into google images to get this? Or do you have a copy of the Coldwater Creek catalog?

and yes I'm being a smartass.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 03, 2009, 01:13:59 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.

WTF is she doing wearing the high waisted pants? Those things can make anyone that isn't a popsicle stick look fat. AAACK!
The belt is a whole 'nuther horror story.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 03, 2009, 01:34:18 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.

WTF is she doing wearing the high waisted pants? Those things can make anyone that isn't a popsicle stick look fat. AAACK!
The belt is a whole 'nuther horror story.

I'm not trying to be a smart ass here. I like you Joy. :wink:

But is 'nuther a word? I guess it could be used as abbreviation for  "another". But in the context that you used it, another cannot be substituted in. However I completely understand, and use this "word" in conversation just like you did.

Therefore I'm going to declare "nuther" a word. 

So let it be written. So let it be done!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 03, 2009, 02:35:19 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.

WTF is she doing wearing the high waisted pants? Those things can make anyone that isn't a popsicle stick look fat. AAACK!
The belt is a whole 'nuther horror story.

I'm not trying to be a smart ass here. I like you Joy. :wink:

But is 'nuther a word? I guess it could be used as abbreviation for  "another". But in the context that you used it, another cannot be substituted in. However I completely understand, and use this "word" in conversation just like you did.

Therefore I'm going to declare "nuther" a word. 

So let it be written. So let it be done!

Congratulations then on an absolutely pointless post your majesty. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 03, 2009, 02:39:36 PM
I call fucking bullshit on all you motherfuckers. Jessica Simpson may be dumb as fuck, and she may need to fire her stylist for that double gold belt, but fat she is not.

WTF is she doing wearing the high waisted pants? Those things can make anyone that isn't a popsicle stick look fat. AAACK!
The belt is a whole 'nuther horror story.

I'm not trying to be a smart ass here. I like you Joy. :wink:

But is 'nuther a word? I guess it could be used as abbreviation for  "another". But in the context that you used it, another cannot be substituted in. However I completely understand, and use this "word" in conversation just like you did.

Therefore I'm going to declare "nuther" a word. 

So let it be written. So let it be done!

Congratulations then on an absolutely pointless post your majesty. 

:lol:

If the post got you to call me "your majesty" I would hardly call it worthless.  :P

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 03, 2009, 03:57:03 PM
Do not pander to a mom.  It sounds extremely basic, but be yourself.  Relax a LOT.  If she thinks you're trying to put on a show, her radar will go off.  Put a little "Hey, how ya doin'?"  into your game.  That'll make the dad think you're cool, too.  Most men like a woman who has a slight 'one of the guys' streak in her, like a chick who is comfortable wearing a blazer casually instead of girly shit.  Girly-girls are high maintenance, and that worries the folks bigtime.  You strike me as that sort anyway, so roll with it. 

This.  Except for the blazer thing-- this is not the early 90's. 

Really?  I see this pretty often.  I guess I just don't speak the fashion language, y'all are calling 'em pant suits nowadays. 

(http://womensfashion365.com/uploaded_images/Women%27s-business-fashion-750455.jpg)

Sooo... did you type 'pantsuits' into google images to get this? Or do you have a copy of the Coldwater Creek catalog?

and yes I'm being a smartass.

No.  Fashion woman.   The word "pantsuit" is not part of my lexicon. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 03, 2009, 04:53:15 PM
 I read a book on existentialism by Jean Paul Sarte.  I had no idea what he was saying.  Can anyone explain this philosophy in

 laymen's terms?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 03, 2009, 04:57:30 PM
Wherever you go, there you are.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on February 03, 2009, 04:58:56 PM
Wherever you go, there you are.

You leave Dr. Banzai out of this.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 04, 2009, 07:02:40 AM
Wherever you go, there you are.

Even reading Wiki definition is confusing.  It sounds like what you do is who you are, not what you think.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 06, 2009, 06:38:01 AM

Playstation3, Xbox360, or Wii ?  I like XboxLive for online multiplayer such as "CALL of DUTY."  Opinions ?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 06, 2009, 06:58:45 AM

Playstation3, Xbox360, or Wii ?  I like XboxLive for online multiplayer such as "CALL of DUTY."  Opinions ?


I prefer Playstation 3

- MGS4 is so fucking awesome looking
-ResEvl 5 is gonna look sick as shit, on pre-order baby!!
-Bioshock has extra material
- It's never given me the red ring of death ;)

I own all 3, and I couldn't live w/o my blue rays...or my Folklore...or my Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe ;) 

but if you ever wanna play me at Uno on Xbox live I will kick your ass....my tag is: kikkibubbles

I miss my Sega, it died 2 months ago :(
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 06, 2009, 09:39:18 AM
Why do guys who are in a relationship attract more women than single guys?
Short answers:
If a guy has a girlfriend or wife, then he's obviously relationship material, and has qualities necessary to attract a mate.

He's less likely to be acting like a predator, meaning women will just feel more at ease around him (this one is easy to see in a friendly gathering, where the women have no idea the guy is already involved).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 06, 2009, 09:46:59 AM

Playstation3, Xbox360, or Wii ?  I like XboxLive for online multiplayer such as "CALL of DUTY."  Opinions ?


I prefer Playstation 3

- MGS4 is so fucking awesome looking
-ResEvl 5 is gonna look sick as shit, on pre-order baby!!
-Bioshock has extra material
- It's never given me the red ring of death ;)

I own all 3, and I couldn't live w/o my blue rays...or my Folklore...or my Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe ;) 

but if you ever wanna play me at Uno on Xbox live I will kick your ass....my tag is: kikkibubbles

I miss my Sega, it died 2 months ago :(

PC games system > Everything.

Fact.

Boooooooo...


Where the hell are you geting your facts from?   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 06, 2009, 09:57:32 AM
Where the hell are you geting your facts from?   :lol:

My ass, mostly. :P

Though technically the PC handles better performance than any console can. You just have to fork out a wee bit more for it.


Yah the nerdos in my old dorm used to pimp out their PC's and play some tweaked out version they messed with of some weird ass Japanese Mario Bros. game.

I was going to ASU for computer science, so they put me with all the dudes that smelled like Doritos and loved to talk about Perl code theories. I didn't get it at the time, but that was some crazy future shit they were doing. It looked like they slaughtered 30 pc's to create one badass monster machine. I wish I was as cool then as I am now, I totally would have been all over it.

I bet they are cash money millionaires, chillin with hoes, and making bank creating PC games.



Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 06, 2009, 10:50:51 AM
Why do guys who are in a relationship attract more women than single guys?
Short answers:
If a guy has a girlfriend or wife, then he's obviously relationship material, and has qualities necessary to attract a mate.

He's less likely to be acting like a predator, meaning women will just feel more at ease around him (this one is easy to see in a friendly gathering, where the women have no idea the guy is already involved).

Obviously Joy is right. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 06, 2009, 12:18:00 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 06, 2009, 12:54:40 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?


A hair clip would be less drastic. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 06, 2009, 01:01:48 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?


A hair clip would be less drastic. 

This.  No hair choppage. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 06, 2009, 01:25:27 PM
Where the hell are you geting your facts from?   :lol:

My ass, mostly. :P

Though technically the PC handles better performance than any console can. You just have to fork out a wee bit more for it.

An X-box is just a PC in console drag.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 06, 2009, 03:09:20 PM
Go with PC! My favorite. You can get pretty much any of the good games for the other systems on the PC (if possibly a bit later) plus many more good games. You can get on the internet and play those online games...free.  Also, PC's can be continually upgraded over time and used for more than just gaming.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 06, 2009, 03:35:13 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?


A hair clip would be less drastic. 

This.  No hair choppage. 


It's gotten long enough that it I'm always accidentally pinning myself when I lean back in a chair, even if it's in a ponytail. I have oodles of hair clips, clasps, and bands. Can never find them, as they are often used for lego man slingshots, or to form the monsterous jaws of a k'nex robot, etc. I do always have a pencil though. Maybe I can offer a short term amnesty for the return of all stolen hair thingies.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 06, 2009, 03:40:26 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?


A hair clip would be less drastic. 

This.  No hair choppage. 


It's gotten long enough that it I'm always accidentally pinning myself when I lean back in a chair, even if it's in a ponytail. I have oodles of hair clips, clasps, and bands. Can never find them, as they are often used for lego man slingshots, or to form the monsterous jaws of a k'nex robot, etc. I do always have a pencil though. Maybe I can offer a short term amnesty for the return of all stolen hair thingies.

Give the kids brownies in exchange for your hair accessories.  I know it'll work.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 06, 2009, 03:48:25 PM
After catching myself twisting a pencil into my hair yet again, to keep it out of my face while working, I'm wondering...
Should I get my hair chopped off?


A hair clip would be less drastic. 

This.  No hair choppage. 


It's gotten long enough that it I'm always accidentally pinning myself when I lean back in a chair, even if it's in a ponytail. I have oodles of hair clips, clasps, and bands. Can never find them, as they are often used for lego man slingshots, or to form the monsterous jaws of a k'nex robot, etc. I do always have a pencil though. Maybe I can offer a short term amnesty for the return of all stolen hair thingies.

Give the kids brownies in exchange for your hair accessories.  I know it'll work.   :lol:

Resorting to bribes to achieve desired behavior from children? What am I, a mom?
 :P
You're probably right. Time to pull the apron off the hook & get baking. 

Hope Mr. Laetitia gets home before I've redeemed the clips. He's rather fond of the pencil/k'nex/paintbrush updos. Be a shame if he missed the last one. (Granted, it will only take a couple weeks for the clips all to disappear again. Darn kids.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 06, 2009, 07:19:49 PM
Why do guys who are in a relationship attract more women than single guys?
Short answers:
If a guy has a girlfriend or wife, then he's obviously relationship material, and has qualities necessary to attract a mate.

He's less likely to be acting like a predator, meaning women will just feel more at ease around him (this one is easy to see in a friendly gathering, where the women have no idea the guy is already involved).

This is true.  At least, I've been told this many times before.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 06, 2009, 07:26:03 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on February 06, 2009, 08:31:19 PM
Is there any correlation between emergence on one layer of any substrate to that of preceding layers n - 1 below it? (Note: it's a strange question that came to mind when I considering emergence of the nervous system and that of the brain...)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 06, 2009, 09:11:42 PM
Why do guys who are in a relationship attract more women than single guys?
Short answers:
If a guy has a girlfriend or wife, then he's obviously relationship material, and has qualities necessary to attract a mate.

He's less likely to be acting like a predator, meaning women will just feel more at ease around him (this one is easy to see in a friendly gathering, where the women have no idea the guy is already involved).

Its because the woman can dabble with their flirtatious nature around a decent guy, but with an emergency brake.  It feels good to be themselves without expectations.  


Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 06, 2009, 09:13:09 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 06, 2009, 09:50:28 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 06, 2009, 11:23:58 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 07, 2009, 01:17:56 PM
Is there any correlation between emergence on one layer of any substrate to that of preceding layers n - 1 below it? (Note: it's a strange question that came to mind when I considering emergence of the nervous system and that of the brain...)

I'm not afraid to say that this either went completely over my head, or it just doesn't make any sense.  :?

I think it is the former.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 07, 2009, 01:25:00 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 

I think my boyfriend might take issue with that.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 07, 2009, 02:54:46 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 

I think my boyfriend might take issue with that.

fuck him, he don't even look at you when you get out of the shower............
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 07, 2009, 04:03:11 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 

I think my boyfriend might take issue with that.

fuck him, he don't even look at you when you get out of the shower............

FTFY
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 08, 2009, 02:18:15 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 

I think my boyfriend might take issue with that.

You're right.  Lets not.  I don't need the problems.

Have him drop you off around the corner and wait. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 08, 2009, 02:20:11 PM
Men who are attached are attractive because they can show that they're capable of being  attached to someone, and you can see what their relationship style is like.  But even more attractive are single men who don't hate their exes and whose exes don't hate them. 

Translation:  window shopping. 

Well, mainly it's like the idea that you should marry a person that you would want to divorce. 

I'm flattered, but lets just live together for a while and see how that works. 

I think my boyfriend might take issue with that.

You're right.  Lets not.  I don't need the problems.

Have him drop you off around the corner and wait. 

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on February 08, 2009, 02:35:56 PM
What is the best "low fantasy" novel that any of you have read?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on February 09, 2009, 08:00:55 AM
What is the best "low fantasy" novel that any of you have read?

Fritz Leiber's Lankhmar books.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 10, 2009, 11:15:19 AM
Not sure what "low fantasy" is, but I loved the Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever series, the One Tree and all those.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on February 10, 2009, 11:48:52 AM
The Merchant Princes series by Charles Stross.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 10, 2009, 03:28:02 PM
Why has no one responded to my post on the post pictures of your pets thread?

Chico demands positive feedback!

Ok, whining over. :?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 10, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
Can I borrow 20K?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: atomiccat on February 10, 2009, 03:38:53 PM
How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck was smoking pot
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 10, 2009, 03:41:16 PM
How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck was smoking pot

A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck, if a woodchuck had the munchies.
 :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 10, 2009, 03:43:10 PM
Why has no one responded to my post on the post pictures of your pets thread?

Chico demands positive feedback!

Ok, whining over. :?


Because some of us are lazy bastards, who don't always bother to turn to the 2nd, 3rd, etc., page of the list of unread posts.

I will go comment now.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 10, 2009, 03:46:01 PM
Why has no one responded to my post on the post pictures of your pets thread?

Chico demands positive feedback!

Ok, whining over. :?


Because some of us are lazy bastards, who don't always bother to turn to the 2nd, 3rd, etc., page of the list of unread posts.

I will go comment now.


HAHA ty. I knew I could count on you! Superwoman :)

I spent like 10 minutes on that damn post. LOL.  :)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 11, 2009, 01:22:05 AM
Not sure what "low fantasy" is, but I loved the Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever series, the One Tree and all those.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_fantasy

Thanks! Turns out, the books I recommended would apply. Thomas Covenant is certainly a sort of "anti-hero." He's a leper and morally, uh. "ambiguous," he even sort of rapes a chick in the first book, but redeems himself later by saving the whole realm, even while believing the whole experience is an elaborate hallucination.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on February 11, 2009, 02:21:15 AM
Alright, I have a question:

Why is it that every time I sit down to take a dump, a cat has to run into the room and get into my business? I'm truing to take a dump, here.

*Sits*

Cat: WACHOO DOIN WACHOO DOIN WACHOO DOIN?

Me: Poopin'

Cat: RUB MAH BUTT!!! *Wiggle*

Me: *Sigh*
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 11, 2009, 10:39:58 AM
Alright, I have a question:

Why is it that every time I sit down to take a dump, a cat has to run into the room and get into my business? I'm truing to take a dump, here.

*Sits*

Cat: WACHOO DOIN WACHOO DOIN WACHOO DOIN?

Me: Poopin'

Cat: RUB MAH BUTT!!! *Wiggle*

Me: *Sigh*

Answer:  Because cats know when you don't want to pay attention to them, and that is their favorite time to pay attention to you.  I would suggest the obvious-- close the bathroom door-- but we all know that would simply result in little kitty paws being stuck under the door for the duration of your bathroom visit, possibly accompanied by plaintive meowing.  Or at least, that's the way it was in my house when I was a kid. 

My question: I'm moving to Dallas on Saturday, and am looking for a house to share with my boyfriend.  He's allergic to cats, although for the past year or so he's bought two bowls and many bags of cat food and has been feeding a couple of cats that took up residence on the back porch, and happily pets them when he goes out for a smoke, although he washes his hands when he comes back in afterward.  I'm slightly allergic to cats, in that if I rub my eyes after petting them I get itchy red eyes.  Yet I feel that life will not be complete unless I can adopt and raise two kittens.  How to arrange this? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 11, 2009, 10:42:26 AM
Zyrtec.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 11, 2009, 03:17:43 PM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: NHArticleTen on February 11, 2009, 04:08:29 PM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



hey...either they're your kids...or they're the state's...can't be both ways...

it's not so much about the shots...it's about choice...and who's choice it is...

for example:
if the shot makes your kid a vegetable for the rest of their life...does the government that demanded the shot and perhaps even administered it without your consent...does that government then bear the full responsibility of full-time life-long care for the kid...and if they do accept that responsibility...then do they also get to decide when to euthanize their ward...

we just don't do enough "do-diligence" and it shows when they give your kid shots without your permission(except that you probably did give them permission via some obscure fine-print somewhere...)

and it should also be noted that one of the main reasons for these "immunizations" is to dispel one of the previous objections to public schooling(which was mass exposure to viruses and diseases, of course)

again, I'm not telling anyone else what they should...or shouldn't do...Everyone should be free to choose...

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 11, 2009, 04:13:01 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 11, 2009, 08:02:25 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?

jus tell 'em you were in vegas, burying a crooked cop in a corn field....(check to see if there are cornfields near vegas)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 11, 2009, 08:04:59 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?

Exaggerate the hell out of it and make your story discredible.  He was seven feet tall.  The wind was a hundred miles per hour.  You heard at least fifty gunshots.

They'll throw your story right in the garbage. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on February 11, 2009, 08:06:52 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?

jus tell 'em you were in vegas, burying a crooked cop in a corn field....(check to see if there are cornfields near vegas)

There aren't cornfields, but plenty of desert.  Just make sure you dig the hole before you show up with a package.  Otherwise anyone could show up and then you have to dig more holes.  You could be there all fuckin' night.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 11, 2009, 08:11:23 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?

jus tell 'em you were in vegas, burying a crooked cop in a corn field....(check to see if there are cornfields near vegas)

There aren't cornfields, but plenty of desert.  Just make sure you dig the hole before you show up with a package.  Otherwise anyone could show up and then you have to dig more holes.  You could be there all fuckin' night.



heh...i didn't think so...it's all desert.....i just harken back to the "casino" thing w/ joe pesci....they musta gone on a road trip
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on February 11, 2009, 08:14:55 PM
Question: I have to prepare a statement for the police about an event I didnt really witness a while ago and I need ideas on some total BS to put in there. Any ideas?

jus tell 'em you were in vegas, burying a crooked cop in a corn field....(check to see if there are cornfields near vegas)

There aren't cornfields, but plenty of desert.  Just make sure you dig the hole before you show up with a package.  Otherwise anyone could show up and then you have to dig more holes.  You could be there all fuckin' night.



heh...i didn't think so...it's all desert.....i just harken back to the "casino" thing w/ joe pesci....they musta gone on a road trip

Well for that particular scene it was after the shit hit the fan and the mob got booted out of vegas.  A few guys then invited Pesci and his brother to discuss heading back out there to reestablish some roots.  Since the bosses were mostly stationed in KC, I assume that's where the rest of 'em went to regroup.  I would think there's lots of corn out that way.

Note that the holes were already dug in that scene.  Smart guys.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 11, 2009, 08:17:21 PM
How many times do I have to tell you?  The victim digs the hole. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on February 11, 2009, 08:20:02 PM
How many times do I have to tell you?  The victim digs the hole. 

That could take a while.  Plus then you'd run the chance of someone wandering by wondering why one dude is diggin' the hole while the other one is holding a gun doing nothing.  Then you gotta have another victim dig another hole.  That could take a while.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 11, 2009, 08:20:56 PM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on February 11, 2009, 08:56:20 PM
I'm slightly allergic to cats, in that if I rub my eyes after petting them I get itchy red eyes.  Yet I feel that life will not be complete unless I can adopt and raise two kittens.  How to arrange this? 

Allergies to cats have a tolerance factor for most people. (Not all)

If you're around a cat for long enough, you build up a resistance to cat dander, in most cases.

Mel is allergic to cats, and we have seven. She almost never has a problem. Maybe once or twice a year she'll get stuffed up and have to take some over the counter stuff.

YMMV though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 11, 2009, 09:17:23 PM
Is having the cats live outdoors an option?

We have 3, all outsidies, but they like to come in long enough to nap a bit and then they're happy back outside.

Now a question for Rillion..

Why have you decided to come back to the US? (maybe it's been covered in another thread somewhere, I dunno..)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 11, 2009, 09:47:44 PM
What does YMMV mean? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 11, 2009, 10:04:09 PM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.

THIS.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Russell Griswold on February 11, 2009, 10:38:16 PM
What does YMMV mean? 

Your millage may vary.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 11, 2009, 10:44:19 PM
What does YMMV mean? 

Your millage may vary.

HOORAY! 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 11, 2009, 11:14:33 PM
How many times do I have to tell you?  The victim digs the hole. 

That could take a while.  Plus then you'd run the chance of someone wandering by wondering why one dude is diggin' the hole while the other one is holding a gun doing nothing.  Then you gotta have another victim dig another hole.  That could take a while.

I got a while. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 11, 2009, 11:17:45 PM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.

THIS.

Nobody is allergic to bees either. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 12, 2009, 12:00:56 AM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.

Why do the Amish have a much lower statistical amount of autism?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 12, 2009, 01:13:00 AM
Why do you confuse correlation with causation?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 12, 2009, 01:16:27 AM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.

Why do the Amish have a much lower statistical amount of autism?

Well that could be from any of the differences between their society and ours (assuming you're not Amish). Also assuming it is such a simple reason why they have less.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 12, 2009, 01:30:52 AM
Here's my statement (names have been changed in order to protect those involved of course).
Background: Supposedly Female 1 was fondled up whilst passed out by Male 1 at a party I was at. Both people are friends of mine but now Female 1 is filing rape charges apparently. The party was at Male1's apartment he shares with a bunch of people. Also, we are all underage at the time of this incident so I cant mention us drinking alcohol (it is assumed we are of course), if we were.
The statement :

First I have some questions I need to ask you before I can give my statement:
1.  My friend Male 2 got subpoenaed as a witness, does he have to go to court, if so why?
2. How did you get this number? Could you please never contact me without me having contacted you first ever again.
FYI this call is being recorded for my records.
I'm Joe Schmo and this is my statement as to what happened the night in question. I was at that house for a significant amount of time that night. It was longer than I expected because I didnt know that someone was going to be bringing Mario Party and that game changes everything. I dont know what time I left, I know it was dark when I got there and dark when I departed. I believe it was cloudy too. Also, outside their house was a girl who I didnt know who had a broken cell phone. It was missing aproximately the entire top half of the phone.  I didnt arrive with Male1 or Female1 nor did I leave with them. I dont know when either of them left or if they did leave where they went or if they returned. I dont know how much, if anything at all they had to drink in the way of alcohol that night. You would have to be an idiot if you thought that anyone other than them knew that.  I do remember that Male1 was playing some tunes on his laptop. It was some sort of hip-hop new crap that I dont enjoy listening to.  Also, Female1 seemed to enjoy sitting on his couch, I dont think she was bothered by the music nearly as much as me but she really didnt seem interested in the fact that a really cool Rob and Big re-run was on t.v.. In the back I'm pretty sure was a crazy cool parrot that could say several phrases in spanish. Also the more sluttier girls, I have no idea who they were, briefly played a rather erotic game of spin the bottle with each other. Once I left I do not know what happened in that house. Anything I think may have happened there beyond that time was told to me through Female1. I never have had an opportunity to talk about the night with Male1.
That is all I have time to say because now I have to go to work: most citizens have to provide a valuable service to put bread on the table and do not have the luxury of demanding our pay with a gun! [hang up]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 12, 2009, 03:36:00 AM
Now a question for Rillion..

Why have you decided to come back to the US? (maybe it's been covered in another thread somewhere, I dunno..)

Because I finished my PhD-- the defense was on Jan. 29th.  We applied for a post-doc grant, but it didn't go through so I need to look for work in the states. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 12, 2009, 07:56:15 AM
This video fucking pissed me off...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news (http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=11992076&ch=4226723&src=news)

So called "free thinkers" ...as if it is a bad thing. WTF!

How many of you immunize/d your kids?

My little one was immunized at the hospital, without my consent and then her pediatrician told me that I was risking her life if I did not get her the recommended shots at the recommended ages.

I feel like a shithead for not researching it more... just curious if any of you haven't, and if so why?



My personal opinion is that the vaccine-autism link is bullshit.  That seems to be supported by most science.  The guy who supposedly showed a link has also been discredited: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

I also just don't see the evidence in my everyday life.  There are tons of people who are vaccinated against all sorts of diseases and those vaccinations work.  We have seen growing numbers of children with autism, but we're also better at diagnosing it and there's a lower infant mortality rate than there used to be.  So, IMO, vaccination-autism fears belong somewhere very close to homeopathy, which I believe is complete bullshit.

Why do the Amish have a much lower statistical amount of autism?

The Amish also have much, much higher rates of genetic disorders than the rest of the US population.  Maybe that's because they don't get vaccinated!  http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/06/08/60II/main700519.shtml
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 12, 2009, 07:58:49 AM
How many times do I have to tell you?  The victim digs the hole. 

That could take a while.  Plus then you'd run the chance of someone wandering by wondering why one dude is diggin' the hole while the other one is holding a gun doing nothing.  Then you gotta have another victim dig another hole.  That could take a while.

if you own the cornfield, this changes everything.....no wandering of anyone that doesn't want a dirt nap
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 12, 2009, 08:25:48 AM
I finished my PhD-- the defense was on Jan. 29th.

Congratulations :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 12, 2009, 05:00:53 PM
I'm going to a party Sunday and want to bring a decent wine.  Any recommendations/favorites?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 12, 2009, 05:04:29 PM
I'm going to a party Sunday and want to bring a decent wine.  Any recommendations/favorites?

Since it's winter I assume you're going for a red.  And if it's a party, I'm assuming you want something that has popular appeal.  That taken into account, my recommendation would be a shiraz.  There are a lot of good ones for the money from Australia, particularly Jacob's Creek.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 12, 2009, 05:14:59 PM
I'm going to a party Sunday and want to bring a decent wine.  Any recommendations/favorites?

Since it's winter I assume you're going for a red.  And if it's a party, I'm assuming you want something that has popular appeal.  That taken into account, my recommendation would be a shiraz.  There are a lot of good ones for the money from Australia, particularly Jacob's Creek.


winter-shminter.....what's wrong w/ a nice chardonnay???
 i drink that shit year round
although, you could splurge & bring a nice bottle o' port....def. a winter beverage for me. it's more an apres-meal-type wine...sweet & heavy
sandeman 20 yr old tawny @ $35.00
that'll warm your cockles
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 12, 2009, 05:32:29 PM
I'm going to a party Sunday and want to bring a decent wine.  Any recommendations/favorites?

Since it's winter I assume you're going for a red.  And if it's a party, I'm assuming you want something that has popular appeal.  That taken into account, my recommendation would be a shiraz.  There are a lot of good ones for the money from Australia, particularly Jacob's Creek.

Billi Billi Shiraz is great. Don't get it at Whole Foods though, 'cause where they sell it for $23/bottle, the farmers market has it for $13.
For a nice Chardonnay around $10, you can get Sustainable White @ Whole Foods. Pretty good, and has the amusing conversation starter of being "carbon neutral".
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 12, 2009, 05:56:37 PM
Thanks for the suggestions.  I'll be sure to look for those.  It's always fun trying out new wine :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 12, 2009, 07:54:05 PM
I got a Jacob's Creek Reserve 2005 Shiraz, and since I was in a store specializing in drinks, was also able to pick up some Goose Island Bourbon County Stout (http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/1146/10672) (2008).  That stuff is crazy good.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on February 12, 2009, 08:12:43 PM
How many times do I have to tell you?  The victim digs the hole. 

That could take a while.  Plus then you'd run the chance of someone wandering by wondering why one dude is diggin' the hole while the other one is holding a gun doing nothing.  Then you gotta have another victim dig another hole.  That could take a while.

if you own the cornfield, this changes everything.....no wandering of anyone that doesn't want a dirt nap

The truth, you speak it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 12, 2009, 10:48:30 PM
Speaking of wine...

What's everybody's favorite champagne? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Russell Griswold on February 12, 2009, 11:07:12 PM
Martini & Rossi. It's like 7-UP.  :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: atomiccat on February 12, 2009, 11:07:38 PM
Are you gonna party like its 1234567890?

http://www.1234567890day.com/
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 13, 2009, 12:17:04 AM
Davann - Why do the Amish have a much lower statistical amount of autism?

Dylboz - Why do you confuse correlation with causation?

Why do you think that by asking a valid question I do not understand the difference between correlation and causation? Why are you attempting to redirect from the question?

anarchir - Well that could be from any of the differences between their society and ours (assuming you're not Amish). Also assuming it is such a simple reason why they have less.



I can go with that answer.

Why does that community of 40,000+ (their name is escaping me) in Illinois that live a modern life just like everyone else but choose not to vaccinate have a much lower statistical rate of autism?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 13, 2009, 06:59:56 AM
I don't know what community you're talking about or the autism rate there.  Since the rate of autism according to Wikipedia is about 0.1-0.2%, in a population of 40k random people you'd expect, on average, to find 40-80 autistic people.  Of course, not every group is random and you will definitely see variations (which are especially noticeable at the extreme ends such as a disease that affects a tenth of a percent of the population).  Autism appears likely to be linked to genetics, especially since 4.3 males have it for every female.  Given that males are much more likely to have genetic issues because they lack two X chromosomes, that explanation would make sense.  I don't see 4.3 males getting vaccinated for every female getting vaccinated.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 13, 2009, 08:18:12 AM
I think that things like women being older when they get pregnant can cause autism as well.  I'm not sure though.  Thought I read it in one of those women's magazines though. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 13, 2009, 08:21:58 AM
I think that things like women being older when they get pregnant can cause autism as well.  I'm not sure though.  Thought I read it in one of those women's magazines though. 

Wired Magazine printed an article about the rise in Autism & Asperger's, which places some of the blame on the rise in the number of nerds, and their increased chances of spawning children. Kids have so much going on in their heads that they have difficulties processing outside stimuli in the "normal" ways.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 13, 2009, 08:25:27 AM
I think that things like women being older when they get pregnant can cause autism as well.  I'm not sure though.  Thought I read it in one of those women's magazines though. 

Wired Magazine printed an article about the rise in Autism & Asperger's, which places some of the blame on the rise in the number of nerds, and their increased chances of spawning children. Kids have so much going on in their heads that they have difficulties processing outside stimuli in the "normal" ways.

I guess I'm not really concerned that she will develop Autism, I just don't like people telling me what to do with my own child or calling me a freak/crazy/a threat to the community if I decide I don't want to vaccinate her. It's set up now that you must have a religious belief not to do so, and I think that is bullshit. People are forced to lie about it, its craziness.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 13, 2009, 09:04:33 AM
I think that things like women being older when they get pregnant can cause autism as well.  I'm not sure though.  Thought I read it in one of those women's magazines though. 

Wired Magazine printed an article about the rise in Autism & Asperger's, which places some of the blame on the rise in the number of nerds, and their increased chances of spawning children. Kids have so much going on in their heads that they have difficulties processing outside stimuli in the "normal" ways.

See...I thought of it because a friend of mine's mom has a 13 year old son and he has Asperger's.  She was 38 when he was born.  Also, their father is a nerd.  Hmmm.   :shock:

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 13, 2009, 04:56:06 PM
I don't know what community you're talking about or the autism rate there.  Since the rate of autism according to Wikipedia is about 0.1-0.2%, in a population of 40k random people you'd expect, on average, to find 40-80 autistic people.  Of course, not every group is random and you will definitely see variations (which are especially noticeable at the extreme ends such as a disease that affects a tenth of a percent of the population).  Autism appears likely to be linked to genetics, especially since 4.3 males have it for every female.  Given that males are much more likely to have genetic issues because they lack two X chromosomes, that explanation would make sense.  I don't see 4.3 males getting vaccinated for every female getting vaccinated.

I will try and find the name of the community. I believe I may read about them on Lew Rockwell.

Is there a close enough (+/- .5 of 4.3) rate of male to female rate with other genetic defects? If not the rates between the two sexes are negliable would it be scientifically acceptable to rule out the lacking X chromosomes as a cause?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 13, 2009, 07:36:34 PM
I don't know what community you're talking about or the autism rate there.  Since the rate of autism according to Wikipedia is about 0.1-0.2%, in a population of 40k random people you'd expect, on average, to find 40-80 autistic people.  Of course, not every group is random and you will definitely see variations (which are especially noticeable at the extreme ends such as a disease that affects a tenth of a percent of the population).  Autism appears likely to be linked to genetics, especially since 4.3 males have it for every female.  Given that males are much more likely to have genetic issues because they lack two X chromosomes, that explanation would make sense.  I don't see 4.3 males getting vaccinated for every female getting vaccinated.

I will try and find the name of the community. I believe I may read about them on Lew Rockwell.

Is there a close enough (+/- .5 of 4.3) rate of male to female rate with other genetic defects? If not the rates between the two sexes are negliable would it be scientifically acceptable to rule out the lacking X chromosomes as a cause?


I'm not sure what the prevalence of other genetic disorders among males and females is, only that there are definitely more genetic disorders among males than females.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on February 13, 2009, 07:49:38 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on February 13, 2009, 07:52:02 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?

Beans + water + celery + bouillon + carrots + noodles.

Boil it. (Serious) Maybe add some tomatoes or tomato soup mix.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 13, 2009, 07:57:25 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?

Beans + water + celery + bouillon + carrots + noodles.

Boil it. (Serious) Maybe add some tomatoes or tomato soup mix.
+ ham
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 13, 2009, 10:30:43 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?

Package of 3 beans

A ham bone from a butcher or from left overs

salt + pepper to taste

ham cut into cubes smaller then a thumbnail

water

mix together in a crock pot, on high for one hour, on low over night (at least 12 hours on low)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 14, 2009, 12:22:30 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?


whatever soup you make, use chicken stock for maximum yumminess
it's the base of most soups
less'n you make a french onion (beef stock, or boiled baby cow bones)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on February 14, 2009, 09:58:33 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?

Beans + water + celery + bouillon + carrots + noodles.

Boil it. (Serious) Maybe add some tomatoes or tomato soup mix.

Canned beans? or raw?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 14, 2009, 10:00:05 PM
Does anyone have a simple bean soup recipe?

1. soak dry pintos overnight to soften them up and reduce the amount of gas you'll have after eating them.
2. sautee two ham hocks in oil with one chopped onion, get them really charred
3. add water and boil for awhile to make a good base
4. add pintos & salt
5. keep an eye on the soup- the beans will soak up a lot of water, so add water & stir
6. eat with Texas Pete or any other non-exotic hot sauce, and cornbread
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 14, 2009, 10:02:09 PM
Here's a nice home video of me enjoying my beans.

[youtube=425,350]XrQ3L6Pt4lM[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on February 14, 2009, 10:24:33 PM
Speaking of wine...

What's everybody's favorite champagne? 

When I was 18 and a Senior in High School, I paid for a 1961 Rolls limo, tux, corsage and dinner with money I had earned. My mom kicked in with a bottle of champagne since I wasn't driving. I got spoiled on several counts that night and the champagne was one of them. For 25 years, every time I drank champagne, I thought, "This stuff is CRAP."

Finally a few years ago I asked mom what brand it was, as if she could remember. She remembered -- Dom Perignon. Between that and the Rolls, I have been spoiled beyond my means to support such tastes. :-/
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Russell Griswold on February 15, 2009, 04:00:38 PM
Why must Diogenes The Cynic makes me want to hate Jews so much?

Is he a troll from Stormfront?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 16, 2009, 09:05:50 PM
Here's a nice home video of me enjoying my beans.

[youtube=425,350]XrQ3L6Pt4lM[/youtube]

manly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 16, 2009, 10:56:47 PM
 :)

Ya gotta watch those movies..
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 17, 2009, 02:24:45 AM
:)

Ya gotta watch those movies..

I've never seen any of those old westerns. They were not popular in my culture.

I'll take you up on your advice since I liked the trucker ballads thread.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 17, 2009, 02:33:21 AM
:)

Ya gotta watch those movies..

I've never seen any of those old westerns. They were not popular in my culture.

I'll take you up on your advice since I liked the trucker ballads thread.

The Best western movies ever IMHO:
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
and
The Magnificent 7

Basically all the best parts of every western (minus the sex) all wrapped into one.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 17, 2009, 02:58:11 AM
:)

Ya gotta watch those movies..

I've never seen any of those old westerns. They were not popular in my culture.

I'll take you up on your advice since I liked the trucker ballads thread.

The Best western movies ever IMHO:
The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
and
The Magnificent 7

Basically all the best parts of every western (minus the sex) all wrapped into one.

Noted. Thanks.  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 17, 2009, 09:09:46 AM
Does anyone have the inside scoop on when Dexter season 3 will be released?

I’ve heard conflicting info…I just re-fucking-netflix’d season 2 because I needed a fix.  :(
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 17, 2009, 10:57:28 AM
Does anyone have the inside scoop on when Dexter season 3 will be released?

I’ve heard conflicting info…I just re-fucking-netflix’d season 2 because I needed a fix.  :(


Dunno. For a fix, have you tried the audiobooks? Is rather good, plus, it's fun to find out which storylines were woven together to become each season.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 17, 2009, 11:02:24 AM
Does anyone have the inside scoop on when Dexter season 3 will be released?

I’ve heard conflicting info…I just re-fucking-netflix’d season 2 because I needed a fix.  :(


Dunno. For a fix, have you tried the audiobooks? Is rather good, plus, it's fun to find out which storylines were woven together to become each season.

ooooooOOOoooo...no! I didn't even think of that. :)

I became addicted to Dexter when I ran out of my "Roswell" TV series DVD's. I usually don't watch TV, but my dad who turned me onto Deadwood, mentioned that it was really good.

Thanks!  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 17, 2009, 11:13:24 AM
...Deadwood...

One of the few shows I actually felt like mourning the end of.
 :(
Partly because it ended without a wrap-up - left far too many loose ends.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 17, 2009, 11:42:57 AM
Does anyone have the inside scoop on when Dexter season 3 will be released?

I’ve heard conflicting info…I just re-fucking-netflix’d season 2 because I needed a fix.  :(



http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4381045/Dexter.S03E01.DVDScr.XviD-NOTYOU
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 17, 2009, 12:10:48 PM
Does anyone have the inside scoop on when Dexter season 3 will be released?

I’ve heard conflicting info…I just re-fucking-netflix’d season 2 because I needed a fix.  :(



http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4381045/Dexter.S03E01.DVDScr.XviD-NOTYOU

annnndddd I love you.  :)

I didn't even think about a torrent site. DUH.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 17, 2009, 08:01:18 PM
:)

Ya gotta watch those movies..

I've never seen any of those old westerns. They were not popular in my culture.

I'll take you up on your advice since I liked the trucker ballads thread.

If you go to Youtube, you'll see a lot of clips of Trinity movies dubbed in Spanish.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 17, 2009, 11:13:57 PM

I'm trying to think of the next series I should grab.  Someone (Eco) mentioned Firefly.  I was thinking Twin Peaks.  Now I see Deadwood mentioned.

I have a few prerequisites.  It must be completed, finished, series over.  Nothing I've seen much of, if at all.  Nothing sci-fi.  No Dr. Who. 

Suggestions? 

I think I'll make a new thread for this, then a sister-thread poll to vote when I've had some good suggestions. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on February 18, 2009, 07:53:12 AM
...Deadwood...

One of the few shows I actually felt like mourning the end of.
 :(
Partly because it ended without a wrap-up - left far too many loose ends.


the wife n' i were addicted to deadwood....
i just don't understand the series vanishing into thin air????
i demand an explanation....
loopy cunts
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on February 18, 2009, 08:26:31 AM
...Deadwood...

One of the few shows I actually felt like mourning the end of.
 :(
Partly because it ended without a wrap-up - left far too many loose ends.


the wife n' i were addicted to deadwood....
i just don't understand the series vanishing into thin air????
i demand an explanation....
loopy cunts

My favorite was when Jane would say "cucksuckers"

oh

and Swearengen's mustache. :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 18, 2009, 10:24:31 AM
I really like doing the same thing, Brasky-- find a series that people say is awesome but finished, and then get the entire thing on DVD and watch it over the course of a weekend (or multiple weekends, depending on how long it is).  We did that with both Firefly and Deadwood.  Both are absolutely worth it.

Firefly takes place on a spaceship and involves all sorts of futuristic technologies, so technically it IS "sci-fi," but Star Trek it definitely ain't.  Don't let the space aspect put you off, as it's mainly just a setting for a story that could take place anywhere. 

The word I would use for Deadwood is "gripping."  There are places in it that are very fucked up, and one episode in particular that I just wish I hadn't watched, but every single character in it is priceless.  (Developing a minor crush on Doc Cochran didn't hurt)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on February 18, 2009, 10:28:01 AM
I always thought of Firefly as more of a Western than a SF show. I love that show.

I've been up since 5 AM (Pacific). I'm exhausted already, but now I'm not sure I'll be able to go to sleep. I don't have anywhere to be so I can go back to sleep whenever. Ideas?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 19, 2009, 12:40:47 PM

     Are facial tats attractive or are they a statement ?  What's the symbolic gesture here ?

                (http://www.geocities.com/nplestenjak/siddharta_val_202_001.jpg)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 19, 2009, 12:53:03 PM
Are facial tats attractive or are they a statement ?

They can be both, or one, or neither.  And I would say it depends entirely on the tattoo in question. 

Quote
What's the symbolic gesture here ?
(http://www.geocities.com/nplestenjak/siddharta_val_202_001.jpg)

No idea.   I just know it looks stupid.  I hope for his sake that was actually done in Sharpie. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 19, 2009, 12:55:48 PM

     Are facial tats attractive or are they a statement ?  What's the symbolic gesture here ?



I do not find facial tats at all attractive. It would take a hell of a great personality to overcome my dislike of them

Tribal markings on the face, whether in the form of permanent ink or henna dyes, such as those in some pacific island cultures, are exempted from this opinion. As long as they're on a person who is actually a member of the tribe.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 19, 2009, 12:58:51 PM
Tribal markings on the face, whether in the form of permanent ink or henna dyes, such as those in some pacific island cultures, are exempted from this opinion. As long as they're on a person who is actually a member of the tribe.
(http://www.brownpages.co.nz/Portals/0/mau_moko02.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 19, 2009, 01:00:53 PM
Exactly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 19, 2009, 09:25:36 PM
Tribal markings on the face, whether in the form of permanent ink or henna dyes, such as those in some pacific island cultures, are exempted from this opinion. As long as they're on a person who is actually a member of the tribe.
(http://www.brownpages.co.nz/Portals/0/mau_moko02.jpg)

IMO, this is about the only acceptable form of facial tattoo (being defined by me as tattoos on your face, not neck, etc.).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on February 19, 2009, 09:27:46 PM
Depends on the design and style. Something that reflects the nature of the person is very nice.. unless it's that sort of tribal stuff like Mike Tyson got.. that too comical. I knew a girl who had a bullseye on her temple, I liked it and her.

Agreed on authenticity too.. a Maori tattoo belongs on Maori people.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: wile-e-coyote on February 21, 2009, 10:32:50 AM
I really couldn't give a fuck. I know that i look to someone’s eyes and face to get an idea of what they are thinking. when what I expected to see is something else entirely, i now why i wince because i know that it's idiocy to think i can get an idea of what someone is thinking by looking at their face. Half of what a facial tattoo accomplishes, is to cause that wince in you. You who have been taught since infancy to unconsciously display your thoughts on your own faces while looking to each others faces for each other’s thoughts, still remain unconcious to this truth that i've found for myself.

But i do like authenticity, myself. Giving yourself a scare, across a cheek or over an eye, seems pretty foolish. Such things are best when achieved through survival. Tattoos can’t be achieved through survival.

Just because someone is from a peer pressure group that mandates facial tattoos ,or used to, gives no more legitimacy in my eye. In fact, mawy, mewi, missouri, or wtf ever facial culture tattoo, legitimate or otherwise, is dumber than the kid down the street who gets one because he wants one with no peer pressure involved. But just as a scar doesn't explain how it got there, tattoos don’t display the reasons why someone got them. So it’s just prejudice to hold someone with one in any regard at all for having just seen it.

In the same way I don’t support peer pressure to get one, I don’t support prejudice style peer pressure not to. But just like you, I think you’re a dumbfuck for thinking any different about it than I do. So I do not claim to be entirely without hypocrisy :)

I’ve got zero respect for jumping off bridges to be like everyone else but there's no reason why you shouldn't if you really want to :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 21, 2009, 11:41:49 AM
That one with the tattoo on one side of his head, sure looked like a sharpie.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: wile-e-coyote on February 21, 2009, 02:25:30 PM
yeah, or maybe a glue on.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 21, 2009, 06:42:54 PM
I really like doing the same thing, Brasky-- find a series that people say is awesome but finished, and then get the entire thing on DVD and watch it over the course of a weekend (or multiple weekends, depending on how long it is).  We did that with both Firefly and Deadwood.  Both are absolutely worth it.

Firefly takes place on a spaceship and involves all sorts of futuristic technologies, so technically it IS "sci-fi," but Star Trek it definitely ain't.  Don't let the space aspect put you off, as it's mainly just a setting for a story that could take place anywhere. 

The word I would use for Deadwood is "gripping."  There are places in it that are very fucked up, and one episode in particular that I just wish I hadn't watched, but every single character in it is priceless.  (Developing a minor crush on Doc Cochran didn't hurt)

Its funny you mention Firefly and Deadwood in the same comment.  I think those are my next tryst.  Normally I'd focus on one at a time, but the Firefly is western-themed and I can segue into deadwood from there.  Also, its only 11 episodes long so it'll be over in a few days of watching. 

I has a plan. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 21, 2009, 09:22:04 PM
We've been dog-sitting this puppy for two weeks now, and sometimes she aggravates the hell out of me and sometimes I think it might actually be a good idea to keep her.  Her owner can't keep her, and is looking for someone to take her.

http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=25593.msg516704#msg516704 (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=25593.msg516704#msg516704)

Problem:  I've never raised a dog, and neither has my boyfriend.  This dog is half husky, half wolf, so she's going to be big.  She's already big, as far as I'm concerned.  She knows what "sit" means, though she hasn't mastered "fetch" yet (doesn't want to return anything).  She can amuse herself by chasing things around on the floor, reminding me of a cat.  Boyfriend gave her a slice of carrot earlier, and she played hockey with it for about 20 minutes. 

I just really don't know whether it would make sense to keep or, or whether it would turn out to be a terrible decision. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 21, 2009, 09:27:03 PM
No reason it can't be a good dog if it's still young.  Do the obedience training at Petsmart, it'll be good for both you and the dog. 

Never mention again that it's half wolf lest the goons take it away.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 21, 2009, 09:55:33 PM
No reason it can't be a good dog if it's still young.  Do the obedience training at Petsmart, it'll be good for both you and the dog. 

Never mention again that it's half wolf lest the goons take it away.

Petsmart is good for basics, and is a great place to start. Some of the local boarding and doggie daycare businesses may have something along the lines of basic agility training, which gets the dog running obstacle courses. There's people who take it seriously, and those who do it just for the fun of it. The extra challenge might be great for channeling excess puppy energy. Didn't interest Peter T. Dog, who just loves to run really fast, taking the shortest route possible between two points, and leaping anything in the way.

And keeping the dog's breed "husky mix" is important. Even if there's no restrictions on specific breeds in your area, you never know if you'll be moving later to someplace where that "part wolf" on official paperwork becomes a liability.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 21, 2009, 10:23:17 PM
I would stress that you make sure you can take care of a dog before you get one.  You don't want to be stuck a year or two or three down the road and realize that you really shouldn't have gotten the dog in the first place.  People tend to prefer puppies to adult dogs, so it will be harder to find it another place later.

I don't mean to be all negative.  I just don't like to see animals suffering because people don't think through decisions to take them in, etc. and end up essentially neglecting or abusing them.  If you're sure you'll be able to properly take care of the dog, then go for it.  It looks like a nice one :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 21, 2009, 10:40:50 PM
I can certainly see that keeping her wolf heritage private would be a good thing, although luckily Texas law doesn't seem to have a problem with that.  But if anyone here happens to know about any problems that might present in terms of raising and training her, I'd really appreciate it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 22, 2009, 12:38:34 AM
I can certainly see that keeping her wolf heritage private would be a good thing, although luckily Texas law doesn't seem to have a problem with that.  But if anyone here happens to know about any problems that might present in terms of raising and training her, I'd really appreciate it. 

I had the same type of breed when I was young (husky and wolf). The dog was great with us, but was extremely territorial. She would jump the fence some nights and go out hunting, and bringing back chickens from I don't know where. Feathers would be all over the front and back yard, bloody carcase in her dog house. We would go outside in the morning and see them all over the front yard and quickly have to pick them up before the person whose chicken coop she got into came by to see it. Other times we would come home to find her sitting on the lawn in front of our house. I suppose she felt like she was protecting it. Despite being tied down and fenced in, she jumped into the neighbor's yard and killed their cat!  Another occasion she jumped into the neighbors yard and bit a woman who lived there. Not good. It was a fatal mistake on her part.  :(

We tried to do everything we could to keep her fulfilled by taking her for walks and playing fetch, but her will was too strong to be fully submissive to anyone in our family. We would tie her up in the back yard but she was too smart and would always find a way out.

But believe me she was never violent with any of us kids. She was the best dog I had ever had. Smart, loyal, and loving. But if my dad or another adult pushed her too hard to do something, she wouldn't take it.

After she bit the neighbor we had to put her down.  :( I was about 12 years old and I loved that dog. It was a extremely sad.

Unfortunately, I would advise to not keep this dog if it is the first one you have ever had. IMO this dog will have a strong will, be tough to keep in a confined area, and will fight you to lead the "pack". All of these traits are difficult things for any dog owner to have to deal with, let alone newbies. I wish you the best of luck. You could overcome all of these things but we were not able to.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 22, 2009, 03:28:40 AM
We've been dog-sitting this puppy for two weeks now, and sometimes she aggravates the hell out of me and sometimes I think it might actually be a good idea to keep her.  Her owner can't keep her, and is looking for someone to take her.

http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=25593.msg516704#msg516704 (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=25593.msg516704#msg516704)

Problem:  I've never raised a dog, and neither has my boyfriend.  This dog is half husky, half wolf, so she's going to be big.  She's already big, as far as I'm concerned.  She knows what "sit" means, though she hasn't mastered "fetch" yet (doesn't want to return anything).  She can amuse herself by chasing things around on the floor, reminding me of a cat.  Boyfriend gave her a slice of carrot earlier, and she played hockey with it for about 20 minutes. 

I just really don't know whether it would make sense to keep or, or whether it would turn out to be a terrible decision. 


I would avoid the wolf moniker, even if you know.  People remember stuff like that, and if the dog ever bites someone (FSM forbid) you could be liable in ways you never dreamed of. 

Its best forgotten, anyway.  Dogs are dogs.  Little yappy things are like chaos that barely fit into the canis familiaris family.  Disregard those. 

What you have appears to have potential.  These animals think and comprehend.  Bloodline has a small piece of the pie chart, but not enough to invalidate the larger aspect of intelligent humans interacting with intelligent beast.  This dog can be trained, and you can train it.  I absolutely guarantee it. 

If you intend to keep this animal, I suggest you crate train it, and immediately identify yourself as the Alpha.  Since its a puppy (semi-grown) the past few weeks can be waived as a get-to-know-ya period. 

Dogs are den animals, and family pack-animals.  The crate provides the den, you feed the dog in the den.  Its his place.  Leave it open, he will go in and out because of the food. 

You need to establish the command "no" and live by it.  As the Alpha, when he acts improperly, you firmly command him with NO and physically put him down, with his head pinned to the floor.  Repeat the command NO.  Then stand and walk away. 

Repetition is the key, as he learns NO, he will eventually react to the command and not the action.  When he goes in and out of the crate, you periodically lock him in it.  When he barks, you say NO and walk away.  As time goes on in the house, he will associate NO with being commanded down, your Alpha, and the cage locked will become NO without even saying it.  He will simply lie down inside the cage.  If you command him NO, he will probably go to the cage and lie down inside it. 

People confuse dogs with too many words.  They have to be monosyllabic and very few to start, thats why I use NO exclusively and build from there.  Next comes CAGE, and he will go there as a command.  This will replace NO when NO is not actually appropriate, and you're just telling him to fuck off for a while, CAGE is the word. 

Outside, when the leash training begins, you add one word a week.  Sit, stay, heel, and come.  If you can train a dog with those six words properly, he will be better behaved than 95% of all dogs. 

Since you haven't begun yet, you could use the German words.  This freaks people out.  When people hear a dog being commanded in German they think he can do all sorts of shit, like he's been to attack training.  Its totally intimidating to onlookers.   But you have to stick to it.  (sit should remain in English, though, because children use it when meeting dogs). 

Thats a beautiful dog, Rillion.  You should consider keeping it if you and Boyfriend are gonna be a permanent thing.  Some dogs appear to have a little extra spark of something going on inside their head, he had that look in the photos.  That dog is a keeper, I'm telling ya. 


(also, I didn't note the gender when seeing the pix a few days ago, so I vacillated between he and it.  I seem to want to recall it being a female, though.  Whatever it is, have it neutered if you keep it.  It mellows 'em out and prolongs their life.  Thats one of the very few times I think its okay to fuck with nature.) 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 23, 2009, 06:21:43 PM
I can certainly see that keeping her wolf heritage private would be a good thing, although luckily Texas law doesn't seem to have a problem with that.  But if anyone here happens to know about any problems that might present in terms of raising and training her, I'd really appreciate it. 

I had the same type of breed when I was young (husky and wolf). The dog was great with us, but was extremely territorial. She would jump the fence some nights and go out hunting, and bringing back chickens from I don't know where. Feathers would be all over the front and back yard, bloody carcase in her dog house. We would go outside in the morning and see them all over the front yard and quickly have to pick them up before the person whose chicken coop she got into came by to see it. Other times we would come home to find her sitting on the lawn in front of our house. I suppose she felt like she was protecting it. Despite being tied down and fenced in, she jumped into the neighbor's yard and killed their cat!  Another occasion she jumped into the neighbors yard and bit a woman who lived there. Not good. It was a fatal mistake on her part.  :(

We tried to do everything we could to keep her fulfilled by taking her for walks and playing fetch, but her will was too strong to be fully submissive to anyone in our family. We would tie her up in the back yard but she was too smart and would always find a way out.

But believe me she was never violent with any of us kids. She was the best dog I had ever had. Smart, loyal, and loving. But if my dad or another adult pushed her too hard to do something, she wouldn't take it.

After she bit the neighbor we had to put her down.  :( I was about 12 years old and I loved that dog. It was a extremely sad.

Unfortunately, I would advise to not keep this dog if it is the first one you have ever had. IMO this dog will have a strong will, be tough to keep in a confined area, and will fight you to lead the "pack". All of these traits are difficult things for any dog owner to have to deal with, let alone newbies. I wish you the best of luck. You could overcome all of these things but we were not able to.

Some more information from Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf-dog_hybrid
Quote
Temperament and Behavior

Wolf-dog hybrids are a mixture of genetic traits, which results in less predictable behavior patterns compared to either the wolf or dog.[1] This is not to say that the behavior of any specific hybrid is erratic. It would, however, be unlikely that someone unfamiliar with an individual animal would be able to predict that animal's behavior with reasonable certainty. The adult behavior of hybrid pups also cannot be predicted with comparable certainty to dog pups, even in third-generation pups produced by wolfdog matings with dogs or from the behavior of the parent animals.[1] Thus, though the behavior of an individual wolf hybrid may be predictable, the behavior of the type as a whole is not.[1] The majority of high wolf-content hybrids are very curious and are generally more destructive than dogs.[26]
According to the CDC and the Humane Society of the United States, the wolfdog ranks sixth in the number of dog attack fatalities in the U.S.; with 14 hybrid-related fatalities between 1979 and 1998 in the United States.[27] [8] In 2000, DEFRA and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals released a lengthy study that attributed much of the reported aggressiveness of wolfdogs to the characteristics of the breeds of dogs the wolves are bred with. With both wolves' and dog's social habits revolving around a pack structure, wolfdogs may not show the dog's natural acceptance of humans as the dominant pack members, possibly resulting in physical confrontations.[1] Some purport that attacks may not even be caused by typical behavior patterns of aggression and dominance present in either parent species, but instead may be related to predatory instincts, as the majority of attacks involve small children.[1] Between 1981 and 1999, there have been 38 severe attacks and 13 fatalities caused by wolf hybrids in North America, with all victims being children.[28]
The probability of aggressive behaviour from a hybrid peaks at the onset of sexual maturity, when the animal attempts to achieve dominance over other pack members. This aggression tends to peak during the winter months when hormones run high. Attacks may also be spurred by people becoming suddenly and conspicuously vulnerable due to either injury, disease or fear. Some half-hearted test attacks may be misinterpreted as play, and result in the owner failing to discourage such behaviour.[26] An officer in the South African Defence Force once commented that it was very difficult to dissuade wolf hybrids from pressing an assault once an attack was initiated.[6]
Most wolf and wolfdog rescue organizations maintain wolfdogs retain many of the traits and requirements of their wild relatives and therefore may be inappropriate as domestic pets.[29][30] The view that aggressive characteristics are inherently a part of wolfdog temperament has been contested in recent years by wolfdog breeders and other advocates of wolfdogs as pets.[31][32] Proponents of wolfdogs as pets say that the animals are naturally timid and fearful of humans, but that with proper training and responsible ownership wolfdogs can become good pets.[33] [32] Even in cases of wolfdogs displaying consistently dog-like behavior, they often retain the wolf's natural curiosity; driving them to dig ferociously, chew up household items such as furniture, and, to varying degrees, display considerable difficulty in housebreaking.[1] [34]

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 24, 2009, 01:04:56 AM

I think you'd find theres a significant correlation between the number of dickheads who buy "tuff" dogs and the way they're treated and raised. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: wile-e-coyote on February 24, 2009, 02:57:29 AM
Is gun powder and hamburger what you feed yours brasskey?

bite them niggers faggots, good.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 24, 2009, 03:22:08 AM
I can certainly see that keeping her wolf heritage private would be a good thing, although luckily Texas law doesn't seem to have a problem with that.  But if anyone here happens to know about any problems that might present in terms of raising and training her, I'd really appreciate it. 

I had the same type of breed when I was young (husky and wolf). The dog was great with us, but was extremely territorial. She would jump the fence some nights and go out hunting, and bringing back chickens from I don't know where. Feathers would be all over the front and back yard, bloody carcase in her dog house. We would go outside in the morning and see them all over the front yard and quickly have to pick them up before the person whose chicken coop she got into came by to see it. Other times we would come home to find her sitting on the lawn in front of our house. I suppose she felt like she was protecting it. Despite being tied down and fenced in, she jumped into the neighbor's yard and killed their cat!  Another occasion she jumped into the neighbors yard and bit a woman who lived there. Not good. It was a fatal mistake on her part.  :(

We tried to do everything we could to keep her fulfilled by taking her for walks and playing fetch, but her will was too strong to be fully submissive to anyone in our family. We would tie her up in the back yard but she was too smart and would always find a way out.

But believe me she was never violent with any of us kids. She was the best dog I had ever had. Smart, loyal, and loving. But if my dad or another adult pushed her too hard to do something, she wouldn't take it.

After she bit the neighbor we had to put her down.  :( I was about 12 years old and I loved that dog. It was a extremely sad.

Unfortunately, I would advise to not keep this dog if it is the first one you have ever had. IMO this dog will have a strong will, be tough to keep in a confined area, and will fight you to lead the "pack". All of these traits are difficult things for any dog owner to have to deal with, let alone newbies. I wish you the best of luck. You could overcome all of these things but we were not able to.

You dont live  near me do you? (you dont, thats not a serious question) Our neighbor used to have 2 wolf-husky hybrids that would get away and kill our chickens. I know I could have handled raising one but they sure couldnt.  They were unsteady when walking the pets and were not good at being the pack leader.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on February 24, 2009, 04:18:34 AM
FSM forbid
May his noodly appendage touch you! I am the head honcho for my local area's Pastover celebration this year aka Flying  Spaghetti Monster Feed held on that Sunday Christians call Easter Sunday. We'll be having a Pirate costume contest, door prize, music and entertainment. I highly recommend holding one in your area too.

For those who have no idea what I am talking about, check out http://venganza.org/
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 24, 2009, 03:17:20 PM
FSM forbid
May his noodly appendage touch you! I am the head honcho for my local area's Pastover celebration this year aka Flying  Spaghetti Monster Feed held on that Sunday Christians call Easter Sunday. We'll be having a Pirate costume contest, door prize, music and entertainment. I highly recommend holding one in your area too.

For those who have no idea what I am talking about, check out http://venganza.org/

RAmen.


"A grail?  Oh, we've already got one.  Its quite nice!"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubGenius
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: wile-e-coyote on February 24, 2009, 03:33:32 PM
Look, I've been posting on this forum for two years plus, and I've seen a lot of trolls come and go.  You're no different. Additionally, the next time Brasky comes to the forum, I give even odds that he'll just delete your posts. So, whatever.


I'm not kidding about this.  I don't expect any official endorsement by any group.  But I would like someone who knows official procedure to hook me up with a few links, so I can officially submit my application for presidency to the United States Government.  Once that is officially recognized, I will submit it for endorsement to the various things like the FSP. 


I appreciate any comments. 










I will not delete trolls from this thread.








nothing would bring me greater satisfaction :D

I put that there specifically for him.  I knew he was gonna do this right from the start.  We can't have nice, civilized discussions with people like him around, and this once again proves it.  He hasn't really broken any 'rules', he's just a tenacious annoyance with way too much time on his hands to derail and destroy the continuity of any thread.  Hansen did this exact pattern. 

I give John or Lindsey permission to delete all his posts in this thread.  I have the delete button at my disposal, so I could do it myself.  So technically, that absolves them of overstepping any Mod bounds. 

Anyhow, enough time has been wasted discussing the child.  He's as predictable as sunrise. 

Thanks for your vote Vandal. 
what kind of people is that brasskey? NIGGERS?
answer the question brasskey

Hey, nigger.  That is not a direct quote.  So stick it up your gay fucking asshole. 

You can quote me on that.
(http://board.bite-fight.us/wcf/images/smilies/lol.gif)
You very clearly said you were interested in this kind of thing. (http://xhamster.com/movies/76603/twins.html)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 24, 2009, 04:12:43 PM
What is something original to say on a "Get well" card that has been passed around the office. I get it last and everyone else has signed it and said "get well", and "hope you feel better" and all that stuff already. Now I have to say something to a guy who I barely know except for exchanging the occasional friendly nod and "good morning".

Is there something in the order of light humor or general warmth without feigning an undue level of familiarity?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: wile-e-coyote on February 24, 2009, 04:21:45 PM
Are you asking what to write? If you don't know anything of this person, at all, write of a common human thing. Apple pie is a good one. In some places it's illegal for a restaurant to charge extra for a slice of cheese with a piece of apple pie. Heartwarming anecdotes go a long way.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sterlingnickle on February 24, 2009, 05:38:48 PM
What is something original to say on a "Get well" card that has been passed around the office. I get it last and everyone else has signed it and said "get well", and "hope you feel better" and all that stuff already. Now I have to say something to a guy who I barely know except for exchanging the occasional friendly nod and "good morning".

Is there something in the order of light humor or general warmth without feigning an undue level of familiarity?

How about "Get your chin to the wind, and your knee's to the breeze." or "Fun is not fun without you."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 24, 2009, 07:42:38 PM
Keep your fly zipped and don't play in traffic.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 24, 2009, 08:42:32 PM
What is something original to say on a "Get well" card that has been passed around the office. I get it last and everyone else has signed it and said "get well", and "hope you feel better" and all that stuff already. Now I have to say something to a guy who I barely know except for exchanging the occasional friendly nod and "good morning".

Is there something in the order of light humor or general warmth without feigning an undue level of familiarity?

Don't die. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 24, 2009, 08:47:45 PM
What is something original to say on a "Get well" card that has been passed around the office. I get it last and everyone else has signed it and said "get well", and "hope you feel better" and all that stuff already. Now I have to say something to a guy who I barely know except for exchanging the occasional friendly nod and "good morning".

Is there something in the order of light humor or general warmth without feigning an undue level of familiarity?

Don't die. 

 :lol: I'm gunna use that one.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 25, 2009, 02:49:41 PM
What is something original to say on a "Get well" card that has been passed around the office. I get it last and everyone else has signed it and said "get well", and "hope you feel better" and all that stuff already. Now I have to say something to a guy who I barely know except for exchanging the occasional friendly nod and "good morning".

Is there something in the order of light humor or general warmth without feigning an undue level of familiarity?

Don't die. 

 :lol: I'm gunna use that one.

I tend to sign just my name then switch writing utensils and write something bat-shit crazy like
"Dont let THEM get you." or "Remember those summer nights ;)"
"Pay up by next thursday." or "Three purple yes."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 25, 2009, 05:49:40 PM
I hate to say it, but it looks like we're not going to adopt the dog.  Primary reasons:

1. Too smart, ironically.  Unfortunately intelligence leads to boredom.   She's destroyed flower pots, flung her food bowl under the fence, and you can play with her for quite a while only to have her come up to you whining when you sit down to do other things.

2. Bad use of teeth.  She snaps at your hands when you pet her-- not hard, but that sets a really bad precedent.

3. Boyfriend and I are both laid back people, and we're basically making a new start.....packing up to move to a new house, one with a good fence but a relatively small backyard, and we're both going to be working full time.  Not a good atmosphere to have a puppy in.

4. Wolf hybrid.  Commitment for the next 10-15 or so years.  Two people who have never owned a dog.  It would be like adopting a furry, snappy child.  It's just too much for us to handle at this point.

She might be a good dog for us to own five years from now, but not now.  It really sucks. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 25, 2009, 06:02:05 PM
I hate to say it, but it looks like we're not going to adopt the dog.  Primary reasons:

1. Too smart, ironically.  Unfortunately intelligence leads to boredom.   She's destroyed flower pots, flung her food bowl under the fence, and you can play with her for quite a while only to have her come up to you whining when you sit down to do other things.

2. Bad use of teeth.  She snaps at your hands when you pet her-- not hard, but that sets a really bad precedent.

3. Boyfriend and I are both laid back people, and we're basically making a new start.....packing up to move to a new house, one with a good fence but a relatively small backyard, and we're both going to be working full time.  Not a good atmosphere to have a puppy in.

4. Wolf hybrid.  Commitment for the next 10-15 or so years.  Two people who have never owned a dog.  It would be like adopting a furry, snappy child.  It's just too much for us to handle at this point.

She might be a good dog for us to own five years from now, but not now.  It really sucks. 

Sorry to hear that, but I think you are making the right choice. If you can't find anyone to take him maybe try this wolf-dog rescue program in Texas:

http://www.saintfrancissanctuary.org/
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on February 25, 2009, 07:08:22 PM
I agree with your choice. I have 3 dogs ( I did have 4, but my oldest just died last week). I had 5 once, the 5th was a stray I took in on Christmas day, obviously either an abandoned or escaped fighting dog. A mastiff/pit mix, covered with little scars, he was big and tough looking but sweet as pie to me. The longer I kept him and the nicer I was to him, the more attached he became. Over time, he went from being a big goof, to an absolute terror. I was completely safe with him (well, except if he was eating, he bit me once when I took a corn cob he stole from the trash away), but no one else was. He would try and protect me from my other dogs, my wife (at the time, ex now), my neighbors, people on the street, etc. He was very scary, too. I took him to a trainer, I had her come and work with him in my home, I eventually had him in a muzzle and a shock collar just so I could move around the house without fearing what he'd do. Even that didn;t stop him from trying to bite my other dogs when they got too close. I searched for people who would take him, but since he had bit me, bit my other dogs, and basically showed a lot of food aggression and other bad behaviors, no one would take him. I thought he might even be a decent police dog, figuring that he'd get a lot of attention and one on one training, and would eventually be with someone pretty much constantly, which seemed like what he wanted, and his aggression might be a plus to them (yes, my desire for him to live surpassed my loathing of the police at that point). But, in the end, I had to put him down. My blood pressure and stress level went down considerably, but it was still very sad, extremely difficult to do, and even today it makes me feel guilty. I watch the dog whisperer and wonder if I gave up to soon or if maybe I had done something different, he could have been rehabilitated. I would not want you to be in the same situation with this wolf hybrid. Find someone who has the time and inclination to handle her, you'll both be better off.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 25, 2009, 07:16:10 PM
I wouldn't do anything with an ex-fighting dog 'cept kill it.  Not worth the risk.  There's too many dogs that need a home and won't eat you or your friends or your kids or your friends kids.


Why did the price of rice double?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 25, 2009, 08:55:49 PM


Why did the price of rice double?

Dow crashed, gold went over a thousand.  Everybody panic, etc.


I was in the army-navy supply store yesterday, wanted a field jacket.  Not panicking, just wanted a jacket.  They seemed a little low on most things my size, and I'm average.  You'd think a store thats been around for fifty years would know enough to keep Large in stock.  Which, I'm sure, they do.  I can only say this leads me to believe a higher number than normal of grown men have been buying stuff that fits. 

I bought a Medium.  Last one in black that wasn't "vintage".  I could wear both, but like Large because you can put heavier layers under it.  Mediums okay. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 25, 2009, 11:03:54 PM
Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry intriguing.  We were thinking GPS company or something.  Since we thought one was based in Atlanta.  We were way off, but yours sounds cooler to me. 

It's quite a bit of fun for me. Plus, I usually only work 10-15 hours a week. Could do more, but I don't wanna.

But, I'm about to tell my clients that I'll be officially quitting. As much as I enjoy doing this, we're bumping up against the edge of our tax bracket. If we go over, the additional tax bill after the phase out of deductions and credits will eat up everything I currently keep after today's taxes.  :x

I'll then be officially unemployed, and eligible for tax credits on tuition. Wonder what I should train for - that I won't actually be able to do anything with, unless I want to hand the paycheck over to the government each month.

Any thoughts on which direction I should take with my future career as an "unemployed" student?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on February 25, 2009, 11:42:59 PM
Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry intriguing.  We were thinking GPS company or something.  Since we thought one was based in Atlanta.  We were way off, but yours sounds cooler to me. 

It's quite a bit of fun for me. Plus, I usually only work 10-15 hours a week. Could do more, but I don't wanna.

But, I'm about to tell my clients that I'll be officially quitting. As much as I enjoy doing this, we're bumping up against the edge of our tax bracket. If we go over, the additional tax bill after the phase out of deductions and credits will eat up everything I currently keep after today's taxes.  :x

I'll then be officially unemployed, and eligible for tax credits on tuition. Wonder what I should train for - that I won't actually be able to do anything with, unless I want to hand the paycheck over to the government each month.

Any thoughts on which direction I should take with my future career as an "unemployed" student?

In reference to what you wrote in the "what are you wearing thread" ( that was locked  :roll:)

I create the blueprint maps. 8) We use GIS data sometime for existing utils and such.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 26, 2009, 12:22:18 AM
Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry intriguing.  We were thinking GPS company or something.  Since we thought one was based in Atlanta.  We were way off, but yours sounds cooler to me. 

It's quite a bit of fun for me. Plus, I usually only work 10-15 hours a week. Could do more, but I don't wanna.

But, I'm about to tell my clients that I'll be officially quitting. As much as I enjoy doing this, we're bumping up against the edge of our tax bracket. If we go over, the additional tax bill after the phase out of deductions and credits will eat up everything I currently keep after today's taxes.  :x

I'll then be officially unemployed, and eligible for tax credits on tuition. Wonder what I should train for - that I won't actually be able to do anything with, unless I want to hand the paycheck over to the government each month.

Any thoughts on which direction I should take with my future career as an "unemployed" student?

Go to Liberty university. Or study whatever you have always thought was really cool to know.

Maybe teaching would be a good use of your time - not public school of course, I wouldn't wish that upon someone I like.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 02, 2009, 05:24:13 PM
Verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry intriguing.  We were thinking GPS company or something.  Since we thought one was based in Atlanta.  We were way off, but yours sounds cooler to me. 

It's quite a bit of fun for me. Plus, I usually only work 10-15 hours a week. Could do more, but I don't wanna.

But, I'm about to tell my clients that I'll be officially quitting. As much as I enjoy doing this, we're bumping up against the edge of our tax bracket. If we go over, the additional tax bill after the phase out of deductions and credits will eat up everything I currently keep after today's taxes.  :x

I'll then be officially unemployed, and eligible for tax credits on tuition. Wonder what I should train for - that I won't actually be able to do anything with, unless I want to hand the paycheck over to the government each month.

Any thoughts on which direction I should take with my future career as an "unemployed" student?

Go to Liberty university. Or study whatever you have always thought was really cool to know.

Maybe teaching would be a good use of your time - not public school of course, I wouldn't wish that upon someone I like.

Did you just suggest that someone go to the university founded by Jerry Falwell? :shock:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 02, 2009, 05:32:23 PM
Did you just suggest that someone go to the university founded by Jerry Falwell? :shock:

That is a good question. I thought there was a different online university, but I'm thinking now it might actually be the online presence of Falwell's institution.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 02, 2009, 08:34:06 PM
Did you just suggest that someone go to the university founded by Jerry Falwell? :shock:

That is a good question. I thought there was a different online university, but I'm thinking now it might actually be the online presence of Falwell's institution.

I thought there was only one, but I could be wrong.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 03, 2009, 03:18:38 PM
Did you just suggest that someone go to the university founded by Jerry Falwell? :shock:
I know someone who went to Liberty University... can't remember if he graduated or not. He's now an atheistic gay activist. LOL
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 03, 2009, 07:37:29 PM
Did you just suggest that someone go to the university founded by Jerry Falwell? :shock:
I know someone who went to Liberty University... can't remember if he graduated or not. He's now an atheistic gay activist. LOL

That's awesome :lol:

Making Falwell proud...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 04, 2009, 01:47:36 AM
Stupid fight: 

Boyfriend: *blasts Nick Cave*

Me: I don't like Nick Cave.  Please stop playing it loudly.

Boyfriend:  If you listen to the lyrics, you'd like it.

Me:  I've listened to the lyrics of about six songs, and the music sucks, and his voice is annoying, and I don't like it.  I wouldn't blast music that I know you hate.

Boyfriend: *sulk*  I didn't know you hate it (lie; I've said it before). 

Me: Well, now you know.   And there's plenty of music we both like.  (We are, by the way, in the same room by circumstance beyond our control)

Boyfriend:  *More sulking*
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 04, 2009, 01:55:37 AM
Time for headphones?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 04, 2009, 02:01:03 AM
Time for headphones?

Yeah, I tried that.  He was offended by the headphones. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on March 04, 2009, 02:14:19 AM
Stupid fight: 

Check. Been around this issue myself with the ol' lady.

She likes those folksy/artsy guitar playing, raspy voiced sitting in a coffee shop female singer type stuff.

I do not.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 04, 2009, 07:39:27 AM
Time for headphones?

Yeah, I tried that.  He was offended by the headphones. 

Sounds to me like he probably shouldn't be complaining about being asked to turn the music off/down in that case.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 04, 2009, 08:10:54 AM
Nick Cave blows. Not a fan, so I totally support you on this one.

Same thing happened to me with my BFF, he is still trying to convice me Bright Eyes is the best band ever. Connor's voice makes me want to peel off my own skin.  :?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: John Shaw on March 04, 2009, 08:13:38 AM
I dig Nick Cave, but subjecting other people to the music you like, like some enforced show and tell, is kinda, you know, the tiniest bit TOTALLY LAME.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 04, 2009, 08:21:52 AM
I dig Nick Cave, but subjecting other people to the music you like, like some enforced show and tell, is kinda, you know, the tiniest bit TOTALLY LAME.

Agreed.

My old man was once on a "business trip" to get MANDATORY fingerprinting done with his boss.

He works part time at Ganmestop for the discount and so he can try before we buy deal, and they made him get fingerprinted because any store that accepts “trades” are considered pawn shops. Since we have fucked up gun laws and rules, he had to get fingerprinted to sell Nintendogs to 8 yr olds.

Anyhow, his boss was playing Slightly Stoopid they ENTIRE ride downtown. He thought he was going to puke… but then the old boss man pulled out a fat J, and lit it up. He said it made the tunes sound slightly better. He felt obligated, free weed and all, to say he really enjoyed the music his boss was pounding into his ears.

To this day his boss still buys him SS gear, cd’s, and has even offered him concert tix…It drives him crazy. I will sometimes queue it up on the old iTunes when I'm cleaning the house just to annoy him.

Might be a bit off topic, but still funny to me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 04, 2009, 10:51:26 AM
I dig Nick Cave, but subjecting other people to the music you like, like some enforced show and tell, is kinda, you know, the tiniest bit TOTALLY LAME.

Yeah....I don't think I've ever known somebody to develop an appreciation for a band by having it played loudly at them against their will.

Boyfriend and I were drunk off our ASSES last night.  That's the only time we are occasionally somewhat shitty to each other. 

The new house is about twice as big as this one, though, and I will have my own office!  That is 40,000 kinds of awesome.

In the meantime, hangover.   
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 04, 2009, 11:34:33 PM
I dig Nick Cave, but subjecting other people to the music you like, like some enforced show and tell, is kinda, you know, the tiniest bit TOTALLY LAME.

Yeah....I don't think I've ever known somebody to develop an appreciation for a band by having it played loudly at them against their will.

Boyfriend and I were drunk off our ASSES last night.  That's the only time we are occasionally somewhat shitty to each other. 

The new house is about twice as big as this one, though, and I will have my own office!  That is 40,000 kinds of awesome.

In the meantime, hangover.   

Back in the winter of '01, things were going not-so-well with my soon-to-be ex-wife.  (hyphenate much?)  I had this great Onkyo stereo, and a killer set of Infinity's to go with it.  Loud, this thing was the stuff of legend.  This was Spinal Tap's "goes to eleven" in the flesh.  I've since then upgraded and downsized for more clarity, but nevermind that. 

My X got this bootleg disc from some asshole that I have a burning desire to harm, a very long disc of Reggae that was downloaded form Napster1, and fairly shitty quality.  Live Marley, Bunny, all sorts of shit.  I'm a music fan, and this was obscure shit, individual tracks that took him weeks to download to completion because everyone was on Dial-Up. 

She played this fucking disc one too many times.  Things were not good between us.  I told her to turn it off, it was loud and static-y and it was fuckin' Reggae, I had had enough.  She turned it down a hair, bopping around.  I ejected the disc, scratched a deep groove from hole to edge on the corner of my stereo tuner, and put it back in.  NOM NOM NOM NOM MON MON MON MON VARK VARK VARK VARK .   Oh, now you want to turn it down?  No, I think not.  We listened to that for a while, good stuff. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 06, 2009, 12:14:48 AM
My question is now how to avoid killing my boyfriend's brother.  He lives with us because he's 36 and completely lacking in any concept of responsibility. 

Poked his head in the room and said "Hey, you guys know how to lose weight?  Poverty.  I've lost like 20 pounds over the last six months or so." 

No, dumbshit, you did not lose 20 pounds due to "poverty."  You're broke, yes-- because you can't be bothered to get anything better than a part time job that pays $10 an hour, you've got debt all over the place, and you spend all of your earnings on pot.  But Boyfriend has been buying more than enough groceries for all of us (yes, I contribute).  That kitchen is always  full of food.  It's not that he's "poor," it's that nobody prepares his meals for him.

Broke?  Yes-- self-inflicted.  Poverty-stricken?  No, you fucking ungrateful dickhead. 

It's like living with a perpetual teenager.  I kind of wonder if he's retarded. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 06, 2009, 12:34:12 AM
My question is now how to avoid killing my boyfriend's brother.  He lives with us because he's 36 and completely lacking in any concept of responsibility. 

Poked his head in the room and said "Hey, you guys know how to lose weight?  Poverty.  I've lost like 20 pounds over the last six months or so." 

No, dumbshit, you did not lose 20 pounds due to "poverty."  You're broke, yes-- because you can't be bothered to get anything better than a part time job that pays $10 an hour, you've got debt all over the place, and you spend all of your earnings on pot.  But Boyfriend has been buying more than enough groceries for all of us (yes, I contribute).  That kitchen is always  full of food.  It's not that he's "poor," it's that nobody prepares his meals for him.

Broke?  Yes-- self-inflicted.  Poverty-stricken?  No, you fucking ungrateful dickhead. 

It's like living with a perpetual teenager.  I kind of wonder if he's retarded. 


Dealt with lots of family who have issues of self-reliance. There's no cure other than making them fend for themselves. There is no way to prepare them for self-reliance and there is not "simulator" for it. They must be cut off from help and allowed to fall before they learn anything from it.

I was pretty bad with money until age 25. I feel bad for my roommates up to that point who had to deal with my money issues (like rent day on Tuesday but I don't get paid until Friday). Finally, I got my own place (again, age 25) and learned within 30 days EXACTLY what I needed to accomplish and how to do it. Of course the key for me was that there was nobody to help me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 06, 2009, 04:52:32 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

Problems:
She claims to believe everything in the bible.
She thinks that if you go to a "psychic", any professional one will do, and they "curse your family" bad things will happen to your family.
          example: her alcoholic drunk/drug user mom supposedly went to a psychic and the psychic told her her next born would die, and the kid died stillborn
She is horribly superstitious of the number 666 AND 999...
She says she is "christian." Just that, not a specific denomination.
She forcibly claims that Catholics are NOT Christian, and gets mad when I try to explain to her that yes, they are.
She says that the Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ 0_o




I'm just a raised Lutheran, Universal Life Church Minister, now an Atheist.
Whatcha think ya'all?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 06, 2009, 04:58:21 PM
This is my all-purpose relatInship advice: accept her completely as she is or walk away. There is no changing of people - and it would be disrespectful to try.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 06, 2009, 05:00:11 PM
This is my all-purpose relatInship advice: accept her completely as she is or walk away. There is no changing of people - and it would be disrespectful to try.

Yes, and the internal debate is,
Can I handle such nonsense?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 06, 2009, 05:01:26 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

You can't. If she's going to stop being so religious, it'll happen when she's ready.
If you want her to stay your girlfriend, the best you can do is to agree to stay away from religious issues.
You're not going to convert her, and she's not going to preach salvation.
Granted, if she's a zealot, she may dump you under the "be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers"
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 06, 2009, 05:06:37 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

You can't. If she's going to stop being so religious, it'll happen when she's ready.
If you want her to stay your girlfriend, the best you can do is to agree to stay away from religious issues.
You're not going to convert her, and she's not going to preach salvation.
Granted, if she's a zealot, she may dump you under the "be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers"

We figure on just not talking about it, her with the religiousness and apathetic towards political science, me the atheist anarchist...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 06, 2009, 05:11:18 PM
My question is now how to avoid killing my boyfriend's brother.  He lives with us because he's 36 and completely lacking in any concept of responsibility. 

Poked his head in the room and said "Hey, you guys know how to lose weight?  Poverty.  I've lost like 20 pounds over the last six months or so." 

No, dumbshit, you did not lose 20 pounds due to "poverty."  You're broke, yes-- because you can't be bothered to get anything better than a part time job that pays $10 an hour, you've got debt all over the place, and you spend all of your earnings on pot.  But Boyfriend has been buying more than enough groceries for all of us (yes, I contribute).  That kitchen is always  full of food.  It's not that he's "poor," it's that nobody prepares his meals for him.

Broke?  Yes-- self-inflicted.  Poverty-stricken?  No, you fucking ungrateful dickhead. 

It's like living with a perpetual teenager.  I kind of wonder if he's retarded. 


Does he have any incentive to change?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 06, 2009, 05:18:22 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

Problems:
She claims to believe everything in the bible.
She thinks that if you go to a "psychic", any professional one will do, and they "curse your family" bad things will happen to your family.
          example: her alcoholic drunk/drug user mom supposedly went to a psychic and the psychic told her her next born would die, and the kid died stillborn
She is horribly superstitious of the number 666 AND 999...
She says she is "christian." Just that, not a specific denomination.
She forcibly claims that Catholics are NOT Christian, and gets mad when I try to explain to her that yes, they are.
She says that the Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ 0_o




I'm just a raised Lutheran, Universal Life Church Minister, now an Atheist.
Whatcha think ya'all?

Why do you think you have a right to change her?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 06, 2009, 05:21:44 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

Problems:
She claims to believe everything in the bible.
She thinks that if you go to a "psychic", any professional one will do, and they "curse your family" bad things will happen to your family.
          example: her alcoholic drunk/drug user mom supposedly went to a psychic and the psychic told her her next born would die, and the kid died stillborn
She is horribly superstitious of the number 666 AND 999...
She says she is "christian." Just that, not a specific denomination.
She forcibly claims that Catholics are NOT Christian, and gets mad when I try to explain to her that yes, they are.
She says that the Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ 0_o




I'm just a raised Lutheran, Universal Life Church Minister, now an Atheist.
Whatcha think ya'all?

Why do you think you have a right to change her?

I dont have a "right" to change her. But I can present her with rational ideas and set a spark in her mind perhaps.
Like when she says a psychic can curse her family, I can say, "No, really I dont think it can."
Then offer ideas of why the bible is full of BS.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 06, 2009, 05:24:56 PM
Does he have any incentive to change?

No, and there's nothing I can do about that. 

My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

How the hell  did you not recognize that if you've known her for years?

Answer: You can't change her.  She is an idiot.  If you can't tolerate her idiocy, then break up with her. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 06, 2009, 05:26:15 PM
I dont have a "right" to change her. But I can present her with rational ideas and set a spark in her mind perhaps.
Like when she says a psychic can curse her family, I can say, "No, really I dont think it can."
Then offer ideas of why the bible is full of BS.

If that is your attitude, then you are just as much of a missionary as she and any of her family members, church friends, etc., who try to preach conversion to you. You'll just be quoting scientists and philosophers instead of scripture.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: therealritasue on March 06, 2009, 05:31:17 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

You can't. If she's going to stop being so religious, it'll happen when she's ready.
If you want her to stay your girlfriend, the best you can do is to agree to stay away from religious issues.
You're not going to convert her, and she's not going to preach salvation.
Granted, if she's a zealot, she may dump you under the "be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers"

We figure on just not talking about it, her with the religiousness and apathetic towards political science, me the atheist anarchist...

This isn't really healthy, IMHO. It sounds like a big part of her life, and there shouldn't have to be big issues that you just have to skate around and pretend don't exist. A good relationship is where everyone is honest, communicative, and not afraid to talk to their partner if there's a problem that needs resolving.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 06, 2009, 05:32:19 PM
I dont have a "right" to change her. But I can present her with rational ideas and set a spark in her mind perhaps.
Like when she says a psychic can curse her family, I can say, "No, really I dont think it can."
Then offer ideas of why the bible is full of BS.

If that is your attitude, then you are just as much of a missionary as she and any of her family members, church friends, etc., who try to preach conversion to you. You'll just be quoting scientists and philosophers instead of scripture.

Maybe so, but a missionary devoted to critical thinking is just a tad better than a missionary for bullshit, wouldn't you say? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 06, 2009, 06:44:18 PM
My question is now how to avoid killing my boyfriend's brother.  He lives with us because he's 36 and completely lacking in any concept of responsibility. 

Poked his head in the room and said "Hey, you guys know how to lose weight?  Poverty.  I've lost like 20 pounds over the last six months or so." 

No, dumbshit, you did not lose 20 pounds due to "poverty."  You're broke, yes-- because you can't be bothered to get anything better than a part time job that pays $10 an hour, you've got debt all over the place, and you spend all of your earnings on pot.  But Boyfriend has been buying more than enough groceries for all of us (yes, I contribute).  That kitchen is always  full of food.  It's not that he's "poor," it's that nobody prepares his meals for him.

Broke?  Yes-- self-inflicted.  Poverty-stricken?  No, you fucking ungrateful dickhead. 

It's like living with a perpetual teenager.  I kind of wonder if he's retarded. 


He hasn't been run through the meat-grinder yet.  People are propping him up like the Weekend At Bernies guy.  As you're aware, this is 'enabling' in the parlance of the head-shrinky types.  Some people don't learn 'til they hit the jagged rock-bottom.  From what you've already mentioned, I can sympathize with a few months of being adrift on his part, lots of people take a temporary flake-out after their life fucks up.  But eventually, they're supposed to do the 'ol pick-yourself-up-by-the-bootstraps thing, wipe off the dust from the implosion, do a line off a hookers ass, realize thats destructive, balance their checkbook, buy some new underwear, stop sleeping past noon, pay their car insurance, get an apartment that isn't a piece of shit, date a chick that isn't an asshole, get dumped by her, say fuckit, and repeat the process until success isn't accidental. 

And he's not gonna because its too easy to shuffle around like a schmuck and make excuses. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 06, 2009, 08:26:52 PM
I don't think there's much you can do about the religion thing.  It's not a logical or rational belief.  If someone is ok with that, then she is ok with that.  You probably aren't going to be able to change her mind because the only way to make someone give up that kind of irrational belief.  I wouldn't say you need to break up, though.  If you and she can deal with it and it's not a problem, then good for you.  Maybe she'll come around at some point, but I wouldn't necessarily count on it or actively work all that hard to bring about that change unless you want to introduce conflict into your relationship.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2009, 09:44:49 PM
I would like to know why I got an e-mail from Capital One saying that my online statement is ready when I paid the card off, canceled the account, and shredded the card almost a month ago.  Do I need to be concerned? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on March 06, 2009, 09:48:41 PM
I would like to know why I got an e-mail from Capital One saying that my online statement is ready when I paid the card off, canceled the account, and shredded the card almost a month ago.  Do I need to be concerned? 

It depends what the email says.  Does it have a link where you "log in" using your credit card number?

It's most likely automated so even if the balance were zero you'd still get an email.  I did for 2 or 3 months after closing the account.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 06, 2009, 09:58:14 PM

My question is:  Why are people so stupid on "Deal Or No Deal"?




Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on March 06, 2009, 10:23:21 PM
rillion should just fuck the brother, let the boyfriend find out, problem solved......
unless he's crazy-jealous & might kill her...
never mind.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 06, 2009, 10:30:18 PM

My question is:  Why are people so stupid on "Deal Or No Deal"?


My question is: why are you watching Deal or No Deal?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2009, 10:36:45 PM
I would like to know why I got an e-mail from Capital One saying that my online statement is ready when I paid the card off, canceled the account, and shredded the card almost a month ago.  Do I need to be concerned? 

It depends what the email says.  Does it have a link where you "log in" using your credit card number?

It's most likely automated so even if the balance were zero you'd still get an email.  I did for 2 or 3 months after closing the account.

Well, it's a User ID and password, but they had the last four digits of the account number listed, and it's the only one I ever had with them.  I finally got through to the website (it said borked), and it says the balance is zero - which I knew - and that the account is restricted with a credit limit of zero.  I'm wondering if I need to call and scream at someone. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on March 06, 2009, 10:38:53 PM
I would like to know why I got an e-mail from Capital One saying that my online statement is ready when I paid the card off, canceled the account, and shredded the card almost a month ago.  Do I need to be concerned? 

It depends what the email says.  Does it have a link where you "log in" using your credit card number?

It's most likely automated so even if the balance were zero you'd still get an email.  I did for 2 or 3 months after closing the account.

Well, it's a User ID and password, but they had the last four digits of the account number listed, and it's the only one I ever had with them.  I finally got through to the website (it said borked), and it says the balance is zero - which I knew - and that the account is restricted with a credit limit of zero.  I'm wondering if I need to call and scream at someone. 

Probably not.  I'd think the regular login on their website would be enough to confirm that the account is closed.  They're a little slow to stop the emails though.

Have you gotten emails from them before?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2009, 10:43:47 PM
I would like to know why I got an e-mail from Capital One saying that my online statement is ready when I paid the card off, canceled the account, and shredded the card almost a month ago.  Do I need to be concerned? 

It depends what the email says.  Does it have a link where you "log in" using your credit card number?

It's most likely automated so even if the balance were zero you'd still get an email.  I did for 2 or 3 months after closing the account.

Well, it's a User ID and password, but they had the last four digits of the account number listed, and it's the only one I ever had with them.  I finally got through to the website (it said borked), and it says the balance is zero - which I knew - and that the account is restricted with a credit limit of zero.  I'm wondering if I need to call and scream at someone. 

Probably not.  I'd think the regular login on their website would be enough to confirm that the account is closed.  They're a little slow to stop the emails though.

Have you gotten emails from them before?

Well, it said "restricted", not closed.  But I called on the phone and closed it.  I did normally get an e-mail informing me when my statement was ready, yes.  My mother's husband kept opening my mail "by accident", so I stopped any and all paper bills coming to the house since I wasn't too happy about my mail being opened by someone other than me. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on March 06, 2009, 10:48:43 PM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

Problems:
She claims to believe everything in the bible.
She thinks that if you go to a "psychic", any professional one will do, and they "curse your family" bad things will happen to your family.
          example: her alcoholic drunk/drug user mom supposedly went to a psychic and the psychic told her her next born would die, and the kid died stillborn
She is horribly superstitious of the number 666 AND 999...
She says she is "christian." Just that, not a specific denomination.
She forcibly claims that Catholics are NOT Christian, and gets mad when I try to explain to her that yes, they are.
She says that the Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ 0_o




I'm just a raised Lutheran, Universal Life Church Minister, now an Atheist.
Whatcha think ya'all?


EJECT! EJECT!!! PULL THE FUCKING CORD! GET OUT, WHILE YOU STILL CAN! FUCKING AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 06, 2009, 10:55:55 PM
rillion should just fuck the brother, let the boyfriend find out, problem solved......

I would rather stab my eyes out with a fork.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on March 06, 2009, 11:01:53 PM
rillion should just fuck the brother, let the boyfriend find out, problem solved......

I would rather stab my eyes out with a fork.

Then you could put a secret spy cam in there!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 06, 2009, 11:03:36 PM
rillion should just fuck the brother, let the boyfriend find out, problem solved......

I would rather stab my eyes out with a fork.

Then you could put a secret spy cam in there!

If I ever lose one or both of my eyes, I will definitely install spy cams in the sockets.  And wear an eyepatch. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 06, 2009, 11:54:40 PM

My question is:  Why are people so stupid on "Deal Or No Deal"?


My question is: why are you watching Deal or No Deal?

Anya Monzikova

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Elitist Bitch on March 06, 2009, 11:58:23 PM
rillion should just fuck the brother, let the boyfriend find out, problem solved......

I would rather stab my eyes out with a fork.

Then you could put a secret spy cam in there!

If I ever lose one or both of my eyes, I will definitely install spy cams in the sockets.  And wear an eyepatch. 

If I ever lose an eye, I'm going to get an eyepatch and become an arms dealer.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 07, 2009, 12:47:09 AM
Quote
How the hell  did you not recognize that if you've known her for years?

My thoughts exactly! How did I miss something so blindingly obvious?

Meh, I'll give it time. Cures a hangover, why not this?


And yes, spy-camera eyes are cool, but make sure you can see infrared or nightvision and have an on-off switch of sorts.
Why become an arms dealer? Become a politician, but hopelessly attempt to become one of those that the youth vote for while saying things such as
"I think America is beyond its prejudice of people with eye patches!"
"Wow, our society is a great one where a one-eyed man can run for office!"
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 07, 2009, 01:31:18 AM
My Question: How can I get my girlfriend to stop being so religious?

As terrible a question this is I somehow didnt notice until last week that my GF falls into the crazy religious type category.
(I havent been dating her too long but really I've known her for years)

Problems:
She claims to believe everything in the bible.
She thinks that if you go to a "psychic", any professional one will do, and they "curse your family" bad things will happen to your family.
          example: her alcoholic drunk/drug user mom supposedly went to a psychic and the psychic told her her next born would die, and the kid died stillborn
She is horribly superstitious of the number 666 AND 999...
She says she is "christian." Just that, not a specific denomination.
She forcibly claims that Catholics are NOT Christian, and gets mad when I try to explain to her that yes, they are.
She says that the Catholic Church is the Anti-Christ 0_o

I'm just a raised Lutheran, Universal Life Church Minister, now an Atheist.
Whatcha think ya'all?

You can try to talk sense to her. Give her the quiz, but I don't give it much of a chance. You best bet is to part ways. I know someone like her from your description and I've been debating religion with her for years now with no luck. She was never my girlfriend, but we did hook up once a long time ago.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 07, 2009, 01:46:57 AM
In fairness, there are ways to live with someone with different beliefs. I was raised catholic. My whole family is catholic. I married a catholic woman. Before we got married we knew each other for about 10 years. We had many, many talks about what we believe and don't believe, how we would behave after married, and - most importantly - how we would raise our children.

We've now been married > 9 years and are happy with our life. We don't argue about religion because there are no surprises and we don't feel the need to persuade each other of anything - because we've already talked it all out.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 07, 2009, 12:01:06 PM
In fairness, there are ways to live with someone with different beliefs. I was raised catholic. My whole family is catholic. I married a catholic woman. Before we got married we knew each other for about 10 years. We had many, many talks about what we believe and don't believe, how we would behave after married, and - most importantly - how we would raise our children.

We've now been married > 9 years and are happy with our life. We don't argue about religion because there are no surprises and we don't feel the need to persuade each other of anything - because we've already talked it all out.

Different beliefs, yes.  But different attitudes about belief?  I don't know.  I think there's a difference between having different ideas about how the world came into existence, whether there's a god and an afterlife, and so on, and one person being chronically superstitious while the other is not.   Imagine living with somebody who is going to freak out if her new license plate or telephone number happens to have a 666 or even a 999 on it.  I'm thinking sooner or later you would probably want to beat that person over the head with their own bible.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 07, 2009, 02:53:37 PM
Quote
Imagine living with somebody who is going to freak out if her new license plate or telephone number happens to have a 666 or even a 999 on it.

That's really whats freaking me out the most. Everybody seems to have slightly different religious/spiritual beliefs, but she saw a storefront the other day whose address was 999 and she flipped out. I did a literal "lolwut?" (same as with the psychic curse thing) and just went "um, really?".
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on March 07, 2009, 03:06:56 PM
Quote
Imagine living with somebody who is going to freak out if her new license plate or telephone number happens to have a 666 or even a 999 on it.

That's really whats freaking me out the most. Everybody seems to have slightly different religious/spiritual beliefs, but she saw a storefront the other day whose address was 999 and she flipped out. I did a literal "lolwut?" (same as with the psychic curse thing) and just went "um, really?".

Differing religious beliefs are really tough. However, my wife went to catholic school and was fairly religious when we met. I experienced a few episodes like you just mentioned, but they were not as bad. I just let her be who she was and over time she became agnostic just like me. :) If you want to be with her, my advice is to let her be who she is, so long as she lets you do the same.

Put yourself in her shoes, not everyone can be as "rational" as you. However think about it this way...as an atheist, how are you so sure there is no god? Both of you are making very specific claims that neither one of you can prove. So I could make the argument that you are just as crazy as her for thinking there is no god. But that is another debate.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 07, 2009, 05:38:41 PM
Put yourself in her shoes, not everyone can be as "rational" as you. However think about it this way...as an atheist, how are you so sure there is no god? Both of you are making very specific claims that neither one of you can prove.

Uh, when did anarchir claim there's no God?

Quote
So I could make the argument that you are just as crazy as her for thinking there is no god. But that is another debate.

Thinking there is no god-- even if you're wrong-- is nowhere near as crazy as freaking out over the number 666 and believing that psychics can curse you.  Bad comparison. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 07, 2009, 10:47:09 PM
Thank you for affirming my sanity Rillon.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: MasterShake on March 07, 2009, 11:27:42 PM
   Imagine living with somebody who is going to freak out if her new license plate or telephone number happens to have a 666 or even a 999 on it. 

I will say this.. the number 666 is a great marketing tool in fast food.

I used to work at an A&W in a food court.  ON several occasions the bill came out to $6.66.  I had a lot of people upsize the drinks because of that number.

Capitalism + 666 = profit for you!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 07, 2009, 11:30:04 PM
So, if she sees either 666 or 999 she gets freaked?

What if she sees a combination of the two numbers?

Whats her reaction to 6969?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on March 07, 2009, 11:31:21 PM
13-14 years ago McDonald's value meals came to 3.57 and 4.54 and 4.27 in certain combinations.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 08, 2009, 12:10:36 AM
anarchir, this sounds pretty serious to you. It is probably best to move on then. I don't see how you can have any kind of relationship without respect. I mean, you always have to expect little idiosyncrasies, and the like, but if you reach the point where you think the person you are with is a nut then it isn't worth trying.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 10, 2009, 07:36:50 PM
We shall see. She does love me so  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 12, 2009, 08:20:42 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on March 12, 2009, 08:51:18 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



1. Maya Herrera - Heroes
(http://iphonetoolbox.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/heroes-maya-herrera-f.jpg)

2. Chicago style pizza

3. Beating the crap out of someone for physically hurting a close family member.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 12, 2009, 10:11:13 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



Sorry its not TV, but Anj Jolie from Mrs+Mrs Smith really turned me on the other day.  I really did like the character, sultry and..  just mmm. 

Veal Francais.

Being extradited back into the country for tax evasion. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 12, 2009, 11:00:57 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 
  Nancy on Weeds - She uses sex as a stress release and she has a LOT of stress ;-)
2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?
  Sushi at Nobu in Vegas - I've eaten there once and it was worth the $100 per person pricetag.
3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 
  It would have to be something that led to an huge increase in liberty.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 13, 2009, 01:36:46 AM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 
2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?
3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 

1. Inara
(http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/firefly/images/thumb/c/c3/Inara02.jpg/250px-Inara02.jpg)
2. Tri-tip Santa Barbara style bar-b-cued with broccoli and a walnut-goronzola-cranberry salad
3. Winning back stolen property or righting a wrong in the style of The Saint or Ragnar Danneskjold
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 13, 2009, 07:47:56 AM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

Howard "TJ" Moon. He is the funniest actor alive. (the one in the brown hat)

(http://i706.photobucket.com/albums/ww63/alphafascination/Boosh.jpg)

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

My grandpa's stuffed bell peppers. He died of cancer, and took his recipe with him. He used to make it all the time for us kids  :(

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 

Throwing a shoe at George W. Bush
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 13, 2009, 08:10:54 AM
1. I would go with Ziva David of NCIS or Kaylee on Firefly though I could settle for both at the same time.

2. Filet mignon with lobster tail.

3. I don't really think any crime would be worth that time in jail, except possibly if someone hurt (raped, murdered, etc.) someone I cared about.  Retaliation may be worth it in some circumstances.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 13, 2009, 09:09:05 AM
Probably Seeley Booth from Bones, or Dr. Chase from House.  Oh lawd. 

Hmmm...probably filet mignon and garlic mashed potatoes and some fresh steamed veggies (don't mean to copy you freeAgent...but it does sound damn tasty).  Either that or romano and parmesan-crusted chicken with pasta in a white sauce.  Damn...all that and I'm still not drooling.  I'm defective.

Murder.  Definitely murder.  My mom's husband. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Njal on March 13, 2009, 09:15:19 AM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



Pam on the Office, Nulclear Spaghetti, Training an Unlicensed Rat Army
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on March 13, 2009, 10:54:57 AM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



Pam on the Office, Nulclear Spaghetti, Training an Unlicensed Rat Army

Pam is a good one. Add her to my list.  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on March 13, 2009, 12:44:56 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



Pam on the Office, Nulclear Spaghetti, Training an Unlicensed Rat Army

Pam is a good one. Add her to my list.  :)

Same here.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 13, 2009, 05:01:58 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 


1. The new Starbuck from the new BSG. Crazy as hell = good in sack.

2. Korean BBQ Ribs.

3. Tax evasion. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 13, 2009, 07:52:41 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



Pam on the Office, Nulclear Spaghetti, Training an Unlicensed Rat Army

Pam is a good one. Add her to my list.  :)

Same here.

(http://editorial.sidereel.com/Images/Posts/office_JAM2.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on March 13, 2009, 07:57:56 PM
FAAAT HALPERT!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jackson on March 15, 2009, 12:27:29 AM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

Max Guevara on Dark Angel, (the adult version played by Jessica Alba).

Quote
2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

Damn near anything, as long as it was served on Jessica Alba's naked body.

Quote
3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 

Licking the platter clean, after eating my meal in question 2.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 15, 2009, 01:04:43 AM
3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 

Throwing a shoe at George W. Bush

I really LOVE that answer! +1
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mountainlion on March 16, 2009, 03:44:49 PM
1.  Name one person-- character, not actor-- on a TV show that you would have sex with.    Any TV show, throughout time. 

2.  What would you have for dinner tonight if it could be anything, prepared instantly, by an excellent chef?

3.  You go to prison for five years.  What crime would make it most worth it?  "No crime" is not an acceptable answer. 



1. Pierce Brosnan when he was in his prime on Remington Steele. (Closely followed by Bruce Campbell.)

2. Seared diver scalloped in a Chavignon Blanc cream sauce, capers, and young vegetables.

3. Cover every single elected official in America with peanut butter and jelly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 17, 2009, 02:33:31 PM
So… I just finished a photo shoot for a friend. It was her wedding present for her soon to be husband and it turned out really good. I even got paid for it, so I guess you could say I am a professional photographer… (Not really). She did a 15 month calendar, with monthly appropriate themes, really cute.

I know a lot of dudes/gals on this forum are into video games (as am I), and I was wondering if you had a gf and she wanted to do something nice for you, like a gift, would you like a video game themed calendar of your girl dressed up like your fav female characters?

I was thinking of doing this for my guy, not nude, but racy. I am not sure if I can think of 12 female video game characters that I could easily portray, so my other thought was doing a video game “magazine.”

Kind of like a sexier, shorter version of “Game Informer”?  Pics of me dressed as Jill Valentine, Chun Li, Ivy, Lara Croft etc…, Vg review articles, vg jokes, just silly shit like a real magazine, but with me in it and on the cover. I'm pretty creative with Photoshop so I know I could pull it off. I have a lot of props and wigs from other shoots I have done. It won’t look exactly the same, but I'm pretty good with make-up so I know it won't be complete shit.

Just looking for some more ideas, or suggestions…or if you think this is a bad idea.  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 17, 2009, 02:56:02 PM
So… I just finished a photo shoot for a friend. It was her wedding present for her soon to be husband and it turned out really good. I even got paid for it, so I guess you could say I am a professional photographer… (Not really). She did a 15 month calendar, with monthly appropriate themes, really cute.

I know a lot of dudes/gals on this forum are into video games (as am I), and I was wondering if you had a gf and she wanted to do something nice for you, like a gift, would you like a video game themed calendar of your girl dressed up like your fav female characters?

I was thinking of doing this for my guy, not nude, but racy. I am not sure if I can think of 12 female video game characters that I could easily portray, so my other thought was doing a video game “magazine.”

Kind of like a sexier, shorter version of “Game Informer”?  Pics of me dressed as Jill Valentine, Chun Li, Ivy, Lara Croft etc…, Vg review articles, vg jokes, just silly shit like a real magazine, but with me in it and on the cover. I'm pretty creative with Photoshop so I know I could pull it off. I have a lot of props and wigs from other shoots I have done. It won’t look exactly the same, but I'm pretty good with make-up so I know it won't be complete shit.

Just looking for some more ideas, or suggestions…or if you think this is a bad idea.  :)

I think it's a great idea. The only video games I play are call of duty and gran turismo so there aren't a lot of females there, so it wouldn't work for me as much as someone who was, but even I know who Lara is, and I think I know who Chun Li is.

It seems to me, stuff like this would sell pretty well. Maybe you should start advertising on craigslist. Come up with a few themed projects like that which would be easy to reproduce. Green screening and one-size-fits-most costumes it seems would be essential.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 17, 2009, 03:06:41 PM

I think it's a great idea. The only video games I play are call of duty and gran turismo so there aren't a lot of females there, so it wouldn't work for me as much as someone who was, but even I know who Lara is, and I think I know who Chun Li is.

It seems to me, stuff like this would sell pretty well. Maybe you should start advertising on craigslist. Come up with a few themed projects like that which would be easy to reproduce. Green screening and one-size-fits-most costumes it seems would be essential.

Thanks for the advice, I wasn’t thinking of “marketing” this, but it is a good idea. ;)

My bff and I are started a photography “business” but it still isn’t fully functional. We are still setting up studio, and are just doing little projects here and there. The people we are trying to market to are the body mod community, pin-up girls, and bands. My partner is going to school for naturopathic medicine/weight management…so we are going to try and market as a package. So if a client gets on the weight management counseling program and loses weight and reaches their goal, we will do a photo shoot for them as a self-esteem booster.  So that is another route we are going to try…

I have so many ideas in my head, its constantly spinning. I def. think I could make this a lucrative venture if I/we can offer unconventional photo shoot themes. I think I will use my shoot as a “practice” run to get some experience.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 18, 2009, 11:36:30 AM
If this were your kid, what would you do?

(http://www.cuteoverload.com/images/2009/03/14/picture_7.png)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on March 18, 2009, 11:52:03 AM
Put down a drop cloth
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 18, 2009, 11:59:16 AM
LMAO - and snap photos, while trying to keep the tears from blurring the view through the lens.

It's crayola markers, for goodness' sake. Nobody's getting sick, and simple soap & water will take care of the mess.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 18, 2009, 12:36:51 PM
If this were your kid, what would you do?

(http://www.cuteoverload.com/images/2009/03/14/picture_7.png)

Call the SPCA and turn his ass in? (And hope someone doesn't call CPS on me)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 18, 2009, 12:39:27 PM
I'd be totally stoked that my kid had artistic ability.  :)

Did you notice the sweet facial coloring? Very tribal.

Then, I'd probably make him give the dog a bath.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on March 18, 2009, 03:59:54 PM
I'd be totally stoked that my kid had artistic ability.  :)

Did you notice the sweet facial coloring? Very tribal.

Then, I'd probably make him give the dog a bath.

This.

Plus, give the dog extra treats to show my appreciation for his tolerance. Bull terriers are not exactly known for that sort of thing, so good on him her for letting the kid "dress him up" a bit. Good boy (whoops) girl!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on March 19, 2009, 11:20:33 AM
Was it just me, or did anyone else get immense amusement when Ian was cursing on last night "internet only" part of the show?

It's kind of like hearing your grandma curse. You know she does in private, but it’s always a treat to hear it, especially when it's unexpected.  :)

I am easily amused I guess.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 19, 2009, 11:22:53 AM
That dog looks like Chico from Next Friday. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Russell Griswold on March 19, 2009, 11:24:14 AM
That dog looks like Chico from Next Friday. 

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 19, 2009, 11:29:56 AM
That dog looks like Chico from Next Friday. 

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Negroe, he DOES. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Russell Griswold on March 19, 2009, 11:46:19 AM
That dog looks like Chico from Next Friday. 

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Negroe, he DOES. 

I didn't disagree.  :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 22, 2009, 09:29:01 PM
A family from two houses down the street actually came by this evening to introduce themselves, say hello, and give us a chocolate pie.  Seriously.  Boyfriend is from southern California, and has never had anything like this happen to him in his whole life.....I think he's going to trip out over it all night. 

What's tripping me  out is that the dad is from Denmark.  What are the odds of that?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 22, 2009, 10:14:51 PM
What's tripping me  out is that the dad is from Denmark.  What are the odds of that?

Is there significance to that? Are you from Denmark?

Actually coincidences are far more common than people usually think. I belong to Michael Newdow's FACTS church (First Atheist Church of True Science) and we have a little thing we do at each meeting called IMBEGORs. IMBEGOR is an acronym for "It Must BE GOd Reasoning." Everyone recounts an instance of high coincidence that occurred to them since the last meeting, usually about one month prior. It is amazing how highly coincidental the anecdotes are. Usually they involve several incidents of coincidence in the same story.

One of mine from the past involved a case of mistaken identity where someone else with my first and last name had a room for rent for the same exact price, at the same time as me. He was described as having the same exact height and the same hair color as me. We both attended the same college but lived on opposite sides of town which was how we finally determined the person calling me had called the wrong person.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 22, 2009, 10:21:12 PM
What's tripping me  out is that the dad is from Denmark.  What are the odds of that?

Is there significance to that? Are you from Denmark?

I lived there for the past three years, before moving to Dallas mid-February.  Not a lot of Danes in north Texas, so far as I know. 

Quote
I belong to Michael Newdow's FACTS church (First Atheist Church of True Science)

Sounds like a great to way to make it clear that atheism and science are not religions. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 22, 2009, 11:31:56 PM
Further discussion:

Boyfriend: Man, things are different now.  Different neighborhood, different atmosphere, all of my friends are having babies (one of his good friends is having a baby next week). 

Me: Yeah, and.....that's good, isn't it?  Well, except for the baby thing.  I mean, it's great if they want babies.  But you don't, right?

Boyfriend: Uh, no.  If all of my friends were doing heroin-- do I want to do heroin?  If they're jumping off bridges, do I want to do it?

Me: So...nothing's changed there?

Boyfriend: Hell no.  You don't have anything to worry about, babe.

Me: Yay. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 22, 2009, 11:42:24 PM
I've got to say, it is really creepy knowing people from high school, etc. who are now having children.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 23, 2009, 12:09:55 AM
Sounds like a great to way to make it clear that atheism and science are not religions. 

I view it more as a way to provide an example of what a religion should really be like.
We don't have commandments, just 3 suggestions:
 Think
 Question
 Do What's Right
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 23, 2009, 12:19:42 AM
Sounds like a great to way to make it clear that atheism and science are not religions. 

I view it more as a way to provide an example of what a religion should really be like.

Like trying to show what Christmas should really be like by inventing Science Claus. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: jeffersonish on March 23, 2009, 01:31:24 AM
Sounds like a great to way to make it clear that atheism and science are not religions. 

I view it more as a way to provide an example of what a religion should really be like.

Like trying to show what Christmas should really be like by inventing Science Claus. 

Pagan Claus? Shopper Claus?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on April 03, 2009, 04:24:42 PM
I need to get a new cell phone.  I've never had a regular cell phone in the states-- just a cheap top-up one from Virgin that is slowly dying. 

I probably won't use it much-- hate talking on the phone.  I do like to text, though, and would like to be able to take and send photos.  I also need to get service, but vastly prefer the top-up thing to getting a set amount of minutes to use per month, because I'd have no idea how much to get and wouldn't pay attention to how many I use. 

Any suggestions? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on April 03, 2009, 05:38:08 PM
I just got these for my girls, and they love them.  The phone itself is about $119, and you get 50 back.  Verizon.  A single plan is $55/mo, you can include Boyfriend on Fam Plan for $79 (I think).  Unlimited text plan, 700 minutes per month, and Verizon callers call each other free, it doesn't deduct minutes if you're in-network with the other caller. 

The screen is touch/drag.  QWERTY, all sorts of slick features, the phones are very underpriced IMO.  It requires no 'data plan' which Blackberries do.  It includes a quality camera (quality for phones, anyway). 

(http://mobile.dpszone.com/images/Samsung-Glyde-Touch-Screen-Phone-from-Verizon-1.jpg)

They are approximately as long as a CD jewel case, which is roughly 4.5 inches, it remains flat when you use it as a phone.  They're very solid, not cheap or flimsy at all.  I like it a lot. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Dylboz on April 03, 2009, 07:19:21 PM
Further discussion:

Boyfriend: Man, things are different now.  Different neighborhood, different atmosphere, all of my friends are having babies (one of his good friends is having a baby next week). 

Me: Yeah, and.....that's good, isn't it?  Well, except for the baby thing.  I mean, it's great if they want babies.  But you don't, right?

Boyfriend: Uh, no.  If all of my friends were doing heroin-- do I want to do heroin?  If they're jumping off bridges, do I want to do it?

Me: So...nothing's changed there?

Boyfriend: Hell no.  You don't have anything to worry about, babe.

Me: Yay. 


This made me really sad in an Idocracy kind of way. Sure, let the immoral, stupid, hyper-religious, statist, military worshipping assholes outbreed the intelligent, decent human beings. I'll do my best to make up for it, though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on April 03, 2009, 07:44:59 PM
Further discussion:

Boyfriend: Man, things are different now.  Different neighborhood, different atmosphere, all of my friends are having babies (one of his good friends is having a baby next week). 

Me: Yeah, and.....that's good, isn't it?  Well, except for the baby thing.  I mean, it's great if they want babies.  But you don't, right?

Boyfriend: Uh, no.  If all of my friends were doing heroin-- do I want to do heroin?  If they're jumping off bridges, do I want to do it?

Me: So...nothing's changed there?

Boyfriend: Hell no.  You don't have anything to worry about, babe.

Me: Yay. 


This made me really sad in an Idocracy kind of way. Sure, let the immoral, stupid, hyper-religious, statist, military worshipping assholes outbreed the intelligent, decent human beings. I'll do my best to make up for it, though.

Thank you for thinking I'm an intelligent, decent human being.....and don't worry.  I have two nieces who are bright girls, and who live less than five miles away.   I don't take it upon myself to indoctrinate them, but when they ask my opinion on things (which they frequently do) I'm only too happy to give it.   :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on April 07, 2009, 02:32:19 PM
My mother wants to get a tattoo in honor of her 65th birthday.  It will be her first, and probably only, tattoo.  I just got off the phone with the tattoo artist.  I want it to be great, and searched carefully for which artist to do it.  I just hope she's not shocked at the price or how long it will take to do it, because I think he can really do a work of art on her leg. 

Now I have to decide if I want the same thing.  It would be really cool to get one with her, but a) I don't have much money, and b) I don't know whether to try and get the same thing because it wouldn't be exactly  the same.  She wants one kind of flower-- her favorite.  Maybe I should get another kind. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on April 07, 2009, 02:44:08 PM
My mother wants to get a tattoo in honor of her 65th birthday.  It will be her first, and probably only, tattoo.  I just got off the phone with the tattoo artist.  I want it to be great, and searched carefully for which artist to do it.  I just hope she's not shocked at the price or how long it will take to do it, because I think he can really do a work of art on her leg. 

Now I have to decide if I want the same thing.  It would be really cool to get one with her, but a) I don't have much money, and b) I don't know whether to try and get the same thing because it wouldn't be exactly  the same.  She wants one kind of flower-- her favorite.  Maybe I should get another kind. 

I think that's pretty cool, even if you're not ready for your own tattoo. Hang out and talk about the milestones in your lives, and what flower or other design you will get when you hit the birthday or event you wish to mark. Probably be a good way to keep her mind occupied during the time.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on April 07, 2009, 03:02:15 PM
My mother wants to get a tattoo in honor of her 65th birthday.  It will be her first, and probably only, tattoo.  I just got off the phone with the tattoo artist.  I want it to be great, and searched carefully for which artist to do it.  I just hope she's not shocked at the price or how long it will take to do it, because I think he can really do a work of art on her leg. 

Now I have to decide if I want the same thing.  It would be really cool to get one with her, but a) I don't have much money, and b) I don't know whether to try and get the same thing because it wouldn't be exactly  the same.  She wants one kind of flower-- her favorite.  Maybe I should get another kind. 

I think that's pretty cool, even if you're not ready for your own tattoo. Hang out and talk about the milestones in your lives, and what flower or other design you will get when you hit the birthday or event you wish to mark. Probably be a good way to keep her mind occupied during the time.

To be clear, I already have three tattoos-- they're not a new thing for me.  And each has marked an important occasion in my life.  My mom turning 65 and deciding to mark the occasion with a tattoo is actually an important occasion for me as well, because it's something she wants to do with me and that means a lot.   

A tattoo done right, I think, is partially made up of two factors-- the "looks good" factor and the "meaningful" factor.    You don't want to exclude either one, or else you end up with an unwanted eyesore.    Maybe I'll go in with the full intention of getting something nice for my mom....and if I end up walking out of it with a daffodil on me somewhere, then so be it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on April 07, 2009, 03:36:54 PM
To be clear, I already have three tattoos-- they're not a new thing for me.  And each has marked an important occasion in my life.  My mom turning 65 and deciding to mark the occasion with a tattoo is actually an important occasion for me as well, because it's something she wants to do with me and that means a lot.   

A tattoo done right, I think, is partially made up of two factors-- the "looks good" factor and the "meaningful" factor.    You don't want to exclude either one, or else you end up with an unwanted eyesore.    Maybe I'll go in with the full intention of getting something nice for my mom....and if I end up walking out of it with a daffodil on me somewhere, then so be it.

Makes perfect sense.

A daffodil? Is your favorite flower, or is it one of the things symbolized by the daffodil from the history of sending messages with blooms?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on April 30, 2009, 09:49:45 PM
[A daffodil? Is your favorite flower, or is it one of the things symbolized by the daffodil from the history of sending messages with blooms?

I don't know; I'm not much into flowers.  You know how relatives can care a lot about your favorite color, favorite animal, and so forth so they can just get you something in line with those and believe you'll like it?  My sister-in-law said that she likes cows once or twice, and she's been getting cow-themed presents for the past ten years or so.  That's why I don't express a preference for any particular animal.  I sometimes feel sorry for my father, who gets golf-themed anything because people don't know that he likes anything but golf.  That's mostly his fault, though. 

I like daffodils.  I also like orchids, irises, poppies, hibiscus, and sunflowers.  And dandelions.  My experience has mainly been with dandelions. 

My mom got her tulip tattoo last Tuesday the 21st....she took it like a champ, and it looks beautiful.  The artist, who has done a lot of flowers, said he'd never done a tulip.  He's normally done more exotic flowers, like lotuses and lately stargazer lilies.   I bet he's never done a daffodil either, just like a tattooist who has done loads of bald eagles and birds of paradise has probably never done a cardinal or a bluejay.  That's part of the appeal. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on April 30, 2009, 10:23:22 PM
I just got these for my girls, and they love them.  The phone itself is about $119, and you get 50 back.  Verizon.  A single plan is $55/mo, you can include Boyfriend on Fam Plan for $79 (I think).  Unlimited text plan, 700 minutes per month, and Verizon callers call each other free, it doesn't deduct minutes if you're in-network with the other caller. 

The screen is touch/drag.  QWERTY, all sorts of slick features, the phones are very underpriced IMO.  It requires no 'data plan' which Blackberries do.  It includes a quality camera (quality for phones, anyway). 

(http://mobile.dpszone.com/images/Samsung-Glyde-Touch-Screen-Phone-from-Verizon-1.jpg)

They are approximately as long as a CD jewel case, which is roughly 4.5 inches, it remains flat when you use it as a phone.  They're very solid, not cheap or flimsy at all.  I like it a lot. 



i can't stand this 'blackberry' type shit.
it looks like you're talking into a fucking calculator
*back to the ''brick phone''*
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on April 30, 2009, 10:36:23 PM
i can't stand this 'blackberry' type shit.
it looks like you're talking into a fucking calculator
*back to the ''brick phone''*
Do you have a Jitterbug (http://www.jitterbug.com/)?


Even old people can use my cell phone.

(http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/images/products/PortORotaryBLK-01-L.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on April 30, 2009, 10:41:58 PM
I just got these for my girls, and they love them.  The phone itself is about $119, and you get 50 back.  Verizon.  A single plan is $55/mo, you can include Boyfriend on Fam Plan for $79 (I think).  Unlimited text plan, 700 minutes per month, and Verizon callers call each other free, it doesn't deduct minutes if you're in-network with the other caller. 

The screen is touch/drag.  QWERTY, all sorts of slick features, the phones are very underpriced IMO.  It requires no 'data plan' which Blackberries do.  It includes a quality camera (quality for phones, anyway). 

(http://mobile.dpszone.com/images/Samsung-Glyde-Touch-Screen-Phone-from-Verizon-1.jpg)

They are approximately as long as a CD jewel case, which is roughly 4.5 inches, it remains flat when you use it as a phone.  They're very solid, not cheap or flimsy at all.  I like it a lot. 



i can't stand this 'blackberry' type shit.
it looks like you're talking into a fucking calculator
*back to the ''brick phone''*

Jizz and I have Blackberries.  We look like bitches fucking typing in to our calculator looking phones, talking in to them, and taking pictures with them.   :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 01, 2009, 03:14:43 AM
Actually, those phones slide closed.  So it looks like you're talking to a flat, oblong piece of black glass. 

I'm still pretty impressed with them. 

I actually prefer my phone, but I don't text. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on May 01, 2009, 08:15:26 AM
Actually, those phones slide closed.  So it looks like you're talking to a flat, oblong piece of black glass. 

I'm still pretty impressed with them. 

I actually prefer my phone, but I don't text. 



I think one of my employees at work has that one you bought for your girls.  I saw another one of them with one that opens two different ways.  It flips open like a regular flip phone and then flips open sideways with a whole keyboard and stuff. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on May 01, 2009, 08:25:05 AM
Do you have a Jitterbug (http://www.jitterbug.com/)?




no.
i have a man's phone.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 01, 2009, 02:31:45 PM
Actually, those phones slide closed.  So it looks like you're talking to a flat, oblong piece of black glass. 

I'm still pretty impressed with them. 

I actually prefer my phone, but I don't text. 





I think one of my employees at work has that one you bought for your girls.  I saw another one of them with one that opens two different ways.  It flips open like a regular flip phone and then flips open sideways with a whole keyboard and stuff. 

Yea, I donno who makes it, but theres one that looks very similar, and it opens sorta like a teeny laptop.  X has one, so it must be all the rage. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 07, 2009, 07:31:40 PM
Is there any direct correlation between your singing ability and what kind of music you like to listen to? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 07, 2009, 09:23:09 PM
Is there any direct correlation between your singing ability and what kind of music you like to listen to? 

I don't know about other people, but I prefer something I can sing along to.  I listen a lot less to the lyrics than I do the voice itself.  I doubt there's a correlation to genre beyond a preference for stuff that includes voice.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 10, 2009, 12:16:30 AM
Boyfriend's computer is fucked up.....

First, his external hard drive took a dump last week.  Took it to the local data recovery place; they agreed to recover the data and transfer it to a new external hard drive which he supplied for them.

He's been transferring files to the new external hard drive all afternoon.  Says he finished a few hours ago, but the new hard drive was still hooked up the computer. 

Then he got the Blue Screen of Death.  So far as I know, he rebooted and things were working fine.

Then later I come downstairs, and he's very unhappy.   I ask what's wrong, and he says "Go start up my computer and see."  What happens is that the computer goes to the start-up menu, but it's all fragmented-- the words are chopped in half and repeated all over the screen.  If you tell the computer to go through its normal start-up process, what you see is the start-up loading screen splattered all over the place. 

I unplug the external hard drive from the computer, make sure nothing else is attached to it except the mouse and power cord, and restart it.  Same thing happens.  No "safe mode" is offered.  No error messages are given.  The end of my very limited trouble-shooting ability has been reached.

Any ideas? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on May 10, 2009, 12:31:35 AM
The only time I've had messed up graphics like that was on a PC with a dying video card. Hopefully it's something simple like that rather than more corrupt data, etc.

I'm still doing the data recovery thing myself.. bleh.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 10, 2009, 12:35:26 AM
The only time I've had messed up graphics like that was on a PC with a dying video card. Hopefully it's something simple like that rather than more corrupt data, etc.

I'm still doing the data recovery thing myself.. bleh.

If it's the video card that would still be pretty screwy since it's a laptop, and one that is less than two years old.  Still, I guess it could be worse.

Edit: Plus, that still wouldn't explain why it went into the set-up menu on start-up. 

I hope the data recovery project is going okay for you. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 10, 2009, 01:07:45 AM
Boyfriend's computer is fucked up.....

First, his external hard drive took a dump last week.  Took it to the local data recovery place; they agreed to recover the data and transfer it to a new external hard drive which he supplied for them.

He's been transferring files to the new external hard drive all afternoon.  Says he finished a few hours ago, but the new hard drive was still hooked up the computer. 

Then he got the Blue Screen of Death.  So far as I know, he rebooted and things were working fine.

Then later I come downstairs, and he's very unhappy.   I ask what's wrong, and he says "Go start up my computer and see."  What happens is that the computer goes to the start-up menu, but it's all fragmented-- the words are chopped in half and repeated all over the screen.  If you tell the computer to go through its normal start-up process, what you see is the start-up loading screen splattered all over the place. 

I unplug the external hard drive from the computer, make sure nothing else is attached to it except the mouse and power cord, and restart it.  Same thing happens.  No "safe mode" is offered.  No error messages are given.  The end of my very limited trouble-shooting ability has been reached.

Any ideas? 

rabidfurby

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on May 10, 2009, 03:31:47 AM
Bad RAM.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on May 10, 2009, 08:18:47 AM
Boyfriend's computer is fucked up.....

First, his external hard drive took a dump last week.  Took it to the local data recovery place; they agreed to recover the data and transfer it to a new external hard drive which he supplied for them.

He's been transferring files to the new external hard drive all afternoon.  Says he finished a few hours ago, but the new hard drive was still hooked up the computer. 

Then he got the Blue Screen of Death.  So far as I know, he rebooted and things were working fine.

Then later I come downstairs, and he's very unhappy.   I ask what's wrong, and he says "Go start up my computer and see."  What happens is that the computer goes to the start-up menu, but it's all fragmented-- the words are chopped in half and repeated all over the screen.  If you tell the computer to go through its normal start-up process, what you see is the start-up loading screen splattered all over the place. 

I unplug the external hard drive from the computer, make sure nothing else is attached to it except the mouse and power cord, and restart it.  Same thing happens.  No "safe mode" is offered.  No error messages are given.  The end of my very limited trouble-shooting ability has been reached.

Any ideas? 

rabidfurby

I deny all responsibility for fucking up Rillion's boyfriend's computer.  :D

BJ's probably right, bad RAM would do that. You can download Memtest86 (http://www.memtest.org/), burn it to a CD or thumbdrive, then boot his computer from it and it should fail pretty quickly if the RAM is that fucked up.

Since it's a laptop, it's also possible that the cable connecting the screen to the guts is fucked up. If the display is fucked up even in the BIOS menu right when you start the machine, that's more likely the problem.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 10, 2009, 08:59:31 AM
I'm thinking either the RAM or video card is bad.  It may be the video card, especially if it's an nVidia.  nVidia built millions of bad video chipsets for a few years until recently, some of which have been quietly recalled.  The problem is more likely to occur in laptops and usually takes a year or two to happen (at least).  The chips basically destroy themselves with time.

One fairly easy way to test the RAM is Memtest86+, as rabidfurby mentioned.  There are also a bunch of testing tools on the Ultimate Boot CD (http://www.ultimatebootcd.com/).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on May 10, 2009, 09:58:55 AM
I would check the manufactures support website to see if there are any customer advisories for that make/model of laptop.

If you want to try to force safe mode, tap the F8 key during windows startup.

Lots of times you can also do a memory test in BIOS. Most of the time you can get into BIOS by pressing one of the F keys during POST, but what F key it is depends on the specific computer.

What was he doing before the issue started happening?

Is it just the boot screen that is messed up?

I have seen similar issues when there is a resolution miss match, and the monitor can't handle what the OS resolution is set to.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mikehz on May 10, 2009, 10:39:51 AM
If I were to get a phone with a data plan, I'd go for the iPhone. It's like having a computer in your pocket.

As it is, I don't need/want a $30 data plan, since I never send text messages. Instead, I have an iPod Touch, which works great. The cell phone, which I carry everywhere but seldom use, is a VX 8300.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Equilibrio on May 10, 2009, 07:25:43 PM
Do blind people listen to pornography?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on May 10, 2009, 10:54:04 PM
I hope the data recovery project is going okay for you. 

Thank you.. good news to report actually. I found the missing backup that holds 90% of all my family pics and vids! So while I haven't yet recovered my work and artwork, at least I have almost all the good stuff.

Any progress on your end?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 11, 2009, 12:31:33 AM
I hope the data recovery project is going okay for you. 

Thank you.. good news to report actually. I found the missing backup that holds 90% of all my family pics and vids! So while I haven't yet recovered my work and artwork, at least I have almost all the good stuff.

Any progress on your end?

Well, we went with the "bad video card driver" theory and tried downloading a new driver, which seemed to work just fine upon restarting....until he tried to play WoW again.  Then the same thing happened-- the screen froze, then went to black, then the startup screen was all wonky.  That happened a couple of times, and then he left it alone for about an hour-- off, not on.  Then he started it up again, and then cautiously started WoW again, and....it seems okay.  He played for a couple of hours or so without incident.  So we're cautiously optimistic, without really understanding what happened.  Meanwhile, I'm going to investigate whether his Nvidia card was actually recalled, and if anything can be done about that. 

I'm very glad you found most of your family pictures....be sure to back that up on an external drive now, or possibly two.  In fact, especially when you (hopefully) get the rest recovered as well, invest in a good and roomy external hard drive and back up the entire system.  I spent this afternoon doing that on a 160 gig drive, and feel so much safer. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on May 11, 2009, 02:09:17 AM
Well, we went with the "bad video card driver" theory and tried downloading a new driver, which seemed to work just fine upon restarting....until he tried to play WoW again.  Then the same thing happened-- the screen froze, then went to black, then the startup screen was all wonky.  That happened a couple of times, and then he left it alone for about an hour-- off, not on.  Then he started it up again, and then cautiously started WoW again, and....it seems okay.  He played for a couple of hours or so without incident.  So we're cautiously optimistic, without really understanding what happened.  Meanwhile, I'm going to investigate whether his Nvidia card was actually recalled, and if anything can be done about that. 

Yeah, this sounds like the video card. Starting up WoW would easily overheat one of the defective chips. You should be able to call Dell and have them repair it, even if it's out of warranty - Nvidia shipped a shitpile of defective laptop chipsets that were prone to overheating.

You can probably make it work a little better by buying a can of compressed air and spraying the dust out of all the fans, but that won't be a permanent fix, and it'll may still crash if he tries to fire up WoW.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 11, 2009, 09:03:57 AM
Yeah...definitely sounds like one of the nVideo chips that was bad.  The Inquirer has the best coverage of the issue IMO: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1004378/why-nvidia-chips-defective
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 11, 2009, 10:26:51 AM
Cool, thank you.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 11, 2009, 11:57:38 AM
Do blind people listen to pornography?

You mean pornographic movies?  I don't know.  I bet they call phone sex lines, though.  For the right amount of money, you could probably get someone to give play-by-play on the porn movie you're listening to.  "Now she's lying down on the pool table, and he's hiked up her skirt.  He's pinching her nipple...now he's licking it....."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 11, 2009, 07:52:09 PM
Do blind people listen to pornography?

You mean pornographic movies?  I don't know.  I bet they call phone sex lines, though.  For the right amount of money, you could probably get someone to give play-by-play on the porn movie you're listening to.  "Now she's lying down on the pool table, and he's hiked up her skirt.  He's pinching her nipple...now he's licking it....."

obaby..
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on May 11, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Do blind people listen to pornography?

You mean pornographic movies?  I don't know.  I bet they call phone sex lines, though.  For the right amount of money, you could probably get someone to give play-by-play on the porn movie you're listening to.  "Now she's lying down on the pool table, and he's hiked up her skirt.  He's pinching her nipple...now he's licking it....."

Can you do an audiobook of this instead of that boring Mary Ruwart shit?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 11, 2009, 08:40:42 PM
Do blind people listen to pornography?

You mean pornographic movies?  I don't know.  I bet they call phone sex lines, though.  For the right amount of money, you could probably get someone to give play-by-play on the porn movie you're listening to.  "Now she's lying down on the pool table, and he's hiked up her skirt.  He's pinching her nipple...now he's licking it....."

Can you do an audiobook of this instead of that boring Mary Ruwart shit?

Depends on how much you want to pay for it.  ;-)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 11, 2009, 09:44:31 PM
He's been on the phone with various persons from Dell for more than two hours.  Here's what the issue turned out to be: http://en.community.dell.com/blogs/direct2dell/archive/2008/09/12/nvidia-gpu-update-limited-warranty-enhancement-details.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage (http://en.community.dell.com/blogs/direct2dell/archive/2008/09/12/nvidia-gpu-update-limited-warranty-enhancement-details.aspx?CommentPosted=true#commentmessage)

If you have bought, or know someone who has bought a Dell within the past couple of years, check that link to see if it is one of the models whose warranty is being extended (very, very reluctantly apparently) to allow for the replacement of the faulty video card and motherboard. 

Boyfriend's comments are as follows:

Quote
Well, I'm working on hour 2* of my quest to get this problem handled.  At the moment I am on hold with a rep named Henry who has assured me that Dell will take care of the problem, at their cost, and that I'll get a box I can use to return the laptop (Vostro 1400) to them.  He has said that it should take 2-3 days for the box to arrive.

When I first started this process I followed the directions laid out in this post.  That first led me to the extended warranty site, then I was transferred to hardware troubleshooting, then customer care (disconnected).  After that, I called customer care again where they assured me that the warranty was expired so they transferred me back to warranty sales.  Warranty sales quoted me a price of roughly $250 to purchase the extended warranty.  At that point, I said thank you to the woman I was speaking with and told her that I would have to call back once I had my emotions under control.

After having a smoke and a drink and after thinking about taking the little Vostro out back for a serious encounter with some buckshot I calmed down enough to call tech support again.  That's where I'm currently at in my saga.  Please hold for 5-8 minutes until Henry comes back on the line.

<silence on line>

Henry came back on the line, apologized profusely and assured me that my return shipping box would arrive in 2-3 days.  He said it would be 5-8 days after that before I got the computer back (note:  I was also instructed to remove the hard drive and the battery and to send the AC adapter back with the machine).

I'm assuming Henry has been honest with me although I reserve total judgement until 1.) the box arrives and 2.) the machine is returned in working order.  As it stands right now, Henry has restored my faith in humanity and also preserved my opinion of Dell.  If any Dell manager needs Henry's rep id, please contact me and I will provide it.  Assuming everything goes as promised, Henry's outstanding service will lead to more orders from me in the future.  Give him a raise because his help, understanding and knowledge did more for Dell's reputation than any commercial on TV.

*This does not count the 4-6 hours I spent yesterday attempting to get anything but a black screen when I booted my system (boot disk, after updating the nVidia drivers and the BIOS).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 11, 2009, 10:17:22 PM
Boyfriend seems like a decent chap.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on May 13, 2009, 11:18:45 AM
Is platinum blonde hair attractive...on young women?  :?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 13, 2009, 11:49:02 AM
Is platinum blonde hair attractive...on young women?  :?

Yes:
(http://www.style-hair-magazine.com/image-files/largeblondehaircolor1.jpg)

...and No:
(http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2009/2/89%20Platinum%20Blonde%20Babe.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rookie on May 13, 2009, 12:00:40 PM
I'm confused, rillion.

is the difference you're alluding to in the way the hair is styled?


one looks simple and chic.  the other just looks like its been preened, krimped, pulled and teased a tad too much.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 13, 2009, 12:11:09 PM
I'm confused, rillion.

is the difference you're alluding to in the way the hair is styled?

one looks simple and chic.  the other just looks like its been preened, krimped, pulled and teased a tad too much.

Yep.  Plus length, complexion, and makeup.  The second girl looks like a wannabe porn star, and not just because she's in her underwear. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on May 13, 2009, 12:12:54 PM
I'm going Platinum this weekend, and some people have been saying I'm going to look weird because my skin is really pale.

This is what it looks like now:

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/SNV35150-1.jpg)

It still has a yellow-y tinge. I want it to be all white (on top) I’m keeping the bottom brown.

This is what I want it to look like:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/3108042961_569150f948_m.jpg)

There are many ways to fuck it up and make it look really over processed and fake.  :?

I like the cut on that first pic…maybe I will cut my hair too?? hmmm??
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 13, 2009, 04:26:45 PM
Boyfriend seems like a decent chap.

He is.  Eminently.

Although today he received in the mail a copy of a book called "Getting the Love You Want."  I gave him an incredulous look, until he explained that while drunk one night he had bitched in an email to a friend that I don't wash dishes enough.  This friend, a native Californian, then sent him this book in the mail.  Boyfriend says he will never, ever read it, and feels kind of bad that his friend spent the money on it.  Apparently the friend is in therapy with his girlfriend of a year and a half-- no kids-- and thinks everybody else needs therapy too. 

My response: "I bet the only valuable advice in that book amounts to saying what you want."  I'm sure not going to read the thing to find out, though. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 13, 2009, 04:31:09 PM
I'm going Platinum this weekend, and some people have been saying I'm going to look weird because my skin is really pale.

This is what it looks like now:

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/SNV35150-1.jpg)

It still has a yellow-y tinge. I want it to be all white (on top) I’m keeping the bottom brown.

I say go for it, except that I understand all that bleach can be hard on your hair over time.  Pale skin doesn't seem to be a problem at all!   A chin-length cut might be, though...I've been told all of my life that you're not supposed to go chin-length unless you're about 90 pounds, because it tends to broaden the face. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 13, 2009, 07:31:38 PM
Boyfriend seems like a decent chap.

He is.  Eminently.

Although today he received in the mail a copy of a book called "Getting the Love You Want."  I gave him an incredulous look, until he explained that while drunk one night he had bitched in an email to a friend that I don't wash dishes enough.  This friend, a native Californian, then sent him this book in the mail.  Boyfriend says he will never, ever read it, and feels kind of bad that his friend spent the money on it.  Apparently the friend is in therapy with his girlfriend of a year and a half-- no kids-- and thinks everybody else needs therapy too. 

My response: "I bet the only valuable advice in that book amounts to saying what you want."  I'm sure not going to read the thing to find out, though. 

I agree, communication is the key.  

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on May 13, 2009, 07:46:10 PM

This is what it looks like now:

 (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/SNV35150-1.jpg)



whoa....hold the phone...
is there some lesbo stuph goin on w/ the exotic-lookin chixa??!!
inquiring minds want to know...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 13, 2009, 08:04:22 PM
Is platinum blonde hair attractive...on young women?  :?

Yes:
(http://www.style-hair-magazine.com/image-files/largeblondehaircolor1.jpg)

...and No:
(http://media1.break.com/dnet/media/2009/2/89%20Platinum%20Blonde%20Babe.jpg)

I dig the bob.  Also, I agree with the yes and no.  It really depends.  The Daphne character on Heroes was pretty good looking all around, but her hair was particularly good, IMO:

(http://www.heroesfanatic.com/images/gallery/daphne-photo.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on May 13, 2009, 09:17:19 PM
Boyfriend seems like a decent chap.

He is.  Eminently.

Although today he received in the mail a copy of a book called "Getting the Love You Want."  I gave him an incredulous look, until he explained that while drunk one night he had bitched in an email to a friend that I don't wash dishes enough.  This friend, a native Californian, then sent him this book in the mail.  Boyfriend says he will never, ever read it, and feels kind of bad that his friend spent the money on it.  Apparently the friend is in therapy with his girlfriend of a year and a half-- no kids-- and thinks everybody else needs therapy too. 

My response: "I bet the only valuable advice in that book amounts to saying what you want."  I'm sure not going to read the thing to find out, though. 

My wife and I read that book together about a year ago. It is actually really good...

No one thinks they need thearpy until shit hits the fan, and by that time it is usually more difficult to fix than if you do some preventative maintenance.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 13, 2009, 09:23:33 PM

Some relationships aren't meant to be fixed. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on May 13, 2009, 09:24:39 PM

Some relationships aren't meant to be fixed. 

This is true.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on May 13, 2009, 09:42:07 PM
Although today he received in the mail a copy of a book called "Getting the Love You Want." 

Great book. My girlfriends and I read it together regularly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 13, 2009, 10:08:59 PM

You have to be dumber than your therapist for therapy to work. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on May 13, 2009, 10:18:06 PM
There may or may not be lesbian stuph happening between her and I. She is my drinking buddy...we were pretty wasted when this was taken. So use your imagianation...yah Rill i think i will avoid the bob my face is too round. I am gonna bleach it ...i made up my mind.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 16, 2009, 04:45:12 PM
I haven't done this, but I can imagine that sometime it might happen so I'm asking:

Let's say you live on a narrow street.  People routinely park on both sides of the street, meaning that if someone in one of those cars should someday open their car door suddenly, you could easily hit it.  If that happens, who is at fault?

Yes, in driver's ed I was taught that if you see parked cars you should always look to see if there's a person in them, and not drive too close to them in case of just such an event.  But driving down these streets regularly, that's just not realistic.  When I get out of my  car, I always check to make sure there's no one coming.  But if in the future somebody should forget to do the same and I hit their car door, is it my fault? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 16, 2009, 06:25:52 PM
Moving vehicle has the right of way in a thoroughfare. 

Pedestrians and operators of non-moving vehicles are required to yield to oncoming traffic. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 16, 2009, 08:27:55 PM
When opening your car door, you should always check your side-view mirror.  It's the fault of whoever opened the door, within reason.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on May 19, 2009, 12:26:41 AM
Should I shave my head?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 19, 2009, 12:10:11 PM
Should I shave my head?

Depends on what your head looks like.  If it's bumpy, pointy, or has a skin disease, don't. 

Also, I would recommend going fuzzy instead of shiny bald unless you have the muscles to pull off the Mr. Clean look. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on May 19, 2009, 03:26:04 PM
Should I shave my head?

Depends on what your head looks like.  If it's bumpy, pointy, or has a skin disease, don't. 

Also, I would recommend going fuzzy instead of shiny bald unless you have the muscles to pull off the Mr. Clean look. 

Agreed.

It's a good summer look.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on May 19, 2009, 03:31:28 PM
Oh...and my hair is platinum. Fuck the naysayers....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/09e67c9d.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/31013944.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/kgeymont/ce8289a3.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 19, 2009, 05:55:21 PM

If you shave your head, people might think you're an asshole dickface scum-sucking douchebag off-duty cop. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 19, 2009, 09:03:12 PM

If you shave your head, people might think you're an asshole dickface scum-sucking douchebag off-duty cop. 

Boyfriend's head is shaved (fuzzy, not shiny) and I don't think people assume that about him.  Of course, that might have something to do with the t-shirts that say things like "Modern Drunkard Magazine," and "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws-- Tacitus."   

Oh...and my hair is platinum. Fuck the naysayers....

Dig it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 19, 2009, 09:07:31 PM
(fuzzy, not shiny)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 19, 2009, 10:35:22 PM
Do highlights (of any kind) in guy's hair make you assume he is gay?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on May 20, 2009, 02:38:39 AM
Yyyyyyep.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 20, 2009, 12:49:55 PM
Do highlights (of any kind) in guy's hair make you assume he is gay?

No.  Of course, I won't necessarily notice them in the first place. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on May 20, 2009, 04:53:06 PM
Do highlights (of any kind) in guy's hair make you assume he is gay?


c'mon agent...you really had to ask?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on May 20, 2009, 04:53:43 PM

If you shave your head, people might think you're an asshole dickface scum-sucking douchebag off-duty cop. 


UNLESS, you are the Humungus


(not so much a shaving of the head, but the result of post-apocalyptic nuclear fallout..)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on May 20, 2009, 08:03:20 PM
Do highlights (of any kind) in guy's hair make you assume he is gay?


c'mon agent...you really had to ask?

Well, there are certain highlights which are like an "I'm gay" billboard to me.  I was just curious given the other hair discussion going on.  I have natural-looking highlights and I get hit on at an acceptable rate, so I'm not too concerned.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on May 21, 2009, 01:20:17 AM
     I know redistribution of wealth is frowned on by a Libertarian.  I heard Ian say FSP had 655 members, so it may be awhile til New Hampshire is set free.  Meanwhile in the U.S.A. Bruce Williams overnight suggested any stimulus payments to the American people should be made in the form of a prepaid debit card w/ 6-mo. expiration.  He believes this would be the fastest way to get commerce moving.  Done in this way people could not save the cash or pay down existing debt.  thoughts?

Thats not really a question but I say that "any stimulus payments" are a bad idea. Where does the government get this money? Through printing out more or raising taxes. Thus people who are earning money get that much poorer due to the loss in value of the dollar, and those who are taxed lose out too. And not saving money/using it responsibly is partially the problem with people in the U.S.  We just havent learned our lesson yet that we dont need to be constantly in debt and having way too many credit cards.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 21, 2009, 12:24:29 PM
Last night I had a very bad dream.....so bad I woke up crying.  It was worse than any horror movie I've ever seen. 

Is there really any connection between what you eat/drink during the day and the dreams you'll have that night, or is that just an old wife's tale?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on May 21, 2009, 03:37:05 PM
Last night I had a very bad dream.....so bad I woke up crying.  It was worse than any horror movie I've ever seen. 

Is there really any connection between what you eat/drink during the day and the dreams you'll have that night, or is that just an old wife's tale?

Combo. I think the food you ate may cause a change in sleep patterns, adding to the cocktail of "stuff" your brain blends together for your dreams. That the food by itself caused the dreams, not so much. You may have had the dream anyway, but being more restless caused you to wake up more easily, making the dream images stick with you.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 23, 2009, 09:29:49 PM
Ever been so angry that you just don't know what to do with yourself?  What do you do then?

(No, it's not Boyfriend....)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on May 23, 2009, 10:10:00 PM
Ever been so angry that you just don't know what to do with yourself?  What do you do then?

Go out to a shooting range, or find a completely deserted road and drive down it at 110mph while listening to speed metal.

Edit: also, fire. Fire and explosions.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on May 25, 2009, 01:24:50 PM
Ever been so angry that you just don't know what to do with yourself?  What do you do then?

(No, it's not Boyfriend....)

kill a small animal....
(torture it 1st)
that seems to help.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 03, 2009, 05:06:40 PM
What the fuck are those stretchy ropes with the hooks on either end called?  The ones you use if you have something in the trunk of your car that doesn't quite fit, and you want to keep it in place and hold the trunk door down?

I think I'm becoming senile. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 03, 2009, 05:32:08 PM
What the fuck are those stretchy ropes with the hooks on either end called?  The ones you use if you have something in the trunk of your car that doesn't quite fit, and you want to keep it in place and hold the trunk door down?

I think I'm becoming senile. 

bungee cords / tie-downs?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 03, 2009, 05:41:32 PM
What the fuck are those stretchy ropes with the hooks on either end called?  The ones you use if you have something in the trunk of your car that doesn't quite fit, and you want to keep it in place and hold the trunk door down?

I think I'm becoming senile. 

bungee cords / tie-downs?

Bungee cords!  Yes!  Thank you thank you thank you. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on June 03, 2009, 06:00:40 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on June 04, 2009, 01:54:43 AM
Why is it that many women who attend festivals for women are the more masculine type of gal?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 04, 2009, 01:57:16 PM
Why is it that many women who attend festivals for women are the more masculine type of gal?

Probably because they are looking for women to...ya know...hump.

The same reason I go to "insert sports team here" games. I like the kind of dudes that attend sporting events, not the douchey type with the popped polo's that spill their $8 coors lights down my top while wearing their hats sideways. The regular dude in khaki’s and a T-shirt.

It's like you know what you’re going to find if you go to a certain place, so you go there looking for it.

Now, I have a question that's OT.

Does anyone know where I can buy a cheap airbrush machine? Like for cosmetic use? The usual places are turning up nada. I'm only willing to spend about $150.00…
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on June 04, 2009, 04:52:32 PM

Does anyone know where I can buy a cheap airbrush machine? Like for cosmetic use? The usual places are turning up nada. I'm only willing to spend about $150.00…


Hobby store.  Or even Kmart.  People use 'em for building model cars.  Testers brand enamel paints, probly get a decent little kit for fifty bucks. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 04, 2009, 05:54:20 PM
A search for "air brush kit" on eBay turned up a bunch of them currently priced at under $50. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on June 04, 2009, 06:41:25 PM
A search for "air brush kit" on eBay turned up a bunch of them currently priced at under $50. 

Ahh, the magic of knowing how to use the internet.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 04, 2009, 07:04:14 PM
Was it that easy? I tried that and the kinds im looking for are all over 250... Am i that much of an rtard???
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on June 10, 2009, 02:12:42 PM
I just upped the bandwidth for video conferencing over IP but cannot find anyone to connect to live with a speed over 512kbps. Does anyone here have IP video conferencing that can connect with me at a speed of over 512kbps? Preferably over 1mbps.

I want to see what kind of quality I get at these speeds. The bonus is that you get to see an authentic SoCal IT nerd at work.  :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on June 10, 2009, 02:57:36 PM
I just upped the bandwidth for video conferencing over IP but cannot find anyone to connect to live with a speed over 512kbps. Does anyone here have IP video conferencing that can connect with me at a speed of over 512kbps? Preferably over 1mbps.

I want to see what kind of quality I get at these speeds. The bonus is that you get to see an authentic SoCal IT nerd at work.  :P

I have a fat pipe.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on June 10, 2009, 03:28:19 PM
I have a fat pipe.

This refers to:

A) Your internet tubes
B) Your anatomical features
C) Your pharmaceutical paraphenalia
D) All of the above
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 10, 2009, 03:31:02 PM
I have a fat pipe.

This refers to:

A) Your internet tubes
B) Your anatomical features
C) Your pharmaceutical paraphenalia
D) All of the above

E) Your plumbing? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 10, 2009, 04:20:56 PM
That sounds bad....no matter what you are talking about.

and question:

Anyone wanna be friends with me on Flickr? I could use the feedback...

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on June 10, 2009, 04:30:03 PM
I have a fat pipe.

This refers to:

A) Your internet tubes
B) Your anatomical features
C) Your pharmaceutical paraphenalia
D) All of the above

Well, my dick is small and I don't own a bong, so obviously A.

I have a 20/5 megabit connection.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on June 10, 2009, 04:33:10 PM
I have a fat pipe.

This refers to:

A) Your internet tubes
B) Your anatomical features
C) Your pharmaceutical paraphenalia
D) All of the above

Well, my dick is small and I don't own a bong, so obviously A.

I have a 20/5 megabit connection.

Do you have IP video conference on that pipe? If so, send me a PM and we can connect.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on June 10, 2009, 04:46:06 PM
YOURE MAKING THIS TOO HARD
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on June 10, 2009, 05:22:38 PM
YOURE MAKING THIS TOO HARD

The pipe?!?!?! Dude, you take this internet thing too seriously.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 11, 2009, 03:26:50 PM
Will someone PLEASE tell me how this can even compute in someone’s head rationally?

"Every day that we don't act, 3,500 American kids — children — will light up for the first time. That is enough to fill 70 school buses." - Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill

WTF GOVT???

My head is going to explode up!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 11, 2009, 03:40:17 PM
Will someone PLEASE tell me how this can even compute in someone’s head rationally?

"Every day that we don't act, 3,500 American kids — children — will light up for the first time. That is enough to fill 70 school buses." - Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill

WTF GOVT???

My head is going to explode up!


Wait a minute, am I missing something?  Can a school bus hold 50 kids? 

(It took me a couple of readings to understand what "child lighting up for the first time" meant.  I was imaging kids with glowing heads)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 11, 2009, 03:55:15 PM
Will someone PLEASE tell me how this can even compute in someone’s head rationally?

"Every day that we don't act, 3,500 American kids — children — will light up for the first time. That is enough to fill 70 school buses." - Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill

WTF GOVT???

My head is going to explode up!


Wait a minute, am I missing something?  Can a school bus hold 50 kids? 

(It took me a couple of readings to understand what "child lighting up for the first time" meant.  I was imaging kids with glowing heads)

HAHA…sorry Rill, it was an article I was reading on yahoo news about the new fed regs passed today to restrict smoker’s/seller’s rights.

They are all happy about it and making sure that everyone knows…IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN.

Quote

Wait a minute, am I missing something?  Can a school bus hold 50 kids? 

 

That’s what I was thinking about as well, among other things like if a kid – child – lights up for the first time, does that automatically make him a chain smoker who will be an addict for life? When I was a kid I smoked one or two and I was done with it. I didn’t like them… and I still don’t. It’s so absurd, they just say things that sound dramatic to get a reaction even if they are total non-sense.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on June 11, 2009, 09:53:03 PM
They have a thing called Blu, its an e-cigarette.  Its a cartridge that has nicotine suspended in flavored water, and a vaporizer in the stick of the cigarette.  No tar, you only inhale nicotine and water vapor. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 11, 2009, 10:43:44 PM
anyone ever have a wet dream? it's been like 7 years but I've never had one... I've come close but I wake up just before climax and pissed off haha
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Zat on June 11, 2009, 10:49:25 PM
anyone ever have a wet dream? it's been like 7 years but I've never had one... I've come close but I wake up just before climax and pissed off haha

Been 7 years since what?  Since you've gotten laid or since the first time you've ejaculated?

Also, if you wank enough, you probably won't have one either.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 11, 2009, 10:55:17 PM
No 7 years since i've come close to having a wet dream. It was just random curiousity.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Zat on June 11, 2009, 10:58:07 PM
No 7 years since i've come close to having a wet dream. It was just random curiousity.

Don't think they are common w/ adults.

Yet one more thing to suck about getting older.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 11, 2009, 11:03:21 PM
Too bad some of the most amazing dreams I had but could never finish completely. The most torturous fantasies I had going through puberty.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on June 12, 2009, 02:40:18 PM
I should have posted this question here:

Anyone know if they still have a Donkey Kong machine at the Luxor hotel arcade in Las Vegas? They had one two years ago.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on June 13, 2009, 12:46:19 PM
I should have posted this question here:

Anyone know if they still have a Donkey Kong machine at the Luxor hotel arcade in Las Vegas? They had one two years ago.

Luxor totally redid the arcade/non-gambling section.  I think it was to fit that whole Titanic exhibit in there.  When I walked by the arcade it looked like all new machines, but I'm heading back in December so I'll look for it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on June 14, 2009, 08:38:26 PM
I should have posted this question here:

Anyone know if they still have a Donkey Kong machine at the Luxor hotel arcade in Las Vegas? They had one two years ago.

Luxor totally redid the arcade/non-gambling section.  I think it was to fit that whole Titanic exhibit in there.  When I walked by the arcade it looked like all new machines, but I'm heading back in December so I'll look for it.
Those fags. I think the arcade is gone. I didn't see it. Fuckers.

There is a Donkey Kong at the pinball museum. I may have to go there.

http://www.pinballmuseum.org/games.php
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 14, 2009, 08:59:42 PM
the question:
why are there SO MANY JEWS in this forum?
inquiring minds want to know.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on June 14, 2009, 10:01:31 PM
the question:
why are there SO MANY JEWS in this forum?
inquiring minds want to know.

Three is many?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on June 14, 2009, 10:20:29 PM
Anyone know where I can buy thermonuclear weapons on credit?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on June 14, 2009, 11:43:20 PM
Anyone know where I can buy thermonuclear weapons on credit?

Cash, Grass, or Ass
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on June 15, 2009, 01:15:19 AM
Anyone know where I can buy thermonuclear weapons on credit?

Cash, Grass, or Ass

(http://image24.webshots.com/25/2/17/86/132521786ZQonFw_fs.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 15, 2009, 03:23:19 AM
so what jew bag you wanna fuck with me jus cuz i jewish?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 15, 2009, 12:43:51 PM
so what jew bag you wanna fuck with me jus cuz i jewish?


i thought you were a jap
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 15, 2009, 12:44:28 PM
the question:
why are there SO MANY JEWS in this forum?
inquiring minds want to know.

Three is many?

they'll be coming out of the woodwork, fore you know it......
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 15, 2009, 12:45:14 PM
so what jew bag you wanna fuck with me jus cuz i jewish?


i thought you were a jap

does my avatar look jap to you punk? bow down to ur messiah!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 15, 2009, 11:11:27 PM
so what jew bag you wanna fuck with me jus cuz i jewish?


i thought you were a jap

Jap, or JAP?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 16, 2009, 09:26:19 AM


Jap, or JAP?



he said he wuz japaneee
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Jetfire on June 16, 2009, 11:05:04 AM
I never said that. I have spoken in japaneeee before as you put it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Keels on June 18, 2009, 11:45:55 AM
I'm learning Danish, and I was wondering if anyone here speaks it and would like to help me? I would like to know some slang words or conversational phrases. I have only been studying for 2 weeks, so I will need a lot of help.

Tak for det.  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on June 18, 2009, 11:48:58 AM
I'm learning Danish, and I was wondering if anyone here speaks it and would like to help me? I would like to know some slang words or conversational phrases. I have only been studying for 2 weeks, so I will need a lot of help.

Tak for det.  :)


I think Rillion probably speaks some, if not fluently.  She lived in Denmark for a few years. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 26, 2009, 02:45:08 PM
Question: My new business is nearly complete.                Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?
Benefit: Receiving constructive criticism, support, marketing, sales.
Cons:    My online username (anarchir) and all it is connected to will get attached to my business and thus my RL full actual name and information.

If I were answering this question towards someone else I would say "yes." I think that's due to my own curiosity though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 26, 2009, 03:17:16 PM
Question: My new business is nearly complete.                Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?
Benefit: Receiving constructive criticism, support, marketing, sales.
Cons:    My online username (anarchir) and all it is connected to will get attached to my business and thus my RL full actual name and information.

If I were answering this question towards someone else I would say "yes." I think that's due to my own curiosity though.

Maybe you could ask that anyone interested let you know, then you can PM it to them?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on June 26, 2009, 08:40:45 PM
Question: My new business is nearly complete.                Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?
Benefit: Receiving constructive criticism, support, marketing, sales.
Cons:    My online username (anarchir) and all it is connected to will get attached to my business and thus my RL full actual name and information.

If I were answering this question towards someone else I would say "yes." I think that's due to my own curiosity though.

Maybe you could ask that anyone interested let you know, then you can PM it to them?

I'd go with this approach.  I definitely wouldn't want to put out my employer's name on public sections of this BBS.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 26, 2009, 11:19:45 PM
Question: My new business is nearly complete.                Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?
Benefit: Receiving constructive criticism, support, marketing, sales.
Cons:    My online username (anarchir) and all it is connected to will get attached to my business and thus my RL full actual name and information.

If I were answering this question towards someone else I would say "yes." I think that's due to my own curiosity though.

Maybe you could ask that anyone interested let you know, then you can PM it to them?

I'd go with this approach.  I definitely wouldn't want to put out my employer's name on public sections of this BBS.

Also, I am sole the proprietor, the only employee.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on June 27, 2009, 09:03:23 AM
Question: My new business is nearly complete.                Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?
Benefit: Receiving constructive criticism, support, marketing, sales.
Cons:    My online username (anarchir) and all it is connected to will get attached to my business and thus my RL full actual name and information.

If I were answering this question towards someone else I would say "yes." I think that's due to my own curiosity though.

Maybe you could ask that anyone interested let you know, then you can PM it to them?

I'd go with this approach.  I definitely wouldn't want to put out my employer's name on public sections of this BBS.

Also, I am sole the proprietor, the only employee.

Yeah, if you're comfortable with the sort of attention that having your business show up on this website might bring, then go ahead.  Given the nature of this forum, I wouldn't want random people associating my business with it--especially without a lot more context than a Google search.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 28, 2009, 10:21:10 AM
            Should I reveal the name of the business/its web site to ya'all?

Cons:    You'll have asshats like the gay wrassler, dick 3, libman, & other such cunts attached to you.


Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 28, 2009, 12:35:02 PM
Ok, you've convinced me, I wont.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: digitalfour on June 28, 2009, 05:02:40 PM
What is the business about?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 29, 2009, 03:44:30 AM
Selling hidden cameras, surveillance systems, diversion safes, pepper spray, child protection gear, some small self-defense weapons, etc.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 07, 2009, 05:11:37 PM
My dog is mopey. Has been for last three weeks, since we got back from vacation, when he had two weeks staying with a friend & his two dogs. We're doing normal walks and playing in the yard, but I think he's missing doggie companionship. I know that getting a 10 yr old dog a younger companion can help keep him active an healthier for a longer life, plus gives me a running buddy when Petey's arthritis gets the better of him but...
Starting with a youngster is a big commitment for time and money.
Kids say they'll take care of and train, but we all know how that works.
I don't want a baby! 2 month old dogs are a ton of work, and you can't tell much about personality yet.

There's the info., now for the question:

Should we get a young, but not infant dog, like maybe the one in the photo below?
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_SaqwbscCzYU/SlO5plH6OVI/AAAAAAAABZQ/raoF1kKhrxg/s400/potential_moppet.jpg)
This is Annie, who is a 5-6 month old terrier mix. Her temperment is good. Playful, but not rough. Only barked once or twice during 15 minutes with kids, and that was while chasing up & down hall. She seems to get along well with Petey dog, and he was pretty good about having his ears tugged and leash wrestled. (Tail kept wagging and he didn't try to walk away from her like he does with itty bitty puppies.) She's spayed and microchipped already and up on shots, so just normal checkup would be required when we take Petey to the vet later this month.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 07, 2009, 05:31:38 PM
Dogs need friends too. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: JWI on July 07, 2009, 07:38:17 PM
My first dog was being mopey a couple years ago so I adopted a brother for him.  Now they're as happy as can be.  Dogs are pack animals so if most of the pack is gone all day (work, school, etc) I think they get bored.  Just having another dog around seems to perk them up.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 09, 2009, 03:58:06 PM
Dogs need friends too. 

My first dog was being mopey a couple years ago so I adopted a brother for him.  Now they're as happy as can be.  Dogs are pack animals so if most of the pack is gone all day (work, school, etc) I think they get bored.  Just having another dog around seems to perk them up.

Well, my dog has a dog of his own now. Not the dog we went in to adopt from the earlier photo. That small to medium female beagle/terrier mix, already six months old, with a semblance of bladder control. No... children (thanks to dad) and dog clicked with a lovely two month old who is already considerably larger than my choice of mutt. Meet Clifford:
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SaqwbscCzYU/SlZKK4j_jvI/AAAAAAAABak/HcBrdzdedHI/s320/clifford-n-pete.jpg)
Collie/Shepherd, sweet and fluffy. Don't let my grumble mislead you, I like him just fine. I'm just cranky from lack of sleep after a 12 midnight and 6:00 am walk. 'Sides, just like Petey, it appears he's picked me as his person.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 10, 2009, 08:46:07 PM


...it appears he's picked me as his person.

I don't blame him.


Good luck with him, even through the regretful moments when he chews the wires.  You did a good thing. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 02, 2009, 02:12:39 AM
Is molecular gastronomy bullshit?  Is it just cooking with a fancy name or fancier equipment?  Or is it something fundamentally different from cooking-- and if so, why?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: YixilTesiphon on August 02, 2009, 05:09:00 PM
I've got to say, it is really creepy knowing people from high school, etc. who are now having children.

Sister had a baby on Thursday.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rookie on August 02, 2009, 07:16:16 PM
if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it....can you still make furniture out of it?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 02, 2009, 08:07:11 PM
if a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it....can you still make furniture out of it?

Some of the finest wood for making furniture is dredged from swamps, ancient logs of enormous size buried in the mud, and exhumed.  I guess they cure somehow in the muck.  Nobody was around to hear them fall thousands of years ago. 

If it was here in the States, they'd probably call a halt to it, examine the site for arrowheads and declare the wetlands off-limits to submerged log harvesting.  But its in South America, where they welcome large earth-moving machinery into the wilderness with unparalleled joy. 

So yes.  Absolutely.  And it is furniture of the highest order, fit for kings. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on August 02, 2009, 11:07:07 PM
This may seem out of place, but you just reminded me of it. I went to the Orange County Fair last week. It was kind of cool. We saw "Al's Brain" and enjoyed it, but one of the best displays was the woodworking area. First, I saw a bunch of well-made stuff that impressed the hell out of me. In a time of mass-produced plastic stuff it was really awesome to see hand-crafted work with careful detail. At the very end of the building there was a group of guys just carving ducks out of wood and spinning wooden bowls, or carving tops on a lathe. Cool stuff. It makes me wish I was better making stuff with my hands.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 03, 2009, 12:49:32 AM
This may seem out of place, but you just reminded me of it. I went to the Orange County Fair last week. It was kind of cool. We saw "Al's Brain" and enjoyed it, but one of the best displays was the woodworking area. First, I saw a bunch of well-made stuff that impressed the hell out of me. In a time of mass-produced plastic stuff it was really awesome to see hand-crafted work with careful detail. At the very end of the building there was a group of guys just carving ducks out of wood and spinning wooden bowls, or carving tops on a lathe. Cool stuff. It makes me wish I was better making stuff with my hands.

I have a small, old-time amusement park here.  Well, I don't have it, I just attend it once every ten years.  Its about a hundred years old.  Very cool stuff.  Its got an old Merry-Go-Round, with hand carved horses.  It probably one of the ten-best old-time permanent regional parks in the nation, as far as I'm concerned.  Its clean as a whistle, and its got a whole bunch of those idiotic baby rides for toddler kids, that go up and down on a hydraulic arm, like jeeps, Red Barron planes, and what-have-you. 

Way off in one corner, they have a village of craftsmanship that blows me away every time I see it.  They have a guy pounding horse shoes, a guy who runs a steam tractor (it has a boiler that works like an antique locomotive) and cuts lumber with it, various and sundry candies and goodies like popcorn cooked in a kettle with a wooden paddle.  Its a great place.  I had half a notion to document my last visit, but those sorta things are often trash-talked, so I don't often make the effort. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on August 03, 2009, 09:02:01 AM


If it was here in the States, they'd probably call a halt to it, . 



there was a documentary on discovery about an american co. that does this very thing.
back in the day, when they floated logs down rivers to the mill, there would always be a certain amount lost to sinkage.....
lack of oxygen preserves the wood, etc...
these guys harvest the sunken logs......150+ yr old wood...big money
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 03, 2009, 09:35:29 PM


If it was here in the States, they'd probably call a halt to it, . 



there was a documentary on discovery about an american co. that does this very thing.
back in the day, when they floated logs down rivers to the mill, there would always be a certain amount lost to sinkage.....
lack of oxygen preserves the wood, etc...
these guys harvest the sunken logs......150+ yr old wood...big money

I'll bet you PETA is all over that one, disturbing the bottom of riverbeds.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on August 04, 2009, 09:03:22 AM


If it was here in the States, they'd probably call a halt to it, . 



there was a documentary on discovery about an american co. that does this very thing.
back in the day, when they floated logs down rivers to the mill, there would always be a certain amount lost to sinkage.....
lack of oxygen preserves the wood, etc...
these guys harvest the sunken logs......150+ yr old wood...big money

Yeah, I saw that show.  It's pretty interesting.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: fatcat on August 05, 2009, 02:47:28 PM
Is molecular gastronomy bullshit?  Is it just cooking with a fancy name or fancier equipment?  Or is it something fundamentally different from cooking-- and if so, why?

Real gastronomy is utterly brilliant. Theres plenty of bullshit being passed off as gasto-food at the moment, but cut the wheat from the chaff and you can find some really amazing stuff going on.


Heston Blumenthal making 4 separate flavors in one drink

[youtube=425,350]3nyVrGFFkLY[/youtube]


Heston Blumenthal on Salt Myths
[youtube=425,350]nlFJVvqgY7k[/youtube]


Heston Blumenthal in search of perfection
[youtube=425,350]P-GJCAogmZk[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on August 05, 2009, 05:52:21 PM
Anyone know who are the investors of General Fusion?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 05, 2009, 06:15:18 PM
Anyone know who are the investors of General Fusion?

Chrysalix Energy Venture Capital, a Vancouver-based venture capital firm, led a C$1.2 million seed round of financing for General Fusion in 2007.[2][4][5]

In 2009 a consortium led by General Fusion was awarded C$13.9 million by Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) to conduct a four-year research project on "Acoustically Driven Magnetized Target Fusion";[6] SDTC is a foundation established by the Canadian government. [7] The other members of the consortium are Los Alamos National Laboratory and Powertech Labs Inc.[6]


-----

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Fusion
refs/links/sources at bottom of page




Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 05, 2009, 07:20:39 PM
Real gastronomy is utterly brilliant. Theres plenty of bullshit being passed off as gasto-food at the moment, but cut the wheat from the chaff and you can find some really amazing stuff going on.
(Heston Blumenthal clips)

Neat!  Thanks so much for the clips....I'm going to have to go on to see if he makes the perfect Baked Alaska. 

The reason I asked was that there was an episode of Top Chef Masters which featured Wylie Dufresne, who is apparently into molecular gastronomy, and all of the judges were making these comments about "scientific cooking" and how they distrusted it.  And I was thinking "Well, cooking is  science....it's manipulation of temperatures, physical pressures, and chemical contents to achieve a desired result."  It seems more like a difference of perspective to me than an actual difference of method. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 27, 2009, 06:15:40 PM
Need some new speakers for the laptop.  Prefer maximum sound for under $80 or so.  Any suggestions? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 27, 2009, 06:21:00 PM
Bose 3 series, I think they connect with the little headphone 3.5mm chrome prong.  Its basically a home system with a little bass cube, ac powerd.  If they need to be totally transportable, it wont work. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on October 27, 2009, 08:30:56 PM
M-Audio makes good stuff: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16836127010
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on October 27, 2009, 08:38:26 PM
Yeah, how portable you need them to be matters a lot. If you want to be able to throw them in a laptop bag, get these:

http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-970155-0403-Notebook-Speakers-Black/dp/B0009WKBGC/ref=pd_cp_pc_0

They plug in through USB, which means you get built-in play/pause/volume buttons, and there's no extra power cable.

If you're going to have them plugged in at a desk where portability doesn't matter, there are a bunch of good 2.1 systems in the $50-$100 range. I'd get one of these:

http://www.amazon.com/Bose-Companion-Multimedia-Speaker-System/dp/B00062QY5W/ref=dp_return_2?ie=UTF8&n=172282&s=electronics (the little brother of the ones Brasky mentioned, which are $200+)

http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Speaker-System-Subwoofer-Black/dp/B000AM6QHE/ref=pd_cp_pc_1

http://www.amazon.com/Altec-Lansing-VS4121-Powered-System/dp/B000TMI07O/ref=dp_return_1?ie=UTF8&n=172282&s=electronics
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 27, 2009, 09:03:41 PM
I don't need them to be portable at all.   Extra power cables aren't a problem-- better sound is the preference, with budget as the constraint. 

Thanks for the suggestions....looks like I'll need to decide from amongst the three that rabidfurby suggested.  Bose, Logitech, and Altec Lansing are all reliable brands so far as I know....
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 27, 2009, 09:15:11 PM
Don't let the size fool you - those microspeakers pack nice sound.  And opt for a system with the bass cube, it makes an enormous difference.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: rabidfurby on October 27, 2009, 11:12:30 PM
Yep, you want a subwoofer. It sounds like you're tired of your laptop speakers, and a huge part of their tinny sound is the lack of bass.

Those 3 I posted aren't your only choices, just a couple that jumped out at me. Your best bet is to look here:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/electronics/559928/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_e_1_4_last

Those are the bestselling 2.1 speakers (2 speakers and a subwoofer, which for what you want is the best setup) on Amazon. Pick one from that list with a lot of positive reviews and you most likely won't be disappointed.

If you're willing to go a bit above your price range, these are #2 on the list above, and have 423 reviews, 90% of which are 4 or 5 stars. And they look damn cool.

(http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/6206/4116yt828dlss500.jpg)

http://www.amazon.com/Harman-SoundSticks-II-Multimedia-Speaker/dp/B0001DBEM4/ref=dp_return_2?ie=UTF8&n=172282&s=electronics
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 27, 2009, 11:15:32 PM
If you're willing to go a bit above your price range, these are #2 on the list above, and have 423 reviews, 90% of which are 4 or 5 stars. And they look damn cool.

Reminds me of a jellyfish.  Yes, they do look very cool, but I ended up going with these (http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Speaker-System-Z523-Black/dp/B002FU5QMK/ref=dp_ob_title_ce), which are a newer version of the Logitech speakers you recommended.  Thanks for the advice.   :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: fatcat on October 28, 2009, 10:20:32 PM
My brother works as an audio engineer and he says these are about the best you can get for amateur budjets.

http://www.dv247.com/studio-equipment/alesis-m1-active-520-active-studio-monitors-pair--30394 (http://www.dv247.com/studio-equipment/alesis-m1-active-520-active-studio-monitors-pair--30394)

Subwoofers are an audio false economy. You might get alot of bass out of them, but you're not actually getting a real good depth of frequencies. If you actually isolate each speaker, all you're getting from the subwoofer is dull thuds, and all you're getting from the little speakers is the same tinny shit you get with a $10 pair of budjet shit, though brought together they can sound somewhat passable.

There really is no substitute for size when it comes to good speakers. The size of the speaker is directly proportional to the range of frequencies it can (clearly) produce at one time.

Granted, most people can't tell the difference between a high grade system, and something thats just made to sound like a high grade system, but if you really care about sound quality, specifically for music listening, you want a good quality pair of active monitors like the ones I linked to, with a decent speaker size and a decent amount of power drain.

If you just want cinema style booming audio, then .1 subwoofer systems are great. Logitech are generally for the gaming / home cinema crowd, who really don't want much more than something that sounds impressive.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 28, 2009, 10:49:46 PM
Dude.  Those are monitors.  You'd need to jack them into a receiver-amp, and run a patch cord from the lappy audio-out and treat it like a stereo component. 

She just wants to hear the computer play some tunes and vids on a 17 inch screen.  Not that big a deal.  You need to be sitting five feet from the screen, or less.  Microspeakers and a bass cube works fine for that. 

If it was a home stereo set-up with big screen, 5.1 surround, I'd agree with you.  Those would probably make decent rears.  But that is not a practical application for a laptop. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 28, 2009, 11:02:07 PM
I love my Yamaha MSP5's:

http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Yamaha-MSP5-STUDIO-Powered-Studio-Monitor?sku=600116
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 29, 2009, 04:24:55 PM
Incidentally, the speakers showed up today.  So, two days after order.  Way to go, Amazon!  Pretty sure I ordered through the freetalklive link, too...

Umm, am I supposed to put the subwoofer on the desk or the floor?

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/newspeakers2.jpg)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 29, 2009, 04:28:48 PM
Sub goes on the floor, it'll drown out the highs when watching/listening stuff with more delicate sounds, dialogue and twinklebells will be borked.  

Nice desk.  

Also, you're a lefty, eh?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 29, 2009, 04:49:51 PM
Sub goes on the floor, it'll drown out the highs when watching/listening stuff with more delicate sounds, dialogue and twinklebells will be borked.  

Nice desk.  

Also, you're a lefty, eh?

Cool, and thanks.  The desk belonged to the stripper who lived in the last house before we did.  Can't believe she didn't want it!  Only thing is that it doesn't have much storage, so I use the silver box and hooks for camera, scanner, tripod, headphones, etc. 

Yep, lefty.  I can use the mouse with my right hand, but would rather lift a drink with it.   :)  Left hand is better for taking notes on whatever. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 29, 2009, 05:15:18 PM
New question: I got a marriage proposal today (http://watchdogblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/10/texas-law-you-can-show-porn-to.html) for defending the legality of showing porn to children.  Is that awesome or terrible?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on October 29, 2009, 05:26:12 PM
New question: I got a marriage proposal today (http://watchdogblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/10/texas-law-you-can-show-porn-to.html) for defending the legality of showing porn to children.  Is that awesome or terrible?

I hope that means he loves your capable mind - as do the rest of us. If he is inappropriately showing porn to children then I suspect he would fail to win your heart and succeed in getting himself ostracized.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 29, 2009, 05:47:11 PM
Gretchen? Why am I not surprised?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 29, 2009, 07:04:34 PM
Gretchen? Why am I not surprised?

Yeah, I've got a name.  What?  What? 

 :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on October 29, 2009, 08:42:20 PM
Dude.  Those are monitors.  You'd need to jack them into a receiver-amp, and run a patch cord from the lappy audio-out and treat it like a stereo component. 

She just wants to hear the computer play some tunes and vids on a 17 inch screen.  Not that big a deal.  You need to be sitting five feet from the screen, or less.  Microspeakers and a bass cube works fine for that. 

If it was a home stereo set-up with big screen, 5.1 surround, I'd agree with you.  Those would probably make decent rears.  But that is not a practical application for a laptop. 

They're powered so you don't need an amp/receiver.  All you have to do is convert the 3.5mm stereo plug from your laptop to RCA (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000GUTP2S/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_2?pf_rd_p=486539851&pf_rd_s=lpo-top-stripe-1&pf_rd_t=201&pf_rd_i=B000A3GPIS&pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=04BK4WPDGKPX28PF1JCK) and then get RCA->TRS cables (http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/TRS202).  I do this with my M-Audio BX-5a/BX-10s monitors/subwoofer (though they use TS cables, not TRS like those Alesis apparently do).  It takes a couple minutes to track down the cables, but the sound and quality is worth it, IMO.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 29, 2009, 08:56:42 PM
Gretchen? Why am I not surprised?

Yeah, I've got a name.  What?  What? 

 :lol:

It just seems so...fitting. I don't know why. Not in a bad way.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 29, 2009, 11:35:08 PM
Dude.  Those are monitors.  You'd need to jack them into a receiver-amp, and run a patch cord from the lappy audio-out and treat it like a stereo component. 

She just wants to hear the computer play some tunes and vids on a 17 inch screen.  Not that big a deal.  You need to be sitting five feet from the screen, or less.  Microspeakers and a bass cube works fine for that. 

If it was a home stereo set-up with big screen, 5.1 surround, I'd agree with you.  Those would probably make decent rears.  But that is not a practical application for a laptop. 
...the sound and quality is worth it, IMO.

It's still 2.1

A modest improvement on something that is sufficient and adequate.  

I'm sure you've seen the wicked shit, lets not confuse the two.  If you want premium sound, you need to do it a little differently.  

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on October 30, 2009, 12:45:04 AM
Dude.  Those are monitors.  You'd need to jack them into a receiver-amp, and run a patch cord from the lappy audio-out and treat it like a stereo component. 

She just wants to hear the computer play some tunes and vids on a 17 inch screen.  Not that big a deal.  You need to be sitting five feet from the screen, or less.  Microspeakers and a bass cube works fine for that. 

If it was a home stereo set-up with big screen, 5.1 surround, I'd agree with you.  Those would probably make decent rears.  But that is not a practical application for a laptop. 
...the sound and quality is worth it, IMO.

It's still 2.1

A modest improvement on something that is sufficient and adequate. 

I'm sure you've seen the wicked shit, lets not confuse the two.  If you want premium sound, you need to do it a little differently. 



I wouldn't trash 2.1.  That's what they use in recording studios and unless you're watching movies and have really thought and effort into your speaker placement, room size, and seating position you get no real benefit from 5/6/7.1.  My M-Audio monitors and subwoofer are the low-end of professional-grade equipment, but the sound quality is noticeably better than my old Logitech 5.1 setup.  The Logitechs were the top of the line computer speakers (5.1, 500-watt, THX, all that jazz) but they are on a different plane from my M-Audio monitors which, even though they're "low-end", cost twice as much as the Logitechs.  The the monitors are made out of better material and produce a much more balanced sound.  Even though I lost 120 watts, each of the 3 speakers I do have is more powerful than its corresponding speaker on the 5.1 system...and they're physically larger and just better at reproducing sound.

I'd say that if you're not going to put a lot of time and energy into designing a home theater setup, 5.1 is probably a waste of space and you'd be better off getting a better quality 2.1 system.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 30, 2009, 02:03:29 AM

I'd say that if you're not going to put a lot of time and energy into designing a home theater setup, 5.1 is probably a waste of space and you'd be better off getting a better quality 2.1 system.

Snort.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on October 30, 2009, 08:14:07 AM
I've been running 5.1 since I bought my first computer speaker system, and I still use the same system.  Cheap Altec setup but I wired in my own 4 speakers.  The sub is the center and the sub.  It works great.  I can crank it to oblivion and it still sounds great.  If these things break I can't see myself going back to 2.1, no matter how good they are.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 02:26:21 PM
Bow hunting: is there a point, when you could be using a gun? 

[youtube=425,350]wt9pUraM4u4[/youtube].
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on November 03, 2009, 02:45:41 PM
Yes, because states won't allow you to hunt with a gun during certain times of the year.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 03, 2009, 02:46:36 PM
I think those arrows are cool because it enables a hunter to see where his shots go and thus improve his aim, determine where his arrow went, judge whether the shot was enough to kill the animal...

Yeah, hunting with a gun is more humane, but do people not argue that hunting with a bow is more of a sport?

Keep in mind that if you shoot with a bow or gun either way you can kill the animal or merely injure it.  I saw a lot of great shots in that video, as well as a few they shouldnt have attempted from what I could see. It was amazing the number of arrows that actually went straight through the animal.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 02:56:37 PM
I have very little knowledge of hunting in general.  But:

Yes, because states won't allow you to hunt with a gun during certain times of the year.

That's a good reason, in my view.

Yeah, hunting with a gun is more humane, but do people not argue that hunting with a bow is more of a sport?

That's a bad reason, in my view.

Quote
Keep in mind that if you shoot with a bow or gun either way you can kill the animal or merely injure it.

Yes, but if you're a lousy shot then you probably shouldn't be hunting in the first place.  They make targets for that sort of thing. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 03, 2009, 02:58:18 PM
Bow hunting: is there a point, when you could be using a gun? 

[youtube=425,350]wt9pUraM4u4[/youtube].

Yes. Bow hunting in general takes much more base level hunting skills. Depending on the quarry hours can be spent tracking, approaching, waiting and learning it's habits. A gun is crude. A bow is art.

While that video might appear shocking, even a hit from a rifle can send many animals running. It is the shock of getting shot. They usually will drop dead within a few feet if it was good clean well placed shot.

It is the worst feeling to have to track an injured animal over long distances. For me it is actually emotionally draining. That is why is it vital to be the best one can be by practicing with what ever you'll be hunting with prior to the actual hunt.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 03:06:26 PM
It is the worst feeling to have to track an injured animal over long distances. For me it is actually emotionally draining. That is why is it vital to be the best one can be by practicing with what ever you'll be hunting with prior to the actual hunt.

Never tracked an animal, but I can thoroughly agree with that.  I just think that, on the whole, "sport" or "art" are not good justifications for torturing an animal that you're hunting.  If you have a more effective way of hunting them that is also more humane, it seems like a no-brainer to use it.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 03, 2009, 04:14:03 PM
It is the worst feeling to have to track an injured animal over long distances. For me it is actually emotionally draining. That is why is it vital to be the best one can be by practicing with what ever you'll be hunting with prior to the actual hunt.

Never tracked an animal, but I can thoroughly agree with that.  I just think that, on the whole, "sport" or "art" are not good justifications for torturing an animal that you're hunting.  If you have a more effective way of hunting them that is also more humane, it seems like a no-brainer to use it.  

I hear what you are saying in regards to humane but on the flip side the animal has a far better chance of never getting killed when a hunter uses a bow. In my mind, a bow shows the animal more respect. I don't know it is hard to explain.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 04:49:04 PM
I hear what you are saying in regards to humane but on the flip side the animal has a far better chance of never getting killed when a hunter uses a bow. In mind, a bow shows the animal more respect. I don't know it is hard to explain.

If you want to honorably engage in combat with an animal, then I think you should fight a bear while armed with a dagger.  Animals for the most part do not possess projectile weapons, which means that shooting an animal is never the equivalent of besting them in combat, regardless of how inefficiently you do so.  The concern is not about animals dying; it's about their suffering-- you don't respect an animal more by making it suffer. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on November 03, 2009, 05:01:54 PM
If you want to talk about what is humane, factory farming is far worse than bow hunting.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Changed My Mind on November 03, 2009, 05:04:06 PM
it would be dishonorable to fight an animal without using every single bit of ingenuity that your species has created.   Deer are more advanced than other animals at certain athletic abilities.  Some species of animals are much smarter and have created tools to help them to survive.  A human denying the ability to use a gun is akin to a deer deciding not to use its antlers. 

If the deer could shoot a gun, it would. . . someday if it evolves enough, it will.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2009, 05:09:02 PM
Most of the people I know who are really "good" hunters - meaning they have an appreciation and respect for it - use a bow.  They may also use a rifle, but thats just so they can get an extra deer and more time in the woods.  Ask them all, most will answer they prefer the bow season.  Around here in Appalachia, the main quarry is deer.  Turkey comes a close second.  Boar is not really indigenous, you have to go into hunting preserves for that, where they are released for the hunt.  

The bow is practiced quite a bit before its taken out into the woods, unless the hunter is a fuckhead.  

When you sight in a bow, you use these little elevation pins on it, and put your target out about 20 to 40 yards.  40 is pushin' it, most hunters will sight for the 20ish yard range.  To put it into perspective, the trailer part of a tractor trailer is normally about 55 ft, about 20 yards.  You have to be pretty stealthy to be within that range from a deer.  A good shot with a bow could hit you in the face at that distance.  Thats a pretty good shot, staying well-inside a dinner plate.  The hunter will sit still, slowly draw, and fire.  They don't sneak up on it.  (boar are different, you have to chase them - theres no way you could ever chase down a healthy deer)

Anyway, it takes a bit of practice to do that.  They spend quite a few hours in their back yard.  A buddy 'o mine can hit targets consistently at 60 yards - albeit slightly larger, pizza box size.  His yard is an acre square, 200x200 - he can go out near the road and hit targets near his back fence.  In the woods, he still uses ~20+ yards.  Any further than that is not cool, in his opinion.

I don't hunt.  

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 05:18:58 PM
If you want to talk about what is humane, factory farming is far worse than bow hunting.

Oh, I agree.  However, I'm thinking about the most humane way to get meat, and don't really understand why somebody wouldn't hunt in the most humane way possible. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2009, 05:29:59 PM
I hear what you are saying in regards to humane but on the flip side the animal has a far better chance of never getting killed when a hunter uses a bow. In mind, a bow shows the animal more respect. I don't know it is hard to explain.

If you want to honorably engage in combat with an animal, then I think you should fight a bear while armed with a dagger.  Animals for the most part do not possess projectile weapons, which means that shooting an animal is never the equivalent of besting them in combat, regardless of how inefficiently you do so.  The concern is not about animals dying; it's about their suffering-- you don't respect an animal more by making it suffer. 

Humans are at the top of the food chain due to their ability to think and use tools.  The bow is a link to the old ways, even though its technologically superior to traditional bows.  Some guys do use a recurve bow, which hasn't changed in two thousand years.  Before there was written language, man was advancing away from brute force.  Using a hand-held tool would be stupid.  The projectile was developed to prevent injury to the hunter, which could often kill him through infection or trauma.  Severe injury to the primary hunter was a serious threat to the entire family group. 

Even the most primitive tribes on earth use projectiles.  Blow guns, spear-chucking sticks, sling-shots.  Sport is a carry-over of that skill.  Men like the competition of besting each other, as well as the animal.  If you want to use the sport argument, soccer was probably developed by conquering armies kicking around severed heads.  I see no reason to revert to tradition on that one, either.   
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2009, 05:39:14 PM
Umm, I didn't make an argument against hunting with projectiles.  I just think it's silly to consider it sport, since I think of sport as a voluntary engagement between individuals or groups of similar abilities.  

No, that's not true.  I think of worthwhile  sport as being like that.  The Predator alien hunting humans was sporting, but he was still a douche.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 03, 2009, 06:14:56 PM
I hear what you are saying in regards to humane but on the flip side the animal has a far better chance of never getting killed when a hunter uses a bow. In mind, a bow shows the animal more respect. I don't know it is hard to explain.

If you want to honorably engage in combat with an animal, then I think you should fight a bear while armed with a dagger.  Animals for the most part do not possess projectile weapons, which means that shooting an animal is never the equivalent of besting them in combat, regardless of how inefficiently you do so.  The concern is not about animals dying; it's about their suffering-- you don't respect an animal more by making it suffer.  

Yeah, I did not explain it right. Getting shot by a gun or an arrow is the same. Both with make an animal bolt if the shot does not hit the spinal system and make that impossible. Both hurt equally. The video is graphic and shows hunting in a bad way due to the fact each shot is follow in quick repetition with another. That does not happen when hunting. With bow hunting the shots are even more spread apart then when hunting with a gun.

Bow hunting sort of levels the playing field for non aggressive type animals and puts the sport back into the hunt. If the people that nearly wiped out the buffalo were armed with only bows, the carnage would have been far far less. A gun is a crude but extremely efficient way to hunt.

And a dagger vs. a bear is would not be much sport for the bear. How about a dagger, a pack of Jack Russells, some bear mace and heavy blunt long weapon? Now that would be sporting!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on November 03, 2009, 06:45:24 PM
And a dagger vs. a bear is would not be much sport for the bear. How about a dagger, a pack of Jack Russells, some bear mace and heavy blunt long weapon? Now that would be sporting!

LIBMAN!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 03, 2009, 07:03:05 PM
I also dont hunt but I took the hunter education/safety class and I live in WI and grew up shooting guns and on a farm. I think hunting is a waste of time, when we could be setting snares and dead-fall traps instead.  In a survival situation, which would you end up doing? Shoot animals and you will be wasting energy and time.

When you sight in a bow, you use these little elevation pins on it, and put your target out about 20 to 40 yards.  40 is pushin' it, most hunters will sight for the 20ish yard range.  To put it into perspective, the trailer part of a tractor trailer is normally about 55 ft, about 20 yards.  You have to be pretty stealthy to be within that range from a deer.  A good shot with a bow could hit you in the face at that distance.  Thats a pretty good shot, staying well-inside a dinner plate.  The hunter will sit still, slowly draw, and fire.  They don't sneak up on it.  (boar are different, you have to chase them - theres no way you could ever chase down a healthy deer)

I thought that in this video they made some excellent shots, but also some poor ones from way too far away that obviously missed.


Quote
While that video might appear shocking, even a hit from a rifle can send many animals running. It is the shock of getting shot. They usually will drop dead within a few feet if it was good clean well placed shot.

Yep. I only saw one deer in the video that went straight down. Typically they run a little bit and the internal damage kills them. Other times they bleed out and you follow the blood (which would suck).

Quote
the most humane way to get meat

Smash in its head with a log, or raise it on a deer farm.
(http://www.rewild.info/fieldguide/images/1/1d/Figure_Four.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on November 03, 2009, 07:16:42 PM
I haven't been listening much to FTL lately. If I was going to introduce somebody to the show is there a really good episode that has been on recently that one might share with a newcomer to get 'em hooked?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mikehz on November 04, 2009, 09:22:30 AM
Should cows be bred and then released into the forest for those who like to hunt for sport?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 04, 2009, 10:47:27 AM
Should cows be bred and then released into the forest for those who like to hunt for sport?

I'm pretty sure hunting a domesticated livestock animal in the forest would be even less sporting than hunting a deer. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 04, 2009, 11:00:59 AM
Should cows be bred and then released into the forest for those who like to hunt for sport?

If there is a market for it why not? Although, cows are rather stupid. I would not have an interest in "hunting" an animal that is used to being around people and not smart enough to raise its head out of the water after getting a drink.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 04, 2009, 12:28:16 PM
Did anybody watch "Out of the Wild: The Alaska Experiment"? 

That was an interesting show as hardly any of them had experience hunting, and they were set down in the middle of Alaska with winter coming and had to work their way to civilization.  By the end of it, the survivors (people had the option of dropping out if they couldn't take it) were all pretty good shots, but some days they had to settle for a ground squirrel or nothing.  Their snares didn't work, but I'm not sure if that was due to not using them correctly or not.  They hunted for bears, but the best they ever got were a couple of porcupines....apparently not that sporting, but when you're starving you'll take what you can get.  They had a "bear gun" and a .22, but I don't know what the "bear gun" was. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on November 04, 2009, 12:46:52 PM
Did anybody watch "Out of the Wild: The Alaska Experiment"? 

That was an interesting show as hardly any of them had experience hunting, and they were set down in the middle of Alaska with winter coming and had to work their way to civilization.  By the end of it, the survivors (people had the option of dropping out if they couldn't take it) were all pretty good shots, but some days they had to settle for a ground squirrel or nothing.  Their snares didn't work, but I'm not sure if that was due to not using them correctly or not.  They hunted for bears, but the best they ever got were a couple of porcupines....apparently not that sporting, but when you're starving you'll take what you can get.  They had a "bear gun" and a .22, but I don't know what the "bear gun" was. 

I watched it. Liked it. Came up in a discussion at my folks' over the summer. My mom had watched some and thought it was interesting, but my dad was so annoyed by the whole thing that he actually interrupted my mom to rant about the &*%$!# idiots... Said the most sensible two were the ones who actually knew what they were doing in the woods, and opted out early.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 04, 2009, 01:12:44 PM
I watched it. Liked it. Came up in a discussion at my folks' over the summer. My mom had watched some and thought it was interesting, but my dad was so annoyed by the whole thing that he actually interrupted my mom to rant about the &*%$!# idiots... Said the most sensible two were the ones who actually knew what they were doing in the woods, and opted out early.

I thought that was pretty cowardly, actually, considering that the others were for the most part listening to what they had to say.  "You guys don't know what you're doing, and I'm fed up" is a good cover for "I'm not as good at this as I thought I'd be." 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on November 04, 2009, 01:55:33 PM
I watched it. Liked it. Came up in a discussion at my folks' over the summer. My mom had watched some and thought it was interesting, but my dad was so annoyed by the whole thing that he actually interrupted my mom to rant about the &*%$!# idiots... Said the most sensible two were the ones who actually knew what they were doing in the woods, and opted out early.

I thought that was pretty cowardly, actually, considering that the others were for the most part listening to what they had to say.  "You guys don't know what you're doing, and I'm fed up" is a good cover for "I'm not as good at this as I thought I'd be." 

That's what I thought, but my dad said, especially in the case of the older lady, that it was a case of not being responsible for a bunch of yahoos who didn't even have the decency to save her a nibble of the field mice they caught while she was out hunting. That knowing what to do meant they'd be expected to carry everyone else in the group... and that the remaining members learned faster without the experienced two there, because they had no choice.

I don't know if I agree with him. I understood it, as it made me think about how tough it is to get my kids to do things for themselves while I'm around.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 04, 2009, 03:00:00 PM
That's what I thought, but my dad said, especially in the case of the older lady, that it was a case of not being responsible for a bunch of yahoos who didn't even have the decency to save her a nibble of the field mice they caught while she was out hunting.

Yes, that was really rude of them. 

Quote
That knowing what to do meant they'd be expected to carry everyone else in the group... and that the remaining members learned faster without the experienced two there, because they had no choice.

I don't know if I agree with him. I understood it, as it made me think about how tough it is to get my kids to do things for themselves while I'm around.

I think they really had no choice anyway-- they were desperate from the start.  Just because people can learn by doing doesn't mean a teacher won't help.  It would suck to be a good hunter and have to share your kills with people who are not good hunters, but on the other hand, the experienced people didn't actually catch or shoot anything, from what I recall.    I guess I would buy your dad's position more if the experienced people had shot a bear or something and then everybody else had eaten off it while not getting any food themselves. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 16, 2009, 01:11:07 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/06/guest-works-urban-chickens-inv.html) about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community.  

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like:  

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on November 16, 2009, 01:15:54 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community. 

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like: 

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."

What are you gonna do if you do win?   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 16, 2009, 01:21:34 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community. 

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like: 

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."

What are you gonna do if you do win?   :lol:

I have no idea.  That's probably why I won't actually do it.   :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on November 16, 2009, 01:28:59 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community. 

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like: 

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."

What are you gonna do if you do win?   :lol:

I have no idea.  That's probably why I won't actually do it.   :)

Darn.  I was kind of hoping you would do it and document it for us.  Kind of like Julia did when she ran for whatever in New Hampshire.  Oh Well.  If it helps any I'd vote for you if I lived there.   :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 16, 2009, 07:38:11 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/06/guest-works-urban-chickens-inv.html) about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community.  

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like:  

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."

Fight the good fight I say. The outcome is not as important as long as you tried to cross along the high road.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on November 16, 2009, 07:46:13 PM
Today a guy approached me while in line to check out at the supermarket, axes me if I will be paying in cash. I say no. He pauses, then leans in really close and tells me that his car has run out of gas, that he needs some cash and would like to pay for my groceries with his food stamps card if I'll give him the cash. I repeat that I have none and wish him luck. He axes me again, more aggressively, so I say no again, more aggressively. He leaves, approaching none of the billions of others there doing their Thanksgiving shopping.

I did have cash, but I also had my daughter with me. With her there I didn't want to make any sort of deal that would probably lead us to meet the guy out in the parking lot where I hand him money.

Even though it's fraud I suppose, I wouldn't mind swapping cash for groceries- none of my business what the other person needed the cash for. Could be that the card was stolen and he wanted me to swipe it- dunno. I didn't make the deal because he was sketchy and pushy.

Would any of you made a deal like this?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 16, 2009, 08:09:11 PM
Today a guy approached me while in line to check out at the supermarket, axes me if I will be paying in cash. I say no. He pauses, then leans in really close and tells me that his car has run out of gas, that he needs some cash and would like to pay for my groceries with his food stamps card if I'll give him the cash. I repeat that I have none and wish him luck. He axes me again, more aggressively, so I say no again, more aggressively. He leaves, approaching none of the billions of others there doing their Thanksgiving shopping.

I did have cash, but I also had my daughter with me. With her there I didn't want to make any sort of deal that would probably lead us to meet the guy out in the parking lot where I hand him money.

Even though it's fraud I suppose, I wouldn't mind swapping cash for groceries- none of my business what the other person needed the cash for. Could be that the card was stolen and he wanted me to swipe it- dunno. I didn't make the deal because he was sketchy and pushy.

Would any of you made a deal like this?



Entrapment if he is a cop.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on November 16, 2009, 08:18:05 PM

Would any of you made a deal like this?



I don't trust people off the street like that, as a general rule. He is up to something sketchy to begin with and you are taking somewhat of a risk by being a part of it. With no real benefit to you, except a warm fuzzy feeling inside that you helped someone out. He could have been a good guy, but it is too bad for him that others have taken advantage of people's general kindheartedness.

It is too bad really. I hope I'm never in that situation.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on November 16, 2009, 08:18:19 PM
My city council member (that is, the city council member for my district) has resigned. (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/11/special-election-to-decide-pla.html)  That's kind of unfortunate because she was probably the best member of the council....which, yes, is not saying much at all.  It basically means that she was the only one to respond to me when I contacted the entire council about an issue of concern, and then later wrote a blog post (http://planoblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/06/guest-works-urban-chickens-inv.html) about it supposedly inviting discussion from the community. 

I'm thinking maybe I should run for her spot.  There's no way in hell I would win, of course, but it might be fun.  I'm thinking something like: 

"Hey everybody, I live in Place 3, and you should vote for me.  I'm 31, libertarian bordering on anarcho-capitalist, and have a PhD.  If elected, I hereby promise to vote for absolutely no tax increase that comes before me, ever.  When given the opportunity, I will vote in favor of any measure which reduces....any other measure.  You might ask why a person opposed to government would run for office, but I think Plato was onto something when he said that one of the penalties for not participating in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.  If that's not enough to convince you to elect me, then you don't deserve to have me elected."

That's probably not going to get people to vote for you, so why not? :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on November 16, 2009, 08:19:28 PM

Would any of you made a deal like this?



I don't trust people off the street like that, as a general rule. He is up to something sketchy to begin with and you are taking somewhat of a risk by being a part of it. With no real benefit to you, except a warm fuzzy feeling inside that you helped someone out. He could have been a good guy, but it is too bad for him that others have taken advantage of people's general kindheartedness.

It is too bad really. I hope I'm never in that situation.

I'm with you.  I would not do this.  You have no idea what their reasons are and it's best to just stay uninvolved.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 16, 2009, 08:47:22 PM
Shoulda told him 4:1 for the deal.  A hundred on the card equals $25 in cash.  Most fraudsters are fine with 2:1 and 3:1 is not uncommon with drug dealers.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 16, 2009, 10:12:23 PM
I bet he was either a cop looking for entrapment or a crackhead looking for his next fix.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 16, 2009, 10:31:09 PM
I bet he was either a cop looking for entrapment or a crackhead looking for his next fix.

I donno man, probly a scummer.  Welfare has their own cops, they're suit investigator guys.  They get sent on assignment to investigate people who are ratted out for fraud-type stuff, like having extra people living in the house which changes the income ratio in the household. 

Trolling for people to agree sounds very extreme, I've never heard of that.  Not saying it couldn't happen, though. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on November 17, 2009, 01:00:34 AM
He didn't appear poor at all, the opposite actually- matching outfit, snazzy hat.. the whole get up. He didn't look like he was jonesin' either.. beats me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on November 17, 2009, 01:03:30 AM
Maybe he's buyin them from the Jonesin crowd at 3:1 and trying to sell them at 3:2 to make a profit. This could be a whole business for him.

Still, best not get involved. At the very least, you are assuming potential risk and helping along transactions in your stolen money.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 17, 2009, 01:13:07 AM
Guns.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 17, 2009, 01:14:59 AM
Shoulda stabbed him a few times quick in the belly, propped him up against the candy rack, paid for your shit with his card, then put it back in his hand and went on your merry way.  He had it comin'.  

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 17, 2009, 01:15:54 AM
He didn't appear poor at all, the opposite actually- matching outfit, snazzy hat.. the whole get up. He didn't look like he was jonesin' either.. beats me.
lol @ the snazzy hat.  I've always wanted one of those.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on November 17, 2009, 01:52:12 AM
Shoulda stabbed him a few times quick in the belly, propped him up against the candy rack, paid for your shit with his card, then put it back in his hand and went on your merry way.  He had it comin'.  



Hindsight!

I think Tuttle hit it with his stolen money comment.

He wore something like this:
(http://www.urbanboundaries.com/v/vspfiles/photos/hipf07-dice-2T.jpg)

Me.. I wear one like this, have had the same one since the 90's:
(https://earlandbrothers.co.uk/images/BrownOvercheck3543.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 17, 2009, 01:59:58 AM
Andrew Dice Gay.  

I never could pull off your kind, H.B.    I'm more of a vietnam crush hat kinda guy.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on November 17, 2009, 01:19:25 PM

Me.. I wear one like this, have had the same one since the 90's:


Ew!

 :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 01:50:50 PM
I like flat caps.  I don't wear one, because it would look stupid on me-- all hats look stupid on me.  But they can look pretty good on some people. 

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2241/2162134195_1748d02877.jpg)

Hot.

How To Wear A Flat Cap And Not Look Like A Twat (http://www.daveknapik.com/2007/12/14/how-to-wear-a-flat-cap-and-not-look-like-a-twat/comment-page-2/)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 17, 2009, 03:04:10 PM
My step son came home with a "man purse". Does this mean he is gay?

Any advice on controlling by inner bully to keep from punching him, taking the purse and throwing it in the mud?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 03:12:44 PM
My step son came home with a "man purse". Does this mean he is gay?

What needing additional storage space for one's stuff while walking around has to do with attraction to people of the same sex, I'll never know.  It's a mystery to me why men haven't always carried purses. 

Quote
Any advice on controlling by inner bully to keep from punching him, taking the purse and throwing it in the mud?

Wear a straight jacket, I guess?  Seek psychiatric help?   Throw yourself in the mud instead?  Play Grand Theft Auto for a while? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 03:47:53 PM
It's a mystery to me why men haven't always carried purses.  

Real men can fit everything they need in life into 3 pockets.

Bosh.  

Contents of my purse: pens (3), small notepad, passport (sometimes), wallet, small bottle of hand sanitizer, packet of tissues, mirror, iPod classic, Advil, Immodium, keys, 40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication), voter registration card, compact umbrella, tampons (3), packet of fruit snacks, dental floss, Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), hair ties, chapstick, magnesium fire-starter, toothbrush, USB drive, coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), pretty marble, sturdy plastic bag.  On occasion, a small paperback.

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on November 17, 2009, 04:03:32 PM
Contents of my purse: pens (3), small notepad, passport (sometimes), wallet, small bottle of hand sanitizer, packet of tissues, mirror, iPod classic, Advil, Immodium, keys, 40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication), voter registration card, compact umbrella, tampons (3), packet of fruit snacks, dental floss, Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), hair ties, chapstick, magnesium fire-starter, toothbrush, USB drive, coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), pretty marble, sturdy plastic bag.  On occasion, a small paperback.

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!

I question the necessity of the voter registration card.  And the chapstick.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 04:05:58 PM
Contents of my purse: pens (3), small notepad, passport (sometimes), wallet, small bottle of hand sanitizer, packet of tissues, mirror, iPod classic, Advil, Immodium, keys, 40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication), voter registration card, compact umbrella, tampons (3), packet of fruit snacks, dental floss, Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), hair ties, chapstick, magnesium fire-starter, toothbrush, USB drive, coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), pretty marble, sturdy plastic bag.  On occasion, a small paperback.

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!

I question the necessity of the voter registration card.  And the chapstick.

I get chapped lips easily.  Guilty on the other one-- I wanted to vote for Kinky Friedman for governor.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 17, 2009, 05:19:13 PM
It's a mystery to me why men haven't always carried purses.  

Real men can fit everything they need in life into 3 pockets.

Bosh.  

Contents of my purse:
pens (3), -[ Men remember what needs remembering with no need to write it down for future reference.  
small notepad, - Same as above. Women's phones numbers can be written on ones palm. The symbolism is obvious.
passport (sometimes), - Only need that when traveling. Can be carried in hand.  
wallet, - - Back or in questionable environments front pockets.
small bottle of hand sanitizer, - Real men have no fear of germs.
packet of tissues, - Snot on the floor in quick focused blow.
mirror, - Bathroom mirrors are enough.  
iPod classic, - Attach to belt.
Advil, - Headaches can be endured until gone or near a medicine cabinet.  
Immodium, - Not even sure what this is.
keys, - Front pocket or attached to belt via chain.  
40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication),
voter registration card, - Wallet.
compact umbrella, - It's only water. Real men scoff at umbrellas.
tampons (3), - Never a need to carry.  
packet of fruit snacks, - Nearest vending machine.  
dental floss, - Good to have near but does not need to be carried until needed.
Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), - Again, not even sure what this is so is not needed.  
hair ties, - The Roman centurion is popular these days so need for these.  
chapstick, - Can be obtained via transference kissing cheerleader types.  
magnesium fire-starter, - Good one. Lighter in the front pocket or breast pocket along with smokes.
toothbrush, - Good to have nearby, only carried on way to restroom.  
USB drive, - Front pocket.
coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), - Pockets.
pretty marble, - Less attracted to pretty shinny objects so less likely to have need to carry one.  
sturdy plastic bag.  - In cabinet or drawer.  
On occasion, a small paperback. - To busy doing something manly to read.  

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!

Mostly I am joking about the whole subject. 90% joking / 10% concerned.

While I can see a woman needing these things in your purse, men have been conditioned to move about with less. Might be the reason why men seem better at attapting to and making use of thier enviroment.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 05:28:31 PM
Mostly I am joking about the whole subject. 90% joking / 10% concerned.

And it was funny!  But why be concerned?  Also, I included a link to what a Leatherman micra is, you lazy git.

Quote
While I can see a woman needing these things in your purse, men have been conditioned to move about with less. Might be the reason why men seem better at attapting to and making use of thier enviroment.  

Riiiiiiggghhht.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on November 17, 2009, 06:36:35 PM
It's a mystery to me why men haven't always carried purses.  

Real men can fit everything they need in life into 3 pockets.

Bosh.  

Contents of my purse: pens (3), small notepad, passport (sometimes), wallet, small bottle of hand sanitizer, packet of tissues, mirror, iPod classic, Advil, Immodium, keys, 40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication), voter registration card, compact umbrella, tampons (3), packet of fruit snacks, dental floss, Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), hair ties, chapstick, magnesium fire-starter, toothbrush, USB drive, coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), pretty marble, sturdy plastic bag.  On occasion, a small paperback.

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!

My wife carries a HUGE purse. I often tease her and call it her luggage.  :) But she does not have much stuff in it.  I think it is in case of an emergency, she could use it as a life raft.

I carry my phone (left pocket), keys (right pocket), and wallet (right back pocket).  If I did carry a bag everywhere I went I would likely put a bunch of crap I don't really need on a day to day basis in there. You know... man stuff, repel rope, straight razor for 5 o'clock shadow, Micky Mantle Rookie card, a pretty marble...  :P :)

What would be in your Man Bag?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 17, 2009, 06:52:09 PM
What would be in your Man Bag?

Well, here's the purse:
(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/greenpurse.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 17, 2009, 07:06:53 PM
A man has to know when its appropriate to carry more shit, or he will devolve into a poofball.  

I carry my wad of money in a clip, no wallet.  Cell phone.  Smokes and lighter.  Keys with my little micro-flashlight (Michigan trip).  Shades.  Cyanide capsule.  

I will procure other necessities as the situation demands.  If the need arises to carry more shit, I may carry a metal briefcase just because it looks totally awesome and manly. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on November 17, 2009, 07:24:46 PM
A leatherman is a nice knife that has multiple tools on it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 17, 2009, 07:26:30 PM
Pen in one side pocket, phone in other, wallet in back, keys in jacket.  If I cant carry in my hands whats left then it goes in a backpack or briefcase.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on November 17, 2009, 10:01:31 PM
Sometimes I wear a jacket just so I have extra pockets and don't have to stuff everything into my pants pockets and create bulges/uncomfortableness.  I always carry my wallet, keys, and cell phone.  The keys are annoying, but that's doable with pockets alone.  However, if I add my MP3 player, and work ID/access cards, pockets don't do the trick.  Sunglasses are also annoying when you only have pockets to use.  The only thing to do is to put them up on your head when not in use.  I refuse to clip them to my shirt.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on November 17, 2009, 10:29:17 PM
I carry a Gerber Multi-Plier 600 Demolition Explosive Technician Tool (http://toolmonger.com/2007/10/24/dealmonger-gerber-demolition-explosive-technicians-tool-for-79/) on my riggers belt (http://www.tacticaltailor.com/riggersbelt.aspx), cus you never know when you will need blasting cap crimpers, or a C-4 punch. There is also a handcuff key and several small rare earth magnets on the belt. Inside the waistband holster would be on the belt if I was going to carry.

I carry my cash in a knife money clip (http://www.premiumknives.com/ShopSite/CRKT_Columbia_River_Knife_Tool_K_I_S_S_in_the_Dark_Plain-Partially_Serrated.html) in the back left pocket. I also keep receipts and notes in that pocket, and sometimes a safety pin or paper clip. Keys go in the other back pocket if I go from the car into a store or some shit like that. I only use sunglasses in the car, so they stay there.

Front right pocket has a 4" blade folding knife clipped to it. Front left has my wallet (http://www.maxpedition.com/store/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=86&idcategory=11)(it's pretty small, has my DL, credit/bank cards and a spare car key), a couple USB keys, any coins I have, a pen, and maybe a sharpie.

I usually have a couple dog-shit bags (http://1085427100.) in the left leg cargo pocket if I have cargo pants on.

I carry a laptop in a backpack when I go to "work". Lots of shit in the backpack. Work badge, passport, analog notebook, pens, USB to serial DB-9 thingy, ethernet cable, some other computer shit, trail mix. I think it still has a t-shirt and some marketing material in it(free backpack from a "trade show").There used to be a small video camera, but I let my kids use it, and they broke it. I haven't had to wear a jacket in TX, so whatever was in my jacket is now in the backpack.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 18, 2009, 02:05:02 AM
Sunglasses are also annoying when you only have pockets to use.  The only thing to do is to put them up on your head when not in use.  I refuse to clip them to my shirt.

Oh crap, is clipping sunglasses to a shirt a dork move?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 18, 2009, 03:55:19 AM
It's a mystery to me why men haven't always carried purses.  

Real men can fit everything they need in life into 3 pockets.

Bosh.  

Contents of my purse: pens (3), small notepad, passport (sometimes), wallet, small bottle of hand sanitizer, packet of tissues, mirror, iPod classic, Advil, Immodium, keys, 40mg propranolol (anti-anxiety medication), voter registration card, compact umbrella, tampons (3), packet of fruit snacks, dental floss, Leatherman micra (http://www.leatherman.com/multi-tools/keychain-tools/micra.aspx), hair ties, chapstick, magnesium fire-starter, toothbrush, USB drive, coins of various currencies (hmm, should clean the purse out), pretty marble, sturdy plastic bag.  On occasion, a small paperback.

Now you try and tell me that any of that is anything other than absolutely necessary!

Bah! All you really need is your towel.

No pockets needed for a towel. Thats what shoulders are for. It is truly the essential item.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 18, 2009, 05:06:15 AM
 



Bah! All you really need is your towel.

No pockets needed for a towel. Thats what shoulders are for. It is truly the essential item.

Quite right. I don't know what I would do without my shoulders.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 29, 2009, 01:50:48 AM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on November 29, 2009, 02:02:28 AM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

That's tough because there are so many variations on a good burger. I really like the Whiskey River BBQ burger at Red Robin. I am also very fond of the burgers at Ruby's here in SoCal - my favorite there is the "Bleus Burger".
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 29, 2009, 04:24:52 AM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

The restaurant I work at  : D

Stinky burger recipe:

Burger meat, salt and pepper'd, grilled to perfection, lathered with minced garlic, then topped with melted blue cheese, warm onion rings, lettuce tomato onion, and a toasted bun.

Cowboy burger recipe:

Burger meat, salt and pepper'd, grilled to perfection, one layer of crispy hot bacon, a hidden layer of barbecue sauce, melted cheddar cheese to hold in and conceal the bbq, then LTO and a bun.

YUM
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 29, 2009, 10:55:23 PM
Is the fact that I can win a game of Jeopardy! at home bad?

I think knowing stuff is fun but to the point where I can beat the contestants on TV might be too far. Your thoughts.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 30, 2009, 10:21:59 AM
Is the fact that I can win a game of Jeopardy! at home bad?

I think knowing stuff is fun but to the point where I can beat the contestants on TV might be too far. Your thoughts.

I think you should go on Jeopardy. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on December 04, 2009, 09:54:28 PM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

Five Guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Guys).  It's a small chain in DC, though there are now two (that I know of) in Chicago and there may be others elsewhere.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 04, 2009, 11:11:44 PM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

Five Guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Guys).  It's a small chain in DC, though there are now two (that I know of) in Chicago and there may be others elsewhere.

Theres one a few miles down the road.  Everybody raved.  I'm not really interested. 

The best burgers I've had usually came from places I liked to go.  One was a corner bar I used to haunt, I'd dream of those burgers.  Nothing special in the wide-world of burgers, as far as burgers go, but they were my burgers.  They came in a little plastic basket, with a nice pile of fries.  You'd probably hate them.  I got mine for free, sometimes.  Tom probably wouldn't sell you one for double, bust ya over the head with a Mag-Lite, throw ya out for askin'. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 04, 2009, 11:12:53 PM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

Five Guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Guys).  It's a small chain in DC, though there are now two (that I know of) in Chicago and there may be others elsewhere.

There are tons of them around.  A girl that worked for me a few years back ended up leaving the company to work for them in Florida.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on December 05, 2009, 11:07:39 AM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

Five Guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Guys).  It's a small chain in DC, though there are now two (that I know of) in Chicago and there may be others elsewhere.

There are tons of them around.  A girl that worked for me a few years back ended up leaving the company to work for them in Florida. 

Interesting.  Wikipedia says they started franchising them, so I guess that explains it.  I have never been to any of the non-original ones, so I don't know how different they are.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 05, 2009, 09:12:24 PM
What restaurant made the best (restaurant) burger you've ever had?

Five Guys (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Guys).  It's a small chain in DC, though there are now two (that I know of) in Chicago and there may be others elsewhere.

There are tons of them around.  A girl that worked for me a few years back ended up leaving the company to work for them in Florida. 

Interesting.  Wikipedia says they started franchising them, so I guess that explains it.  I have never been to any of the non-original ones, so I don't know how different they are.

I'm not sure, I didn't investigate it too much, but I've also never eaten there. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 06, 2009, 01:05:56 PM
Oh of course, vastly different at each one.  Everyone knows when you buy a franchise, you just buy the name and start serving whatever the fuck you want.  The one here is built like a native american sweat lodge, and all they sell is ham salad on a cracker.  I don't think its gonna last. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on December 06, 2009, 01:34:38 PM
Oh of course, vastly different at each one.  Everyone knows when you buy a franchise, you just buy the name and start serving whatever the fuck you want.  The one here is built like a native american sweat lodge, and all they sell is ham salad on a cracker.  I don't think its gonna last. 



Well, the three that I have been to in the NoVA area are fairly different as far as the atmosphere is concerned.  The food is mostly the same, though one of them doesn't offer the unlimited in-shell peanuts that you can eat/throw all over the floor.  One also has a really cool message board (a combo of a real-life version of Craigslist and comment cards/whatever), and a scary bathroom.  The food was pretty much the same at all three of them, though.  As you said, atmosphere matters.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 06, 2009, 08:05:41 PM
Innovative. 

I was at a restaurant/bar once where the barmaid blew me in the bathroom.   And they had ice in the urinals!  Couldn't throw your peanut shells around, though.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on December 06, 2009, 08:09:53 PM
And they had ice in the urinals!

What's the point of that, now?  Is body temperature piss verboten?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 06, 2009, 08:25:04 PM
When they fill one of those big buckets, then come out front and fill the ice wells under the chrome lids, they just dump the rest in the pissers.  If you throw a half-bucket of wet ice back in the icemaker, it'll freeze in a big chunk. 

But it looks fancy, and guys are endlessly amused with penis games.  Melting cubes and whatnot.  We're apes, you know this.  Its a natural fit.  I don't know a single guy who wouldn't be privately delighted to find the xanadu of ice in the pisser. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on December 07, 2009, 03:39:48 PM
What's a good Christmas gift for an anarcho-capitalist male?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on December 07, 2009, 04:32:18 PM
A stateless society.  Or possibly a urinal.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 07, 2009, 06:51:58 PM
What's a good Christmas gift for an anarcho-capitalist male?

Great question.  I'm having a hard time finding something for teh Jizzy. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 07, 2009, 08:25:18 PM
If he's into guns and you have a few normal ones like most people do, shotgun, deer rifle, and a pistol or two.. 

Get him a tactical urban weapon, like a mini-14 with the plastic stocks and all that.  The regs would probably know better prices $600 is about right, I believe.  I'm not a gun nut, but if my chick got me that, hooboy.  I'd be blown away.  That may be more than you might want to part with, but its not really insane.  Its just kinda, not cheap.  First year in the new house if I recall, its been a big year.  Something like that may be in order, if you'll excuse my sayin' so.  Besides, its just completely badass, and flies in the face of religious holiday conformity. 

This one is brand new, ships from a dealer with good feedback.  You'd have to get it shipped to a licensed firearm guy on your end, show ID and fill out a paper.

http://www.gunsamerica.com/978293734/Guns/Rifles/Ruger-Rifles/Mini-14-Type/GB_RUGER_MINI_14_GB.htm
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on December 07, 2009, 08:36:08 PM
If he's into guns and you have a few normal ones like most people do, shotgun, deer rifle, and a pistol or two.. 

Get him a tactical urban weapon, like a mini-14 with the plastic stocks and all that.  The regs would probably know better prices $600 is about right, I believe.  I'm not a gun nut, but if my chick got me that, hooboy.  I'd be blown away.  That may be more than you might want to part with, but its not really insane.  Its just kinda, not cheap.  First year in the new house if I recall, its been a big year.  Something like that may be in order, if you'll excuse my sayin' so.  Besides, its just completely badass, and flies in the face of religious holiday conformity. 

This one is brand new, ships from a dealer with good feedback.  You'd have to get it shipped to a licensed firearm guy on your end, show ID and fill out a paper.

http://www.gunsamerica.com/978293734/Guns/Rifles/Ruger-Rifles/Mini-14-Type/GB_RUGER_MINI_14_GB.htm

That's a good suggestion, but I should've mentioned that I do not have much money right now.  I was thinking of something under $100 or so.  He's definitely into guns though, so I'll have to file that away for his birthday next year. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 07, 2009, 08:48:40 PM
Understood. 

I'll be honest, I draw a blank when I think for myself.  I don't really want anything in the normal realm of "stuff".  However, we don't look at tools like chicks do.  We actually like them.  Get a chick a vacuum and you're a fuckinasshole, get a guy a cordless Makita drill, genuine happy.  But these are the things we each need to do our self-appointed home tasks. 

Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?  Someone got me one two years ago, and it had a layout of about fifty bits included, all sorts of wizardry tips.  Great gift.   
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 07, 2009, 09:06:23 PM
Understood. 

I'll be honest, I draw a blank when I think for myself.  I don't really want anything in the normal realm of "stuff".  However, we don't look at tools like chicks do.  We actually like them.  Get a chick a vacuum and you're a fuckinasshole, get a guy a cordless Makita drill, genuine happy.  But these are the things we each need to do our self-appointed home tasks. 

Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?  Someone got me one two years ago, and it had a layout of about fifty bits included, all sorts of wizardry tips.  Great gift.   

Haha, I want a vacuum cleaner for Christmas.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 07, 2009, 09:42:54 PM
Understood. 

I'll be honest, I draw a blank when I think for myself.  I don't really want anything in the normal realm of "stuff".  However, we don't look at tools like chicks do.  We actually like them.  Get a chick a vacuum and you're a fuckinasshole, get a guy a cordless Makita drill, genuine happy.  But these are the things we each need to do our self-appointed home tasks. 

Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?  Someone got me one two years ago, and it had a layout of about fifty bits included, all sorts of wizardry tips.  Great gift.   

Haha, I want a vacuum cleaner for Christmas.   :lol:

Cool. 

Well, asking for one eliminates the fuckinasshole lashback that typically accompanies gifting a chick with a vacuum.  We as men seek to eliminate the fuckinasshole lashback from the gifting process. 

We've had meetings on the subject.  Spontaneous gifting of household appliances in lieu of frivolities is discouraged under manlaw.  In gifting of household appliances, the subject must be broached by the female, and at least two separate affirmations must be extracted prior to gifting. 

This was unanimously ratified under manlaw in the cohabitation accord of 1982, and passes unchallenged each revisit on a biannual schedule. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 08, 2009, 03:26:31 PM
Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?

Rechargeable drills have always failed me. They always run out of juice or don't have enough power.  I'm in the market for a plug in since I'm usually near an outlet when working.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 08, 2009, 04:28:55 PM
Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?

Rechargeable drills have always failed me. They always run out of juice or don't have enough power.  I'm in the market for a plug in since I'm usually near an outlet when working.

I've always had good luck with 'em if you get 18v and don't buy junk like B+D.  My last Craftsman lasted me ten years, and the new one (also Craftsman) is sick for the money.  I avoid brand names that are supposed to be good in the middle of their product-line, like affordable priced DeWalt and Makita.  Those make good contractor grade, but their weekend warrior stuff is meh. 

Also, don't leave the batts on charge, it fucks 'em up.   
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 08, 2009, 07:45:25 PM
Hows he in the rechargeable drill department?

Rechargeable drills have always failed me. They always run out of juice or don't have enough power.  I'm in the market for a plug in since I'm usually near an outlet when working.

I've always had good luck with 'em if you get 18v and don't buy junk like B+D.  My last Craftsman lasted me ten years, and the new one (also Craftsman) is sick for the money.  I avoid brand names that are supposed to be good in the middle of their product-line, like affordable priced DeWalt and Makita.  Those make good contractor grade, but their weekend warrior stuff is meh. 

Also, don't leave the batts on charge, it fucks 'em up.   

Interesting you say that. I had a Makita and switch to a DeWalt because I didn't like it (both 14V).

I helped a friend a couple of weeks ago build a gazebo in his backyard.  His corded drill had more power than I could have wanted. The first screw I put in went deeper and faster into the redwood than I was used to and I had to back the mo-fo down a couple of power notches. I was zipping screws and bolts in faster than ever before. The extra power was real nice and I didn't mind the cord whatsoever.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on December 08, 2009, 07:53:25 PM
I would appreciate a cordless drill for Christmas much more than Boyfriend would, to be honest.  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on December 08, 2009, 08:10:49 PM
I've always had good luck with 'em if you get 18v and don't buy junk like B+D.  My last Craftsman lasted me ten years, and the new one (also Craftsman) is sick for the money.  I avoid brand names that are supposed to be good in the middle of their product-line, like affordable priced DeWalt and Makita.  Those make good contractor grade, but their weekend warrior stuff is meh. 

Also, don't leave the batts on charge, it fucks 'em up.   

Had a B+D years ago, that couldn't handle anything at all. Total waste of money, as far as I'm concerned. (Plus all the time and frustration over the two years before going out to buy something with actual power.) Will not purchase anything less than 18v again. I think ours is going on 7 years or so now. Ryobi, 18v. Quite happy with it, and with the other 18v products we bought from them. Having only one charger for the 2 batteries which swap between 4 things is convenient. Need to pick up a couple of new batteries, as the two we have aren't holding a charge so well these days.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on December 08, 2009, 08:12:11 PM
Black&Deckers are known for being garbage.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 08, 2009, 09:11:12 PM
@ all

Yep.  18v min.  Ryobi is nice, with the caveat of buying up the line.  I always go for the big bulky fuckers.  Bigger motor in there.  The bigger the better. 

B+D is shit.  I think I have a hate thread floating around here.  They're on it. 

My corded is a 1/2 inch chuck.  Handle on the side.  Not for pussies.  Not the kind of thing where you can squeeze the chuck and spin the bit shut.  It'll rip your whole fuckin arm off like a rag. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on December 08, 2009, 09:29:23 PM
Man, I've only used Makitas.  Have a Makita on my Amazon wishlist.  Maybe I should get a deWalt instead? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 08, 2009, 09:42:40 PM
Compare the user reviews. 

I like my trusty old Craftsman.  She's a trooper.  Hundred bucks, you could build anything.  I used mine to construct a shed (none of this prefab shit, I'm a freestyle builder) 8x16, and a deck that would knock your socks off.  Plus all the normal stuff guys do. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 08, 2009, 11:13:16 PM
If he's into guns and you have a few normal ones like most people do, shotgun, deer rifle, and a pistol or two.. 

Get him a tactical urban weapon, like a mini-14 with the plastic stocks and all that.  The regs would probably know better prices $600 is about right, I believe.  I'm not a gun nut, but if my chick got me that, hooboy.  I'd be blown away.  That may be more than you might want to part with, but its not really insane.  Its just kinda, not cheap.  First year in the new house if I recall, its been a big year.  Something like that may be in order, if you'll excuse my sayin' so.  Besides, its just completely badass, and flies in the face of religious holiday conformity. 

This one is brand new, ships from a dealer with good feedback.  You'd have to get it shipped to a licensed firearm guy on your end, show ID and fill out a paper.

http://www.gunsamerica.com/978293734/Guns/Rifles/Ruger-Rifles/Mini-14-Type/GB_RUGER_MINI_14_GB.htm

That's a good suggestion, but I should've mentioned that I do not have much money right now.  I was thinking of something under $100 or so.  He's definitely into guns though, so I'll have to file that away for his birthday next year. 
God damn I would cream myself if my girlfriend got me one of those for x-mas.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on December 08, 2009, 11:28:18 PM
I have a $30 black and decker cordless drill. It does what I need.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 08, 2009, 11:30:56 PM
<tears grooves down face
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 08, 2009, 11:35:24 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 08, 2009, 11:37:02 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 08, 2009, 11:38:32 PM
@ all

Yep.  18v min.  Ryobi is nice, with the caveat of buying up the line.  I always go for the big bulky fuckers.  Bigger motor in there.  The bigger the better.  

B+D is shit.  I think I have a hate thread floating around here.  They're on it.  

My corded is a 1/2 inch chuck.  Handle on the side.  Not for pussies.  Not the kind of thing where you can squeeze the chuck and spin the bit shut.  It'll rip your whole fuckin arm off like a rag.  

That is why I'm in the market for corded drill. You get all the power without the awkward weight distribution in the big bulky fuckers and you don't have to deal with changing out the battery. Just keep plugging along. Besides, my property is small enough that I can run a cord from an outlet to anywhere I would need it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 08, 2009, 11:40:13 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 08, 2009, 11:42:12 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:

You are in for a treat. We got one as a wedding gift back when we were young. I don't know how we did without it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 08, 2009, 11:42:43 PM
@ all

Yep.  18v min.  Ryobi is nice, with the caveat of buying up the line.  I always go for the big bulky fuckers.  Bigger motor in there.  The bigger the better.  

B+D is shit.  I think I have a hate thread floating around here.  They're on it.  

My corded is a 1/2 inch chuck.  Handle on the side.  Not for pussies.  Not the kind of thing where you can squeeze the chuck and spin the bit shut.  It'll rip your whole fuckin arm off like a rag.  

That is why I'm in the market for corded drill. You get all the power without the awkward weight distribution in the big bulky fuckers and you don't have to deal with changing out the battery. Just keep plugging along. Besides, my property is small enough that I can run a cord from an outlet to anywhere I would need it.
I'm with you there.  Cordless drills always give me issues anyways.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 08, 2009, 11:45:16 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:

You are in for a treat. We got one as a wedding gift back when we were young. I don't know how we did without it.

I've used them quite often at friends' and family's houses.  I love them, and I've wanted one for sooooo long.  I told Jizz we should get married because people will give us stuff.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 08, 2009, 11:54:27 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:

You are in for a treat. We got one as a wedding gift back when we were young. I don't know how we did without it.

I've used them quite often at friends' and family's houses.  I love them, and I've wanted one for sooooo long.  I told Jizz we should get married because people will give us stuff.   :lol:

Haha! Do it! I'd buy you one.  :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 08, 2009, 11:56:46 PM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:

You are in for a treat. We got one as a wedding gift back when we were young. I don't know how we did without it.

I've used them quite often at friends' and family's houses.  I love them, and I've wanted one for sooooo long.  I told Jizz we should get married because people will give us stuff.   :lol:

Haha! Do it! I'd buy you one.  :lol:

Well, you know.  I also told him it's because we love each other and junk.   :lol:

But all of my friends keep telling me about all the stuff they got when they got married... :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 09, 2009, 12:03:15 AM
<tears grooves down face

I had a Black & Decker hand mixer before.  I left it with Ann & Whorehay and now I have a KitchenAid.

Words that heal. 

Indeed.  I love it, but I'm ready to get the big stand mixer.  I just have bills to pay instead.   :lol:

You are in for a treat. We got one as a wedding gift back when we were young. I don't know how we did without it.

I've used them quite often at friends' and family's houses.  I love them, and I've wanted one for sooooo long.  I told Jizz we should get married because people will give us stuff.   :lol:

Haha! Do it! I'd buy you one.  :lol:

Well, you know.  I also told him it's because we love each other and junk.   :lol:

But all of my friends keep telling me about all the stuff they got when they got married... :P

Yeah, yeah, all that mushy lovey dovey stuff.  :P I'm happy for you guys.

Tell Jizz I said hi and I miss his antics on here.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 09, 2009, 12:05:27 AM
He's studying for finals.  He says he's conquering Mexico.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 09, 2009, 12:17:43 AM
He's studying for finals.  He says he's conquering Mexico.   :lol:

 :lol:

He would not be the first.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 09, 2009, 12:19:01 AM
He's studying for finals.  He says he's conquering Mexico.   :lol:

 :lol:

He would not be the first.

By conquering Mexico he means blabbering bullshit and eating an apple, I think.  He's a freak, don't ask.   :P

He wants to know how your wife is doing with the bun in the oven and all.  And to name the baby Ruslan after him.   :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 09, 2009, 02:24:30 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 09, 2009, 08:04:33 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: NHArticleTen on December 09, 2009, 09:02:37 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

interesting factoid:  most womenz can...if they are so inclined...out-perform menz...in luvin the womenz...

.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 09, 2009, 09:03:45 AM
I bet Rob could out perform the ladies at pleasuring the men too....   In prison.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on December 09, 2009, 12:47:55 PM
He's studying for finals.  He says he's conquering Mexico.   :lol:

 :lol:

He would not be the first.

By conquering Mexico he means blabbering bullshit and eating an apple, I think.  He's a freak, don't ask.   :P

He wants to know how your wife is doing with the bun in the oven and all.  And to name the baby Ruslan after him.   :lol: :lol: :lol:

Tell him to get in line. :lol: Everyone wants the baby named after them.  :roll:

My wife is doing really well. Handling the pregnancy like a champ. We are having a girl, we are thinking of name her Adele Hanna, but we are not 100% yet.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 09, 2009, 07:13:18 PM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

interesting factoid:  most womenz can...if they are so inclined...out-perform menz...in luvin the womenz...

.

That's because we know what having a vag is like, and what makes it feel good.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 09, 2009, 07:14:06 PM
He's studying for finals.  He says he's conquering Mexico.   :lol:

 :lol:

He would not be the first.

By conquering Mexico he means blabbering bullshit and eating an apple, I think.  He's a freak, don't ask.   :P

He wants to know how your wife is doing with the bun in the oven and all.  And to name the baby Ruslan after him.   :lol: :lol: :lol:

Tell him to get in line. :lol: Everyone wants the baby named after them.  :roll:

My wife is doing really well. Handling the pregnancy like a champ. We are having a girl, we are thinking of name her Adele Hanna, but we are not 100% yet.

Haha, not me.  I wouldn't wish the name Lindsey on anyone!  I think that's a pretty name.  Unusual.  Is it a family member's name or did you just like it?   :D
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on December 09, 2009, 10:13:36 PM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

Doesn't want MMF or MFF?

Theres a big difference.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on December 10, 2009, 12:05:52 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

Doesn't want MMF or MFF?

Theres a big difference.

He doesn't want either.   :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 10, 2009, 12:29:54 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

Doesn't want MMF or MFF?

Theres a big difference.

He doesn't want either.   :P

He may not be aware that Richard is near. 

Would he not love to practice the Magikal Tantric arts, now, with the living embodiment of Hermes himself!  Who is free of Herpes, and knows Secrets!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 10, 2009, 12:39:31 AM
The best gift you can ever give your man is a reason to stick around.

A threesome is a pretty close second.

Mine doesn't want one.   :shock:

Doesn't want MMF or MFF?

Theres a big difference.

He doesn't want either.   :P

He may not be aware that Richard is near. 

Would he not love to practice the Magikal Tantric arts, now, with the living embodiment of Hermes himself!  Who is free of Herpes, and knows Secrets!
:lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 06, 2010, 05:12:54 PM
You know what's frustrating?  Saying something very complicated to one group of people, and they say "Hey, good point!  We hadn't thought of that; that's very useful."

And then saying something very basic to another group of people, and they're like "What?  You think cows are secretly Nazis who dance in the moonlight and eat clowns for breakfast?"

*bang, bash, boom*

(Not really a question.  Just an expression of frustration.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 06, 2010, 06:14:22 PM
I've always had good luck with 'em if you get 18v and don't buy junk like B+D.  My last Craftsman lasted me ten years, and the new one (also Craftsman) is sick for the money.  I avoid brand names that are supposed to be good in the middle of their product-line, like affordable priced DeWalt and Makita.  Those make good contractor grade, but their weekend warrior stuff is meh.  

Also, don't leave the batts on charge, it fucks 'em up.  

Had a B+D years ago, that couldn't handle anything at all. Total waste of money, as far as I'm concerned. (Plus all the time and frustration over the two years before going out to buy something with actual power.) Will not purchase anything less than 18v again. I think ours is going on 7 years or so now. Ryobi, 18v. Quite happy with it, and with the other 18v products we bought from them. Having only one charger for the 2 batteries which swap between 4 things is convenient. Need to pick up a couple of new batteries, as the two we have aren't holding a charge so well these days.

I'm probably late on this drill thing, didn't read the rest of the thread but....

A quality 14v has more battery life both per charge and lifespan, power, torque and is lighter weight and ergonomically more comfortable and easy to use.  Heavier drills cause more fatigue, wear on joints (which can lead to increased risk of tendonitis and other aches and pains) and consequently less productivity.

Craftsman sucks, Black and decker sucks.  My Dewalt and Ridgid and Bosch 14 volts were/are (the Dewalt and Ridgid were stolen, never broken) plenty strong to handle 99% of what I do and for the rest there is power cords.  I have an 18volt cordless but it's typically used by my helper or when I need a light weight hammer drill ( by lightweight hammer drill I mean I use it to set tapcons 3-6 inches into concrete),cuz it does that.)  NO ONE on this BBS has ever come close to putting power tools what I put them through and no one here needs a good 18V drill, if you require 18 volts you bought a piece of crap and by upgrading you're only going to get a bulkier and more awkward piece of crap.  Dewalt makes a 9.6V screwdriver that does light weight drilling just fine and is a far better choice for 90% of homeowners than a crappy cordless drill.

I have two main drills:
-14V Bosch
-Corded Bosch Hammer Drill (Don't take this to infer a preference for Bosch over Dewalt, Milwaukee, Ridgid, Makita.  Just happened that way.  My current 18V set is Ridgid and I hate the sawzall)

Homeowners should probably take a step down on each.
-9.6V screwdriver or 12V drill from a Quality manufacturer (My uncle has used his 12V dewalt to hang drywall for several years, I'm jealous, it's much lighter than my 14v)
-Corded drill.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on January 06, 2010, 06:22:27 PM
Ecolitan- are there any Harbor Freight tool shops in your area? If so, what's your take on their stuff.. junk or OK ?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 06, 2010, 06:44:00 PM
My Dad once picked up three of those commercial electric or general appliance or whatever they call those things.  With the angle grinder I ground on a concrete pipe for hours and it kept breaking and I'd have to cut it farther back, then I gave up and let him try til I saw the thing come flying out the hole and he left and came back with a dewalt that did the job in 4 minutes and we were all glad cuz we could flush the toilet.  The sawzall broke on it's first use cutting a fence post and the drill went to smoking on it's first use when I tried to mix mud (All Purpose Joint Compound) but if it hadn't ended up in the trash it might still be spinning weakly today.  I have occasionally heard good things about them from residential handymen types but never commercial professionals.  

When a tool breaking means time, fuel, wages, reputatiuon, etc. I buy top end tools, I've never had one fail.

Black and Decker and those commercial appliance things are the worst, Craftsmen are awful to use when you're used to better but homeowners seem to be happy with them, the battery life sucks.  If top tier just isn't in the budget, Ryobi is probably your best choice.  It's what's used by the minority of pros that don't use professional grade.  I judge them.  I haven't tried the Hitachi line yet, they sure look cool.

I have a friend who bought a couple of weed eater brand weed eaters for his landscaping business just to see.  It lasted almost 8 hours.  So, he did the math.

A homeowner mows their lawn 8 months a year twice a week 16 times for 15 minutes each time.... Two years = 8 hours of rarely if ever working hard.  So maybe it makes it 4 years, 16 total hours running time and the homeowner thinks that was a good weed eater, got 4 years out of it.  Meanwhile the echo is running 8 hours a day 6 days a week for 5 years.  It's not slightly better, it did not last 25% longer.  The performance is incomparable.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 06, 2010, 07:05:38 PM
Craftsman is my choice because of the cost versus quality, not quality alone. 

A comparatively priced "better name" usually isn't better in the low-end price products.  Meaning, you probably couldn't get a better cordless than Craftsman for the $70 they charge for 'em.  If you use it once a month to put together a swingset, or fasten a porch rail, it'll last you a long time. 

I have a 20 year old Craftsman circular saw, its rusty on the metal parts, cuts crooked, the blade wobbles, and will probably catch fire.  It was like $39 in 1990.  I've left it in the rain, under tarps, in the mud, and thrown it off decks.  If you have a $39 DeWalt that will handle that, I'll buy it right now. 

Homeowners who pay $270 for a Bosch to do that stuff are snoots.  If I was running them 50 hours a week, I'd buy the better names.  They're probably more comfortable ergonomically, the little adjustments probably more accurate after much abuse, and the motors provide better torque after long periods of service where cheaper stuff gets tired. 

I'd do the same with hand tools.  If I wanted a set of wrenches and sockets, I'd go with Craftsman.  If I owned a car shop, I'd have Snap-On or whoever makes good shit. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 06, 2010, 08:38:59 PM
Craftsman is my choice because of the cost versus quality, not quality alone.  

A comparatively priced "better name" usually isn't better in the low-end price products.  Meaning, you probably couldn't get a better cordless than Craftsman for the $70 they charge for 'em.  If you use it once a month to put together a swingset, or fasten a porch rail, it'll last you a long time.  

I have a 20 year old Craftsman circular saw, its rusty on the metal parts, cuts crooked, the blade wobbles, and will probably catch fire.  It was like $39 in 1990.  I've left it in the rain, under tarps, in the mud, and thrown it off decks.  If you have a $39 DeWalt that will handle that, I'll buy it right now.  

Homeowners who pay $270 for a Bosch to do that stuff are snoots.  If I was running them 50 hours a week, I'd buy the better names.  They're probably more comfortable ergonomically, the little adjustments probably more accurate after much abuse, and the motors provide better torque after long periods of service where cheaper stuff gets tired.  

I'd do the same with hand tools.  If I wanted a set of wrenches and sockets, I'd go with Craftsman.  If I owned a car shop, I'd have Snap-On or whoever makes good shit.  

20 year old craftsman circular saws are good, most old craftsman corded tools are strong.  I don't have 270 dollar Bosch but I got mine for 149.95 and it came with the coolest radio ever and a flashlight and a carry bag.  Everyone comments on my radio, it is cool.  Ryobi is a better cordless than craftsman for 70 dollars.  My dad has a newish craftsman set, Ryobi is superior in every way.  I got a 18V dewalt circular saw used for less than 39 bucks.  

I am sometimes willing to accept a bargain brand is ok for some people but not an 18V ever.  If you need an 18V you need something that doesn't suck and a high end 12V is just as strong or stronger and you won't be buying batteries every year.  I've only bought new batteries once and that was just cuz I wanted more of them.

My dad has this (http://www.amazon.com/Craftsman-DieHard-Cordless-Drill-Driver/dp/B001NYUW28/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1262827677&sr=8-1-fkmr1) one and it's crap.  I was mistaken that his set is 19.2V  

$78.99

An extra 10 bucks gets you this (http://www.amazon.com/Craftsman-DieHard-Cordless-Drill-Driver/dp/B001NYUW28/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1262827677&sr=8-1-fkmr1)

Pictures are worthless but you don't even have to squeeze the trigger to know which is better, just hold it in your hand, if you want to squeeze the trigger well... be prepared to never buy another craftsman power tool again.  

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 07, 2010, 02:49:25 AM
Thats fancy.  They don't even sell ones that look like mine.  Mines got a square chunky batt, like a squared off baseball. 

I couldn't believe how long the old one held a charge, I could drive deck screws a long while with it, at least a few hours of constant work.  If anything slowed me down, it was the fuckin bits shattering.  Never built anything good with the new one.  The old one was the one I did all my damage with. 

I used a DeWalt the other day, doing some fuckaround on a girls car I know.  It fit the hand nice and had a smooth trigger, no complaints.  I donno what he paid for it, but it was probably a lot. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 09, 2010, 09:56:56 PM
I spent three or four hours  cleaning my desk today, and 90% of the junk cleared away belonged to the other four people in the house... or the dogs.

Does anyone know of a small electrified barbed wire enclosure I can install to keep away the cluttering rabble?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 10, 2010, 11:39:29 AM
http://www.pet-super-store.com/pet-supplies/dog-training-collars/
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 12, 2010, 04:30:10 PM
(http://gallery.mailchimp.com/d811121b84b5b1082b55b15f9/images/crochetninjaandcthulhu.JPG)
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51WBKmJXjWL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg)

I've made bunnies, penguins, angels, bears and even coral snakes, but there's a super cute book of monsters my kidlets want me to start making. There's only so much of zombies, ninjas and medeusas they "need", so... just wondering... would you guys ever buy things like these?

I'm putting together my first batch of stuff for Etsy, most of which wouldn't interest anyone here at all - aforementioned animals, aprons, clothing for American Girl dolls, things made from felted wool sweaters & "upcycled" clothing - yeah, I'm green like that  :roll:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 12, 2010, 07:30:08 PM
Advertise 'em as talismans to ward off the sickeningly evil-sweet soccer moms, for cool moms only to hang from the rear-view mirror of their Ram Quad Cab or similarly non-wimpy kid-hauler.    "I retain the right to refuse sale to soccer moms with e-mail names that make me want to barf"  $5 each, 3 for $10

You'll sell 'em by the bushel basket.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 12, 2010, 07:38:38 PM
Advertise 'em as talismans to ward off the sickeningly evil-sweet soccer moms, for cool moms only to hang from the rear-view mirror of their Ram Quad Cab or similarly non-wimpy kid-hauler.    "I retain the right to refuse sale to soccer moms with e-mail names that make me want to barf"  $5 each, 3 for $10

You'll sell 'em by the bushel basket.

I agree, except the price point is too low.  Make them $7 each and three for $18.  I'm not even a mom and I'd buy one. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 12, 2010, 08:01:49 PM
I'm just the marketing guy.  If Rill would click 'Buy' with Paypal for that price, might be on to something.  Its an impulse item.  Tag it with "rear view mirror" "car accessory" "bauble". 

Hit 'em with a buck-fortynine shipping, too.  You might have to eat about fifty cents shipping, but so what.  You want to get them to kick in something, but not too much or it'll deter a buyer of a cheapo trinket. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 12, 2010, 11:32:44 PM
Make a cthulhu and I'll give it to my ferrets.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 13, 2010, 12:28:56 AM
Ok FTL, I am putting myself on the chopping block here.

How would you rate my intelligence level?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 12:32:06 AM
132, slightly above average for the neighborhood.

You could be a really smart guy if you lost all the superstitious false information clogging up your thinking patterns.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 13, 2010, 02:58:59 AM
About a starfish.
 :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 09:27:48 AM
132, slightly above average for the neighborhood.

I think 131 is the cutoff to get into Mensa.  You consider that "slightly above average"?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on January 13, 2010, 11:05:31 AM
132, slightly above average for the neighborhood.

I think 131 is the cutoff to get into Mensa.  You consider that "slightly above average"?
"for the neighborhood". Most libertarians are geniuses.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 11:09:50 AM
132, slightly above average for the neighborhood.

I think 131 is the cutoff to get into Mensa.  You consider that "slightly above average"?
"for the neighborhood". Most libertarians are geniuses.

 :lol:

HAHAhahahaha......good one.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 11:48:27 AM
145 or higher   Genius
130 - 144   Gifted
125 - 129   Superior
115 - 124   High Average


Most liberty oriented types fall into high average or better I expect.  Average people believe what the government tells them.  We're not even average libertarians here.  There are some really smart folk here and as a community we tend to strongly discourage people dumber than us.  I wouldn't be the least surprised if around here we averaged in the 120s, 125 actually was my thought when posting.

MENSA is not impressive.  Most people I respect enough to think they have something to teach me could join if they were pompous assholes with something to prove.  None have.

<120=noticeably slower than me through casual observation.  What'dya think Rillion?  Have I made a mistake assuming you and most here aren't slower than me in a blatantly obvious way?  

Statistically I know In RL I don't run into anyone smarter than me in an average week.  I expect to be the smartest person in the room wherever I go.  Here I don't expect to be the smartest person in the thread.

My apologies if I over estimated you but since you decided to mock me while I'm having my coffee I'll tell you straight that while emotionally you seem healthier than some here so your brain functions relatively clearly I don't think it does so at great capacity.  You're a 120.  It's probably served you much better than being 132 with a background of jewish extremism.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 01:02:14 PM
Most liberty oriented types fall into high average or better I expect.  Average people believe what the government tells them.

From what I can tell, intelligence doesn't actually seem to have much to do with how people feel about government.   A lot of libertarians are just contrarians who don't want anyone telling them what to do, and that is the entirety of their political philosophy.   Not that that's a bad position to take, but it sure doesn't require genius-level IQ.   And a lot of very intelligent people believe that government is the best way to improve the world.  Having a misguided belief doesn't make you stupid-- not by any stretch of the imagination.  

Quote
<120=noticeably slower than me through casual observation.  What'dya think Rillion?  Have I made a mistake assuming you and most here aren't slower than me in a blatantly obvious way?  

I think that the average IQ level of people who post here is probably not radically different from that of a typical college student.  Higher than the average for general society, but by no means "genius."

Quote
My apologies if I over estimated you but since you decided to mock me while I'm having my coffee I'll tell you straight that while emotionally you seem healthier than some here so your brain functions relatively clearly I don't think it does so at great capacity.  You're a 120.  It's probably served you much better than being 132 with a background of jewish extremism.

I have found that, without exception, people who throw their IQ around tend to be assholes who are most likely liars as well.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 01:54:47 PM
You attacked my statement.  I don't know how to defend it w/o explaining how I came to it.  I still avoided putting a number on myself though I couldn't properly describe how I came to my conclusions w/o betraying my perspective.  AND.;...  DID you just call me a liar?  FUCK YOU BITCH.  I'm engaging in open and honest discourse and you can go STRAIGHT TO FUCKING HELL.

why do you keep saying "genius"?  You used that word, not me.  I said I think Diogenes is slightly into the gifted range and put the average around here at 'superior'.  Why are you making shit up?  There's a clear record that I never used that word nor meant it but you still want to pretend otherwise and I don't see how that can be anything but intentionally dishonest.  YES,  I AM calling you a liar.  I'm not insinuating or suggesting.  I'm saying very specifically what you said and how it is an obvious attempt to deceive the reader into attributing to me a view I very clearly have never espoused. 

About he average IQ of liberty people.  I'm pretty sure there's scientific numbers to dispute that and they've been posted around here before but it doesn't matter to me.  I know my observations.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 02:34:02 PM
Errr.....excuse me?

Let's recap:

Ecolitan: [I think that Diogenes' IQ is] 132, slightly above average for the neighborhood.
Me: You consider 131 "slightly above average"?
blackie: Most libertarians are geniuses.
Me: HAHAhahahaha......good one.
Ecolitan: You're a 120.  It's probably served you much better than being 132 with a background of jewish extremism.
Me: Wow, that's a really asshole thing to say.
Ecolitan:  FUCK YOU BITCH.

See, the "genius" thing was a reference to blackie's statement.  And when you estimated my IQ and compared it to 132, I thought you were claiming that was your  IQ.  It's only slightly less of an assholish thing to say, however, if you really were referring to Diogenes' IQ.   Estimating someone's IQ unprovoked is generally not a nice thing to do, especially if you compare it negatively to someone else's. 

I didn't "attack" any statement of yours either, Mr. Anger Management Issues. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 05:46:28 PM
Did you even read the thread?  Diogenes asked how smart we thought he was.  I answered.  Now you're talking about things I said unsolicited.

Jesus fucking christ. You are a stupid cunt.  Go home.

It's true about me being angry on occassion.  I'm out of pot for 2 days now.  I smoke pot mostly every day. Out of a one hitter so a quarter/wk pretty much keeps me stoned morning to night.  I'm a pretty angry and anxious guy when I don't and, I don't like you.  You rarely have anything nice to say.  You never respond to me except to make some silly contradiction about a statement you probably misunderstood in the first place.  Like here when you didn't even know I was responding to the post above me.  Naturally, I have no patience for it.

as far as your reference to 'genius' being toward blackie... bullshit.  It directly follows a quote from my post.  

  I decided long ago you don't hold truth and honesty in anywhere near the regard I do, makes me wonder why you want to hop in this thread after me and say obviously slanted things, like its not something I'm going to call you on.  Not believing you held yourself to a high standard of truth when you typed something comes very easy to me.

Of course it was an assholish thing to say, you jumped in the thread and insunuated I am a liar and an asshole when you didn't even understand the topic, you should thank me for making you at least half right.  You had a little asshole coming.  AND...  You're a 120, that's a fact, it is entirely relevant when responding to how smart you think people are since our perceptions of intelligence are greatly influenced by our own.  

I think it was very brave of Diogenes to ask what he did.  I'm interested in other responses.  I would never ask that question.  I don't want to know.

Are college students really higher than average?  I wouldn't think so.  If I were going to pick particularly smart people by education level I'd say PhDs and HS dropouts.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 06:15:17 PM
Jesus fucking christ. You are a stupid cunt.  Go home.

It's true about me being angry on occassion.

Ya think?

Quote
as far as your reference to 'genius' being toward blackie... bullshit.  It directly follows a quote from my post.  Are you calling me stupid now?

No, dumbshit.  I was explaining that I had attributed blackie's statement (erroneously) to you, since it quoted and elaborated on what you'd said before. 

Quote
I decided long ago you don't hold truth and honesty in anywhere near the regard I do

And I decided about two hours ago that you're batshit crazy. 

Quote
Of course it was an assholish thing to say

Glad you acknowledge that.  It's always good to hear assholes cop to being assholes. 

Quote
you jumped in the thread and insunuated I am a liar and an asshole

Because I was incredulous about calling an IQ of 132 "slightly above average"?  I repeat: batshit. 

Quote
You're a 120, that's a fact

You are wrong; that's a fact. 

Quote
I think it was very brave of Diogenes to ask what he did.  I'm interested in other responses.  I would never ask that question.

Which should make you understand that somebody else might not want that opinion unsolicited, but apparently not.   

Quote
Are college students really higher than average?

I estimated that they are based on sheer literacy and test-taking ability.  You can't get into most colleges without those, and yet a good proportion of the country doesn't have them. 

Quote
If I were going to pick particularly smart people by education level I'd say PhDs and HS dropouts.

Guess who's got a PhD, motherfucker? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 13, 2010, 06:28:44 PM
Normally, my better sense would tell me to stay out of this and mind my own GD business based on where this conversation has been going, but I do want to comment one thing, Rillion:

I estimated that they are based on sheer literacy and test-taking ability.  You can't get into most colleges without those, and yet a good proportion of the country doesn't have them. 

I would have thought this too, until I actually went to college.  I was quite surprised to see what constituted 'literate' even in my final years of college by supposedly learned individuals.  I will freely admit however, that my sentiments fall dangerously close to the Fallacy of Personal Experience and readily concede this could be the exception rather than rule.

Good to read your stuff again, by the way.  :)

------
edit: Removed a prepositional phrase that causes a redundancy in my paragraph, thus weakening my own position of literacy as a point of comparison.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 06:29:58 PM
It took you til two hours ago... :/  That's not very impressive.  Just cuz you have a PhD doesn't mean you're not a 120.  I know a fucking idiot who is an MD.  I didn't really read the most of it.  I don't care what you have to say.


Why are you still on about calling 132 slightly above average?  That's been clarified.  wait....

Quote
you jumped in the thread and insunuated I am a liar and an asshole....

Because I was incredulous about calling an IQ of 132 "slightly above average"?  I repeat: batshit. 

NO IT WASN'T  you called me a liar and an asshole because you thought I was calling myself a 132, you said that yourself in a previous post and now you're changing your story and I have no idea why.  about calling 132 slightly above average "for the neighborhood" you just called me wrong.  You really DON'T give a damn about communicating accurately even when it's the topic of conversation.  I'm really done now.  You are the suckiest.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 06:38:56 PM
Point well taken, Celestrian.  I have actually read and graded some appallingly illiterate college essays.  

Ecolitan, I don't especially care.  That post was fun to write, and I had no further reason to actually take you seriously, so I figured "What the hell?" It amused me whether you read it or not.   :)

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 13, 2010, 06:46:44 PM
Really Celestrian.... why?  Maybe you haven't been paying attention.

Quote from: me
you jumped in the thread and insunuated I am a liar and an asshole

Quote from: dishonest bitch
Because I was incredulous about calling an IQ of 132 "slightly above average"?  I repeat: batshit.


Quote from: me
NO IT WASN'T  you called me a liar and an asshole because you thought I was calling myself a 132, you said that yourself in a previous post and now you're changing your story and I have no idea why.  about calling 132 slightly above average "for the neighborhood" you just called me wrong.  You really DON'T give a damn about communicating accurately even when it's the topic of conversation.


Quote from: dishonest bitch
Ecolitan, I don't especially care.  That post was fun to write

Why would anyone give a damn what she has to say when she herself doesn't care if it's truthful.  She gets a lot mileage 'round here for being female.  Is that what it is Celestrian?  Cuz she's not a particularly truthful person and that's OK with her, people who don't care that they say true things are not worth listening to.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 13, 2010, 10:11:10 PM
Really Celestrian.... why?  Maybe you haven't been paying attention.

Ecolitan. I understand that things are a bit heated at the moment, but I'll be more than happy to answer your question:

It's been about a year and since I was last on the BBS with any measure of consistency.  Rillion happens to be one of the few names that's still present and unchanged.  I have reason to believe Drifter is Brasky, but if that's mistaken - he's an individual I already miss hearing from.

My parting statement was not intended either as an endorsement or condemnation of either of your positions.


Why would anyone give a damn what she has to say when she herself doesn't care if it's truthful. 

My experiences with Rillion have in the past been to the contrary; generally in our exchanges she has been as far as I'm aware, honest and up-front.  In fact, she has made it clear to me in the past the at times my posts got on the far side of ridiculous to the point of requiring a level of focus to maintain reading.


She gets a lot mileage 'round here for being female.  Is that what it is Celestrian? 

<smiles> Insinuating that I'm not exercising the proper level of chastisement because she is in possession of a vagina?

If so: clever.  However, I will also chalk this up to me incorrectly interpreting your honest question for an implied insult, for reasons I will delineate further later.

As I mentioned before, it's been a while since I've posted on here with any regularity, so I understand why my motivations/reservations could potentially be suspect, and in regards to that I will endeavor to clarify:


Cuz she's not a particularly truthful person and that's OK with her,

Again, I would need to see evidence where she was unilaterally caught in a lie beyond all shadow of a doubt/misinterpretation, for her to acknowledge that it was a deliberately false statement, and her actions or comments to show an indication of the indifference.

Should Rillion make the same accusation of you, I would also require the same of her.

people who don't care that they say true things are not worth listening to.

I am assuming you meant untrue things, and even then I'm reminded of the Axiom, Even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day.  While I understand that one must always wiegh a pathological liar's statements with a fair amount of skepticism and caution, simply and categorically disregarding everything one says as 'all lies' may sometimes prevent you from hearing that one bit of truth that could be very informative.

Again, I think given the circumstances, I understand that some things probably were misread all around.  It's just unfortunate that the tenor had to turn so sour.




oh. One last thing:  Calling anybody, but a woman in particular, a cunt:  never classy. :/



-----
edit: cleaned up some typos and grammar, but I'm sure there will be more as I re(re)read.
edit: yep, cleaned up a little more garbage. : /
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on January 13, 2010, 10:19:23 PM
<well-reasoned peacekeeping effort>

This forum has been impoverished by your absence.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 13, 2010, 10:24:29 PM
<well-reasoned peacekeeping effort>

This forum has been impoverished by your absence.

That's just what I was thinking.  Even if the Celestrian's well-crafted analysis had concluded that I was in fact an irredeemable villain in the exchange, it couldn't have been more fun to read.  

And yes, Celes, the Drifter is Brasky.  I don't know why he switched identities, but don't think it's any big secret that he did. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 13, 2010, 10:35:50 PM
I genuinely appreciate the sentiments - though I'm not sure if my "peace-keeping effort" really will be that or simply the opening salvo into a more protracted confrontation, despite my intentions  :?

...and thanks for the confirmation.  I'll have to PM him.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 14, 2010, 12:34:10 AM
Wow that was a lot of words.  I'm glad to have you back even if I'm yet to read one of your posts since returning cuz they are all far too long for me.  

Peace keeping efforts... I appreciate it but I disliked her long before she claimed in one post that her remark was in response to Blackie and later confessed to having falsely attributed Blackie's comment to me when making that same remark and then pretended as if the words she says can be at all relied upon.  That's a great idea about making it protracted, maybe I'll stalk her posts for awhile and point out how she's full of shit.  She probably usually is, I don't much read them in general.  I'm awfully bored here these days and I do think she's a callous holier than thou cunt with far more moral flexibility than qualifies one as an honest person.  I'm pretty sure she already knew that.  To my knowledge she and I have never exchanged kind words except that one really wierd time she kinda half offered to drive some porn to OKC as if we had ever been anything but antagonistic toward each other in the past.  That was wierd.  Point being since she and I are never kind to each other she must have been looking for a fight or she wouldn't have jumped in a conversation w/ me.  I'm OK w/ that.  She can bring it anytime.  She's a stupid bitch.  I'm more than happy to be abusive to her.  If you're REALLY bored you can find every time over the years someone has suggested that I'm being deliberately untruthful and see that it pisses me off a LOT.  It's quite an explicit request to meet angry Royce.

She didn't know what I was talking about with the 132 in the first place as if I just up and said "132, average for the neighborhood" entirely in a vaccum then she responded to Blackies comment as if I had said it, then she said she was responding to Blackie and then later admitted she had thought the comment had come from me.  Clearly she made no effort at all to follow the conversation so I can only assume she was there to pick a fight w/ me.  She does that every 6 months or so.

here's your proof not that she deliberately lied but that she makes no sense and isn't worth listening to.

She went on too long about the genius thing so I called her deliberately deceitful.  She defended with.

See, the "genius" thing was a reference to blackie's statement.

feeling good about having won that part and it being over with she later forgot and said this:

Quote
No, dumbshit.  I was explaining that I had attributed blackie's statement (erroneously) to you, since it quoted and elaborated on what you'd said before.


Which is it?  Really..  you were explaining that?  When?  You claimed to refer to blackie's statement and you did... erroneously attributing it to me.  The next time you mention it you call me a dumbshit and tell me how your were explaining your error.  Oh yeah... where?  Fucking bitch.  If you don't care to accurately communicate I don't care to talk to you.


And no.  I meant true things.  Doesn't care if they say true things, Doesn't care if they say untrue things.  Means the same thing.  How about, doesn't care about the truth of what they say, the truth of what they say in unimportant to them etc.  I mean really, you needed to include that little nitpick.

And I didn't mean to insinuate anything about your level of chastisement.  I wasn't even really talking to you even though I used your handle.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 14, 2010, 01:03:19 AM
A lot of people are still here, a lot of people changed their names.  I'm Roycerson, I felt left out with all the name changing so I changed mine too.  I can't keep track.  I just realized today that Admiral Naismath might be Joelberg.  If so I'm probably the last to know.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 14, 2010, 10:02:15 AM
How to Throw a Maximally Effective Hate Parade in 5 Easy Steps:

1. Make sure to not accidentally understand or identify with anything your opponent has said or done.  Empathy is the quickest way to kill a good rage-on.
2. Make things personal: everything your opponent has said or done that can be perceived negatively, he/she has done specifically to you  because he/she is evil and hates you.
3. Paint the situation in the strongest possible terms: there are no mitigating factors.  Your opponent's behavior is always deliberate, and it is always done to hurt, offend, or mock you. 
4. Use the most explicit words to condemn your opponent's words and actions-- we don't want any misunderstanding about who is to blame here.
5. Speak at length, don't leave out any detail, and feel free to repeat yourself for emphasis.  That's the best way to show you really mean business. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 14, 2010, 11:11:52 AM
Was that an answer to this?


She didn't know what I was talking about with the 132 in the first place as if I just up and said "132, average for the neighborhood" entirely in a vaccum then she responded to Blackies comment as if I had said it, then she said she was responding to Blackie and then later admitted she had thought the comment had come from me.  Clearly she made no effort at all to follow the conversation so I can only assume she was there to pick a fight w/ me.  She does that every 6 months or so.

here's your proof not that she deliberately lied but that she makes no sense and isn't worth listening to.

She went on too long about the genius thing so I called her deliberately deceitful.  She defended with.

See, the "genius" thing was a reference to blackie's statement.

feeling good about having won that part and it being over with she later forgot and said this:

Quote
No, dumbshit.  I was explaining that I had attributed blackie's statement (erroneously) to you, since it quoted and elaborated on what you'd said before.


Which is it?  Really..  you were explaining that?  When?  You claimed to refer to blackie's statement and you did... erroneously attributing it to me.  The next time you mention it you call me a dumbshit and tell me how your were explaining your error.  Oh yeah... where?  Fucking bitch.  If you don't care to accurately communicate I don't care to talk to you.


Or just trying to get the last word while avoiding the fact that you jumped in the conversation with someone you know doesn't like you at all having no idea what it was about and then lied about what you said when it was discovered what you said was a lie and then changed your story back when you forgot how important the lie was to your position cuz you're a mean spirited fucking cunt who doesn't give a damn about truth?


Maybe a different question.  Why did you even get in this thread at all when you had no idea what I was talking about with the first 132 post?  I can't imagine a reason other than to pick a fight from someone you knew was willing to give it.  You didn't even know the fucking topic on the table.  Now you're whining cuz when you came looking for a fight you found one. boo fucking hoo
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 14, 2010, 11:31:22 AM
Wow that was a lot of words.  I'm glad to have you back even if I'm yet to read one of your posts since returning cuz they are all far too long for me.

A fair point - and one that you are not the first to make, and likely won't be the last.  In that mind, I'll place concessions first, elaborations next.

And I didn't mean to insinuate anything about your level of chastisement.   

Excellent. Exactly my point in my earlier post.  You do see how it could very easily be read this way, don't you?

For my part, I apologize for incorrectly assuming the worst even if it was for only a moment.

I wasn't even really talking to you even though I used your handle.

That's the tricky thing about using someone's name/handle when posing a question:  They tend to think the question is directed at them.

And no.  I meant true things.  Doesn't care if they say true things, Doesn't care if they say untrue things.  Means the same thing.  How about, doesn't care about the truth of what they say, the truth of what they say in unimportant to them etc.  I mean really, you needed to include that little nitpick.

It was not a nit-pick, apologies if it seemed so.  What I was doing was assuming you meant the point that was most compelling to your cause from my point of view.  There's a reason I chose the untrue tac rather than what I now realize was your originally intended construction.  Your construction, through the mention of "true things" implies to the reader (me) that the person says things that are true to a point that it is worth mentioning.  If we are to talk about "truth" as that which is objectively verifiable and quantifiable (fact) - then whether or not a person has an emotional attachment to the truth they speak, or indeed that they are in fact speaking the truth is irrelevent.

Because it's the truth - and therefore truth is always worth at least listening to.

Conversely, when changing the sentence to "untrue things" - the inverse connotation applies:  the individual speaks untruths or falsehoods to the extent that it must be mentioned (i.e. more than a couple by a bunch).  With this reading, it a far more compelling point that if the person does not care or have an emotional attachment to the fact that they are speaking falsehoods - then this person should be largely ignored.

Summary: It was not me being malicious or looking for "easy points" against you, I was simply looking to respond to the best possible point you made that I could infer.

Peace keeping efforts... I appreciate it but I disliked her long before she claimed in one post that her remark was in response to Blackie and later confessed to having falsely attributed Blackie's comment to me when making that same remark and then pretended as if the words she says can be at all relied upon.

Fair enough, but I said previously it's context and information that I am unaware of, and would therefore be imprudent of me to use as context for judgment.

That's a great idea about making it protracted, maybe I'll stalk her posts for awhile and point out how she's full of shit.  She probably usually is, I don't much read them in general.

Fair enough.  I nor anyone else can prevent you from doing otherwise if you choose to do so.  My only question to this is: Is the vindictiveness and time/emotional investment really worth it to you?

I'm awfully bored here these days and I do think she's a callous holier than thou cunt with far more moral flexibility than qualifies one as an honest person.
I'm pretty sure she already knew that. 

Again, these are your personal feelings which are 100% fine and acceptable for you to have - even if they are 100% true or 100% off-base.  Personally, I don't even think it's a bad thing for you to let her know that you don't like her.  I think the honesty is far better than smiling through your teeth.

With that said, at some point, I have to imagine there's a point of diminishing returns.  When I read statements like the above, I just can't help but ask myself if this is how you deal with all issues where conflict arises.  My guess is, obviously, no - the Internet and a BBS allows the individual some liberties that generally are not considered acceptable in a more corporeal social context.  I guess my only point here is that on this BBS, where (at least the last time I was here) issues and points of view are often debated - I would be extremely reticent to engage in a protracted discussion of a potentially controversial nature if I have a good suspicion that should it turn south this is what awaited me.

If you're REALLY bored you can find every time over the years someone has suggested that I'm being deliberately untruthful and see that it pisses me off a LOT.  It's quite an explicit request to meet angry Royce.

Understandable. I don't know many people who enjoy being called a liar - explicitly or implicitly.  As I said in my previous post - both of you used ad hominems.




At this point, I see that during writing this that you have already posted another response - and I think that further involvement on my part here would be inappropriate.  I will summarize that I still maintain the belief that there has been some mis-interpretation of some of the original quotes on your part - and that happens, so it's not really a mark of right/wrong.  Similarly I think Rillion has at least 1 misinterpretation, which I mentioned previously as well.

I also still think the veracity of the vitriol (perhaps on the part of both parties) is unfortunate.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 14, 2010, 12:39:10 PM
Memo to Ecolitan, since he didn't get it the first time:  I am not taking you seriously.  I am laughing at you, because you took a misunderstanding about IQ and turned it into a burning tower of rage and then accused me of trying to pick a fight, and that's hilarious to me.   Probably not good for your health, though, so you might want to smoke a joint or something. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 14, 2010, 07:07:10 PM
I might have asked this before. If so, I must not have gotten an answer.

Is it bigoted to only accept medical services from people that can clearly speak English if you live in the U.S.?

My thinking is that my health is far to important to trust that the dude from India was able to to get through medical school with only a basic grasp of English with out some how gaming the system. Or maybe he was trained in some far inferior country. Either way, it has to be an issue with the English speaking staff.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 14, 2010, 07:18:22 PM
I might have asked this before. If so, I must not have gotten an answer.

Is it bigoted to only accept medical services from people that can clearly speak English if you live in the U.S.?

My thinking is that my health is far to important to trust that the dude from India was able to to get through medical school with only a basic grasp of English with out some how gaming the system. Or maybe he was trained in some far inferior country.

Yes and no.

No - it is not bigoted to accept medical services only from people that speak your language.  That's common sense - what happens if you have questions?  What happens if the Interpretor says something you don't understand. 

In on regard having a translator/interpretor just adds one extra-step for dealing with issues.  When I lived in Japan, I had to research to ensure my doctors spoke English to a degree that I was comfortable with for this reason - it was also another reason that I had to bone up on my Japanese.  However, sceintific/medical Japanese is extremely difficult, and something I would still consider myself illiterate in to this day.

Yes - it is bigoted to accept medical services only from people that speak your language because of some of the reasons you're citing:

...my health is far to important to trust that the dude from India was able to to get through medical school with only a basic grasp of English with out some how gaming the system.

This is likely improbable since English is an official language in India, my guesses are an Indian that spent approx. 11 yrs in college in the US is unlikely to not being able to speak English fluently.

Even if he/she didn't speak English fluently, your conclusion that they "some how gamed the system" is ultimately unprovable and overgeneralized.  Sure some doctors might have, but probably not all.

Or maybe he was trained in some far inferior country.

I'm assuming you mean the Medical Schools in <India> are far inferior, correct?  This is possible, but at the same time an over generalization/categorization.  A similar statement might be as follows:

"All High School graduates who went to public school are inferior to those who were privately schooled."

Sure, it might be true for a good portion of individuals, but it is certainly not true of all.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 14, 2010, 11:17:20 PM
Medical schools in India are not bad at all.  I have been considering going to one eventually.  And yes, they are typically taught in English from what I understand.  I just really am not interested in living in India.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 15, 2010, 12:20:21 AM
Medical schools in India are not bad at all.  I have been considering going to one eventually.  And yes, they are typically taught in English from what I understand.  I just really am not interested in living in India.

A lot of Indians come here for their education, and it costs a lot more. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 15, 2010, 11:51:55 AM
Advertise 'em as talismans to ward off the sickeningly evil-sweet soccer moms, for cool moms only to hang from the rear-view mirror of their Ram Quad Cab or similarly non-wimpy kid-hauler.    "I retain the right to refuse sale to soccer moms with e-mail names that make me want to barf"  $5 each, 3 for $10

You'll sell 'em by the bushel basket.

I agree, except the price point is too low.  Make them $7 each and three for $18.  I'm not even a mom and I'd buy one. 

Thanks for the thoughts. I'll need to figure out the pricing after I've tried making a couple. The last 3 animals I made went pretty quickly, during the LOTR New Year's Eve/Day marathon. I think the creepy cute creations might be a little smaller, so would go at least as fast, even with the greater detail. I'll take better photos before setting up shop, but I'm currently keeping track of which patterns/items work out pretty well on Flickr:
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/4276180335_6075f0fce1_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4025/4276180217_098ef614a8_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4038/4270890471_3b16f1b48b_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/4271645362_eed546a8cd_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4271645286_a26e967346_m.jpg)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/89027102@N00/sets/72157623201737012/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/89027102@N00/sets/72157623201737012/)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 15, 2010, 12:07:12 PM
Medical schools in India are not bad at all.  I have been considering going to one eventually.  And yes, they are typically taught in English from what I understand.  I just really am not interested in living in India.

A lot of Indians come here for their education, and it costs a lot more. 
That is true as well.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on January 15, 2010, 07:37:51 PM
Laetitia, if you created them with Organic Bamboo Thread, or other "greenie" type stuff, you may rouse a little more interest.

I know a gal who makes these little things, bought one for my daughter (Bunny & carrot). She loves it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 15, 2010, 08:58:28 PM
Is it ever a good idea to discuss your IQ or that of others on the internet?



That was rhetorical.  There's no need to answer.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 15, 2010, 09:35:33 PM
Laetitia, if you created them with Organic Bamboo Thread, or other "greenie" type stuff, you may rouse a little more interest.

I know a gal who makes these little things, bought one for my daughter (Bunny & carrot). She loves it.

To some extent, yes. But the prices for supplies to able to put the organic label on a product are much higher, and I'd have to charge more. The etsy crowd will be sticklers for any little detail, and you don't want to get it wrong, or you get a bad reputation right off the bat. By going with upcycling and recycling, I have more flexibility, and can have a slightly higher profit margin. Plus, there's the added perk of me not needing "perfect", so I'm getting merchandise off the rack at goodwill that would otherwise have gone unsold. Doesn't matter to me if buttons are missing, there's a rip in the cuff, or a coffee stain at the neck... I can chop enough material out of it to make a doll or child's clothing item, which is a part of the treehugger code I am actually quite happy with. Environmentally aware doesn't have to mean moonbat; I'll settle for thrifty. Thrift has character.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on January 15, 2010, 09:45:40 PM
Well when it's described like that, it sounds even better than organic!  :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 15, 2010, 09:46:07 PM
Great stuff Joy


My question for the thread is:

Do you like Swing music?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 15, 2010, 10:39:44 PM
My question for the thread is:

Do you like Swing music?

Yes, yes I do.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 16, 2010, 12:05:01 AM
My question for the thread is:

Do you like Swing music?

Yes, yes I do.
Awesome, I saw these guys tonight: http://www.myspace.com/thestilettosmusic
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 16, 2010, 12:07:01 AM
Is it ever a good idea to discuss your IQ or that of others on the internet?



That was rhetorical.  There's no need to answer.

Oh hey, look at that.  Good to see another familiar face. . . and unchanged avatar picture.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 16, 2010, 12:14:47 AM
Is it ever a good idea to discuss your IQ or that of others on the internet?



That was rhetorical.  There's no need to answer.

Oh hey, look at that.  Good to see another familiar face. . . and unchanged avatar picture.

Nice to see you back around these parts, too :)  I'm not really into changing my avatar.  First, because Milton Friedman is/was awesome.  And second, because I usually recognize people by their avatars more than usernames, I like it when they stay relatively constant.  Of course, neither avatars nor usernames stay fixed for very long on most of the accounts around here :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 18, 2010, 01:45:04 PM
Memo to Ecolitan, since he didn't get it the first time:  I am not taking you seriously.  I am laughing at you, because you took a misunderstanding about IQ and turned it into a burning tower of rage and then accused me of trying to pick a fight, and that's hilarious to me.   Probably not good for your health, though, so you might want to smoke a joint or something.  

the burning tower of rage is long overdue and was brought on by you calling me a liar... NOT the misunderstanding (read, complete lack of attempt to understand what the conversation was about before deciding to disagree with it).  You're a cunt.  You never answered.  Why did you post in a conversation you were clueless about if not to start a fight?  WHY?  What did you want to accomplish by disagreeing with a statement you made no effort to understand?  Is it reasonable to expect that would be met with anything but contempt?

It's true, probably not good for my health, that's why I've long avoided you and threads you're involved in.  Because once upon a time you said something awful about a demographic you had no idea applied to me or anyone else here.  It struck me in a profound way.  I produce more than I consume and don't hurt anyone and anyone for whom that is not good enough reason to refrain from disparaging or spreading hate towards the harmless person is someone to be avoided.  So I do.  Because I know even if you don't that when you say "Hi Royce" you mean "Hi Royce you complete waste of space I wish you would quit sucking up my oxygen and I hope awful things happen to you".  I try to avoid that.  it effects me.  I will continue to be upset and abusive when you make that difficult for me.  Leaving the board entirely is even less desirable so I will continue to encourage you to stay the fuck away any way I can.  I hope I've made some progress toward that. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 18, 2010, 01:58:14 PM
the burning tower of rage is long overdue and was brought on by you calling me a liar...

I have found that, without exception, people who throw their IQ around tend to be assholes who are most likely liars as well.  

If this statement does not apply to you, I did not, in fact, call you a liar.  If you think it does apply, then it is most likely true for you and therefore there's no reason for me to regret saying it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 18, 2010, 02:00:42 PM
You, I and every reader in this thread knows you very much intended it to apply to me.  I am again calling you intentionally deceitful.  It also further illustrates how you came in the thread disagreeing w/ me w/o having any idea what the conversation was about?  Clearly your intention was no to participate in the conversation since you didn't even know what it was about.  That leaves disagreeing w/ me as your intention.  That's what you did, came here just to disagree w/ me regardless of what the conversation was about.. i.e. to pick a fight.  Cuz you're a cunt.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 18, 2010, 02:14:35 PM
You, I and every reader in this thread knows you very much intended it to apply to me.

Yes, because I thought you were claiming that your IQ was 132, and that it's 12 points higher than mine, which is a douchebag thing to do.  As I believe I've said....a few times.

Quote
Cuz you're a cunt.

Holy fuck, I give up. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 18, 2010, 02:36:26 PM
You, I and every reader in this thread knows you very much intended it to apply to me.

Yes, because I thought you were claiming that your IQ was 132, and that it's 12 points higher than mine, which is a douchebag thing to do.  As I believe I've said....a few times.

Quote
Cuz you're a cunt.

Holy fuck, I give up. 

It's probably best, even though he'll now add "quitter" to all the other terribly lovely things he has to say about you. Or, maybe he'll use his genius to come up with more creative ways to challenge you than by simply shooting back one word insults worthy of a middle school spat.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 18, 2010, 03:15:36 PM
Quote from: Rillion link=topic=27003.msg584693#msg584693 date=1263842075

Yes, [i
because I thought you were claiming that your IQ was 132, and that it's 12 points higher than mine[/i], which is a douchebag thing to do.  As I believe I've said....a few times.


I know you thought that.  I've understood that all along because I read what you had to say and understood it before I ever responded.  YOU did not because disagreeing with me is what was important to you, NOT participating in the conversation.  Because you're a cunt.  

Quote from: a couple of pages ago when you read this and STILL didn't realize that I've known all along that you THOUGHT I was saying something that I was not
as if I just up and said "132, average for the neighborhood" entirely in a vaccum

I won't call you a quitter.  It would be more than I could possibly hope to accomplish to have you stay the fuck away from me as I try to do with you.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 18, 2010, 10:39:44 PM
Advertise 'em as talismans to ward off the sickeningly evil-sweet soccer moms, for cool moms only to hang from the rear-view mirror of their Ram Quad Cab or similarly non-wimpy kid-hauler.    "I retain the right to refuse sale to soccer moms with e-mail names that make me want to barf"  $5 each, 3 for $10

You'll sell 'em by the bushel basket.

I agree, except the price point is too low.  Make them $7 each and three for $18.  I'm not even a mom and I'd buy one.  

Thanks for the thoughts. I'll need to figure out the pricing after I've tried making a couple. The last 3 animals I made went pretty quickly, during the LOTR New Year's Eve/Day marathon. I think the creepy cute creations might be a little smaller, so would go at least as fast, even with the greater detail. I'll take better photos before setting up shop, but I'm currently keeping track of which patterns/items work out pretty well on Flickr:
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/4276180335_6075f0fce1_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4025/4276180217_098ef614a8_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4038/4270890471_3b16f1b48b_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4058/4271645362_eed546a8cd_m.jpg)
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4271645286_a26e967346_m.jpg)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/89027102@N00/sets/72157623201737012/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/89027102@N00/sets/72157623201737012/)


You sexy hippy you!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 18, 2010, 10:45:36 PM
You sexy hippy you!

just because I'm not wearing a bra does not make me a hippie  :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 25, 2010, 12:16:06 AM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 25, 2010, 12:18:03 AM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

Performing acts of gluttony and watching funny commercials.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 25, 2010, 12:54:47 AM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

I will be working!  I think I'd rather watch football... :x
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 25, 2010, 01:13:32 AM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

Drink yourself into a stupor. Always works.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 25, 2010, 01:25:59 AM
Does anybody have any tips for fighting utility bills that are too high?

I live in a one bedroom apartment and got an electric bill for $230 for the past month.
The only things that use any significant electricity are my laptop, a lamp, a few small ceiling lights, the microwave and the fridge. Thats it. My heating is through gas.

My parents have a monstrous 2 story house with many electronics plugged in/running at any given time. Multiple computers, 2 tv's, a well that takes in water based on electricity, 4 or more different people turning on lights, etc etc...and their bill was 110 for the same time period with the same company. WTF

I dont recall what the "units" were but basically the statement said that last years usage was 20 for the past tenant during this time frame. Mine was 2000.  My bill has been rising exponentially since Aug. when I moved in.

First call to them resulted in them denying any wrong-doing, tomorrow morning I am going to their physical location and demanding answers. If they do not compensate me I will refuse to pay it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 25, 2010, 02:24:36 AM
Does anybody have any tips for fighting utility bills that are too high?

I live in a one bedroom apartment and got an electric bill for $230 for the past month.
The only things that use any significant electricity are my laptop, a lamp, a few small ceiling lights, the microwave and the fridge. Thats it. My heating is through gas.

My parents have a monstrous 2 story house with many electronics plugged in/running at any given time. Multiple computers, 2 tv's, a well that takes in water based on electricity, 4 or more different people turning on lights, etc etc...and their bill was 110 for the same time period with the same company. WTF

I dont recall what the "units" were but basically the statement said that last years usage was 20 for the past tenant during this time frame. Mine was 2000.  My bill has been rising exponentially since Aug. when I moved in.

First call to them resulted in them denying any wrong-doing, tomorrow morning I am going to their physical location and demanding answers. If they do not compensate me I will refuse to pay it.

Usually they don't physically read the meter every month, they do estimates based on history of the location then do an "actual" which will adjust.  Rate hikes will effect this too, and they've all been doing rate hikes in the last year, so it may be a combination of the two - applying the rate hike (if any) on top of the estimated period.  

Air conditioners are usually the guilty culprits, if it jacked up rapidly in the fall and you're new there even a small AC unit can suck down the wattage.  

Sometimes there is a baseboard heater in a bathroom that is turned to "low" and its just running forever and you don't know about it.  

If you're living in an apartment, make sure where your meter location goes straight to your breaker box, and all the switches control shit inside your pad.  Sometimes in old houses theres a rogue switch that goes to a porch light or something weird, like an outside porch plug, and if the neighbors know about it, they may run a cord off it to power a heater.  You must be aware of where all wires go, and what they power.  So you'll need to turn all your lights on, plug stuff into all your outlets, the go to the breaker box and shut everything off.  Then, 1 by 1, come back and turn each switch on, and check what it powers.  Its really the only way to get familiar with the routing of the wiring.  If you have extra switches in the box that don't seem to power anything in your pad, leave them turned off.  

If the water heater is electric, check the dial and turn it down to as low as you can comfortably tolerate the warm water.  

Put a thermometer in your fridge for a few days and keep turning the cold setting down (less cold) until the fridge reads 36 degrees.  

The measure of 2000 kw/h versus the last tenants usage of 20 is not normal.  Ask them to audit the other accounts in the place with similar features (you probably know which others have 1BR and a single guy living in it)  Yours should be approximately what theirs is, give or take for personal habits.  They may say its confidential information, ask for a manager.  Tell the manager you have no interest in anyones personal information, but would like him/her to compare your account to others in the building.  They should be similar.  

If they insist the 2000 kw/h is correct and everyone else is using about 20/30ish, tell them you want the meter socket replaced.  You have legitimate grounds to believe there is something wrong with their meter.  (the meter socket is the glass dome part that covers all the whirly dials, and the mechanical junk inside it)  This piece just pops out of the gray box, simple.  The socket belongs to the electric company, it is their property and must be checked if it is disputed.  

My last electric bills were in the $60-70/mo range and I ran central air all summer long at 73*, and everything was electric.  I have no idea how many kw/h I was using, but it sure as fuck wasn't 2000, it was more like 100ish.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 25, 2010, 02:57:54 AM
Air conditioners are usually the guilty culprits, if it jacked up rapidly in the fall and you're new there even a small AC unit can suck down the wattage. 
Its the middle of winter here (WI) so no AC units have been used since Aug. And even then my bill was less than 50 bucks.

Quote
Sometimes there is a baseboard heater in a bathroom that is turned to "low" and its just running forever and you don't know about it. 
We dont have anything like that. Literally there is nothing else that can be plugged in in the place. Maybe a phone charger, a printer, and occasionally my gal's hair straightener.

Quote
If you're living in an apartment, make sure where your meter location goes straight to your breaker box, and all the switches control shit inside your pad.  Sometimes in old houses theres a rogue switch that goes to a porch light or something weird, like an outside porch plug, and if the neighbors know about it, they may run a cord off it to power a heater.  You must be aware of where all wires go, and what they power. 
I may have to go scouting around outside then. Maybe the plugs the landlord (I live in the upper half of a house, shes downstairs) uses to power Christmas lights are wired to my meter?
Quote
 So you'll need to turn all your lights on, plug stuff into all your outlets, the go to the breaker box and shut everything off.  Then, 1 by 1, come back and turn each switch on, and check what it powers.  Its really the only way to get familiar with the routing of the wiring.  If you have extra switches in the box that don't seem to power anything in your pad, leave them turned off. 
I dont think I have access to a breaker. I think it is in the landlords basement, and when I have called her about the ridiculously high bills (other bills are unreasonably high too, but thats a different story) she says she wont do anything, I just have to talk to the utility companies.

Quote
If the water heater is electric, check the dial and turn it down to as low as you can comfortably tolerate the warm water. 
I have about 5 minutes of warm water before it is completely gone when I take a shower. I've timed it at about 6 if I keep it lukewarm and turn the water on when I'm standing directly under the spout. I havent seen the water heater, but if a smaller version for homes exists I'd be very surprised.

Quote
Put a thermometer in your fridge for a few days and keep turning the cold setting down until the fridge reads 36 degrees. 
I'm not sure how that helps? Turn the temp down?

Quote
They may say its confidential information, ask for a manager.  Tell the manager you have no interest in anyones personal information, but would like him/her to compare your account to others in the building.  They should be similar. 
If they insist the 2000 kw/h is correct and everyone else is using about 20/30ish, tell them you want the meter socket replaced.
When I talked to them on the phone they said multiple things which necessitate me storming their physical turf. First off, they refuse to give me a past history of any data beyond the small amount that gave me the 20 vs 2000. They claimed it was "illegal" for them to do so. Second, I wanted to speak to a manager, but they would not let me. >:( Finally, they said that the meter was actually recently replaced. This was something I had noticed on my own because the first electric bill I received was reasonable, all the rest just got outrageous as they grew and grew and grew. The first bill I noticed said meter #XXXXXXX but all the rest after that said #YYYYYYYY. I pointed this out to them thinking perhaps they were reading someone elses house or something but nope, they claimed the whole town got new meters at that time.
 
Quote
My last electric bills were in the $60-70/mo range and I ran central air all summer long at 73*, and everything was electric.  I have no idea how many kw/h I was using, but it sure as fuck wasn't 2000, it was more like 100ish. 
I kept the AC off and stripped clothing off when it was hot, I almost always have the heat at 55 F unless my gal is around for a few days during which I temporarily crank it up to 65. I dont have anything really in my apartment that does anything and I dont even do many dishes or cooking since I work as a cook and eat the majority of my meals at work.

I was really really shocked when I saw my parents bill. If you combine their bill for the house with theirs for the barn (which uses a lot due to poor heating, heating water, lights, freezers, etc.) it still barely breaks 200 bucks.

In sum I am mostly pissed because I was told utilities (gas, water, elec, water, sewer, etc.) would come to about 150 per month when I signed the lease. Actual total last month for those: 400+.  Thats an entire paycheck, or half my total pay each month straight to these bills.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 25, 2010, 04:52:41 AM
If your breaker panel is in the basement, and you have no access to switches, check on the outside of the house and see how many meter sockets there are.  If there are two residences in the house there should be two glass-domed meters, one is yours and one is the landlords.  If there is only one, you are paying the electricity for the entire house. 

When you rent a duplex, the electricity is supposed to come inside in a straight line from the meter to the residence, so you have access for blown circuits - or to shut the whole fucker down in an emergency.  It shouldn't be in the basement.  Ask the landlord to see it, even if there are two glass domes - you'll be able to tell if both are active by just looking at them. 

Inside the basement, it'll run into two panels - one should power her house, and one should power your stuff.  Trace the wires, just open the doors and look.  If theres only one box, you're getting fucked.  It'd be a good reason to refuse to show you, it'd be my immediate suspicion.  (there will actually be one small box and one large box in each set-up, a master with a primary kill-switch and then that goes into the big box)  So in the properly designed rig, there would actually be four  boxes in total, small-into-big for hers, and small-into-big for yours.  Get it? 

If your water is running out that quickly, I suspect the whole house is running off one water heater.  When the utilities are all mixed up like that, its usually that the upstairs (or whichever is the renters side) is given utilities included wit the rent, and they're all the landlords responsibility.  She would charge you 600 (or whatever) and you'd have no other bill - and fueling the upstairs could be zoned off her one electric box, and one furnace.  If you're paying elec,gas,water, and have no access to any of the shit, she could've switched everything over in a situation like that into your name when you accepted the tenancy. 

There should be two furnaces, two gas meters, two electric meters, two water meters, two water heaters - all on separate utilities in the situation you describe.  Nothing should be shared.  Not one water heater, not one furnace.  Two.  No excuses.  I would tell her since the bills are so much higher than expected, you demand to check the settings on the water heater to make sure its properly adjusted.   

Even if there are two gas meters, and only one electric panel, the gas could be on the up-and-up and she's augmenting her heat with your electricity, thinking she won't get caught by a rube, since the gas is technically the primary heat source.  Maybe a little personal-sized space heater to keep the chill down, so her furnace doesn't kick on as often.  I am very suspicious of this large rise in kw/h consumption. 

Ask how many accounts are active in the house if ALL those meters are not visible or located outside.     

Don't take any shit from these people.  Know your shit and be certain of your accusations.  Wait til they're not home downstairs and give everything a thorough look.  Take pictures.  Christmas lights aren't enough to make much of a difference, if she just has a few strands like normal people. 

--

The fridge controls, down is actually warmer in many fridges = less cold, and up is colder = more cold.  It varies.  But in this case, its probably not the problem.  I was just saying to turn everything to its more efficient directions. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 25, 2010, 12:04:35 PM
Does anybody have any tips for fighting utility bills that are too high?

I live in a one bedroom apartment and got an electric bill for $230 for the past month.
The only things that use any significant electricity are my laptop, a lamp, a few small ceiling lights, the microwave and the fridge. Thats it. My heating is through gas.

My parents have a monstrous 2 story house with many electronics plugged in/running at any given time. Multiple computers, 2 tv's, a well that takes in water based on electricity, 4 or more different people turning on lights, etc etc...and their bill was 110 for the same time period with the same company. WTF

I dont recall what the "units" were but basically the statement said that last years usage was 20 for the past tenant during this time frame. Mine was 2000.  My bill has been rising exponentially since Aug. when I moved in.

First call to them resulted in them denying any wrong-doing, tomorrow morning I am going to their physical location and demanding answers. If they do not compensate me I will refuse to pay it.

I'd suggest unplugging any and all little gadgets when not in use. Like the microwave. It is still drawing power for the clock when you are not using it. Multiply that by all the electronics you might have plugged in. Also, electric has been going up regular for awhile. Double check with your parents and verify what they are paying.

You might want to get a hold of the power company and see if they have a free home check up program.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on January 25, 2010, 12:13:32 PM
You could try one of these things.

http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/ (http://the-gadgeteer.com/2003/12/23/kill_a_watt_electric_usage_monitor_review/)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 25, 2010, 12:47:23 PM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

If the weather is nice go for a bike ride with your man. Take along a little food in a backpack and stop at a park for lunch.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 25, 2010, 12:55:57 PM
I'm I being picked on by my boss?

Set up scenario.

I had a picture of von Mises for my desktop wallpaper. The boss did not like it because he associated Mises' mustache with Hitler. I replaced it with a wallpaper of a close up of a common house fly. I thought it looked interesting since how often does one see a house fly that close up. It was neat. The boss must have come in after hours and removed it. I can sort of see the Mises one, but it boggles me that he was offended by a house fly.

Note:  I will honor his wishes as he is the boss and it is a company computer.  I just thought this was strange. Also, I thought a Mises picture would be ambiguous enough as to not offend anyone. I was right at least in the political encomic way.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 25, 2010, 02:49:52 PM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

If the weather is nice go for a bike ride with your man. Take along a little food in a backpack and stop at a park for lunch.

Great idea, though not during super bowl, unless you have proper gear for riding at night.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on January 25, 2010, 03:06:05 PM
I'm I being picked on by my boss?

Set up scenario.

I had a picture of von Mises for my desktop wallpaper. The boss did not like it because he associated Mises' mustache with Hitler. I replaced it with a wallpaper of a close up of a common house fly. I thought it looked interesting since how often does one see a house fly that close up. It was neat. The boss must have come in after hours and removed it. I can sort of see the Mises one, but it boggles me that he was offended by a house fly.

Note:  I will honor his wishes as he is the boss and it is a company computer.  I just thought this was strange. Also, I thought a Mises picture would be ambiguous enough as to not offend anyone. I was right at least in the political encomic way.


It sounds like you are being picked on. Once your desktop got onto his "radar" he has come to pay way too much attention to it. It is now like a gnat bugging him. If I were you, I would go completely in the other direction now to disarm him. Put up one of the following:

1) a blank wallpaper
2) your company logo
3) something that represents something to do with your company's industry
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 25, 2010, 03:19:03 PM
Does anyone want to run a half marathon through lovely Calloway Gardens this coming weekend... pretending to be me?

It's supposed to be right around freezing Sunday morning, and I don't wanna go. (I will, but don't wanna.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on January 25, 2010, 03:57:52 PM
I think your boss sounds like a douche, since the last time you mentioned him he was being an ass about upgrading to a current version of IE.  He should concentrate on more important things, micromanagement is a sign of incompetence and indicates an inability to prioritize.  In other words, those things don't matter. 

It doesn't mean he's not a Decent Chap, and slurping the morning coffee with him is a valid reason for suicide.  People are multi-layered.  But those quirks, very douche. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 25, 2010, 04:17:30 PM
It sounds like you are being picked on. Once your desktop got onto his "radar" he has come to pay way too much attention to it. It is now like a gnat bugging him. If I were you, I would go completely in the other direction now to disarm him. Put up one of the following:

1) a blank wallpaper
2) your company logo
3) something that represents something to do with your company's industry

Going with blank screen might be seen as smart ass. Company logo, or industry related image is better, unless your industry is food. In that case, you should avoid white bread, vanilla ice cream, and things like that.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 25, 2010, 07:33:58 PM
It defaulted to the theme color I had it on so it is basically blank. So far he has not done anything to the forest scene I have on my main/desk PC. Very odd.

The version of I.E. is determined by our Information Services department so the boss was not being a douche there. I could go get firefox but I've made it a point not to mess with the setup Info Service has configured. It is tempting but I wont.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 25, 2010, 07:44:55 PM
What is the best way to spend February 7th if you don't give a shit about the Super Bowl?

Come to Chicago and go to see the Best Church of God: http://www.bestchurchofgod.org/.god/?72
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 25, 2010, 07:48:55 PM
It defaulted to the theme color I had it on so it is basically blank. So far he has not done anything to the forest scene I have on my main/desk PC. Very odd.

The version of I.E. is determined by our Information Services department so the boss was not being a douche there. I could go get firefox but I've made it a point not to mess with the setup Info Service has configured. It is tempting but I wont.



At my company we're all supposed to have the exact same (company logo) wallpaper.  It's kind of dull, but I don't really spend any real amount of time staring at my desktop so it doesn't bother me all that much.  I would think a closeup of a fly should be fine.  Perhaps you could try something abstract like neat architecture or a landscape.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 28, 2010, 06:29:46 AM
Question:

Why do assholes with shitty cars have to have the most annoying and over sensitive alarm systems?  I just got home and set off this damn shitty civic's alarm system for the 4th time this week.  I put a Flowmaster 50 SUV series muffler on my Suburban just so that it would have a good sound but not be too loud!  It's really not that loud!  I got the quietest damned Flowmaster muffler they make that's designed to eliminate drone just so it could have a good sound but be relatively quiet.  And this fucker who just moved into my apartment complex has to have the most RIDICULOUSLY sensitive alarm system on their shitty ass early 90's Honda Civic!  NOBODY WANTS TO STEAL YOUR POS CAR!  TURN THAT SHIT OFF so I don't keep waking up the entire complex when I get home at 3AM.

I think I'm going to try and teach this person a lesson by repeatedly setting off the alarm as many times as possible in one day so it kills their damned battery.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on January 28, 2010, 08:06:49 AM
I once had flowmasters on a chevy truck.  It was loud.  I hated driving through residential areas at night.  I never would have bought them myself but they came with the truck.  Over a couple of years I set off 3 alarms total and none at idle.  It was not quiet with good sound.  It was loud and obnoxious and rude.  If you're setting off his over-sensitive alarm you're waking up at least part of the complex anyway.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 28, 2010, 08:16:33 AM
I once had flowmasters on a chevy truck.  It was loud.  I hated driving through residential areas at night.  I never would have bought them myself but they came with the truck.  Over a couple of years I set off 3 alarms total and none at idle.  It was not quiet with good sound.  It was loud and obnoxious and rude.  If you're setting off his over-sensitive alarm you're waking up at least part of the complex anyway.
The Flowmaster 40 series I had on my last Suburban was super loud and obnoxious.  The 50 series SUV is much quieter believe me.  I couldn't deal with another 40 series, but the 50 series isn't very loud, especially when the truck is just idling.

It sounds like this exactly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXWBqnbmgzE

Vs. the 40 series that sounds like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlgo41ELZ0  Far more obnoxious.

Trust me, my truck is only loud when I open the throttle wide open.  It's their quietest muffler.  This person just moved in, and they have an oversensitive alarm system.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 28, 2010, 01:39:46 PM
I used to date a guy who lived near downtown Dallas, across the street from a parking garage.  Unfortunately, the part of the parking garage right across from his bedroom window contained some sort of speed bump.  And somebody with a highly sensitive car alarm regularly parked right next to that bump.  This meant that when somebody else was working late at night (or whatever they were doing) and drove down the ramp and over that bump, it would set off that car's alarm.  It was the typical variable alarm:  WOOOOOP  WOOOOOP  WOOOOP EH EH EH EH HHHEEEOOOO HEEEOOOOO etc.  Every time somebody went over that bump.  Cue lack of sleep, murderous rage.

We went into the garage, located the car, and put a note under the windshield wiper.  Not "Fuck you, asshole," but just explaining what was happening and requesting that he park somewhere else.  And he did-- after that night we never heard the alarm again.   I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice-- it wasn't as if we could track the guy down and explain things to him in person, because we didn't know where in the area he actually worked or was hanging out.  To be honest I would've gotten some satisfaction out of shooting out his windows, but he probably had no actual idea of how much his car was disrupting the sleep of two very pissed off people across the street.  Sometimes people just need to be made aware, politely, of how much of a dick they are being and they'll cut it out.  Problem solved, everyone's happy. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on January 28, 2010, 02:03:05 PM
WOOOOOP  WOOOOOP  WOOOOP EH EH EH EH HHHEEEOOOO HEEEOOOOO

Wonderful. :D
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 28, 2010, 02:12:45 PM
WOOOOOP  WOOOOOP  WOOOOP EH EH EH EH HHHEEEOOOO HEEEOOOOO

Wonderful. :D

This.  Personally I would like video of Rillion making these noises.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 28, 2010, 02:26:09 PM
WOOOOOP  WOOOOOP  WOOOOP EH EH EH EH HHHEEEOOOO HEEEOOOOO

Wonderful. :D

This.  Personally I would like video of Rillion making these noises.   :lol:

Sorry, I only make those noises during sex, and I'm not showing you video of that.  

"Having sex with her is incredible. It's just like a concert, I swear it is.  We throw Frisbees around the room. And when she wants more, she lights a match." -- Steven Wright
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 28, 2010, 02:38:03 PM
WOOOOOP  WOOOOOP  WOOOOP EH EH EH EH HHHEEEOOOO HEEEOOOOO

Wonderful. :D

This.  Personally I would like video of Rillion making these noises.   :lol:

Sorry, I only make those noises during sex, and I'm not showing you video of that.  

"Having sex with her is incredible. It's just like a concert, I swear it is.  We throw Frisbees around the room. And when she wants more, she lights a match." -- Steven Wright

Car alarm noises during sex...this sounds like an awesome prank I would pull.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on January 28, 2010, 03:54:39 PM
... I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice--...

Really? I don't think note-leaving is passive aggressive. Notes are practical tools that serve a useful purpose. It is not like you were using it to be malicious, manipulative, or secretive. I'm glad it got you a result.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on January 28, 2010, 04:01:42 PM
... I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice--...

Really? I don't think note-leaving is passive aggressive. Notes are practical tools that serve a useful purpose. It is not like you were using it to be malicious, manipulative, or secretive. I'm glad it got you a result.
Notes are probably a much nicer thing to leave than the dead battery I'd like to leave this person.

It's a good idea and I think I'll do it.  Just a suggestion to get their alarm system tuned so it isn't so sensitive.  It's not like I'm backing into my parking spot revving my engine or anything, it just idles as I roll into the spot very slowly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 28, 2010, 04:08:14 PM
... I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice--...

Really? I don't think note-leaving is passive aggressive. Notes are practical tools that serve a useful purpose. It is not like you were using it to be malicious, manipulative, or secretive. I'm glad it got you a result.

I really, really hate confronting people.  And I read Passive Aggressive Notes (http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/) a lot (it's hilarious, by the way, you should check it out).  So I don't think that leaving a note is always passive aggressive, but sometimes have a hard time telling when it is and when it isn't.  It's certainly better than screaming at someone, but it's not likely to make you their best friend either. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on January 28, 2010, 04:15:44 PM
... I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice--...

Really? I don't think note-leaving is passive aggressive. Notes are practical tools that serve a useful purpose. It is not like you were using it to be malicious, manipulative, or secretive. I'm glad it got you a result.

I really, really hate confronting people.  And I read Passive Aggressive Notes (http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/) a lot (it's hilarious, by the way, you should check it out).  So I don't think that leaving a note is always passive aggressive, but sometimes have a hard time telling when it is and when it isn't.  It's certainly better than screaming at someone, but it's not likely to make you their best friend either. 

I'm a note person too.  I have a problem with talking to people, like my employees when they've done something that isn't exactly acceptable.  Either because I'll get mad or ask them why they did something so stupid, and to me that's crossing a line and it's just easier to leave them a note on occasion. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 28, 2010, 07:27:00 PM
... I'm a note-leaver by nature, and I know that's a passive aggressive thing to do, but in this case there really wasn't any choice--...

Really? I don't think note-leaving is passive aggressive. Notes are practical tools that serve a useful purpose. It is not like you were using it to be malicious, manipulative, or secretive. I'm glad it got you a result.


In some scenarios, it is, but in this context, its the easiest way to get a point across, and not really passive-aggressive.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 30, 2010, 07:12:19 PM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on January 30, 2010, 08:18:46 PM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

I swear more in real life.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on January 30, 2010, 08:28:22 PM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

I'm more agreeable in real life :)

Aside from that, I'd say I'm pretty similar.  I don't really try to put off a different persona online than I do in real life.  I say I'm more agreeable in real life because I would rather stay friends with people in real life than be "right", at least most of the time.  There's much less personal connection to people I only know through online mediums.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: CaL DaVe on January 31, 2010, 01:00:08 AM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

When I get angry, I start turning green and become increadibly strong. Most of my arguments end with me yelling out "CAL DAVE SMASH!!!! RRRRAAAAHHHH!!!"

Then my wife has to buy me a new shirt.  :?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 31, 2010, 11:19:44 AM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

I swear more in real life.

I swear less in real life. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: theCelestrian on January 31, 2010, 11:37:15 AM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

Tough.  I try to make my online persona in the BBS as close to "me" (that's why I sign w/ my real name, my avatar pic is one of me, etc...)  I think the main difference is going to be that my body language, look on my face and tone of voice is missing here - which because I have no inner monologue, tends to play poorly when people say ignorant things in my general direction.

My team of developers that I lead often call me, "the jerk/asshole (affectionately - because they realize my personality directly makes their jobs easier)" - with the two terms used interchangeably, and that's because especially at work, I say what I mean, mean what I say and if something is stupid or a person has demonstrated themselves as being incompetant I have zero compunctions with proclaiming as much.

However, I'm still just as verbose in real life.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 01, 2010, 03:38:11 PM
I think I tend to come of angry in this board. I talk the same in real life, but it is easier to see sarcasm and a smile in real life so I come off a lot more personable. I'm quite a regular guy (a bit gregarious) and I feel safe saying that if I sat down for a coffee or a beer with anyone here, we would get along famously.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 01, 2010, 03:56:31 PM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

In real life I am Ellen DeGeneres.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 01, 2010, 06:03:20 PM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

In real life I am Ellen DeGeneres.

I knew it!  :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 02, 2010, 01:58:15 AM
How does your online persona differ from your real-life persona?

In real life I am Ellen DeGeneres.

I knew it!  :lol:

Well, I guessed the gender wrong, but the haircut correctly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on February 02, 2010, 02:07:26 AM
The person's car alarm went off again today when I slammed my truck's door.  :shock:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 02, 2010, 10:24:27 PM
Not a question, but an answer...and a very thorough one: How to poach an egg (http://www.b3ta.com/features/howtopoachanegg/).  It covers several different methods, but I've done the recommended one a few times and can definitely vouch for it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on February 02, 2010, 11:03:00 PM
I've never had a poached egg, and I'm glad.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 02, 2010, 11:09:56 PM
I've never had a poached egg, and I'm glad.

I never thought I could deal with the runny yolk thing....ate exclusively scrambled or hard boiled eggs until I was 25 or so. Then one morning a friend made me an egg over easy on a toasted English muffin with bacon and cheese.....holy bejeezus.  Mouth orgasm.  Changed my whole perspective.  A poached egg can achieve the same effect, and if done correctly can be the easier, cleaner, and (most importantly) tastier option. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 02, 2010, 11:11:54 PM
I cant stand egg (like eating melted rubber YUCK) but I need to make them at my job.

What is your method for boiling an egg (or more than one)?

I've heard many ways, and many of the recommended "work every time" ones suck.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 02, 2010, 11:29:51 PM
I cant stand egg (like eating melted rubber YUCK) but I need to make them at my job.

What is your method for boiling an egg (or more than one)?

I've heard many ways, and many of the recommended "work every time" ones suck.

For the longest time I thought the best method was to get the water to a boiling point and then add the egg(s), and leave them in there for 20 minutes or so.  But recently I watched a video on raising and cooking chickens and eggs which said that the best method is to not actually allow the water to boil, but to come just short of it.  This allows you to basically steam the eggs if you want a more creamy, less rubbery texture to them.  Eggs are notoriously hard to cook well.  When they want to mess with the contestants on Top Chef, they tell them to cook eggs.  But it takes time and trial and error to do properly....which is probably exactly why they would demand that people do it in a cooking competition. 

Note: I am no chef....not at all.  I just know what tastes good to me.  I think a soft-boiled egg in an egg cup is less than optimal, yet that's what a lot of European restaurants serve standard for breakfast. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 02, 2010, 11:38:04 PM
I've never had a poached egg, and I'm glad.

I never thought I could deal with the runny yolk thing....ate exclusively scrambled or hard boiled eggs until I was 25 or so. Then one morning a friend made me an egg over easy on a toasted English muffin with bacon and cheese.....holy bejeezus.  Mouth orgasm.  Changed my whole perspective.  A poached egg can achieve the same effect, and if done correctly can be the easier, cleaner, and (most importantly) tastier option. 

Poached and over-easy eggs are the way to go.  The runny yolk has so much more flavor than it does when it's hard.  It is definitely a mouthgasm.  I've never heard of wrapping the egg in plastic wrap, and I'd be slightly worried about it melting, particularly if the plastic hits the side or bottom of the pot for any length of time.  I usually try to keep the water just above simmering heat, add a bit of vinegar, and break the egg very gently into the water.  It works decently when done properly, but it's never perfect.  I'm intrigued by the plastic wrap thing.  Maybe I'll try it :)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 02, 2010, 11:50:27 PM
I've never heard of wrapping the egg in plastic wrap, and I'd be slightly worried about it melting, particularly if the plastic hits the side or bottom of the pot for any length of time.  I usually try to keep the water just above simmering heat, add a bit of vinegar, and break the egg very gently into the water.  It works decently when done properly, but it's never perfect.  I'm intrigued by the plastic wrap thing.  Maybe I'll try it :)

The egg in the plastic wrap will float, but you can try twining the plastic wrap around a spatula or something to keep it suspended in the middle of the pot.  I didn't find that necessary, however, and the plastic wrap didn't break open.  Once I did leave it in too long and the yolk solidified, but if you time it right that shouldn't be a problem. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 03, 2010, 12:22:59 AM
Put eggs in cool water and bring to full boil.  Maintain for five minutes, remove from heat and allow to cool.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 03, 2010, 10:45:08 AM
Not a question, but an answer...and a very thorough one: How to poach an egg (http://www.b3ta.com/features/howtopoachanegg/).  It covers several different methods, but I've done the recommended one a few times and can definitely vouch for it. 

I've tried many of those. The only problem with the plastic wrap was that it looked icky when I put it on the plate. It tasted great, but I was sure the texture was funky because of plastic. It was all in my head, but still ruined it for me.

I do the egg cup drop thing, but use a ladle. The ladle goes in the water & I wait less than a minute for the egg to start to set around the outside, then let the egg slide into the water and drop the next one. When they're ready, I scoop out with a slotted spoon.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 03, 2010, 10:52:11 PM
I asked the maid how she does it, she said "Twan toshade, kom fup twok nom nom hashakazumi, kipkip wan urrrrshwa kuzuku, Brasky-san." 

Whatever that means. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on February 04, 2010, 12:19:26 PM
I asked the maid how she does it, she said "Twan toshade, kom fup twok nom nom hashakazumi, kipkip wan urrrrshwa kuzuku, Brasky-san." 

Whatever that means. 



 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on February 05, 2010, 04:52:24 PM
If a home goes back to the bank, does the bank have to pay the property taxes still?

I'm trying to understand why so many local govs are talking about budget shortfalls.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 05, 2010, 04:57:56 PM
If a home goes back to the bank, does the bank have to pay the property taxes still?

I'm trying to understand why so many local govs are talking about budget shortfalls.

Businesses are posting lower revenues. Sales taxes are dropping. The federal government is handing out "stimulus" for some things, but cutting back on other payments to state & local agencies, and with higher unemployment rates, people are using those state & local government services.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 05, 2010, 05:08:02 PM
If a home goes back to the bank, does the bank have to pay the property taxes still?

I'm trying to understand why so many local govs are talking about budget shortfalls.

Yes the bank pays the property taxes.  Most times they have already collected the money from the borrower and placed it in an escrow account.  In addition most of the banks have an emergency surplus fund they borrower paid as well.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 05, 2010, 05:11:58 PM
If a home goes back to the bank, does the bank have to pay the property taxes still?

I'm trying to understand why so many local govs are talking about budget shortfalls.

Its a little complicated, but basically the banks are being given a break on the property tax, yes, they have to pay it if they take the house back but the local govts are allowing to pay a small percentage of whats owed through monthly payments that are less than the averaged monthly tax on that property. The reason the local govs are doing this is because they dont want the banks to just put all those homes out on the market at once, thus driving property values down even more and screwing the local govt in the process....... it wont work in the end though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 06, 2010, 04:39:56 PM
Read an article in the NY Daily News about these. Would you wear Pajama Jeans?
http://www.pajamajeans.com/Default.aspx?bhcp=1 (http://www.pajamajeans.com/Default.aspx?bhcp=1)
(http://www.pajamajeans.com/images/side_shot.jpg) (http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/06/alg_pajama_jeans.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 06, 2010, 05:02:16 PM
Read an article in the NY Daily News about these. Would you wear Pajama Jeans?
http://www.pajamajeans.com/Default.aspx?bhcp=1 (http://www.pajamajeans.com/Default.aspx?bhcp=1)
(http://www.pajamajeans.com/images/side_shot.jpg) (http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/06/alg_pajama_jeans.jpg)

I wouldn't (though it looks like my gender is not the target audience).  If I want to look like I'm wearing jeans, I'll wear jeans.  I'm sure that these would look "off" since the fabric is too light, stretchy, and uniform to look like real jeans.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 07, 2010, 06:12:08 PM
Read an article in the NY Daily News about these. Would you wear Pajama Jeans?


They look alright, man. 

(http://www.daveandthomas.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/thedude-lebowski.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 11, 2010, 01:09:31 AM
Why do some guys flush the urinal before they start to pee? Is it to deflect back-spatter? Does hearing water run help them to go? Do they just prefer the fresh water?

Also, I always hear that thing about running water making people want to pee. What the hell is that all about?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 11, 2010, 02:29:41 AM
Why do some guys flush the urinal before they start to pee? Is it to deflect back-spatter? Does hearing water run help them to go? Do they just prefer the fresh water?

Also, I always hear that thing about running water making people want to pee. What the hell is that all about?

Sometimes I do that if the pisser is stinky. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 11, 2010, 07:52:45 AM
Why do some guys flush the urinal before they start to pee? Is it to deflect back-spatter? Does hearing water run help them to go? Do they just prefer the fresh water?

Also, I always hear that thing about running water making people want to pee. What the hell is that all about?

Sometimes I do that if the pisser is stinky. 

I also frequently flush it if the person before me hasn't done it.  That's the only reason I do it, though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 11, 2010, 08:35:01 PM
It has snowed about 8 inches in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area last night and today, and is still snowing.  They're predicting 10 or so, in total, but predictions have been going up by two inches at a time all day. 

Not being used to snow, we didn't think to lower or remove the umbrella on the backyard table patio....that table being glass. 

At about 10am I heard a loud KeeeeRACK from somewhere, and ran to the window:

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/BrokenTable21110.jpg)

Oops.

That's smashed glass underneath.  The umbrella is broken too, I'm pretty sure. 

Guess we need some new patio furniture now!  Not a big loss....the umbrella was pre-used.  Actually, the whole thing was pre-used, and a couple of those chairs are in seriously bad shape.  This is just the final blow, I guess. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on February 11, 2010, 08:53:36 PM
It snowed in Texas?


The suckery  exists here in upstate NY too.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 11, 2010, 10:10:26 PM
It snowed in Texas?


The suckery  exists here in upstate NY too.

Yeah, I had a call with someone in the Dallas area today and she was talking about how everyone was so amazed that there was enough snow to make a snowman the size of a person.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 11, 2010, 10:20:41 PM
Yeah, I had a call with someone in the Dallas area today and she was talking about how everyone was so amazed that there was enough snow to make a snowman the size of a person.

I read that it was the largest amount of snow we've gotten in 25 years.  It snowed on Christmas Eve, and it has snowed/sleeted other years-- in 2001 (I think) my car's door lock froze and the windshield wipers did too.  But in terms of actual inches of snow mass, this is a big one.  They've canceled school tomorrow, so I'm sure there will be snowmen going up everywhere and the park will be a hot spot for sledders.  Woe to the child who stays home sick today/tomorrow. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on February 13, 2010, 11:08:33 AM
Why are nekos (catboys or catgirls) so adorable? :3

Exhibit A:
(http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/482/picturehq.jpg)

Exhibit B:
(http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/8356/12079615307235242.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 13, 2010, 11:10:29 AM
Cute animal + cute girl = cuteness twice over?

I always figured that was the rationale behind slapping bunny ears and tails on Playboy models. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 14, 2010, 08:26:38 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 14, 2010, 08:35:50 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

Depends if the cost of the trailer and the seasonal lot rentals are more expensive than the loan.  Lot rental will cost about $3,000 per year.  Trailer is however much you pay for it.  Then you need a truck to tow it, and keep it legal.  When you're gypsy, you may not make enough income to support the costs of living. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on February 14, 2010, 09:43:04 PM
Prostitutes park free at truck stops.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 14, 2010, 10:12:17 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

Depends if the cost of the trailer and the seasonal lot rentals are more expensive than the loan.  Lot rental will cost about $3,000 per year.  Trailer is however much you pay for it.  Then you need a truck to tow it, and keep it legal.  When you're gypsy, you may not make enough income to support the costs of living. 

Probably not even going to have a trailer at this point, just a largish van with some stuff to keep me in electricity.

I know some people whose houses or at least driveways I could stay at, but they're all a fuck of a long way away from where I am. I may as well just take the van and squat in a national forest or wilderness land.

Always aiming high, that's me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 15, 2010, 02:22:33 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

Depends if the cost of the trailer and the seasonal lot rentals are more expensive than the loan.  Lot rental will cost about $3,000 per year.  Trailer is however much you pay for it.  Then you need a truck to tow it, and keep it legal.  When you're gypsy, you may not make enough income to support the costs of living. 

Probably not even going to have a trailer at this point, just a largish van with some stuff to keep me in electricity.

I know some people whose houses or at least driveways I could stay at, but they're all a fuck of a long way away from where I am. I may as well just take the van and squat in a national forest or wilderness land.

Always aiming high, that's me.

I still dont understand WHY you would want to do this.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 15, 2010, 02:49:01 PM
If a Paralympian is as good or better at an Olympic sport than an Olympian, are they allowed to compete in the Olympics or required to participate in the Paralympics only?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 15, 2010, 03:51:29 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

Depends if the cost of the trailer and the seasonal lot rentals are more expensive than the loan.  Lot rental will cost about $3,000 per year.  Trailer is however much you pay for it.  Then you need a truck to tow it, and keep it legal.  When you're gypsy, you may not make enough income to support the costs of living. 

Probably not even going to have a trailer at this point, just a largish van with some stuff to keep me in electricity.

I know some people whose houses or at least driveways I could stay at, but they're all a fuck of a long way away from where I am. I may as well just take the van and squat in a national forest or wilderness land.

Always aiming high, that's me.

I still dont understand WHY you would want to do this.

For the same reason Libman wants to live in a trailer. I want to be as far away from what the government can do to me as possible.

If I'm asked to move along in a park or wilderness land, I can just move along. If I have a house, then they can find me. I'm paranoid like that.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 15, 2010, 04:17:18 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

Depends if the cost of the trailer and the seasonal lot rentals are more expensive than the loan.  Lot rental will cost about $3,000 per year.  Trailer is however much you pay for it.  Then you need a truck to tow it, and keep it legal.  When you're gypsy, you may not make enough income to support the costs of living. 

Probably not even going to have a trailer at this point, just a largish van with some stuff to keep me in electricity.

I know some people whose houses or at least driveways I could stay at, but they're all a fuck of a long way away from where I am. I may as well just take the van and squat in a national forest or wilderness land.

Always aiming high, that's me.

I still dont understand WHY you would want to do this.

For the same reason Libman wants to live in a trailer. I want to be as far away from what the government can do to me as possible.

If I'm asked to move along in a park or wilderness land, I can just move along. If I have a house, then they can find me. I'm paranoid like that.

I think you would be better off renting a place, off the books. I know someone who does that. He shovels snow, does maintenance, etc. for a local business, and so they let him stay in the attached apartment for free. Pretty sweet setup, but you have to know the right person, be in the right place at the right time.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on February 15, 2010, 05:46:53 PM
If a Paralympian is as good or better at an Olympic sport than an Olympian, are they allowed to compete in the Olympics or required to participate in the Paralympics only?

It's a good question. I'm not sure, but I think they're only allowed the Paralymics. I remember there being a big controversy about an amputee running... something about the prosthetics giving him an advantage over runners on their own feet. Less impact & more push off.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on February 15, 2010, 07:42:42 PM
It's a good question. I'm not sure, but I think they're only allowed the Paralymics. I remember there being a big controversy about an amputee running... something about the prosthetics giving him an advantage over runners on their own feet. Less impact & more push off.

Yeah, Oscar Pistorius (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_Pistorius). But they ultimately got a final dodge on the question when he came just short of qualifying. Personally, I think the Paralympics are perfectly positioned to become an alternative that allows enhancements banned in the current games. They've traditionally hosted "disabled" athletes overshadowed by "natural" counterparts, but—human ingenuity being what it is—that state of affairs is temporary. I'd love to see what's possible beyond the constraints of biological history, and I'm not alone (http://dvice.com/archives/2008/08/shift_why_the_o.php).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 15, 2010, 07:45:05 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

That sounds like a horrible way to live to me.  I would rather declare bankruptcy and attempt to get the loans discharged than live as a gypsy fugitive.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 15, 2010, 08:01:49 PM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

It seems to me that you are going to have to keep this van registered so that you can operate it. That means you are going to need a mailing  address, at least. I don't know what lengths the gov't will go to in order to collect a debt or if that's what you really want to get away from, but I think that becoming a gypsy is either way too much of a precaution or way too little.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 16, 2010, 01:03:21 AM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

That sounds like a horrible way to live to me.  I would rather declare bankruptcy and attempt to get the loans discharged than live as a gypsy fugitive.

Nope, can't do that with bankruptcy.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 16, 2010, 01:05:41 AM
Good idea or bad idea: living in a trailer and moving around the country to evade the Feds when they come after me for student loan nonrepayment? (Long story there.)

That sounds like a horrible way to live to me.  I would rather declare bankruptcy and attempt to get the loans discharged than live as a gypsy fugitive.

Nope, can't do that with bankruptcy.

True, government student loans are excluded. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on February 16, 2010, 07:36:39 AM
I've heard it's possible to do it if your situation is bad enough (ie, if it would cause "undue hardship").  If your income puts you at or below poverty, then I think you can make that case.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on February 16, 2010, 09:03:03 AM
How much do you owe?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 16, 2010, 02:16:05 PM
1. around 11k

2. I'm sort of a shutin who gets deep panic attacks whenever I go out beyond a block or so from my house by myself. If I could see a psychiatrist to diagnose me I can see how I'd be able to make some kind of excuse to them about it, but it'd also be nice to have a car to go there, also money to buy a car and put gas in it. So you can see the van thing was sort of a pipe dram.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on February 16, 2010, 02:20:57 PM
Get a loan to payoff the 11k, then go bankrupt.

Seems a little bit silly to go on the run over 11k.

How nuts do you have to be to get SSI?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on February 16, 2010, 02:53:56 PM
Quote
gets deep panic attacks whenever I go out beyond a block or so from my house by myself.

Then I doubt you can handle going off in a van.

I have about 3 grand in student loans to pay off right now, which I cant, so I'm just going to chip away at it forever when I can.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on February 16, 2010, 03:07:04 PM
TimeLady. Is there any possibility of you getting over your discomfort with humans? I mean, do you have that interest - or have you accepted that as your life?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 16, 2010, 03:08:12 PM
Get a loan to payoff the 11k, then go bankrupt.

Seems a little bit silly to go on the run over 11k.

How nuts do you have to be to get SSI?

Around here, pretty god damn nuts. The only people who seem to be able to get it for being crazy are schizophrenics.

While I am crazy, I'm not THAT crazy.

TimeLady. Is there any possibility of you getting over your discomfort with humans? I mean, do you have that interest - or have you accepted that as your life?

I honestly don't know, but I'd obviously have to get over it if I want to get a job. Which I do. But I can't get one until we move to somewhere else from where we are now, fuck fuck fuck. *Is in the living with parents BASE*
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 27, 2010, 12:38:37 AM
How do you link a word to a url so that the url is hidden but you can click the word and visit the site?

In yahoo mail I highlight the word and click on url then paste the link in a pop up box.

I can't figure out how to do it here. 

Guess I'm a tard.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 27, 2010, 12:53:33 AM
How do you link a word to a url so that the url is hidden but you can click the word and visit the site?

In yahoo mail I highlight the word and click on url then paste the link in a pop up box.

I can't figure out how to do it here. 

Guess I'm a tard.

Reply to what I'm saying (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Keller) while quoting it, and you'll see the code. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on February 28, 2010, 01:59:05 AM
How do you link a word to a url so that the url is hidden but you can click the word and visit the site?

In yahoo mail I highlight the word and click on url then paste the link in a pop up box.

I can't figure out how to do it here. 

Guess I'm a tard.

Reply to what I'm saying (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Keller) while quoting it, and you'll see the code. 

In before Dan Brown. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 28, 2010, 03:09:44 AM
How do you link a word to a url so that the url is hidden but you can click the word and visit the site?

In yahoo mail I highlight the word and click on url then paste the link in a pop up box.

I can't figure out how to do it here.  

Guess I'm a tard.

Reply to what I'm saying (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubert_Keller) while quoting it, and you'll see the code.  


 Thank You Rillion (http://www.funmunch.com/comments/thank_you/thank_you_comment_graphic_02.gif) I really appreciate it.  

Is that  you? (http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/lens6045152_1248276353thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 28, 2010, 11:31:42 AM
Am I an internationally-known male French chef?  Uh, no. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 28, 2010, 01:17:06 PM
Am I an internationally-known male French chef?  Uh, no.  

You didn't click on the  you (http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/lens6045152_1248276353thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg), silly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 28, 2010, 02:10:40 PM
Am I an internationally-known male French chef?  Uh, no.  

You didn't click on the  you (http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/lens6045152_1248276353thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg), silly.

Because it wasn't a link before.  I notice it is now....sneaky, you.

No, that isn't me.  I favor this t-shirt (http://www.tshirthell.com/funny-shirts/atheist/?fdo=n&productid=1204&style=w&color=2%3A+CHOOSE+COLOR&size=3%3A+CHOOSE+A+SIZE&stype=&is_fivestar=), which I'm wearing right now actually:
(http://www.tshirthell.com/shirts/products/a1204/a1204_w_72.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 28, 2010, 05:58:38 PM
Not that it's significant, but my last edit was at 3 a.m. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on February 28, 2010, 06:03:50 PM
Not that it's significant, but my last edit was at 3 a.m. 

See, just what I was saying.  You found a clever way to bend space and time, and that was terribly sneaky of you. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 01, 2010, 11:55:02 AM
Not that it's significant, but my last edit was at 3 a.m.  

See, just what I was saying.  You found a clever way to bend space and time, and that was terribly sneaky of you.  

Wouldn't saying he's bending space and time imply that time and space are straight or at least angluar?

Are you suggesting that they are gay or at least bi?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 01, 2010, 12:00:59 PM
Not that it's significant, but my last edit was at 3 a.m.  

See, just what I was saying.  You found a clever way to bend space and time, and that was terribly sneaky of you.  

Wouldn't saying he's bending space and time imply that time and space are straight or at least angluar?

Are you suggesting that they are gay or at least bi?

Curved space-time is totally gay. Everyone knows it's cubed.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 01, 2010, 01:54:41 PM
I've seen rule 34 on space, and its a big goatse in the center of the universe.  So draw your own conclusions.  I'm not into labels, but its very filthy and crude, and heterosexual doesn't exactly leap to the front of the line when you're trying to choose a word. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Level 20 Anklebiter on March 01, 2010, 02:11:32 PM
Does anyone know the title of the song by Phil Collins that happens to be played on the GTA IV radio?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 01, 2010, 02:33:15 PM
Not that it's significant, but my last edit was at 3 a.m.  

See, just what I was saying.  You found a clever way to bend space and time, and that was terribly sneaky of you.  

Wouldn't saying he's bending space and time imply that time and space are straight or at least angluar?

Are you suggesting that they are gay or at least bi?

I thought he was implying that space and time are white angluaro-saxon.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 01, 2010, 08:25:08 PM
Does anyone know the title of the song by Phil Collins that happens to be played on the GTA IV radio?

Probly this, guessing.  It was made popular in Miami Vice. 

[youtube=425,350]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/manxPVTLth8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/manxPVTLth8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on March 01, 2010, 08:36:45 PM
He looks fucking freaky.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 01, 2010, 08:46:08 PM
He looks fucking freaky.

I thought so too.  Intense. 

A lot of people kinda forget Genesis was one of the biggest bands ever.  So he's totally got all the bells and whistles of the rockstar world under his belt.  He's probably seen more debauchery than Tommy Lee. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 01, 2010, 11:17:30 PM
Phil Collins rocks pretty hard.  That was a good performance of that song, too.   :D
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 02, 2010, 12:23:42 AM
Phil Collins rocks pretty hard.  That was a good performance of that song, too.   :D

Ya.  I like him.  I never was a huge Genesis fan, but they're on the classy side of rock.  They're really tight and proficient, professional musicians. 

Good version of Abacab. 

[youtube=425,350]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_RIH4A_XWME&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_RIH4A_XWME&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/youtube]

BTW, that enigmatic bearded fucker in the previous video, playing bass is Leland Sklar. 

I guarantee the two seconds he appeared, anyone who watches will wonder "who da fuck!!?"  He plays on all of your albums.  Seriously. 

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Leland_Sklar_August_2007.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on March 02, 2010, 12:39:55 AM
When I was watching the first video you posted before, I accidentally yelled "HOLY FUCK DUMBLEDORE ISN'T DEAD".  Also, the only reason I have any idea who Dumbledore is, is because of that t-shirt that TShirtHell put out a while back.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 02, 2010, 01:06:03 AM
When I was watching the first video you posted before, I accidentally yelled "HOLY FUCK DUMBLEDORE ISN'T DEAD".  Also, the only reason I have any idea who Dumbledore is, is because of that t-shirt that TShirtHell put out a while back.   :lol:

He certainly is noticeable. 

His wiki article says his nickname among friends is Father Time. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 02, 2010, 01:19:45 AM
Wearing right now:

(http://media.typetees.com//product/636x636/2075-tee_large.png)

(http://campsockmonkey.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/sockmonkeypj.png) (lower half)

Those pajama pants, by the way, are the best ever.  I'll wear them until they wear out.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 02, 2010, 07:47:41 AM
The shirt is great!

I have a pair of sock monkey PJ pants - and they will be worn until the fibers disintegrate in the wash. Mine are fuzzy microfleece with 3 large sock monkeys sew on applique... and they make me wish it was acceptable for almost 40 year olds to wander about town in PJs.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 02, 2010, 11:24:25 AM
Wearing right now:


Those pajama pants, by the way, are the best ever.  I'll wear them until they wear out.

You don't go online from work, do you?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 02, 2010, 11:41:22 AM
Wearing right now:


Those pajama pants, by the way, are the best ever.  I'll wear them until they wear out.

You don't go online from work, do you?

Look at the time that post was made.  And I didn't post it in gay time, or even bisexual time. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 02, 2010, 11:59:40 AM
If you can't work in flannel jammy-pants, your job blows. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 03, 2010, 01:04:05 AM
Wearing right now:


Those pajama pants, by the way, are the best ever.  I'll wear them until they wear out.

You don't go online from work, do you?

Look at the time that post was made.  And I didn't post it in gay time, or even bisexual time. 

Your reply is bizarre and incomprehensible.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 03, 2010, 07:57:57 AM
Question: An anarchist, a revolutionary, and a Communist walk into a bar. What does he say?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 03, 2010, 08:26:57 AM
Question: An anarchist, a revolutionary, and a Communist walk into a bar. What does he say?

One guy is all three of those things, or three different men?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 03, 2010, 10:21:24 AM
Question: An anarchist, a revolutionary, and a Communist walk into a bar. What does he say?

One guy is all three of those things, or three different men?

thatsthejoke.jpg
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 03, 2010, 02:18:08 PM
Wearing right now:


Those pajama pants, by the way, are the best ever.  I'll wear them until they wear out.

You don't go online from work, do you?

Look at the time that post was made.  And I didn't post it in gay time, or even bisexual time. 

Your reply is bizarre and incomprehensible.

Read more.

Is gay time like happy hour?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 03, 2010, 07:12:55 PM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 03, 2010, 07:36:31 PM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?

Nah, they're built for it.  Their digestive systems are pretty tough, they can eat spoiled stuff that would make us extremely sick because they have a comparatively high acid content.  That would kill the majority of parasites.  Dogs do get worms but usually from exposure to other animals feces who are infected. 

I had a special breed of cat that we were supposed to feed raw chicken twice a week, vet recommended.  It kept the urge to kill at bay, he'd tear through the window screens to get outside. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 03, 2010, 08:43:53 PM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?

Nah, they're built for it.  Their digestive systems are pretty tough, they can eat spoiled stuff that would make us extremely sick because they have a comparatively high acid content.  That would kill the majority of parasites.  Dogs do get worms but usually from exposure to other animals feces who are infected. 

I had a special breed of cat that we were supposed to feed raw chicken twice a week, vet recommended.  It kept the urge to kill at bay, he'd tear through the window screens to get outside. 

Hah! I'm reading a book all about human evolution & cooking of food. (Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human) The last few chapters included talk about how a Biologically Appropriate Raw Food (yes, BARF) Diet is a very good option for helping household pets shed extra weight. (I've heard about switching dogs/cats over to raw food for dealing with health issues before, but not with the official name.)

You should ease them into it, just like you would do with switching between foods. (old to new - 3:1, 2:2, 1:3) Cooked/processed foods are much easier to digest, and they won't be able to pull as many nutrients as quickly as from the food, so it's going to be a bit of a shock to the system.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on March 03, 2010, 09:48:20 PM
Our cats won't touch anything raw. God knows I've tried.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 04, 2010, 12:11:14 AM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?

Nah, they're built for it.  Their digestive systems are pretty tough, they can eat spoiled stuff that would make us extremely sick because they have a comparatively high acid content.  That would kill the majority of parasites.  Dogs do get worms but usually from exposure to other animals feces who are infected. 

I had a special breed of cat that we were supposed to feed raw chicken twice a week, vet recommended.  It kept the urge to kill at bay, he'd tear through the window screens to get outside. 

Hah! I'm reading a book all about human evolution & cooking of food. (Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human) The last few chapters included talk about how a Biologically Appropriate Raw Food (yes, BARF) Diet is a very good option for helping household pets shed extra weight. (I've heard about switching dogs/cats over to raw food for dealing with health issues before, but not with the official name.)

You should ease them into it, just like you would do with switching between foods. (old to new - 3:1, 2:2, 1:3) Cooked/processed foods are much easier to digest, and they won't be able to pull as many nutrients as quickly as from the food, so it's going to be a bit of a shock to the system.

Barf, thats pretty good.

Ya, in fact I don't think I'd go with a total raw meat diet at all.  As a supplement, yes, but you probably wouldn't want to go more than 50/50 just because keeping a supply of raw meat is not easy and you want to default into some friggin kibble when you don't feel like screwing around with raw meat. 

My kids have an older kittay and she pukes when you switch her food.  Its just a regular brand like 9Lives or something, but she's used to it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 04, 2010, 11:06:29 AM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?

Nah, they're built for it.  Their digestive systems are pretty tough, they can eat spoiled stuff that would make us extremely sick because they have a comparatively high acid content.  That would kill the majority of parasites.  Dogs do get worms but usually from exposure to other animals feces who are infected.  

I had a special breed of cat that we were supposed to feed raw chicken twice a week, vet recommended.  It kept the urge to kill at bay, he'd tear through the window screens to get outside.  

Hah! I'm reading a book all about human evolution & cooking of food. (Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human) The last few chapters included talk about how a Biologically Appropriate Raw Food (yes, BARF) Diet is a very good option for helping household pets shed extra weight. (I've heard about switching dogs/cats over to raw food for dealing with health issues before, but not with the official name.)

You should ease them into it, just like you would do with switching between foods. (old to new - 3:1, 2:2, 1:3) Cooked/processed foods are much easier to digest, and they won't be able to pull as many nutrients as quickly as from the food, so it's going to be a bit of a shock to the system.

Barf, thats pretty good.

Ya, in fact I don't think I'd go with a total raw meat diet at all.  As a supplement, yes, but you probably wouldn't want to go more than 50/50 just because keeping a supply of raw meat is not easy and you want to default into some friggin kibble when you don't feel like screwing around with raw meat.  

My kids have an older kittay and she pukes when you switch her food.  Its just a regular brand like 9Lives or something, but she's used to it.  

From what I've been reading going cold turkey is the way to go, lots of raw meat with a carrot or some sort of raw vegetable thrown in everyday. The reason being you don't want to confuse their digestion system. That can get hard to clean up in the back yard.

Many people that have switched also suggest adding a little fish oil every now and then to get a nice coat. Every time my dogs get any sort of fish the end result was impossibly messy. I'm a little leery of adding this.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on March 04, 2010, 11:17:04 AM
You should put your dog on a diet of stray cats.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 04, 2010, 12:44:28 PM
You should put your dog on a diet of stray cats.

Unfortunately there are many Asian restaurants in Vegas. No stray cats to be found. Not a bad idea otherwise. A meal would only cost the price of a .22 round. Wonder if they would like desert tortoise.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 04, 2010, 02:18:17 PM
I've heard of people putting their dogs on a raw meat diet. I was thinking doing so myself. Question is; wouldn't raw meat greatly increase the odds of them getting worms?

Nah, they're built for it.  Their digestive systems are pretty tough, they can eat spoiled stuff that would make us extremely sick because they have a comparatively high acid content.  That would kill the majority of parasites.  Dogs do get worms but usually from exposure to other animals feces who are infected.  

I had a special breed of cat that we were supposed to feed raw chicken twice a week, vet recommended.  It kept the urge to kill at bay, he'd tear through the window screens to get outside.  

Hah! I'm reading a book all about human evolution & cooking of food. (Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human) The last few chapters included talk about how a Biologically Appropriate Raw Food (yes, BARF) Diet is a very good option for helping household pets shed extra weight. (I've heard about switching dogs/cats over to raw food for dealing with health issues before, but not with the official name.)

You should ease them into it, just like you would do with switching between foods. (old to new - 3:1, 2:2, 1:3) Cooked/processed foods are much easier to digest, and they won't be able to pull as many nutrients as quickly as from the food, so it's going to be a bit of a shock to the system.

Barf, thats pretty good.

Ya, in fact I don't think I'd go with a total raw meat diet at all.  As a supplement, yes, but you probably wouldn't want to go more than 50/50 just because keeping a supply of raw meat is not easy and you want to default into some friggin kibble when you don't feel like screwing around with raw meat.  

My kids have an older kittay and she pukes when you switch her food.  Its just a regular brand like 9Lives or something, but she's used to it.  

From what I've been reading going cold turkey is the way to go, lots of raw meat with a carrot of some sort of raw vegetable thrown in everyday. The reason being you don't want to confuse their digestion system. That can get hard to clean up in the back yard.

Many people that have switched also suggest adding a little fish oil every now and then to get a nice coat. Every time my dogs get any sort of fish the end result was impossibly messy. I'm a little leery of adding this.


I'm just going by my experience and what the vet recommended.  Age and size of the animal is an important factor as well.  The veggies are obviously important because pure meat doesn't provide the complete balance of nutrients and roughage.  You could probably use rice for the fiber bulk and a liquid vitamin in place of spending an hour per day making dog stew.  

If the consistency of the dog waste becomes problematic, it can be adjusted with training methods.  You administer six to eight rapid kicks to the ribs when the dog is making a bowel movement, this will teach the dog to hold the shit longer and the bowel will absorb the excess moisture.  You can usually expect positive results within a month.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 04, 2010, 03:39:18 PM

If the consistency of the dog waste becomes problematic, it can be adjusted with training methods.  You administer six to eight rapid kicks to the ribs when the dog is making a bowel movement, this will teach the dog to hold the shit longer and the bowel will absorb the excess moisture.  You can usually expect positive results within a month.  

Hehe, think I will try a little natural pumpkin mashed into some softer meat product first if the stool becomes to messy for Jose, our yard guy, to clean up. Feeding them raw meat and then kicking them might get them to thinking bad thoughts when I am sleeping.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on March 04, 2010, 04:30:30 PM
You should put your dog on a diet of stray cats.

Unfortunately there are many Asian restaurants in Vegas. No stray cats to be found. Not a bad idea otherwise. A meal would only cost the price of a .22 round. Wonder if they would like desert tortoise.
Desert tortoise... YUM.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 25, 2010, 01:37:45 PM
I bought two pairs of shorts yesterday.  Both of them came with a belt.  Why?  Does anybody actually wear the belt that comes with the shorts or pants they bought?

And is this just a girl thing, or do guys' pants come with them too?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on March 25, 2010, 02:28:30 PM


And is this just a girl thing, or do guys' pants come with them too?

With guys, its usually the youth sizes - and some of the hipster trendy shit. 

Big boy pants come sans-belt. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 25, 2010, 02:35:51 PM
I bought two pairs of shorts yesterday.  Both of them came with a belt.  Why?  Does anybody actually wear the belt that comes with the shorts or pants they bought?

And is this just a girl thing, or do guys' pants come with them too?

You know, I never do. At first, my answer would have been "sure", and then I realized the only things I wear with original belt or sash are dresses and a couple of skirts. My regular belts for slacks/jeans/shorts were separate purchases.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 25, 2010, 02:48:04 PM
You know, I never do. At first, my answer would have been "sure", and then I realized the only things I wear with original belt or sash are dresses and a couple of skirts. My regular belts for slacks/jeans/shorts were separate purchases.

If they were nice belts, I'd consider it.  But belts that come with pants seem to be uniformly some kind of pleather nonsense, and in this case they're freakin' gold.   A gold pleather belt on a perfectly good pair of Levi's shorts.  Ridiculous.  I'm offended.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 25, 2010, 02:53:05 PM
You know, I never do. At first, my answer would have been "sure", and then I realized the only things I wear with original belt or sash are dresses and a couple of skirts. My regular belts for slacks/jeans/shorts were separate purchases.

If they were nice belts, I'd consider it.  But belts that come with pants seem to be uniformly some kind of pleather nonsense, and in this case they're freakin' gold.   A gold pleather belt on a perfectly good pair of Levi's shorts.  Ridiculous.  I'm offended.

They're treating us like the 10 & under crowd, using sparkly & shiny objects to get our attention.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 25, 2010, 02:59:21 PM
Why is Firefly so ridiculously overhyped? I mean, it's not a bad series . . . it's just not as good as the Internet's legions of fanboys make it out to be.

According to some, I should have ten orgasms just from watching Summer Glau do something crazy. (Yes, I say this with at least two people on this forum who have Firefly quotes in their sigs.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 25, 2010, 03:09:29 PM
Why is Firefly so ridiculously overhyped? I mean, it's not a bad series . . . it's just not as good as the Internet's legions of fanboys make it out to be.

According to some, I should have ten orgasms just from watching Summer Glau do something crazy. (Yes, I say this with at least two people on this forum who have Firefly quotes in their sigs.)

When it was originally on Fox, it was the best option out there. There was no Battlestar Galactica, no Lost, Dollhouse, Pushing Daisies, Fringe, Caprica, Heroes, etc... It might not be as much of a standout when put in the context of the programming on television now. More & more "quirky" series are being given a shot - if not on standard primetime, then on cable.

That being said, I still think it was/is a great series, and wish Fox had given it a bit more time.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 25, 2010, 03:58:05 PM
I bought two pairs of shorts yesterday.  Both of them came with a belt.  Why?  Does anybody actually wear the belt that comes with the shorts or pants they bought?

And is this just a girl thing, or do guys' pants come with them too?

In the maniverse, pants never come with belts.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on March 25, 2010, 04:36:06 PM
I wear the same belt every day.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 25, 2010, 04:36:51 PM
And is this just a girl thing, or do guys' pants come with them too?

In the maniverse, pants never come with belts.

I've purchased pants & shorts for teenager & spouse which have come with belts. Usually funky canvas things, with lots of grommets and frayed edges. Not terribly sturdy. Neither of them use those belts.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on March 25, 2010, 04:54:30 PM
You know, I never do. At first, my answer would have been "sure", and then I realized the only things I wear with original belt or sash are dresses and a couple of skirts. My regular belts for slacks/jeans/shorts were separate purchases.

Me too.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 25, 2010, 05:17:44 PM
Is Dollhouse over?

If you watched it what did you think of it?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on March 25, 2010, 10:12:56 PM
Is Dollhouse over?

If you watched it what did you think of it?

Yes, it's over.  I thought it was a great concept, and it had some good episodes.  However, it was disappointing overall due to trying to speed up the story development by ridiculous amounts in order to tell the whole story before the show was canceled.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 26, 2010, 05:21:52 AM
Why is Firefly so ridiculously overhyped? I mean, it's not a bad series . . . it's just not as good as the Internet's legions of fanboys make it out to be.

According to some, I should have ten orgasms just from watching Summer Glau do something crazy. (Yes, I say this with at least two people on this forum who have Firefly quotes in their sigs.)

When it was originally on Fox, it was the best option out there. There was no Battlestar Galactica, no Lost, Dollhouse, Pushing Daisies, Fringe, Caprica, Heroes, etc... It might not be as much of a standout when put in the context of the programming on television now. More & more "quirky" series are being given a shot - if not on standard primetime, then on cable.

That being said, I still think it was/is a great series, and wish Fox had given it a bit more time.

I honestly don't remember it being on Fox at the time, and at the time I was watching a LOT of TV.

I guess that shows just how much Fox fucked it over if someone like me didn't even know it was out there.

Also - unrelated - I was listening to Rollye James on WWCR the other day and there was a commercial that had the instrumental theme to Firefly in the background, It had to be bar none the WEIRDEST commercial I'd ever heard on domestic shortwave.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on March 26, 2010, 09:47:54 AM
Firefly and the movie were good enough to watch once. I don't get the fanatics either, it just never really drew me in.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on March 26, 2010, 04:21:13 PM
I think Firefly was great. That's it. I don't have an a life-size cardboard cutout of the characters or walk around with a jacket like Mal's. I mean, opinions aren't cumulative. Even if everyone rates it a 9 or 10, you don't say the show rates a 100 million, you just say that the average rating is 9 or 10.

When it was originally on Fox, it was the best option out there. There was no Battlestar Galactica, no Lost, Dollhouse, Pushing Daisies, Fringe, Caprica, Heroes, etc... It might not be as much of a standout when put in the context of the programming on television now. More & more "quirky" series are being given a shot - if not on standard primetime, then on cable.

You remind me of one day when I was flipping through the TV channels with my 15-year-old nephew. I came across the old Batman tv series and showed him. His response was "how could anyone watch this garbage?"

I had to point out that back then we had 3 TV channels and your alternatives were a game show and the news (or something like that).

You should in know way take this as a connotation that Firefly is equivalent to Batman.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 26, 2010, 05:23:16 PM
You remind me of one day when I was flipping through the TV channels with my 15-year-old nephew. I came across the old Batman tv series and showed him. His response was "how could anyone watch this garbage?"

I had to point out that back then we had 3 TV channels and your alternatives were a game show and the news (or something like that).

You should in know way take this as a connotation that Firefly is equivalent to Batman.

 :lol: I'd not thought of it that way, but...

So, by the time my children sit down with their kids to watch Firefly, Stargate SG-1 or any of the other shows they enjoy now, they should get the same reaction that I've seen from them when we've watched Batman, ST:TNG, A-Team, Buck Rogers, Voyagers, etc...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on March 26, 2010, 05:24:52 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on March 26, 2010, 05:29:33 PM
Has anyone ever made a THC slurpee and if someone got brainfreeze while drinking it would they really care?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 26, 2010, 05:32:17 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?

Why should porn actors be different than any other profession?
Some love the job. Some are there for the paycheck.
And some, both - just depends on the day.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on March 26, 2010, 05:36:58 PM
Does anyone else think the American Movie Classics channel has dropped their standards lately? Lots of examples, but today.... Pitch Black!

Don't get me wrong - I really liked the movie - but a "Classic"?!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on March 26, 2010, 08:01:15 PM
I think Firefly was great. That's it. I don't have an a life-size cardboard cutout of the characters or walk around with a jacket like Mal's. I mean, opinions aren't cumulative. Even if everyone rates it a 9 or 10, you don't say the show rates a 100 million, you just say that the average rating is 9 or 10.

When it was originally on Fox, it was the best option out there. There was no Battlestar Galactica, no Lost, Dollhouse, Pushing Daisies, Fringe, Caprica, Heroes, etc... It might not be as much of a standout when put in the context of the programming on television now. More & more "quirky" series are being given a shot - if not on standard primetime, then on cable.

You remind me of one day when I was flipping through the TV channels with my 15-year-old nephew. I came across the old Batman tv series and showed him. His response was "how could anyone watch this garbage?"

I had to point out that back then we had 3 TV channels and your alternatives were a game show and the news (or something like that).

You should in know way take this as a connotation that Firefly is equivalent to Batman.

I love that show.

You should have thorwn your nephew out the window. Then sodomized his corpse.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on March 31, 2010, 02:29:00 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?

I bet the vast majority are faking it. Many were abused as children and tend to be screwed up in the head some. Their main motivation is drug money, I bet. Of course, I really have no idea other than the info I get from local prostitutes and strippers which is kinda the same profession minus the camera.

It is a rare thing to find a whore that really gets into her work and enjoys it. Once you do though, she is a keeper. Jenna Haze appears to be such a creature.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on March 31, 2010, 04:16:12 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?

They do it for the money. Looks like one of the more enjoyable occupations to me.
They look a hell of a lot happier then I do at work and I do it for the same reason.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on March 31, 2010, 05:53:37 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?

They do it for the money. Looks like one of the more enjoyable occupations to me.
They look a hell of a lot happier then I do at work and I do it for the same reason.

Do you get paid to look like you're having an orgasm?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on March 31, 2010, 10:00:01 PM
Do bar sluts really enjoy giving it away for free or are they just doing it for the drinks?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on March 31, 2010, 10:01:31 PM
yes
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on April 05, 2010, 03:08:54 PM
Do pornstars really enjoy their jobs or are they just faking it?

They do it for the money. Looks like one of the more enjoyable occupations to me.
They look a hell of a lot happier then I do at work and I do it for the same reason.

Do you get paid to look like you're having an orgasm?

Make me a offer.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on April 06, 2010, 12:02:23 PM
Speaking of orgasms, has anyone ever broken up with a person due to the their ridiculous orgasm face?

Better question, what is the most minor insignificant reason you have ever ended a relationship over?

So you get the idea, mine was I broke up with a very nice nurse lady for the simple reason she liked to watch Bob Saget shows. Like that one with the Olson twins when they were little and the goofy home video one.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on April 06, 2010, 12:37:54 PM
Better question, what is the most minor insignificant reason you have ever ended a relationship over?

We go now to the master (http://seinfeld.wikia.com/wiki/Jerry_Seinfeld#Breakups):
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on April 10, 2010, 01:54:01 AM
Speaking of orgasms, has anyone ever broken up with a person due to the their ridiculous orgasm face?

Better question, what is the most minor insignificant reason you have ever ended a relationship over?

So you get the idea, mine was I broke up with a very nice nurse lady for the simple reason she liked to watch Bob Saget shows. Like that one with the Olson twins when they were little and the goofy home video one.

You know what...Full House IS a dealbreaker.  It's not even the Bob Saget thing.  It's the Bob Saget COMBINED with those alien monkey twins from Hell.  And Uncle Jessie's hair.   :x
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on April 10, 2010, 02:26:48 AM
Full House makes more sense when you're high.

One time I was high and I watched it and I figured out that Becky and Vicky were beards for the gay threesome of Danny, Joey, and Jessie; DJ and Kimmy were secret lesbians; and Michelle was a demon summoned by Steve Urkel.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mikehz on April 11, 2010, 03:15:54 AM
They do it for the money.

Of COURSE they do it for the money. Everyone does their job for the money. I do my job for the money, and so does the kid working at McDonalds.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on April 11, 2010, 01:13:18 PM
Full House makes more sense when you're high.

One time I was high and I watched it and I figured out that Becky and Vicky were beards for the gay threesome of Danny, Joey, and Jessie; DJ and Kimmy were secret lesbians; and Michelle was a demon summoned by Steve Urkel.


Very Freudian.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on April 13, 2010, 12:35:43 AM
Speaking of orgasms, has anyone ever broken up with a person due to the their ridiculous orgasm face?

Better question, what is the most minor insignificant reason you have ever ended a relationship over?

So you get the idea, mine was I broke up with a very nice nurse lady for the simple reason she liked to watch Bob Saget shows. Like that one with the Olson twins when they were little and the goofy home video one.

I didn't have a second date with a girl whose taste in books I didn't like.


Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 17, 2010, 07:29:46 AM
What would you do for $5 that you wouldn't do for free?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on May 17, 2010, 07:40:24 AM
What would you do for $5 that you wouldn't do for free?

Every 3-4 weeks I go through my own personal version of hell - shopping in wal-mart - to save $5 on dog toys & treats. (I did the math, so I know that it's a few cents either side of $5)

I definitely would not wander the Supercenter & wait in the horrible lines for free.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on May 18, 2010, 01:18:22 PM
Am I an internationally-known male French chef?  Uh, no.  

You didn't click on the  you (http://static.squidoo.com/resize/squidoo_images/-1/lens6045152_1248276353thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg), silly.

Out of curiosity, how did you find this image?  I ask because someone is using it on their newly made Facebook account (http://www.facebook.com/pages/Atheist-A-Thoughtful-Honest-Ethical-Intelligent-Skeptical-Thinker/123456317673917?v=wall).  That person's Facebook name is "Atheist: A Thoughtful, Honest, Ethical, Intelligent, Skeptical, Thinker!" which just so happens to be a slogan that Surly Amy has been using on her necklaces (http://www.etsy.com/listing/46943083/atheist-ceramic-necklace-in-green) for two years.  The Facebook account owner (I suspect it is not, in fact, that girl) denies taking it, and says "she" came up with it on "her" own.  

I suspect the girl in the photo is a t-shirt model, but I can't find the source.  Either way, it kind of belies the "honest" and "ethical" parts of that slogan.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on May 18, 2010, 02:43:29 PM
I think I did a Google image search for atheist red head or something like that?  Not really sure, It's been a long time since I posted that.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://skepacabra.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/05/04/atheist-declares-god-is-punishing-us/&usg=__F3Lp4CTGfkMRnY9B97gT0jQ7VXU=&h=432&w=288&sz=91&hl=en&start=18&sig2=5EjbSUhF-_26Nb5cb5X6pg&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=Dge69Ye_07bh-M:&tbnh=126&tbnw=84&prev=/images%3Fq%3Datheist%2Bredhead%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=Tt_yS8SfF8SblgeZ67GoDQ (http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://skepacabra.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/thank-god-im-an-atheist.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2010/05/04/atheist-declares-god-is-punishing-us/&usg=__F3Lp4CTGfkMRnY9B97gT0jQ7VXU=&h=432&w=288&sz=91&hl=en&start=18&sig2=5EjbSUhF-_26Nb5cb5X6pg&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=Dge69Ye_07bh-M:&tbnh=126&tbnw=84&prev=/images%3Fq%3Datheist%2Bredhead%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26tbs%3Disch:1&ei=Tt_yS8SfF8SblgeZ67GoDQ)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on May 18, 2010, 05:56:20 PM
What would you do for $5 that you wouldn't do for free?

I would tuck in my shirt if told to tuck my shirt in.  Five bucks.

I would pump approximately 1.8 gallons of gas into a car.

I would wash George Clooney's hair, towel-dry it, and comb it with minor attention to detail.

I would walk the neighbors dog and return it unharmed.

I would refill the ice cube trays.

I would make someone a sandwich, if the necessary ingredients were supplied.

I would put the seat down.

I would give accurate directions to any destination.

I would hang two pictures properly, horizontally aligned. 

I would change your windshield-wiper blades.

I'd turn the TV down to a reasonable level. 

I'd trip someone down a concrete flight of stairs for absolutely no reason. 

I would run one hundred yards, or one hundred meters if in Europe.

I would give you one of my disposable Bic lighters if I had two - but you'd get the one with less juice.

I'd arrange your spice rack by height or alphabetically.

I'd tie a windsor knot on your necktie perfectly.

I'd skim the pool and empty the filter basket - except on July 5th.

I would tidy up the wires behind your computer, with velcro wraps.

I'd water your plants - (ten plant maximum - indoor)

I'd put the butter away.

I'd change the chain on your chainsaw.




Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on June 01, 2010, 06:35:39 PM
Is there a reason why you can't get Berkey water filters in Iowa?

I imagine this big business smuggling Berkey filters in under cover of darkness.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 15, 2010, 10:35:44 PM
Is there a reason why you can't get Berkey water filters in Iowa?

I imagine this big business smuggling Berkey filters in under cover of darkness.

You can order them through Amazon, which I assume delivers to Iowa. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on June 15, 2010, 11:57:57 PM
Is there a reason why you can't get Berkey water filters in Iowa?

I imagine this big business smuggling Berkey filters in under cover of darkness.

You can order them through Amazon, which I assume delivers to Iowa. 

Nearly every program on GCN says (about Berkey filters) "Not available in Iowa."

They've been saying that ever since I started listening to GCN programs on shortwave, which would be like since 04 or 05.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on June 16, 2010, 12:40:40 AM
What would you do for $5 that you wouldn't do for free?

I would tuck in my shirt if told to tuck my shirt in.  Five bucks.

I would pump approximately 1.8 gallons of gas into a car.

I would wash George Clooney's hair, towel-dry it, and comb it with minor attention to detail.

I would walk the neighbors dog and return it unharmed.

I would refill the ice cube trays.

I would make someone a sandwich, if the necessary ingredients were supplied.

I would put the seat down.

I would give accurate directions to any destination.

I would hang two pictures properly, horizontally aligned. 

I would change your windshield-wiper blades.

I'd turn the TV down to a reasonable level. 

I'd trip someone down a concrete flight of stairs for absolutely no reason. 

I would run one hundred yards, or one hundred meters if in Europe.

I would give you one of my disposable Bic lighters if I had two - but you'd get the one with less juice.

I'd arrange your spice rack by height or alphabetically.

I'd tie a windsor knot on your necktie perfectly.

I'd skim the pool and empty the filter basket - except on July 5th.

I would tidy up the wires behind your computer, with velcro wraps.

I'd water your plants - (ten plant maximum - indoor)

I'd put the butter away.

I'd change the chain on your chainsaw.






For 5 bucks you are very generous, change a chain on a chainsaw for instance, that is a steal of a deal.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on June 16, 2010, 12:55:26 AM
The question is:

What is the question? Gotta love the Germans, making shit music for hundreds of years, bound to make it for hundreds more.

[youtube=425,350]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xwQw6_X9hPk&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xwQw6_X9hPk&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 17, 2010, 09:35:28 PM
How is it that making one dish for family dinner night at the pool leaves my kitchen a bigger mess than cooking a full dinner, plus dessert for just the five of us at home?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on June 18, 2010, 11:06:57 AM
For 5 bucks you are very generous, change a chain on a chainsaw for instance, that is a steal of a deal.

Maybe he's so fuckin' good at it that you'd feel ripped off after witnessing the speed and dexterity at which he performs the task.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on June 18, 2010, 11:48:47 PM
For 5 bucks you are very generous, change a chain on a chainsaw for instance, that is a steal of a deal.

Maybe he's so fuckin' good at it that you'd feel ripped off after witnessing the speed and dexterity at which he performs the task.

That's why he gets paid, if it took him an hour I'd be fucking worried.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on June 22, 2010, 01:30:09 PM
For 5 bucks you are very generous, change a chain on a chainsaw for instance, that is a steal of a deal.

Maybe he's so fuckin' good at it that you'd feel ripped off after witnessing the speed and dexterity at which he performs the task.

That's why he gets paid, if it took him an hour I'd be fucking worried.

I'd actually do it for free.  The five bucks is just so you don't feel like you're accepting charitable expertise. 

The real reward is knowing your chainsaw is operating properly, and you can go about your task safely - without the chain breaking free and slashing you across the torso and wrapping around your neck like a murderous steel bullwhip. 

There is much work to be done, and when your saw goes rogue it puts a halt to the manly chainsawing. 

A chainsaw is a brutish, temperamental machine.  It requires a master to keep it cowed, its always looking for a chance to strike out against its operator.  It wants your blood, it lusts to taste your pain.  It wants to sit in your garage knowing it exists in your nightmares, tearing you into dirty ribbons of flannel and flesh.  It can wait decades for its few fleeting moments of gore, the savage dance of lashing steel as it is thrown into the dirt and chips, idling its throaty chuckle until it is taken away like a criminal. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 24, 2010, 06:13:53 PM
If you are an extreme introvert, what is the best way to make that clear and understandable to people who expect you to go out and do things with them on less than two hours' notice? 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on June 24, 2010, 06:28:40 PM
If you are an extreme introvert, what is the best way to make that clear and understandable to people who expect you to go out and do things with them on less than two hours' notice? 

Explain it to them in a simple and honest way that you need more time to prepare yourself for the torment that is other people.


Does a dexterity bonus count for both ranged and melee attacks or just ranged? 3rd edition rule answers will be the only ones accepted.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 24, 2010, 07:16:02 PM
If you are an extreme introvert, what is the best way to make that clear and understandable to people who expect you to go out and do things with them on less than two hours' notice? 

Explain it to them in a simple and honest way that you need more time to prepare yourself for the torment that is other people.


I have found that the only person who understands this is another introvert; and that's not ever the person who asks on short notice. (If they do, you know it's an emergency.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on June 26, 2010, 09:15:55 PM
Are Puke and Bile related?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 26, 2010, 09:26:50 PM
Are Puke and Bile related?

Yes, they're twin brothers.  Bile was firstborn with Puke quickly following. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on June 26, 2010, 09:52:21 PM
hehe
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 27, 2010, 04:30:49 PM
What's more annoying than an AFLAC plush duck, which screams AFLAC 3 times for each squeeze, in the hands of a 9 year old?
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4115/4739923338_5457e93380_b.jpg)
Nothing. Don't let its cuteness and fashionable fitness wear fool you.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 27, 2010, 05:54:29 PM
How many different addresses have you lived under? I counted myself at 17 the other day.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 27, 2010, 06:26:31 PM
How many different addresses have you lived under? I counted myself at 17 the other day.

Nifty question! I think I have 18 as an adult... And another 10, if I add childhood homes.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 27, 2010, 07:01:32 PM
How many different addresses have you lived under? I counted myself at 17 the other day.

15 for me, 3 states in the U.S., 3 countries.  

And I lived at the first address for 18 years. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on June 27, 2010, 07:31:10 PM
How many different addresses have you lived under? I counted myself at 17 the other day.

I've only lived at 6 addresses so far.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on June 27, 2010, 08:57:09 PM
5 addresses
in the SAME FUCKING TOWN
how lame
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on June 27, 2010, 11:12:42 PM
How many different addresses have you lived under? I counted myself at 17 the other day.

For my entire life , 19 different addresses, 7 different countries (Canada, US, England, France, Morocco, Slovenia, South Africa), pretty stable as a kid but as an adult I can't make up my fucking mind as to where I want to live. Someplace in the hills or mountains where I can kick back and have a drink with friends and let life happen, put down roots, grow some crops, have 12 kids, etc. I'm not a yank so I can't just move to the US, I'd be in NH already if I was a yank, nice cheap housing with lots of land down in them parts, nice. Up here in LaLa land people are still going cukoo over real estate, "Prices only ever go up!" Oh I can't wait for the crash.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on June 28, 2010, 12:24:35 AM
That's a tough one, especially with military experience. What is the time limit on living somewhere before you call it an address? If I count only places in which I have actually received mail then I think the answer is 24 addresses.  Since I've now been at the same address for 3.5 years I think I have set my adult record.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mikehz on June 28, 2010, 12:19:17 PM
Ten. Two of them right now. Day after tomorrow, it's going up to eleven, total.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on June 28, 2010, 05:31:26 PM
Rant to follow:

Libertarians are not atheists are not skeptics are not scientists are not philosophers.  This much has been made abundantly clear to me.  

I'll talk to someone who believes in all manner of tomfoolery if they seem like a calm, rational, friendly person.  Reasonable people can disagree on many things related to any of the above topics, and if you think that their disagreement with you on its own makes them a stupid, irrational, hateful person, then there's something wrong with you.  Everybody is ignorant and irrational about certain things.  If, on the whole, they are intelligent and thoughtful, they can be persuaded to believe something else.  Or maybe they can persuade you.  But the conversation is at least worth it.  

I don't especially care that PZ Myers, though a great scientist, skeptic, and atheist, thinks libertarianism is rubbish.  

I do care that a philosopher like Massimo Pigliucci (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massimo_Pigliucci) thinks that we don't have the right to bear arms because such right was acknowledged in the Bill of Rights for a different reason than most people want it today.  Let's grant that the Constitution is indeed the law of the land (I know, this may be difficult to do).  And let's grant (this might be difficult as well) that the people who wrote the Bill of Rights, Jefferson and Madison, actually knew what they were talking about.  Does that mean that our rights are dependent on their intentions?  Would they even want that to be the case?  Should we even give a fuck what they wanted?  

I love how people who would never claim that free speech rights don't include TV or the internet suddenly become originalists when it comes to the right to bear arms.  For fuck's sale, be consistent.  If the reason that Madison and Jefferson acknowledged is relevant for one right; it's relevant for another.  If it isn't relevant for one, it's not relevant for the rest.   Make up your mind.  If you think the Bill of Rights is binding but don't like one of the rights acknowledged, introduce a new fucking amendment which negates it (such as the 21st Amendment, which ended Prohibition).  Don't pretend that the current amendments say something other than what they say.   I know opponents of gun ownership won't do that, because they know it would never fly.  But trying to ban gun ownership via any other means is unreasonable and dishonest.  If your arguments are so good, bring them.  Otherwise, shut the hell up.

</end rant> You were warned.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 28, 2010, 11:25:07 PM
I think thats one of the wonderful things about discussing a voluntary society; politically, its consistent. Philosophically on a basic level it is too, but religiously (as Ian has proved through personal example) it is not.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 29, 2010, 12:23:12 AM
I think thats one of the wonderful things about discussing a voluntary society; politically, its consistent. Philosophically on a basic level it is too, but religiously (as Ian has proved through personal example) it is not.

Why?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on June 29, 2010, 01:03:38 AM
I think thats one of the wonderful things about discussing a voluntary society; politically, its consistent. Philosophically on a basic level it is too, but religiously (as Ian has proved through personal example) it is not.

Why?

Why is it not consistant religiously? Because you can call yourself Pantheist (Ian), Christian (Mark), Atheist (yo), or Muslim (the MuslimAgorist) and still be voluntaryist. I think that's a pretty cool thing. Try asking a Republican or even a Liberal if they think others can join their group.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on June 29, 2010, 02:33:37 PM
What's more annoying than an AFLAC plush duck, which screams AFLAC 3 times for each squeeze, in the hands of a 9 year old?
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4115/4739923338_5457e93380_b.jpg)


The chinese hooker that passed gas everytime I squeezed her head.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on June 29, 2010, 07:15:20 PM
What's more annoying than an AFLAC plush duck, which screams AFLAC 3 times for each squeeze, in the hands of a 9 year old?
(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4115/4739923338_5457e93380_b.jpg)
Nothing. Don't let its cuteness and fashionable fitness wear fool you.

I need that duck.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on June 29, 2010, 09:46:09 PM
I need that duck.   :lol:
Closest event to you is July31, in Racine.
http://www.irongirl.com/Events/Racine.htm (http://www.irongirl.com/Events/Racine.htm)
It's not sold out. Damn. If only I were still going to be in the area at end of July, instead of beginning. Would be a blast to do another in the AFLAC series... could be a training brick for my August event.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 01, 2010, 10:28:37 PM
I don't "get" wikileaks

what _is_ so important about it?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on July 01, 2010, 10:47:27 PM
Hey apple, why is Annoying Orange so funny?

(http://funfeel.pl/fun/files/2010/02/hqdefault.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on July 01, 2010, 11:04:00 PM
I made the mistake of showing those vids to my son..
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 01, 2010, 11:47:17 PM
I made the mistake of showing those vids to my son..

I made the mistake of walking into the room when my sons were enjoying an Annoying Orange video marathon.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 01, 2010, 11:57:00 PM
I'm dog-sitting for two dogs-- one young and boisterous but generally obedient, and the other older and painfully shy to the point that she prefers to stay in her crate all day except for bathroom breaks.  I was told that they need to go out and relieve themselves at various points in the day, the last time being around 10 at night.  But though the younger one cheerfully went out and did his business and is in his crate right now, the elder refuses to do so.  She just looks at me.  The last time she went out was a little after 6pm.  I'm not sure what to do.  If I go ahead and crate her up for the night, will there be a mess in the morning?  I can't exactly force  her to go outside and do her thing. 

For reference, the morning backyard excursion is scheduled for 5:30am. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 02, 2010, 12:22:12 AM
If the older dog is painfully shy, to the point of not settling down to take care of late night outing, did she also skip eating dinner?

If she didn't really eat or drink much, then you're probably fine until morning. Dogs are very much "in with the new, out with the old". My dogs go out every few hours, but they don't really have to. Unless they've recently eaten, or after the 7-8 hour overnight time.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 02, 2010, 12:41:47 AM
If the older dog is painfully shy, to the point of not settling down to take care of late night outing, did she also skip eating dinner?

If she didn't really eat or drink much, then you're probably fine until morning. Dogs are very much "in with the new, out with the old". My dogs go out every few hours, but they don't really have to. Unless they've recently eaten, or after the 7-8 hour overnight time.

Yes, she's staying my brother's and SIL's laundry room (she belongs to SIL's parents) with a bowl of food and water right next to her crate.  She doesn't seem to eat much, though.  She's in the laundry room because that way it can be shut off while she's eating, or the other one will come in and scarf down all of her food.  

I went back in just a bit ago, though, and this  time she was willing to go out...and, after relieving herself, apparently wanted to spend the rest of the night sniffing every square inch of the yard.  Dear dog, you had all day to do that....

The idea of standing around waiting for another creature to defecate just boggles my mind-- especially if you have to pick up the, err, product and dispose of it afterward.  Guess I'm really not cut out to be a dog-owner or a mom.  ;-)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 06, 2010, 02:05:22 PM
Am I the only one annoyed by when a store gets a product on their website months before in-store?  This is retarded, because Sephora has this makeup palette I want on their website already, but I called the store (It's like 3 doors away from my store at the mall) and the girl said they're not getting it for another 3 months.  Maybe it's just me but I'd rather be able to walk down there and get it instead of waiting for it to come in the mail?  Grrr.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 06, 2010, 03:20:57 PM
does rob jacobs show up for porcfest?

did he this year?

is he like he is on the boards irl?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on July 06, 2010, 03:24:11 PM
does rob jacobs show up for porcfest?

did he this year?

is he like he is on the boards irl?

I think Rob is AWOL.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on July 06, 2010, 05:18:56 PM
Am I the only one annoyed by when a store gets a product on their website months before in-store?  This is retarded, because Sephora has this makeup palette I want on their website already, but I called the store (It's like 3 doors away from my store at the mall) and the girl said they're not getting it for another 3 months.  Maybe it's just me but I'd rather be able to walk down there and get it instead of waiting for it to come in the mail?  Grrr.

I usually like it, because I buy most stuff online :P  However, that does sound annoying.  Can you order it from the website or can the store have it shipped there for you?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 06, 2010, 08:05:00 PM
Why are all libertarians except me filthy rich?

Why does the majority of the worlds population live by a border?

Why are Germans so sexually perverted?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on July 06, 2010, 08:16:31 PM
Why are all libertarians except me filthy rich?

Why does the majority of the worlds population live by a border?

Why are Germans so sexually perverted?

1. I'm sure you know that's not true, but the more visible members of any group are the wealthy ones.  I think it's also possible that more wealthy people are libertarian because it appeals to people who work hard for what they have.  I'd also say that it appeals to intelligent people, who probably tend to be more well-off.

2. People live near borders because they tend to be along coasts or trade routes.  It makes a lot of sense to live in an area where trade and commerce are easy.

3. I have no idea :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 06, 2010, 08:51:38 PM
I've often wondered how many people became libertarian AFTER they made their fortune but were in fact statist numnuts before. And by rich I mean people like Drew Carey or Clint Eastwood, I find it hard to believe they were libertarian when they were waiting tables waiting for their big break, know what I mean?

The borders one was to sort of prove a point, why do we need borders? People gravitate to each other because they want to trade.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on July 07, 2010, 12:59:41 AM
I've often wondered how many people became libertarian AFTER they made their fortune but were in fact statist numnuts before. And by rich I mean people like Drew Carey or Clint Eastwood, I find it hard to believe they were libertarian when they were waiting tables waiting for their big break, know what I mean?

The borders one was to sort of prove a point, why do we need borders? People gravitate to each other because they want to trade.

I was libertarian whilst poor and am still libertarian while I am "middle class". I expect I will still be libertarian when I am living in my sea-stead penthouse with the 75 foot yacht moored below, drinking brandy and laughing that the daily financial news. Note, to suggest otherwise of me would be very bad manners.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on July 07, 2010, 01:00:56 AM
does rob jacobs show up for porcfest?

did he this year?

is he like he is on the boards irl?

I think Rob is AWOL.

His bosses at the FBI probably sent him off to infiltrate a white supremest militia.  :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on July 07, 2010, 07:51:06 AM
I've often wondered how many people became libertarian AFTER they made their fortune but were in fact statist numnuts before. And by rich I mean people like Drew Carey or Clint Eastwood, I find it hard to believe they were libertarian when they were waiting tables waiting for their big break, know what I mean?

The borders one was to sort of prove a point, why do we need borders? People gravitate to each other because they want to trade.

Drew Carey has said that he didn't know about libertarianism until some point after he was famous.  However, the way he put it, it sounded like he's always held libertarian beliefs.  John Stossel might be a better example, though I don't think it has to do with him getting rich...just more educated.  There are a lot of people who aren't libertarians until some point in adulthood.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on July 08, 2010, 11:12:34 AM
Why are all libertarians except me filthy rich?

Why does the majority of the worlds population live by a border?

Why are Germans so sexually perverted?

1 Right.......

2 Didn't know they did.

3 A Friend of mine asked a history buff this same question. He suggested that the more "manly" males were more or less wiped out during WW2 in Germany leaving a lot of sexually desperate woman. Desperate woman are perhaps more inclined to enable men to be perverse and this has built up and desensitised for 4 generations now.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 10, 2010, 06:34:44 AM
It's 5:17am on a Saturday.  Why the hell am I up?

Well, because Older Dog usually gets up at 5:30am to go outside and do her business.  So that means I've been getting up at 5:20 every day.  The only reason I'm up earlier today is because she decided to start barking to go out at 4:45am, interrupting a weird dream I was having with Drifter in it, and since it was so close to the normal time I decided to just stay up and release Younger Dog to go outside as well.  I probably will not go back to sleep as once I get up and start walking around and thinking about things, it's almost impossible to sleep again. 

Both dogs are neurotic.  OD because she's fearful, YD because he freaks out if things are in the "wrong" place.  He goes nuts if you give him a milk bone by putting it in his food dish instead of on the floor.  He won't eat it, just stand there and bark and growl at it.  This morning OD has apparently stolen YD's squeaky bone toy and put it in her crate.  YD is too afraid to go in there and get it, however, so he simply stands at the front of the crate barking and whining.  I'm tempted not to get it for him as he can be a real pain in the ass to OD sometimes....she just wants to go outside and use the bathroom, and this crazy dog is chasing her around trying to chew on her ears.  Imagine being a middle aged woman who lives in a box, and every time you come out some manic 25 old year guy comes charging at you.  I'd probably want to stay in my box as well. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Stoker on July 10, 2010, 09:14:15 AM
I was up @ my regular time of 4:30 a.m. on this fine Saturday. O.K.- I actually rolled over and layed in bed a while to enjoy the fresh scent of the rain on the desert we got here last night, something I haven't seen since early April. Getting up crazy early is necessary here in the Sonoran Desert if a person wants to have any outdoor time during the Hell months.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 10, 2010, 10:30:55 AM
I'm trying to figure out why I woke up at 9am on a Saturday.  And then I remembered that I can count the Saturdays I've taken off work for the last few years on one hand. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 10, 2010, 01:54:48 PM
...interrupting a weird dream I was having with Drifter in it,..

Not to pry, but I hope I didn't represent anything too negative. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 10, 2010, 03:31:57 PM
...interrupting a weird dream I was having with Drifter in it,..

Not to pry, but I hope I didn't represent anything too negative. 

Terraforming had commenced on a previously barren planet, with good progress so far.  I'd established a farm on a fertile patch of land, only to discover that an alien army had been dispatched to combat the humans and take the planet for themselves after all our work.  Late in the night I heard a tremendous crash coming from the barn.  Fearing the worst, that the aliens had finally come for me, I grabbed my space blaster and dashed out to investigate.  With great trepidation I climbed into the hayloft, only to be greeted by a human form stumbling out from the shadows, having given the slip to the gang pursuing him. 

"Yeah, I guess you can stay.  You're going to need some fresh clothes though... come on."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 10, 2010, 04:25:12 PM
The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 11, 2010, 10:05:59 AM
The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.



I am sorry, but you need to phrase that in the form of a question?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 11, 2010, 06:05:58 PM
The man in black fled across the desert and the gunslinger followed.



I am sorry, but you need to phrase that in the form of a question?

Blasphemy.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 13, 2010, 09:11:54 AM
If you had a peacock, would you rent it out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party"?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on July 13, 2010, 09:40:43 AM
For the right price, sure, but it would have a high deposit or a rental price higher than the replacement cost. The amount of illicit substances needed to be at that party would be staggering and I am sure someone would flip out and eat the thing. Also I would have to have a signed legal document absolving me of all responsibility of anything to do with the party.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 13, 2010, 09:41:33 AM
If you had a peacock, would you rent it out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party"?

No, I just can't see things working out for the peacock. Something bad is going to happen to it, call it a feeling I get, or a hunch, perhaps a sixth sense. I think a better question would be,

Would you rent anything you own out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party?"

or perhaps

How fast would you run away if you lived within 1000 miles of a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts wanting to throw an "underground sex party?"
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 13, 2010, 09:59:47 PM
If you had a peacock, would you rent it out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party"?

No, I just can't see things working out for the peacock. Something bad is going to happen to it, call it a feeling I get, or a hunch, perhaps a sixth sense. I think a better question would be,

Would you rent anything you own out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party?"

or perhaps

How fast would you run away if you lived within 1000 miles of a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts wanting to throw an "underground sex party?"


 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I think I like you.   :P
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 13, 2010, 10:15:57 PM

Would you rent anything you own out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party?"

No, I would not.


Quote
How fast would you run away if you lived within 1000 miles of a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts wanting to throw an "underground sex party?"


Unfortunately, I cannot run very fast. But I can run very far, so I think I will have no problem getting as many miles as necessary between me and the party in question.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 13, 2010, 10:16:47 PM

Would you rent anything you own out to a function a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts described as an "underground sex party?"

No, I would not.


Quote
How fast would you run away if you lived within 1000 miles of a skinny man in opera gloves, a ski mask and black boxer shorts wanting to throw an "underground sex party?"


Unfortunately, I cannot run very fast. But I can run very far, so I think I will have no problem getting as many miles as necessary between me and the party in question.

Unfortunate, since I think you were invited to said aforementioned underground sex party. 

I'm pretty sure my brain has exploded. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 14, 2010, 12:42:27 PM
I had the horrible thought that I might have been invited had I not been so rude to him, yessss! Score one for being rude, yipee!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 14, 2010, 02:50:02 PM
I had the horrible thought that I might have been invited had I not been so rude to him, yessss! Score one for being rude, yipee!

So far only one chick with a dick has been invtied, and we need more.

If Bridget were invited there could be moar fun.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on July 14, 2010, 08:35:49 PM
Is it weird that I read Israeli news websites?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 14, 2010, 08:42:44 PM
Is it weird that I read Israeli news websites?

Kinda.  You should put a post-it on the screen that says "lies" whilst you read, just as a reminder. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 14, 2010, 09:55:07 PM
I had the horrible thought that I might have been invited had I not been so rude to him, yessss! Score one for being rude, yipee!

So far only one chick with a dick has been invtied, and we need more.

If Bridget were invited there could be moar fun.

wat
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 14, 2010, 10:15:31 PM
I had the horrible thought that I might have been invited had I not been so rude to him, yessss! Score one for being rude, yipee!

So far only one chick with a dick has been invtied, and we need more.

If Bridget were invited there could be moar fun.

wat

Everything is always moar fun when theres trannys involved. 

Even one-on-one lovemaking with your special someone, with mellow candles burning on the dresser...  if there was a tranny in the corner sitting on the rocking chair, beating its pud...  don't try to tell me you wouldn't like that. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 14, 2010, 10:53:36 PM
Is it weird that I read Israeli news websites?

A bit.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 19, 2010, 09:36:12 PM
Is anybody else eagerly awaiting next weekend's season premiere of "Mad Men" on AMC?

I was a big fan of the series from S1E1, but the more sewing I do, I now watch episodes twice... once for the story, and once for the clothing.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 19, 2010, 10:00:41 PM
Is anybody else eagerly awaiting next weekend's season premiere of "Mad Men" on AMC?

I was a big fan of the series from S1E1, but the more sewing I do, I now watch episodes twice... once for the story, and once for the clothing.

Hell yes, thanks for the heads-up.

The lawnmower episode was my favorite. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 19, 2010, 10:20:41 PM
Is anybody else eagerly awaiting next weekend's season premiere of "Mad Men" on AMC?

I was a big fan of the series from S1E1, but the more sewing I do, I now watch episodes twice... once for the story, and once for the clothing.

I haven't seen any of it, but if you're a fan of the costuming I would definitely suggest looking here (http://projectrungay.blogspot.com/search/label/Mad%20Style?max-results=18).  It's a repository of very good analyses of the things that Joan, Peggy, Betty, Trudy, Rachel, and other women I'm completely unfamiliar with have worn on the show and why.   Like we did with Dexter and Weeds, this household might just burn through the first seasons on Netflix and wait for a while to catch the rest.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 19, 2010, 10:32:25 PM
Is anybody else eagerly awaiting next weekend's season premiere of "Mad Men" on AMC?

I was a big fan of the series from S1E1, but the more sewing I do, I now watch episodes twice... once for the story, and once for the clothing.

I haven't seen any of it, but if you're a fan of the costuming I would definitely suggest looking here (http://projectrungay.blogspot.com/search/label/Mad%20Style?max-results=18).  It's a repository of very good analyses of the things that Joan, Peggy, Betty, Trudy, Rachel, and other women I'm completely unfamiliar with have worn on the show and why.   Like we did with Dexter and Weeds, this household might just burn through the first seasons on Netflix and wait for a while to catch the rest.

Let me guess without following the link... It's TLo, over at ProjectRungay, isn't it? (Ooh, I'm right! I can see it in the quote code.) Those two are fabulous.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 20, 2010, 03:40:01 PM

BAM!


(http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/joan-mad-men2.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 20, 2010, 04:27:57 PM
Let me guess without following the link... It's TLo, over at ProjectRungay, isn't it? (Ooh, I'm right! I can see it in the quote code.) Those two are fabulous.

Yep!  I love their site so much.  I don't even give a damn about fashion, but still can't seem to stay away.  And several shows I've either started or kept watching mainly because of their recaps. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on July 20, 2010, 07:09:27 PM
pfft...

(http://images.ctv.ca/gallery/photo/aliens_visit_20081203/image4.jpg)

.

(http://arttattler.com/Images/NorthAmerica/NewYork/MoMA/Tim%20Burton/31-Mars_Attacks.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 20, 2010, 08:14:15 PM
I'd motorboat her ass for a week.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on July 20, 2010, 08:21:13 PM
It looks so comfy.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 21, 2010, 03:16:38 AM
It looks so comfy.

It does.

I like her.
 

Quote
Christina Hendricks (born May 3, 1975) is an American actress best known for her starring role as Joan Holloway in the AMC cable television series Mad Men, and as Saffron in Fox's short-lived series Firefly. Hendricks was named "the sexiest woman in the world" in 2010 in a poll of female readers taken by Esquire magazine.[1]

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 22, 2010, 02:59:50 AM
How do I shot web?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 22, 2010, 03:53:53 AM
I'd motorboat her ass for a week.



I wish I had an ass like hers that I could get motorboated for a week. I aspire to have a body like hers, although I'll need big implants. She is beautiful, she is a real women, married I think, to an average dude, not some jock asshole. I would love to find a mistress with her looks. To bad more women don't eat and drink like she does, all these skinny crack whores are doing my head in. If she gets preggo I think her back will really hurt. As far as fashion goes I really like the red dress she is wearing below.

(http://backseatcuddler.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/christina-hendricks-photos-5.jpg)



Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on July 22, 2010, 06:30:35 AM
I think there's already a thread for giant tits...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on July 22, 2010, 11:12:23 PM
I think there's already a thread for giant tits...

I didn't want to necro.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 22, 2010, 11:27:27 PM
I think there's already a thread for giant tits...

I didn't want to necro.

I'm pretty sure that's one thread nobody really minds seeing again.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on July 22, 2010, 11:55:19 PM
I'm a face guy, and she got one.   


Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 27, 2010, 07:14:07 PM
To the educated women: Does it turn you off when a guy has less formal education than you?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 27, 2010, 08:15:32 PM
To the educated women: Does it turn you off when a guy has less formal education than you?

I don't think it has as much to do with formal education as it does personal development & drive. A plumber who pursues a wide variety of interests and has put the time and effort into learning how to run his own business stands a good chance of carrying on a good conversation. But, in the question of first impressions, the degree(s) speak to the idea that a fellow cared enough about something to stay focused & follow through.  It's an obstacle that those with less formal education have to get past in order to get to the conversation... and some women won't give that opportunity.

Of course, if the educated woman is just out for a night of fun it has nothing to do with education; it's all about appearance, attitude & hormones.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 28, 2010, 01:40:55 AM
If someone asks me a question in a foreign language, is there a social dictum that I should answer back in that language? Can I answer a question in English without being rude? Does it matter if I could speak their tongue, or not?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on July 28, 2010, 01:49:58 AM
I don't think it matters. I always try to answer in the language if I can for practice, but you should do what you are able. ff they don't accept your best effort then they are a snobbish jerk.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on July 28, 2010, 01:59:28 AM
If someone asks me a question in a foreign language, is there a social dictum that I should answer back in that language? Can I answer a question in English without being rude? Does it matter if I could speak their tongue, or not?
I understand Spanish, but can't speak it for crap.  So when people speak to me in Spanish I reply in English.  If they don't like it they can bite me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 28, 2010, 11:25:29 AM
If someone asks me a question in a foreign language, is there a social dictum that I should answer back in that language? Can I answer a question in English without being rude? Does it matter if I could speak their tongue, or not?

If you are in a country where that language is traditionally spoken and you can speak it, then I think you should.  If you can't then you can't, but for them to be offended by that would be pretty silly. 

Regarding education-- ignorance is more of a turn-off than lack of degrees. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 28, 2010, 04:16:12 PM
Why is women's gear for a predominantly male sporting activity only available in pink?
Would using black gloves for the heavy bag or swinging around a dark gray kettlebell really make me less of a girl?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on July 28, 2010, 04:20:07 PM
Why is women's gear for a predominantly male sporting activity only available in pink?
Would using black gloves for the heavy bag or swinging around a dark gray kettlebell really make me less of a girl?
So a guy will never mistakenly put on or use women's gear, because that would be gay.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 28, 2010, 04:33:25 PM
Why is women's gear for a predominantly male sporting activity only available in pink?
Would using black gloves for the heavy bag or swinging around a dark gray kettlebell really make me less of a girl?

I've never seen a pink kettlebell.  I thought they were all dark grey or black, except the ones that are color-coded by weight?

As for other things....I usually go to Dick's for sporting stuff, and they have such an absurd variety that you can get almost anything in almost any color.  Default: green.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 28, 2010, 06:02:56 PM
Why is women's gear for a predominantly male sporting activity only available in pink?
Would using black gloves for the heavy bag or swinging around a dark gray kettlebell really make me less of a girl?

I've never seen a pink kettlebell.  I thought they were all dark grey or black, except the ones that are color-coded by weight?

As for other things....I usually go to Dick's for sporting stuff, and they have such an absurd variety that you can get almost anything in almost any color.  Default: green.

I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile. I didn't want to order gloves without trying them on, because I don't want to have to ship them back until I find the right fit.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 28, 2010, 06:06:28 PM
I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile.

Well, according to their web site among the ones that are color-coded the 10 pounders are yellow.  Will that do?  You might want to call ahead to check, though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 28, 2010, 06:08:43 PM
I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile.

Well, according to their web site among the ones that are color-coded the 10 pounders are yellow.  Will that do?  You might want to call ahead to check, though.

Yes, yellow will be quite alright. Really, any color is fine... I'm just sick of pink.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on July 29, 2010, 02:20:04 AM
Clearly a marketing gimmick, as if to say "look girls, you can use this too!!."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 29, 2010, 11:56:29 AM
I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile.

Well, according to their web site among the ones that are color-coded the 10 pounders are yellow.  Will that do?  You might want to call ahead to check, though.

Yes, yellow will be quite alright. Really, any color is fine... I'm just sick of pink.

I'm sick of things with pink ribbons.  We even have limited edition YSC Oakley sunglasses in the store with a pink ribbon print on the inside, and a pink ribbon etched in to the lens in the bottom corner.  I'm gonna go crazy one of these days. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: libertylover on July 29, 2010, 12:48:15 PM
I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile.

Well, according to their web site among the ones that are color-coded the 10 pounders are yellow.  Will that do?  You might want to call ahead to check, though.

Yes, yellow will be quite alright. Really, any color is fine... I'm just sick of pink.

I'm sick of things with pink ribbons.  We even have limited edition YSC Oakley sunglasses in the store with a pink ribbon print on the inside, and a pink ribbon etched in to the lens in the bottom corner.  I'm gonna go crazy one of these days. 
This, this is what is going to push you over the edge!?  The statement on it's own leads one to believe you may already be a bit touched you poor woman.   I thought you liked your job in the sunglasses hut.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on July 29, 2010, 06:11:23 PM
I needed a lighter weight for a couple of exercises. The 10 lb bells were all Pink Ribbon models... ugh.

Knowing that Dick's is likely to have options like green... makes the drive into Buckhead worthwhile.

Well, according to their web site among the ones that are color-coded the 10 pounders are yellow.  Will that do?  You might want to call ahead to check, though.

Yes, yellow will be quite alright. Really, any color is fine... I'm just sick of pink.

I'm sick of things with pink ribbons.  We even have limited edition YSC Oakley sunglasses in the store with a pink ribbon print on the inside, and a pink ribbon etched in to the lens in the bottom corner.  I'm gonna go crazy one of these days. 
This, this is what is going to push you over the edge!?  The statement on it's own leads one to believe you may already be a bit touched you poor woman.   I thought you liked your job in the sunglasses hut.

It's the pink ribbons that drive me batty.  I have a friend whose aunt dealt with breast cancer a few years ago - and talking to her made me realize how obnoxious these pink ribbons are.  The thought behind it is nice, in a way - raising money for research is great.  But having pink ribbon this and pink ribbon that shoved in your face can get on your nerves when you're trying to focus on something other than the fact that you have cancer.  For me, I suppose that affected me in a pretty significant way.  I never forgot the that conversation and every time I see a pink ribbon I think of that particular person.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on July 29, 2010, 06:50:58 PM
Who deleted my fucking post? It sure wasn't Rillion.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on July 29, 2010, 06:58:30 PM
Who deleted my fucking post? It sure wasn't Rillion.

Post it again?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on July 29, 2010, 07:09:43 PM
THAT WOULD BE GIVING INTO THE TERRORIST
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on July 29, 2010, 07:15:16 PM
Who deleted my fucking post? It sure wasn't Rillion.

Why, was it something nice about me?  If so, definitely re-post. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on July 30, 2010, 12:35:45 AM
Who deleted my fucking post? It sure wasn't Rillion.

That would have been me, Anarchir: King of teh Interwebs.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on July 30, 2010, 08:50:37 PM
You know what's annoying?

Well I guess I'll answer my own question because I do.

It's annoying when you haven't used your coffee maker to make coffee in a couple months and you go downstairs to make coffee so you can stay awake during a play you're seeing with your girlfriends family tonight and you find that someone has broken the glass pot and you don't know who did it and then you realize that it could have been broken 6 weeks ago and you never knew because you haven't made coffee  with it for such a long time.  It's even more annoying when you find that replacing the glass coffee pot for the drip machine you were given as a gift is 40 dollars, which could buy a whole other half decent drip machine and pot and leave you with change.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 03, 2010, 09:21:43 PM
When is force morally acceptable?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 03, 2010, 09:32:13 PM
When is force morally acceptable?
self defense
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 03, 2010, 09:44:41 PM
When is force morally acceptable?

When your children won't stop picking on their little siblings?

You gotta force them to stop.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 03, 2010, 10:00:26 PM
When is force morally acceptable?

When your children won't stop picking on their little siblings?

You gotta force them to stop.

That is not initiating force.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 03, 2010, 10:41:19 PM
When is force morally acceptable?

When your children won't stop picking on their little siblings?

You gotta force them to stop.

That is not initiating force.

Then I am ignorant on the subject. Any good books on the subject?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 03, 2010, 11:32:27 PM
When is force morally acceptable?

When your children won't stop picking on their little siblings?

You gotta force them to stop.

That is not initiating force.

Then I am ignorant on the subject. Any good books on the subject?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 03, 2010, 11:47:18 PM
When is force morally acceptable?

When your children won't stop picking on their little siblings?

You gotta force them to stop.

That is not initiating force.

Then I am ignorant on the subject. Any good books on the subject?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle

Read it. Not that great a resource.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 03, 2010, 11:53:32 PM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 03, 2010, 11:55:28 PM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 04, 2010, 12:49:59 AM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.

Saw it. Still have some reservations about it. Not what I would call a scholarly work either.

Maybe this subject needs its own thread.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 04, 2010, 01:14:06 AM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.

Saw it. Still have some reservations about it. Not what I would call a scholarly work either.

Maybe this subject needs its own thread.

I'd say the NAP is pretty damn simple. Only Libman regularly tries to find exceptions to it (his most recent being the "private borders" idea) and it is rather easy to figure out what the best point of view is.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on August 04, 2010, 02:26:13 AM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.

Saw it. Still have some reservations about it. Not what I would call a scholarly work either.

Maybe this subject needs its own thread.

I apologize, in advance, for coming of mean here, but here goes anyway.

It sounds a bit pretentious to call for "scholarly work". If you really care about the topic of liberty, I'm sure you will find plenty of sources from which to read, study and perform exegesis (exegesi?). If you want to discuss particular weaknesses in an argument then do so, but appeals to authority are unnecessary.

Not initiating force is simple. Not indicates the negative. Initiation means to produce the beginning or cause of action. Force is the only portion that really admits of ambiguity. I would say that it would be best to refer to force as causing action upon another that is unwelcome.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 04, 2010, 03:27:05 AM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.

Saw it. Still have some reservations about it. Not what I would call a scholarly work either.

Maybe this subject needs its own thread.

I'd say the NAP is pretty damn simple. Only Libman regularly tries to find exceptions to it (his most recent being the "private borders" idea) and it is rather easy to figure out what the best point of view is.

*I should clarify. By "find exceptions" I meant for debate purposes, and not in actual physical confrontations.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on August 04, 2010, 03:57:08 AM
Why do people think that by dressing all nice things will get better, as if people dressing sloppy is the cause of all our problems, (ie. we will somehow go back to the good old days, whatever the fuck those are.)? I bring this up as I heard a podcast where some lady who moved to NH called in to FTL about how people dress all sloppy, I don't know, maybe she wants them to dress in a suit and have a top hat, I know she is a free stater but she sounded like a bloody statist, fuck, she'd have a fucking shit hemmorage if she saw me dressed up as a sex kitten lolita.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: YixilTesiphon on August 04, 2010, 09:30:23 AM
Why do people think that by dressing all nice things will get better, as if people dressing sloppy is the cause of all our problems

My mom actually believes this. I have no idea why.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 04, 2010, 11:16:28 AM
Why do people think that by dressing all nice things will get better, as if people dressing sloppy is the cause of all our problems

My mom actually believes this. I have no idea why.

It's probably a naive and questionable assignment of cause and effect, sorta like trash and graffiti in the ghetto.  I'm not sure if it's been demonstrated, but many municipalities have robust clean-up programs, because they associate criminal activity with an unkempt neighborhood.  It's usually not the people in suits and ties who are about to jack your car--but watch your bank account.

Addendum:
about the jack -> about to jack
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on August 04, 2010, 04:04:22 PM
When is the force morally acceptable?

When Obiwan tells you to turn off your targeting computer and you have to drop two protan torpedos into a small thermal exhaust port no bigger than a womp rat to put an end to the Emperor's plans.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Trillian on August 04, 2010, 05:43:10 PM
What's the best non chemical spraying way to get rid of house flies?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 04, 2010, 05:52:24 PM
What's the best non chemical spraying way to get rid of house flies?

(http://www.1ofakindgifts.com/products/FlyZapper2.jpg)
http://www.1ofakindgifts.com/Fly-Zapper.html
Zaps on contact--no need to catch 'em against a wall.  Shop around...I picked the first hit I saw when searching.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 04, 2010, 06:06:55 PM
screens on your doors and windows, plus not leaving food and garbage out
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Trillian on August 04, 2010, 06:24:37 PM
screens on your doors and windows, plus not leaving food and garbage out

Doesn't seem to keep them away regardless at the moment.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 04, 2010, 07:06:29 PM
maybe its the town you're in?
you should just bug bomb the house and take a vacation
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 04, 2010, 10:17:36 PM
When is the force morally acceptable?

When Obiwan tells you to turn off your targeting computer and you have to drop two protan torpedos into a small thermal exhaust port no bigger than a womp rat to put an end to the Emperor's plans.

The best answer has gotta be this one or "self defense".. but I'm thinking if it's become a matter of defense, then it's not really "force" to retaliate. Maybe in the case of coming to another's defense, since that would involve a third party.

Another FB discussion with a person who loves gov. prompted me to ask her this question.. so far she has only dodged giving an answer.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 04, 2010, 10:54:49 PM
Why do people think that by dressing all nice things will get better, as if people dressing sloppy is the cause of all our problems, (ie. we will somehow go back to the good old days, whatever the fuck those are.)? I bring this up as I heard a podcast where some lady who moved to NH called in to FTL about how people dress all sloppy, I don't know, maybe she wants them to dress in a suit and have a top hat, I know she is a free stater but she sounded like a bloody statist, fuck, she'd have a fucking shit hemmorage if she saw me dressed up as a sex kitten lolita.

Clearly, you must post pics yourself dressed up as a sex kitten lolita.

Not for us, but for the old ladies.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 04, 2010, 11:18:33 PM
fly tape.


---

People who dress nice generally have other facets of their personality under control.  Its part of a larger process.  They keep their property nice, they pay their bills, they have a nice job, and they don't do that exploding jar-in-the-ass thing that occasionally surfaces here -- probably in the next two posts...

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Terror Australis on August 05, 2010, 05:03:52 AM
Why do people think that by dressing all nice things will get better, as if people dressing sloppy is the cause of all our problems, (ie. we will somehow go back to the good old days, whatever the fuck those are.)? I bring this up as I heard a podcast where some lady who moved to NH called in to FTL about how people dress all sloppy, I don't know, maybe she wants them to dress in a suit and have a top hat, I know she is a free stater but she sounded like a bloody statist, fuck, she'd have a fucking shit hemmorage if she saw me dressed up as a sex kitten lolita.

Clearly, you must post pics yourself dressed up as a sex kitten lolita.

Not for us, but for the old ladies.

Pics or it didnt happen.... :D
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 05, 2010, 05:33:49 PM
fly tape.

How many people here actually know what this is and have seen them in use?

I remember them hanging in the country stores and my grandparents' place when I was a kid.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 05, 2010, 05:39:31 PM
the best is old fly tape, while fossilized flies on it

you could also set your a/c to about 40°F
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 05, 2010, 06:17:16 PM
Shit is sticky.

How do I know?

This is why being tall sucks. Fly paper in hair. Yeah.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 05, 2010, 07:27:31 PM
So since Prop 8 got struck down in CA a close friend who lives there wants me to become her wife. She's offering to drive to Michigan to pick me up and meet my parents, then we can drive to CA together.

The question is, how long will Prop 8 stay struck down until the CA government passes a constitutional amendment banning it again (which Prop 8 wasn't)?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Trillian on August 05, 2010, 08:35:28 PM
fly tape.

How many people here actually know what this is and have seen them in use?

I remember them hanging in the country stores and my grandparents' place when I was a kid.

I saw someone hang up gallon size zip locks of water above a door and say it was for flies. They explained how it was supposed to work, and why but I can't remember.  I never really saw that it did anything though.

For some reason fly tape creeps me out, I think I'm going to spray the house really well and after the fumes leave, never open my door again.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 05, 2010, 08:52:06 PM
you should invest in some toads...battle toads
(http://www.411mania.com/game_article_pictures/9691.jpg)

or you could move to frogtown
(http://www.filmbrutti.com/images/imdirect.php?load=744)
either way you couldnt go wrong
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 05, 2010, 08:59:47 PM
So since Prop 8 got struck down in CA a close friend who lives there wants me to become her wife. She's offering to drive to Michigan to pick me up and meet my parents, then we can drive to CA together.

The question is, how long will Prop 8 stay struck down until the CA government passes a constitutional amendment banning it again (which Prop 8 wasn't)?

Its being appealed, so I don't see any sudden changes to the status quo.

You're ok with a trip to CA?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 05, 2010, 11:47:54 PM
So since Prop 8 got struck down in CA a close friend who lives there wants me to become her wife. She's offering to drive to Michigan to pick me up and meet my parents, then we can drive to CA together.

The question is, how long will Prop 8 stay struck down until the CA government passes a constitutional amendment banning it again (which Prop 8 wasn't)?

Its being appealed, so I don't see any sudden changes to the status quo.

You're ok with a trip to CA?

I'm more than okay with it, especially with someone I'd actually want to be with.

Also

you should invest in some toads...battle toads
(http://www.411mania.com/game_article_pictures/9691.jpg)

Is this Battletoads?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on August 06, 2010, 04:31:40 AM
fly tape.


---

People who dress nice generally have other facets of their personality under control.  Its part of a larger process.  They keep their property nice, they pay their bills, they have a nice job, and they don't do that exploding jar-in-the-ass thing that occasionally surfaces here -- probably in the next two posts...



Perhaps in your experience, in mine they have usually been the opposite not to mention total stuck-up assholes and douchebags. I think the whole, "They are dressed nice so all their shit must be together and smell like roses," thought process is an urban myth. People like soldiers, cops, IRS employees, they all dress nice, have a nice job, but does that mean they have it all together, hell no. I'd go so far as to say I worry about people dressed nice as having an underhanded agenda more often than the slobs I see. Yea, slobs are disgusting and they need to scrub up, but I don't judge people by what they wear (well, most of the time), as I'm usually wrong. It's the whole 1950's, daddy wearing a suit, mommy wearing a dress and little tommy wearing dress shoes to school bullshit, the most fucked up people I have ever met have been dressed very nice, it's a fallacy, a total fucking lie.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on August 06, 2010, 07:57:28 AM
For some reason fly tape creeps me out,

Me too. When I was a little kid, I saw the "joggertape" Saturday Night Live skit, always felt weird around the tape since.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 06, 2010, 04:25:30 PM
I think its creepy. My uncles cabin always had a ton of flytape. I had to put some of it up at work the other day, and a roll fell into a tub of melted cheese  :? yuk yuk yuk
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on August 06, 2010, 05:57:08 PM
I'd go so far as to say I worry about people dressed nice as having an underhanded agenda more often than the slobs I see.

I dress nice and I do have an underhanded agenda.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 06, 2010, 08:00:59 PM
I'd go so far as to say I worry about people dressed nice as having an underhanded agenda more often than the slobs I see.

Two by two, hands of blue . . .
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 07, 2010, 12:25:58 AM
fly tape.


---

People who dress nice generally have other facets of their personality under control.  Its part of a larger process.  They keep their property nice, they pay their bills, they have a nice job, and they don't do that exploding jar-in-the-ass thing that occasionally surfaces here -- probably in the next two posts...



Perhaps in your experience, in mine they have usually been the opposite not to mention total stuck-up assholes and douchebags. I think the whole, "They are dressed nice so all their shit must be together and smell like roses," thought process is an urban myth. People like soldiers, cops, IRS employees, they all dress nice, have a nice job, but does that mean they have it all together, hell no. I'd go so far as to say I worry about people dressed nice as having an underhanded agenda more often than the slobs I see. Yea, slobs are disgusting and they need to scrub up, but I don't judge people by what they wear (well, most of the time), as I'm usually wrong. It's the whole 1950's, daddy wearing a suit, mommy wearing a dress and little tommy wearing dress shoes to school bullshit, the most fucked up people I have ever met have been dressed very nice, it's a fallacy, a total fucking lie.

Sounds like someone has had a lot of bad experiences with people.

Soldiers, cops, and IRS agents do not have good jobs, nor do they typically dress well. 

Also, you mention cocks too often in your personally edited information for me to take your observations seriously.





Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on August 07, 2010, 10:17:21 AM
i love fly tape, cuz i loathe flies.
i have a couple in my garage.
i appreciate the fact that they don't die right away.
good times.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 07, 2010, 10:42:20 AM
I use it in my grow room, but it pisses me off when I get my hair or my plants' foliage stuck in it!  Just leaned over and got the goop stuck on my neck.  Ew!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 07, 2010, 07:39:56 PM
.[youtube=425,350]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zW4Liv6pTKY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zW4Liv6pTKY&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 08, 2010, 12:35:34 AM
Why hasn't the Pink Pistols website seemed to have been updated since '06?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 08, 2010, 02:09:11 PM
Why hasn't the Pink Pistols website seemed to have been updated since '06?
No idea, but there are several members active at calguns.net
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 08, 2010, 07:25:55 PM
What's with the popularity of trailer park culture for white folks?

The local scene seems to have shifted from "Emo" to "Homeless Androgynous Trucker Who Drinks Pabst In A Can While Riding An Old Bicycle".

And I don't know shit about Lady Gaga, but did see her wearing some sort of veil (kinda looked like lingerie for Muslim women) how long before the kids start wearing lacy masks?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 09, 2010, 10:17:48 PM
Does anyone here think "Night of the Living Dead" is an appropriate movie for a 9 year old girl?

(Not for the Wednesday Addams sort of 9 year old - the 9 year old who loves to wear pink and still sleeps with the bunny that came home with her from the hospital.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 09, 2010, 10:20:56 PM
Does anyone here think "Night of the Living Dead" is an appropriate movie for a 9 year old girl?

(Not for the Wednesday Addams sort of 9 year old - the 9 year old who loves to wear pink and still sleeps with the bunny that came home with her from the hospital.)

No.

Hell, it freaked my mom out when she was 15.

Then again, it had something to do with someone at the local ABC affiliate somehow putting on the scene in NOTLD when the ZOMBIE GIRL KILLS HER PARENTS on instead of whatever was coming up next on the Wonderful World of Disney after a commercial break, so . . . yeah.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 09, 2010, 10:29:07 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 09, 2010, 10:29:42 PM
Does anyone here think "Night of the Living Dead" is an appropriate movie for a 9 year old girl?

(Not for the Wednesday Addams sort of 9 year old - the 9 year old who loves to wear pink and still sleeps with the bunny that came home with her from the hospital.)

No.

Hell, it freaked my mom out when she was 15.

Then again, it had something to do with someone at the local ABC affiliate somehow putting on the scene in NOTLD when the ZOMBIE GIRL KILLS HER PARENTS on instead of whatever was coming up next on the Wonderful World of Disney after a commercial break, so . . . yeah.

Thank you. I did not think I was being unreasonable in my assumption.

The original black & white scared me when we watched as young teens at a sleepover.
The remake was disturbing when I was about 20.

Don't care how funny/cheesy a grown man thinks it is, it is not "Shawn of the Dead" - that one I would actually think of letting her watch if she wanted to see a scary movie. It's funny enough to offset - and she'd be grossed out & lose interest long before nightmares set in.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 09, 2010, 10:36:48 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

Just out of curiosity, do you have to work at being a Cynic. Pessimist. Skeptic. Jerk. or does it come naturally to you?

And, is your descriptive statement meant merely as informative? Because using them to bolster your identity if you're not working very hard at it... might be seen as pride.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 09, 2010, 10:49:25 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

Just out of curiosity, do you have to work at being a Cynic. Pessimist. Skeptic. Jerk. or does it come naturally to you?

And, is your descriptive statement meant merely as informative? Because using them to bolster your identity if you're not working very hard at it... might be seen as pride.

It sounded like an interesting question to me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 09, 2010, 10:50:18 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

If for no other reason, it makes em feel good about themselves. Mostly people with no real accomplishments to speak of. This is the next best thing for them.


Next
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 09, 2010, 10:56:27 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

Just out of curiosity, do you have to work at being a Cynic. Pessimist. Skeptic. Jerk. or does it come naturally to you?

And, is your descriptive statement meant merely as informative? Because using them to bolster your identity if you're not working very hard at it... might be seen as pride.

It sounded like an interesting question to me.

It is actually an interesting question. Pretty simple to answer.

People like to feel connected to something, and by identifying themselves with pride as part of a group, whether Irish or Chinese, gives them an instant community. Even if they're alone with another group, the tie is a link to others like them.

The tall thing? Well, since it's perceived as being more desirable than being short, it give the person a benefit over others. No reason to be ashamed of an advantage.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 09, 2010, 11:01:05 PM
I think people voted for Obama because he was the tallest. :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Trillian on August 09, 2010, 11:17:05 PM
Does anyone here think "Night of the Living Dead" is an appropriate movie for a 9 year old girl?

(Not for the Wednesday Addams sort of 9 year old - the 9 year old who loves to wear pink and still sleeps with the bunny that came home with her from the hospital.)

No.

Hell, it freaked my mom out when she was 15.

Then again, it had something to do with someone at the local ABC affiliate somehow putting on the scene in NOTLD when the ZOMBIE GIRL KILLS HER PARENTS on instead of whatever was coming up next on the Wonderful World of Disney after a commercial break, so . . . yeah.

Thank you. I did not think I was being unreasonable in my assumption.

The original black & white scared me when we watched as young teens at a sleepover.
The remake was disturbing when I was about 20.

Don't care how funny/cheesy a grown man thinks it is, it is not "Shawn of the Dead" - that one I would actually think of letting her watch if she wanted to see a scary movie. It's funny enough to offset - and she'd be grossed out & lose interest long before nightmares set in.

You're right on there.  I've had Shaun of the Dead playing and my 8 year old  wanted to watch, but as soon as there was blood, she was over it and went on to do something else.  No nightmares.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 09, 2010, 11:38:57 PM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

Just out of curiosity, do you have to work at being a Cynic. Pessimist. Skeptic. Jerk. or does it come naturally to you?

And, is your descriptive statement meant merely as informative? Because using them to bolster your identity if you're not working very hard at it... might be seen as pride.


I mean for those to be a shorthand way of describing myself to others.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 10, 2010, 11:03:22 AM
Why do people take pride in things that they had no investment in?

Pride of heritage, background, or even height. Why? None of these are personal accomplishments.

Just out of curiosity, do you have to work at being a Cynic. Pessimist. Skeptic. Jerk. or does it come naturally to you?

And, is your descriptive statement meant merely as informative? Because using them to bolster your identity if you're not working very hard at it... might be seen as pride.

It sounded like an interesting question to me.

It is actually an interesting question. Pretty simple to answer.

People like to feel connected to something, and by identifying themselves with pride as part of a group, whether Irish or Chinese, gives them an instant community. Even if they're alone with another group, the tie is a link to others like them.

The tall thing? Well, since it's perceived as being more desirable than being short, it give the person a benefit over others. No reason to be ashamed of an advantage.

...and no reason to be proud of something you didn't do, as well.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 13, 2010, 10:29:03 PM
Surreal is having the mother of the guy you broke up with ten years ago threaten you for saying "fuck" on Facebook in a discussion about the use of the word "fuck."

Question: What would the appropriate response be?


Threaten you? With what dire consequence?

Assuming there's no actual harm in the threat, like a "stop that or else"... I'd ignore her.

If she's threatening some sort of action, I suppose you'd have to report her threats to FB.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 13, 2010, 10:37:56 PM
Surreal is having the mother of the guy you broke up with ten years ago threaten you for saying "fuck" on Facebook in a discussion about the use of the word "fuck."

Question: What would the appropriate response be?


Threaten you? With what dire consequence?

Assuming there's no actual harm in the threat, like a "stop that or else"... I'd ignore her.

If she's threatening some sort of action, I suppose you'd have to report her threats to FB.

I'd say "Fuck off."
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 13, 2010, 10:47:18 PM
I'd say "Fuck off."

That's just going to "prove" the woman's argument that Rillion is rude and abrasive.
If Rillion ignores her, the woman can either drop it, or pick up the attack in a public forum, which makes her the asshole, not Rillion.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 13, 2010, 10:54:55 PM
Threaten you? With what dire consequence?

Assuming there's no actual harm in the threat, like a "stop that or else"... I'd ignore her.

If she's threatening some sort of action, I suppose you'd have to report her threats to FB.

Quote
Subject: Potty mouth
That was sickening. If you ever do that on that page again, I will report you!

To my knowledge, profanity isn't against the rules on Facebook.  I did actually respond to her in private message stating that, and also saying that telling adults how they may speak is more inconsiderate than any word I could've used.  

Funnily enough, not long after the exchange a friend of mine (and the ex) posted something about having attended a live sex show...you can imagine her reaction to that. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 13, 2010, 11:03:40 PM

To my knowledge, profanity isn't against the rules on Facebook. 

Unless you're sending it directly to people who have requested you not contact them, or are peppering conversations with underage individuals and/or groups, you would be correct.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 14, 2010, 12:44:12 AM
I have a question.

Do women know that we (men) typically choose to not urinate on things that anger us?

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 14, 2010, 12:47:37 AM
I have a question.

Do women know that we (men) typically choose to not urinate on things that anger us?

Otherwise wouldn't everything we know of be soaked?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on August 14, 2010, 07:25:55 AM
Lol. That was beautiful, I love it when two posters get the timing perfect like that. :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on August 14, 2010, 12:30:54 PM
I have a question.

Do women know that we (men) typically choose to not urinate on things that anger us?



I would definitely piss on things I was angry at if I wasn't in the habit of only urinating in urinals and toilets...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 14, 2010, 05:06:09 PM
The conclusion:

Quote from: Angry Mom
Apparently your fine education did NOT teach you how to act like a lady. If you find limited vocabulary of the slutty kind to your liking, then why don't you wallow around with your birds of a feather.

Quote from: Rillion
Dear Angry Mom,

Your note got me thinking about profanity quite a bit yesterday. I thought "Does the mere use a word really reflect on a person's personality, or is it more a matter of style rather than substance? Do the words a person uses matter more than the intent behind them?" And I decided....no, intent matters. I could say the word "fuck" probably several thousand times in one day, and it would still not make me the kind of person who insults people for simply using a word in context of a discussion about whether (and when) it might or might not be appropriate to use it.

This I learned not from my fine education but from my wonderful parents who understand context, value the freedom of speech, and use profanity rarely but do not treat it as if it were Kryptonite. They also taught me to not go looking for reasons to be offended, but to consider the source-- is harm meant, or not? If not, don't give it back. That has more to do with being a decent human being than whatever permutation of letters happens to come out of your mouth or from your fingers.

P.S. Birds don't wallow-- that would be pigs. Oink oink.
P.P.S. You probably shouldn't watch the most recent video I posted...which is a shame, as it's a fucking good one.

Quote from: Angry Mom
Dear Ms. Rillion,
Thank you for your "erudite" discourse on semantics and your equally brilliant observation of the wallowing habits of pigs, which, I must defer, to your personal knowledge of kindred habits.
I, too, had wonderful parents. My father was a scholar and a Judge. From my earliest youth, he taught me the beauties and intracacies of our language. He and I had many wonderful discussions covering a plethora of interesting subjects. With the many wonderfully descriptive and elegant words, in abundance, at our disposal, we never found that we were so insufficiently grammatically starved that we had to resort to filth to get our point across.
Apparently, it is different in your family.
In addition, MISS Rillion, my parents also taught me the honor and integrity of monogamy in one's relationships; a lesson, perhaps, you missed that day because you were out in the sty, consorting with your cohorts.

Quote from: Rillion
Well, this has been a fun conversation. I can't say what a pleasure it has been to be labeled a cheating pig slut whose parents didn't raise her right by the mother of the only person I've ever dated who was both emotionally and physical abusive, all because I dare to occasionally use the word "fuck" without apology. I wish you the best, honestly, but see no need to further extend this dialog.
/blocked


Yeah, that last post could've used a good deal more finesse.  But you know....my patience isn't the best.  Should probably work on that. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on August 14, 2010, 06:57:20 PM
lol WOW.  Why were you even "friends" with that woman in the first place?  So much facebook drama I do not partake in.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 14, 2010, 06:59:42 PM
Geez, I think I hate that chick and I dont even know her. She sounds like a giant DICK. Oh wait, exuse my lack of elegance in my wording, where are my manners? She sounds like a "penis erectus"
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 14, 2010, 07:14:39 PM
lol WOW.  Why were you even "friends" with that woman in the first place?  So much facebook drama I do not partake in.

I wasn't-- she went after me based on a conversation I was having with someone who is my friend. 

For the most part, my Facebook experience is drama free....my friends are all colleagues or people who have similar views about religion/science/politics, so that's the first time something like that came up.   Even though the exchange was bizarre enough to find funny, it still isn't fun to have things like that said by someone you used to know.  For the record: 1) No, I did not cheat on her son, and 2) Yes, he was (probably still is) an asshole. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Pilot_MKN on August 14, 2010, 07:40:10 PM
Question: Who agrees with this: (It's from the mandatory alcohol-education course my university is forcing everyone to take)

How to Help a Friend Who Has Been Sexually Assaulted

You chose: Ask Denise for details. You need to know the whole story before you can decide whether to help her.

Feedback:

The last thing your friend needs right now is to feel pressured into describing the details of the rape. It takes a lot of guts for a person to talk about a sexual assault, and you really ought to let your friend choose how she wants to talk about the incident.

More importantly, you should never question whether your friend is making this up. The truth is that people rarely make up stories about being sexually assaulted, and what Denise needs right now is for you to believe and support her.

You might also consider this option:

Believe your friend right away and assure her that she's not to blame.


I'm sorry but I don't think immediately believing everything they say is a smart thing to do. How many guys have been wrongly accused of rape? This just seems like a slippery slope to me.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 14, 2010, 07:47:44 PM
I'm sorry but I don't think immediately believing everything they say is a smart thing to do. How many guys have been wrongly accused of rape? This just seems like a slippery slope to me.

Get back to them with a printout about the Duke lacrosse case (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case).
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: alaric89 on August 14, 2010, 08:08:18 PM
In all fairness, the question states she was sexually assaulted. It doesn't say she just just claims it.
Evidently the hypothetical person being queried was standing there watching while the assault was happening.

You stand there like a potted plant while a Friend is sexually assaulted what do you do?

A: Rub one out.
B: drink a beer in a unmarked container.
C: Call the police.
D: All the above in sequential order A B C

A friend has just been raped, while you stood there not helping because that would have been dangerous to you. What do you say to him/ her?

A: Wow that was intense! High five!
B: Ask: Hey, what the fuck does reacting to sexual assault have to do with alcohol?
C: Give victim a drink of your unmarked drink, ask to borrow a towel.
D: offer sloppy secants
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Pilot_MKN on August 14, 2010, 08:13:58 PM
In all fairness, the question states she was sexually assaulted. It doesn't say she just just claims it.
Evidently the hypothetical person being queried was standing there watching while the assault was happening.

You stand there like a potted plant while a Friend is sexually assaulted what do you do?

A: Rub one out.
B: drink a beer in a unmarked container.
C: Call the police.
D: All the above in sequential order A B C

A friend has just been raped, while you stood there not helping because that would have been dangerous to you. What do you say to him/ her?

A: Wow that was intense! High five!
B: Ask: Hey, what the fuck does reacting to sexual assault have to do with alcohol?
C: Give victim a drink of your unmarked drink, ask to borrow a towel.
D: offer sloppy secants

Sorry, I should have included more details on the course:

The scenario is that your friend calls you and says she is upset about something and when you arrive at her house, she tells you this story about the night before that she went home with a guy and doesn't remember all the details. You weren't there to witness what happened. All you have to go on is your friend's word.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Pilot_MKN on August 14, 2010, 08:14:17 PM
I'm sorry but I don't think immediately believing everything they say is a smart thing to do. How many guys have been wrongly accused of rape? This just seems like a slippery slope to me.

Get back to them with a printout about the Duke lacrosse case (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case).

Great point!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 14, 2010, 10:59:51 PM
I had one of my college friends (gal) accuse another college friend of mine (guy) of rape. It was one of those both-were-really-drunk situations. Didnt really sound like rape. Awkward! Never really took sides but had to talk to a fucking detective.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 14, 2010, 11:26:29 PM
I had one of my college friends (gal) accuse another college friend of mine (guy) of rape. It was one of those both-were-really-drunk situations. Didnt really sound like rape. Awkward! Never really took sides but had to talk to a fucking detective.

If we as a society claim that all drunk sex is nonconsentual because drunk people are incapable of consent, we would have to begin putting tons of sorority girls in jail for rape.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: gibson042 on August 15, 2010, 03:21:32 AM
Quote from: Angry Mom
Dear Ms. Rillion,
Thank you for your "erudite" discourse on semantics and your equally brilliant observation of the wallowing habits of pigs, which, I must defer, to your personal knowledge of kindred habits.
I, too, had wonderful parents. My father was a scholar and a Judge. From my earliest youth, he taught me the beauties and intracacies of our language. He and I had many wonderful discussions covering a plethora of interesting subjects. With the many wonderfully descriptive and elegant words, in abundance, at our disposal, we never found that we were so insufficiently grammatically starved that we had to resort to filth to get our point across.
Apparently, it is different in your family.
In addition, MISS Rillion, my parents also taught me the honor and integrity of monogamy in one's relationships; a lesson, perhaps, you missed that day because you were out in the sty, consorting with your cohorts.

I would expect someone taught "the beauties and intracacies [sic]" of a language from "earliest youth" to make fewer errors while communicating with it. Angry Mom seems fond of redundancy, particularly with commas.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 15, 2010, 03:41:21 PM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 15, 2010, 04:04:26 PM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?

American Sign Language (which I think I've heard is essentially international), most likely.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 15, 2010, 04:37:55 PM

Whatever language they read in. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 15, 2010, 04:56:16 PM
If nobody likes you and everybody hates you, why is the recommended course of action to go eat worms (http://everything2.com/title/Nobody+likes+me%252C+everybody+hates+me%252C+think+I%2527ll+go+eat+worms)?  Do people like worm-eaters more, or is it an agenda to make oneself so miserable that people can't help but pretend to like you out of a sense of pity?  Or perhaps suicide by worm poisoning?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 15, 2010, 04:58:47 PM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?

American Sign Language (which I think I've heard is essentially international), most likely.

Do they think in the syntax of ASL? They must have to. Interesting.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 15, 2010, 05:09:17 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 15, 2010, 05:22:15 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

I don't know about you, but I don't normally think in words.  I don't hear or see the word "door" in my head if I think about a door-- I see a door.  Presumably it's the same for them. 

Rhymes, puns, etc.-- those are probably a different story.  If you see a translation of the lyrics of a song "sung" in ASL typed out, they're not the same as the lyrics we hear.  ASL gives impressions rather than the importance being on specific words...that's why people use exaggerated facial expressions to accompany their signs. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 15, 2010, 05:31:15 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

They could think in words, or ideas, and not in sounds.

I presume you think in sounds.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 15, 2010, 05:37:26 PM
(http://touchofmeh.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Philosoraptor-If-a-person-was-born-deaf-Then-what-language-do-they-think-in.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 15, 2010, 06:01:33 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

They could think in words, or ideas, and not in sounds.

I presume you think in sounds.

I THINK IN PICTURES
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 15, 2010, 06:13:33 PM
what would a blind, deaf person think it?  :shock:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 15, 2010, 06:14:22 PM
Orgasms.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 15, 2010, 06:18:04 PM
I'm satisfied with that answer.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 15, 2010, 06:32:39 PM

Whatever language they read in. 

Yeah, but how does it sound in their head? Since they cant hear, theres no phonic sound to refer to when thinking to yourself.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 15, 2010, 06:32:53 PM
If nobody likes you and everybody hates you, why is the recommended course of action to go eat worms (http://everything2.com/title/Nobody+likes+me%252C+everybody+hates+me%252C+think+I%2527ll+go+eat+worms)?  Do people like worm-eaters more, or is it an agenda to make oneself so miserable that people can't help but pretend to like you out of a sense of pity?  Or perhaps suicide by worm poisoning?

Have you been asking this question, in some form or another, since childhood?
I have wondered about this since I was 4-5 years old, when my Mom was leading her group of Girl Guides in song around the campfire.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 15, 2010, 07:29:13 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

How could they have a concept of sound?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 15, 2010, 07:40:34 PM
If nobody likes you and everybody hates you, why is the recommended course of action to go eat worms (http://everything2.com/title/Nobody+likes+me%252C+everybody+hates+me%252C+think+I%2527ll+go+eat+worms)?  Do people like worm-eaters more, or is it an agenda to make oneself so miserable that people can't help but pretend to like you out of a sense of pity?  Or perhaps suicide by worm poisoning?

Have you been asking this question, in some form or another, since childhood?
I have wondered about this since I was 4-5 years old, when my Mom was leading her group of Girl Guides in song around the campfire.

When I was a kid we sang it just for fun, or when somebody was feeling sorry for him/herself.  Today I'm feeling both childish and sorry for myself, which made the song come to mind reflexively and I started thinking about it.  Also that book How to Eat Fried Worms, which I don't remember at all except for the title and the fact that I liked it. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 15, 2010, 07:45:49 PM

Whatever language they read in. 

Yeah, but how does it sound in their head? Since they cant hear, theres no phonic sound to refer to when thinking to yourself.

There are different kinds of thinking.  There are rudimentary forms, and complex forms. 

A rudimentary form of thinking would be "Get pen from kitchen", which would be a series of flashes, kinda like storyboard sketches when they're roughing out the directors shots in a movie.  Pen.  Walking man.  Kitchen. 

The complex form would be when composing a letter, or responding like we are now.  This requires each word, and follows the mechanics of language.  Deaf people can write, and know a good sentence structure from a bad one.  And to do that, you must be able to compose in a linear fashion, with rhythm and flow - much like you'd speak, whether it be in sign, or linguistically.   

There is also internal dialogue, which follows the structure of written or spoken word.  Like, if you were watching the guy int he next car picking his nose, you'd probably think in dialogue.  Look at this fucking guy, sick bastard, really digging up in there.  He's gonna give himself a nosebleed.  Damn...  I wonder if he's gonna eat it...  here he goes...  OH FUCK he's gonna...  OOOHHHHH, SHIT!" 

We all do this, all the time.  Standing in line, watching a commercial, looking for our shoes.  Where the fuck are my shoes...  shoes shoes shoes, I bet I left them on the porch... 

Sometimes its rudimentary, and you just get flashes of happy, sad, irate, nonplussed, annoyance, coldness, or whatever.  But more often, at least for me, I get the dialogue.  Lets go, Betty, just take your fucking change and quit with the fucking chatter...  Whole sentence, dialogue.  It doesn't have to have specific mnemonics associated with it, although mine are often colored with certain patterns of speech from famous actors.  Like DeNiro, Walken, or whoever has recently influenced me in some way.  And deaf people are capable of that, too, whomever they've recently invented a vocal color for, in something they've read or watched.  For deafs, I imagine they assign certain people other things, like bears growl or mices squeaks, because their imaginations are not entirely incapable of producing those connections.  We see them in illustrated storybooks as children. 






Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 15, 2010, 11:58:40 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

How could they have a concept of sound?

Vibration. A good pal of mine is deaf. Back in high school he bought a big green Lincoln (at a steal, since an old man died inside it and remained inside for a few days). He packed it with speakers and amps, cruised around with music incredibly loud. He'd crank it particularly high if us hearing-folks went for a ride with him. He'd just sit there and smile.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 16, 2010, 10:12:22 AM
Why does a recording of an over-the-air analog signal take up nearly as much space as an HDTV recording? I never had this occur when I was recording stuff off cable.

- If you're wondering, I'm using Windows Media Center for its ease of use, and the stuff I'm recording off analog are Canadian programs I can't find to download easily or at all.

(http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc259/bakamen/wat.gif)

Picture includes a lot of stuff I forgot to crop out!
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: YixilTesiphon on August 16, 2010, 10:25:17 AM
I always think in sounds, pictures, and music when relevant. Going deaf would really fuck me up.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 16, 2010, 02:18:19 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

How could they have a concept of sound?

Vibration. A good pal of mine is deaf. Back in high school he bought a big green Lincoln (at a steal, since an old man died inside it and remained inside for a few days). He packed it with speakers and amps, cruised around with music incredibly loud. He'd crank it particularly high if us hearing-folks went for a ride with him. He'd just sit there and smile.

Yeah, well, that's a whole lot different from sound as in speech.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 16, 2010, 03:01:17 PM
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST THE WHOLE POINT IS THEY DONT KNOW WHAT A LANGUAGE SOUNDS LIKE SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE THEY THINKING IN THEIR HEAD? HAND FLAPPING?

How could they have a concept of sound?

Vibration. A good pal of mine is deaf. Back in high school he bought a big green Lincoln (at a steal, since an old man died inside it and remained inside for a few days). He packed it with speakers and amps, cruised around with music incredibly loud. He'd crank it particularly high if us hearing-folks went for a ride with him. He'd just sit there and smile.

Yeah I have a deaf cousin. At her wedding they had a lot of songs with heavy heavy bass and the deaf would put their hands on the tables and basically pick up the vibes. Ear drums are just a big vibrating things in your ears anyway.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Harry Tuttle on August 16, 2010, 03:04:15 PM
If nobody likes you and everybody hates you, why is the recommended course of action to go eat worms (http://everything2.com/title/Nobody+likes+me%252C+everybody+hates+me%252C+think+I%2527ll+go+eat+worms)?  Do people like worm-eaters more, or is it an agenda to make oneself so miserable that people can't help but pretend to like you out of a sense of pity?  Or perhaps suicide by worm poisoning?

I first heard that song as an adult from a friend's son. At first I thought he was wacko, then I laughed. I think the point is to poke fun at yourself for the self-pity, then move on to the productive phase.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 17, 2010, 07:09:42 PM
Did someone here say they had dreadlocks once?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 17, 2010, 07:15:50 PM
Did someone here say they had dreadlocks once?

Yup- mine were short though.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 17, 2010, 07:18:36 PM
what method did you use ?  that wax bs, crochet hook, or neglect  ?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 17, 2010, 10:23:46 PM
Bees wax & my gf knotted it up. I had em for a few seasons, but they got kinda nasty.

(http://i484.photobucket.com/albums/rr202/anonobserv/def.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 17, 2010, 10:47:41 PM
how often did you wash your hair?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on August 18, 2010, 04:48:11 PM
I didn't, much. Back then I mostly let the cool Atlantic waters carry all my gunk away, it seemed to keep my hair spongy too.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on August 18, 2010, 08:43:31 PM

Yeah, that last post could've used a good deal more finesse.  But you know....my patience isn't the best.  Should probably work on that. 

you could have summoned my foul mouth.....here for the asking;
see, a precision placement of the phrase ''insipid cunt'', goes quite far, in many instances
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on August 18, 2010, 08:45:45 PM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?

American Sign Language (which I think I've heard is essentially international), most likely.


how bout  helen keller-esque peeps?

i didn't get thru the whole book, but, where the FUCK  do you begin there?

how the fuck can one of those people even get off the fuckin ground?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 19, 2010, 12:02:29 AM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?

American Sign Language (which I think I've heard is essentially international), most likely.


how bout  helen keller-esque peeps?

i didn't get thru the whole book, but, where the FUCK  do you begin there?

how the fuck can one of those people even get off the fuckin ground?

With water.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 19, 2010, 12:05:22 AM
Ok, heres a question.

If a person is born deaf, what language do they think in?

American Sign Language (which I think I've heard is essentially international), most likely.


how bout  helen keller-esque peeps?

i didn't get thru the whole book, but, where the FUCK  do you begin there?

how the fuck can one of those people even get off the fuckin ground?

With water.

And dating outside of her religion.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 19, 2010, 03:24:12 PM
I guess no one was able to answer my question ;_;

Here's one I hope people can answer: do you or anyone you know watch Larry King Live on a regular basis? I've been struggling to understand why he's relevant for the longest time now.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on August 19, 2010, 04:34:03 PM
I guess no one was able to answer my question ;_;

Here's one I hope people can answer: do you or anyone you know watch Larry King Live on a regular basis? I've been struggling to understand why he's relevant for the longest time now.

Nope. Never.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 19, 2010, 05:49:45 PM
Here's one I hope people can answer: do you or anyone you know watch Larry King Live on a regular basis? I've been struggling to understand why he's relevant for the longest time now.

I do not watch Larry King. I do not know anybody who watches his show.

I think he's been irrelevant for a very long time, as I cannot recall watching more than 5-10 minutes of his show at any point in my adult life. But somebody sure must think he is.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 19, 2010, 07:04:29 PM
Why do dogs have cold noses?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 19, 2010, 10:40:52 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 19, 2010, 10:51:50 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

I see a lot of chicks with a little doo-dad on their calf.  Thats acceptable in almost anyone's world.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 19, 2010, 10:58:08 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

Inside the anus. The more conservative the woman, the farther up inside, then come back out 1mm for every year of age under 40.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 19, 2010, 10:58:56 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

I see a lot of chicks with a little doo-dad on their calf.  Thats acceptable in almost anyone's world.



I've considered the calf. I'm in shorts, skirts or dresses 90% of the time, so kind of wondered how that would look.
(I am PTA board & room mom... and not in a cool intown neighborhood.) Was trying to figure out something that would show in running/cycling gear, but not in my street clothes.

Inside the anus. The more conservative the woman, the farther up inside, then come back out 1mm for every year of age under 40.

Conservative in dress, not the uptight churchy kind of conservative.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 19, 2010, 11:06:46 PM
Oh ok, I'd say ankle or calf for sure.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 19, 2010, 11:20:46 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

I see a lot of chicks with a little doo-dad on their calf.  Thats acceptable in almost anyone's world.



I've considered the calf. I'm in shorts, skirts or dresses 90% of the time, so kind of wondered how that would look.
(I am PTA board & room mom... and not in a cool intown neighborhood.) Was trying to figure out something that would show in running/cycling gear, but not in my street clothes.

Inside the anus. The more conservative the woman, the farther up inside, then come back out 1mm for every year of age under 40.

Conservative in dress, not the uptight churchy kind of conservative.

Yea, I'm aware of your general lifestyle.  I see a lot of soccermoms with ink down above the ankle. 

I think it more depends on the design and size, to get the upturned nose from peers. 

My kid has a friend, who's mom is a nice respectable chick.  Husband's a school teacher, she's a nurse.  She's got a dancing bear down there.  I've never seen anyone give her the snake-eye at softball games. 

Mostly, "we" as adults look at that stuff as a little message, in parentheses.  Probly got it on the boardwalk one summer in college, or something. 

More daring women sometimes get them on the crown of their foot.  But that would probably hurt like a bastard, and you couldn't see it in running shoes.  And you'd probably be off your game for a while allowing it to heal. 

The back of the shoulder is a pretty traditional place for women, but I think it requires more thought because of summer dresses. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 19, 2010, 11:21:36 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/Femalenudebacktattoooptions.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on August 19, 2010, 11:49:42 PM
I think ankle might work well for what I'm looking for, a chain link & leaf pattern.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sylviels/3351204821/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sylviels/3351204821/)
There's somebody selling temporary bike chain tattoos, which might be a good idea. Can add the leaves and see how I like it for a few days before I get official measurement, design & price.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 20, 2010, 02:09:50 AM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

I see a lot of chicks with a little doo-dad on their calf.  Thats acceptable in almost anyone's world.



I've considered the calf. I'm in shorts, skirts or dresses 90% of the time, so kind of wondered how that would look.
(I am PTA board & room mom... and not in a cool intown neighborhood.) Was trying to figure out something that would show in running/cycling gear, but not in my street clothes.

Inside the anus. The more conservative the woman, the farther up inside, then come back out 1mm for every year of age under 40.

Conservative in dress, not the uptight churchy kind of conservative.

On the outside of the mid-thigh, or around the hip.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 20, 2010, 07:07:39 PM
Which is faster electricity or light?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on August 20, 2010, 08:03:18 PM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I think it depends on the medium.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 20, 2010, 08:21:45 PM
Electricity is probably as fast if you're pissing on an exposed wire.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 20, 2010, 08:56:09 PM
Electricity is probably as fast if you're pissing on an exposed wire.
aluminum wire or copper?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 20, 2010, 09:13:15 PM
Electricity is probably as fast if you're pissing on an exposed wire.
aluminum wire or copper?

copper is a better conductor, so probably that
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 20, 2010, 09:25:13 PM
I bet if my pee is dark yellow it'll help too.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 20, 2010, 09:52:30 PM
If a woman gets hit in the crotch, did she stub her camel toe?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 20, 2010, 10:48:17 PM
I think ankle might work well for what I'm looking for, a chain link & leaf pattern.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sylviels/3351204821/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/sylviels/3351204821/)
There's somebody selling temporary bike chain tattoos, which might be a good idea. Can add the leaves and see how I like it for a few days before I get official measurement, design & price.

I like the bike chain, and its cool the way it melts into a leaf.  But a sprocket is probably not something I'd include.  The sprocket would be too big for your leg. 

I'd rather see it just wrap your ankle and end with a single leaf on the outside of the calf, raked back like a flame. 

I think its more feminine without the sprocket. 

Sprockets on the leg are also kinda cliche', after checking.  It seems there is a "chain ring" tattoo thats gotten kinda old, where you'd get shredded from the crank if you slipped a pedal.  (Inside right calf)

--

Certain things mean certain things.  There is biker-bitch lore to contend with.  So, I wouldn't link the ends, because that usually means some kind of slavery or incarceration, with chains of any sort.  Leave the ends open, like a spiral staircase. 

Just trying to help decipher the language.  I'd rather not see you get something that has an unintended meaning. 




Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on August 20, 2010, 11:02:48 PM
Which patch of skin is a good place for a fairly conservative woman "of a certain age" to get inked?

Get a tramp stamp. Since most of your world/lifestyle is conservative it would be a little somthing different. Variety is the spice of life. Your husband might really like it so that could be a bonus.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on August 21, 2010, 01:16:01 AM
here are some bike tats, if you get one round your wrist people will think it's a bracelet at first. If you got something around your upper thighs they could look like stocking tops, your hubby will love that, of course you'd need short shorts in competition to see them.

(http://worldonabike.com/files/2008/08/mg-9994-bethany-wiseman.jpg)

I'm sure it's not a tat but a good idea
(http://www.cyclelicio.us/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/chainring-tattoo.jpg)

(http://r3reviewer.thirdraildesignlab.com/images/1267550010.jpg)

(http://urbanvelo.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/alicia.jpg)

(http://www.vepraskas.com/tattoo.jpg)

(http://www.1lesscar.com/images/nighttrain/Sat_My_favourite_tattoo_all_weekend.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on August 21, 2010, 08:33:59 AM
the big question for das madchen von zeit is WHY are bulldykes so hot!?

do I unconsciously want to have sex with myself? I do too much of that as it is...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on August 21, 2010, 01:51:56 PM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I believe light is faster.  That's why they use it in high-speed communications equipment.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on August 21, 2010, 04:33:19 PM
Makes sense, fiber optics and what not.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: ForumTroll on August 21, 2010, 04:46:09 PM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I believe light is faster.  That's why they use it in high-speed communications equipment.

They use it because long lengths of wire have resistance and capacitance issues, and act as radio antennas.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Stoker on August 22, 2010, 09:44:49 AM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I believe light is faster.  That's why they use it in high-speed communications equipment.

According to current theory, light and electricity "travel" at the same speed. Fiber Optic communication (using light) allows for more information to be sent in a particular time period than most electricity based communication systems . This doesn't mean that light is faster, only that current technologies allow for more rapid deciphering of the information that is being sent in light based systems than electricity based long distance communication systems.

As for what exactly this speed that light and electricity travel at, there are issues concerning this: http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.15 (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.15)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 22, 2010, 03:38:50 PM
Hey Joy, did you ever start selling those little knit critters?

On the craft front, I'm thinking of doing some leatherworking again....I've got a lot of equipment, dyes, and leather just sitting around waiting to be used.  Last project was a leather Pente (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pente)/Go board, for which I made little suede drawstring bags to hold the glass pieces. 

So I'm wondering....would anyone buy such a thing if I were to make more?  The closest thing I've found is this (http://www.etsy.com/listing/14621448/leather-hand-tooled-and-carved-pente), which is not as detailed as mine and doesn't appear to come with playing pieces.  He/she did mount it on a wooden board which I have not done, because I prefer to be able roll the game up and take it places. 

Pente is not such a well-known game, which is kind of a good thing actually because it means if you set it up in a pub somewhere and start playing, people tend to come over and say "What on earth is that?  Can I play too?" (which they can-- it's up to four players).  Not a selling bonus necessarily, but a meeting people bonus. 

If I did try to make and sell these, would Ebay or Etsy be better?   I've never sold anything on either, though I've bought from both. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on August 22, 2010, 03:58:21 PM
I'm not much of a game guy, but that is an attractive board. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on August 22, 2010, 04:13:17 PM
Mine's rather warped from being rolled up for a long time:

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/Penteboarddaylight.jpg)
(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/Pentepiecesbagdaylight.jpg)

That silver on the bag is part of a stamp from when the leather was cut....I liked it, so left it on.  

There are obviously a lot of improvements that could be made with the next one.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 27, 2010, 01:12:09 AM
We had a bunch of French and Mexican students transfer into the school recently, and it makes me wonder:

Why are foreigners so faggy?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Stoker on August 27, 2010, 09:02:30 AM
We had a bunch of French and Mexican students transfer into the school recently, and it makes me wonder:

Why are foreigners so faggy?

They are probably just trying to fit in with American society.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 31, 2010, 03:35:42 AM
obviously you havent watched the philosophy of liberty video
http://www.isil.org/resources/philosophy-of-liberty-english.swf

Well, duh.

Saw it. Still have some reservations about it. Not what I would call a scholarly work either.

Maybe this subject needs its own thread.

I apologize, in advance, for coming of mean here, but here goes anyway.

It sounds a bit pretentious to call for "scholarly work". If you really care about the topic of liberty, I'm sure you will find plenty of sources from which to read, study and perform exegesis (exegesi?). If you want to discuss particular weaknesses in an argument then do so, but appeals to authority are unnecessary.

Not initiating force is simple. Not indicates the negative. Initiation means to produce the beginning or cause of action. Force is the only portion that really admits of ambiguity. I would say that it would be best to refer to force as causing action upon another that is unwelcome.

The other week, I was reading Nietzsche, and when he started on slave mentality, I got mad at myself. I have had zero accidents, and one ticket in 7 years of driving, and in every way I read myself into the part about the whole slave thought thing. I jumped into my car, and drove home from the cafe at double the speed limit, blowing every stop sign on the way. Man was I pissed.

Same books mentions Schopenhauer and how he too was an anarchist. I'll read him when I find the time.

I'll also start a thread on this later.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: avshae on August 31, 2010, 08:02:17 AM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I think it depends on the medium.

Blackie is correct. Light and electricity both travel as electromagnetic waves. Therefore in a void they would both travel at the speed of light C=300,000Km/sec. Through materials they travel slower, depending on the electrical properties of the medium. For example on a stock PCB (printed circuit board), electricity travels at around C/3.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Stoker on September 01, 2010, 10:23:39 AM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I think it depends on the medium.

Blackie is correct. Light and electricity both travel as electromagnetic waves. Therefore in a void they would both travel at the speed of light C=300,000Km/sec. Through materials they travel slower, depending on the electrical properties of the medium. For example on a stock PCB (printed circuit board), electricity travels at around C/3.

The Speed of Light as currently defined is based on circular reasoning and assumptions (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.msg607002#msg607002). There is no proof that this is the highest attainable speed, or if it is, exactly what that speed might be. The approximate speed you are quoting is a fairly accurate empirical observational measurement relating to our very limited perspective. It is quite possible that Light (and other radiations) behave completely differently in different conditions, many of which we cannot duplicate or even observe. There are new observations and experiments (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.msg610614#msg610614) showing that the currently stated Speed of Light is either wrong, or that it is not the highest attainable speed.

(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTiTJp8Au6648_Pb-eh-o6ncug6x1ulvdFGt1dGWV9LN6BnWx4&t=1&usg=__SLecJLFyJ4ae9Rrm-9_OHztmqtE=)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 01, 2010, 01:30:21 PM
Which is faster electricity or light?

I think it depends on the medium.

Blackie is correct. Light and electricity both travel as electromagnetic waves. Therefore in a void they would both travel at the speed of light C=300,000Km/sec. Through materials they travel slower, depending on the electrical properties of the medium. For example on a stock PCB (printed circuit board), electricity travels at around C/3.

The Speed of Light as currently defined is based on circular reasoning and assumptions (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.msg607002#msg607002). There is no proof that this is the highest attainable speed, or if it is, exactly what that speed might be. The approximate speed you are quoting is a fairly accurate empirical observational measurement relating to our very limited perspective. It is quite possible that Light (and other radiations) behave completely differently in different conditions, many of which we cannot duplicate or even observe. There are new observations and experiments (http://bbs.freetalklive.com/index.php?topic=34462.msg610614#msg610614) showing that the currently stated Speed of Light is either wrong, or that it is not the highest attainable speed.

(http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTiTJp8Au6648_Pb-eh-o6ncug6x1ulvdFGt1dGWV9LN6BnWx4&t=1&usg=__SLecJLFyJ4ae9Rrm-9_OHztmqtE=)

I remember reading an article a decade ago where they were able to "slow down" light to about 39 mph.

Avshae, any chance we will see fiber-optic circuit boards in the future?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: avshae on September 02, 2010, 07:17:39 AM
Avshae, any chance we will see fiber-optic circuit boards in the future?

Currently network information typically travels over a medium such as copper or fiber, (or electromagnetic waves in the air, which is a different story), until it reaches a network node such as a switch or end-point, such as your modem at home. There it is converted into digital electrical signals for processing, which is done on a system which resides on a circuit board. From there it might be reconverted and retransmitted over fiber/copper/wireless.

So, you are asking, will it be possible to skip the conversion to electrical and do the entire processing optically. Well there are definitely people working on it, but it'll take years of research before computation in optics will be able to do what transistor-based processors are able to do today. MEMS (Microelectromechanical systems) might be the key. MEMS researchers try to do stuff like fabricate miniaturized motorized directional mirrors on a silicon die, to do computation in optics. Fascinating stuff for your PhD research.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on September 15, 2010, 01:41:36 AM
Do farts have lumps?  :?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on September 15, 2010, 03:54:11 AM
Do farts have lumps?  :?

only the stinkiest ones
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on September 15, 2010, 04:19:39 AM
I imagined as a kid some farts coming out like blowing a bubble, with a semi-opaque pearlescent brown sheen to them.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 15, 2010, 04:36:09 AM
I imagined as a kid some farts coming out like blowing a bubble, with a semi-opaque pearlescent brown sheen to them.

Holy crap me too.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on September 15, 2010, 07:06:27 AM
So, currently in VirtualBox I have WinXP, Win7, and Mythbuntu VMs.

What's some interesting crap I can screw around with? Interesting OSes?

Libman seemed to be extremely wet for DragonFlyBSD so I'm gonna check that out, I also remember talking with some people who swore that BeOS was *the* OS for them.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: YixilTesiphon on September 15, 2010, 09:54:45 AM
I imagined as a kid some farts coming out like blowing a bubble, with a semi-opaque pearlescent brown sheen to them.

Holy crap me too.

Odd, me too. Apparently that's the intuitive way children imagine farts.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on September 15, 2010, 11:02:00 AM
I imagined as a kid some farts coming out like blowing a bubble, with a semi-opaque pearlescent brown sheen to them.

I once farted at my mother while naked (at age 4 or something, shaddup) and asked her if that was the case.  When she said no, I was very disappointed.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Andy on September 15, 2010, 11:12:36 AM
I imagined as a kid some farts coming out like blowing a bubble, with a semi-opaque pearlescent brown sheen to them.

Holy crap me too.

Odd, me too. Apparently that's the intuitive way children imagine farts.

Count me for a fifth.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on September 15, 2010, 11:57:08 AM
So, currently in VirtualBox I have WinXP, Win7, and Mythbuntu VMs.

What's some interesting crap I can screw around with? Interesting OSes?

Libman seemed to be extremely wet for DragonFlyBSD so I'm gonna check that out, I also remember talking with some people who swore that BeOS was *the* OS for them.

Solaris is fun/agony.

Of those so far I've tried out DFBSD, which wouldn't boot from the VM HDD. Maybe I should have just grabbed the VMware image off the site . . . Mythbuntu won't work so well in a VM, which makes sense, considering it's just a media center version of the same version of Ubuntu I'm running.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on September 15, 2010, 06:16:17 PM
Do farts have lumps?  :?



sharts do
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on September 15, 2010, 07:41:08 PM
Do farts have lumps?  :?



sharts do

how bout queefs?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 17, 2010, 01:02:07 AM
Do farts have lumps?  :?



sharts do

how bout queefs?

queefs should not have lumps.

you fuckin moron. 

no offense.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 17, 2010, 01:08:06 AM
The symmetry of that post is just fuckin beautiful..  In 2-3-5-3-2 configuration. 

Jolly good.

And very little ripple.


9.9's and a ten from Yugoslavia.  That'll be hard to beat.



Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 19, 2010, 01:29:09 PM
Question for the ladies:

How much does grey hair on a guy bother you if its only a few strands?



P.S. Another question:

Is it dishonest to cut off only grey hairs?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on September 19, 2010, 01:38:50 PM
How much does grey hair on a guy bother you if its only a few strands?

Not at all.  Guys who are neurotic about their grey hair, on the other hand, are quite bothersome.  I knew a guy in college who was so freaked out by his early greying of hair at age 21 that he wore a hat all of the time.  When I found out why, I thought he was an idiot, which is probably not the reaction he was aiming for.  He wouldn't dye it because he considered that to be "girly."  That didn't provoke a response of awe and admiration either. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 19, 2010, 01:40:07 PM
How much does grey hair on a guy bother you if its only a few strands?

Not at all.  Guys who are neurotic about their grey hair, on the other hand, are quite bothersome.  I knew a guy in college who was so freaked out by his early greying of hair at age 21 that he wore a hat all of the time.  When I found out why, I thought he was an idiot, which is probably not the reaction he was aiming for.  He wouldn't dye it because he considered that to be "girly."  That didn't provoke a response of awe and admiration either. 


 :( oh.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on September 19, 2010, 01:52:53 PM
:( oh.

Dude....dye it, shave it, or own it.  You have a lot of options.  Including the hat thing, but I still think that's dumb.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 19, 2010, 01:54:15 PM
:( oh.

Dude....dye it, shave it, or own it.  You have a lot of options.  Including the hat thing, but I still think that's dumb.

Well, thank you Rillion.  :wink:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 19, 2010, 02:12:00 PM
Quality chicks don't mind gray hair.  But you have to keep the rest of yourself up to snuff.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on September 19, 2010, 03:01:28 PM
Quality chicks don't mind gray hair.  But you have to keep the rest of yourself up to snuff.




not necessarily.
good quality cocaine shellacks right over the rough spots.
you could have a 10'' puss-laden zit hanging off your nose, if you have a ziploc full of free blo.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on September 20, 2010, 11:54:44 PM
Quality chicks don't mind gray hair.  But you have to keep the rest of yourself up to snuff.




not necessarily.
good quality cocaine shellacks right over the rough spots.
you could have a 10'' puss-laden zit hanging off your nose, if you have a ziploc full of free blo.

Thats a lot of yayo for a guy with a fucked up nose. 

Or maybe not.


Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on September 25, 2010, 03:32:54 PM
Is this wrong?

Last night I was walking to my table at a restaurant when I noticed this hot, large breasted woman with her eyes closed and her  head bowed saying a prayer.

She was leaning over, exposing lots of mammary gland, holding the hand of her lover who was wearing a John 3:16 t-shirt. 

I took the opportunity, her eyes being closed and all, to lean over and take a hard glance down her shirt at her tits, hoping for areola. 

Was that wrong?

I think I saw some nip.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on September 25, 2010, 05:33:02 PM
Is this wrong?

Last night I was walking to my table at a restaurant when I noticed this hot, large breasted woman with her eyes closed and her  head bowed saying a prayer.

She was leaning over, exposing lots of mammary gland, holding the hand of her lover who was wearing a John 3:16 t-shirt.

I took the opportunity, her eyes being closed and all, to lean over and take a hard glance down her shirt at her tits, hoping for areola.

Was that wrong?

I think I saw some nip.

Maybe that's what she was praying for.  If she doesn't want people to see or look at her breasts, she should cover them up.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on September 25, 2010, 09:34:02 PM
Is it just me or is it a pain in the ass to create a Win7 virtual machine just to play one game?

(The game is Civ V.)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on September 27, 2010, 01:46:23 PM
Is it just me or is it a pain in the ass to create a Win7 virtual machine just to play one game?

(The game is Civ V.)
HOLY SHIT ITS FINALLY OUT!  Yeah that is a major pain in the ass, and it probably won't run well because graphics seem to blow hard through virtual machines, but if you can get it to run well then it should definitely be worth it. 

Downloading Civ V now.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on October 03, 2010, 08:33:51 PM
If a Jew lusting for a white gentile is shiksa fever, would someone lusting for a Jewish woman have matzoh fever?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 05, 2010, 01:12:13 AM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 05, 2010, 11:04:22 AM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?

The tax code?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 05, 2010, 01:36:42 PM
Maybe I'm being a little too paranoid, but I feel like there are just some things you should not ask on a public forum.  Here are a few.

1.)  How do I avoid paying my taxes?

2.)  How can I avoid paying for television and movies?  What's a good place to download them illegally?

3.)  How do I buy a gun without registering it?  Is there any way to get rid of the serial number?

4.)  How can I avoid registering as a sex offender?  I found a great house near an elementary school, but these government regulations sure are annoying!

You know, I'm just saying.  If you're gonna do the shit, fine.  I wouldn't advertise though. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: sillyperson on October 05, 2010, 01:46:03 PM
You do realize your post just made this thread a likely google hit for exactly those questions...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 05, 2010, 01:49:55 PM
You do realize your post just made this thread a likely google hit for exactly those questions...

Yes.  Yes I do.  I kind of figured that it's all already all over this forum.  Personally I believe that it's fairly innocuous, especially in relation to some of their shit people post on associated sites.  You see, I am a tax paying citizen that buys DVDs, has no interest in owning a gun, and has never committed a crime.  It's just a thought is all.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 06, 2010, 01:20:47 AM
Get a fresh dead person.

Badda boom, badda bing.  You're golden!

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on October 06, 2010, 01:35:04 AM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?

Don't give out your SSN to people who give you money.  Don't put it in any accounts that have your SSN.  Don't own things that are worth than whatever income you can't avoid reporting.  Be prepared to live in a cage.  Anyone who tells you there are reliable methods for not getting caught is an unreliable source.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 06, 2010, 06:14:58 PM
When did bicycle tires start having two types of valves? I guess one is the normal valve for off road type bikes and another for street bikes. When and why did this happen? Is that asshole Lance Armstrong behind it?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 06, 2010, 06:17:49 PM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?

Peter Shiff's father is an excellent source. He has resided at the same address for years now. Track that down and contact him directly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on October 06, 2010, 06:33:37 PM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?

Peter Shiff's father is an excellent source. He has resided at the same address for years now. Track that down and contact him directly.

Yeah, didn't he serve time in prison for not paying taxes?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 06, 2010, 07:18:09 PM
What are some reliable resources on tax avoidance, and evasion?

Peter Shiff's father is an excellent source. He has resided at the same address for years now. Track that down and contact him directly.

Yeah, didn't he serve time in prison for not paying taxes?

Still serving time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irwin_Schiff
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on October 06, 2010, 07:57:45 PM
When did bicycle tires start having two types of valves? I guess one is the normal valve for off road type bikes and another for street bikes. When and why did this happen? Is that asshole Lance Armstrong behind it?

I'm not sure, but my latest street bike has the presta valves on the tires.  I'm not sure what the advantages are, aside from being easier to release pressure and marginally less wind resistance...maybe.

That said, it looks like the real reason is because the schrader valve is too wide for thin tires found on road bikes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presta_valve
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on October 06, 2010, 08:18:13 PM


3.)  How do I buy a gun without registering it?  Is there any way to get rid of the serial number?


in b4 j.s.
don't everevereverever..............talk
guns+
unreg.+
ser. # erasure+
ghetto neegs
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 06, 2010, 08:20:40 PM
Bah! You could always manufacture your own (better do so legally, though!)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 06, 2010, 11:48:12 PM


3.)  How do I buy a gun without registering it?  Is there any way to get rid of the serial number?


in b4 j.s.
don't everevereverever..............talk
guns+
unreg.+
ser. # erasure+
ghetto neegs


I totally agree.  But if idiots are going to ask these types of questions on this forum - we may as well make fun of them somethin' awful. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: YixilTesiphon on October 07, 2010, 04:27:29 PM
HI I WOULD LIKE TO NO HOW TO MAKE A FERTILIZER BOMB HAVE ANY OF U DONE IT AND WHERE TO PLACE IT FOR MAXIMUM DAMAGE EXAMPLES PLZ

/fed off
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 07, 2010, 05:21:26 PM
HI I WOULD LIKE TO NO HOW TO MAKE A FERTILIZER BOMB HAVE ANY OF U DONE IT AND WHERE TO PLACE IT FOR MAXIMUM DAMAGE EXAMPLES PLZ

/fed off

I knew there was a reason I liked you.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on October 07, 2010, 08:56:19 PM
HI I WOULD LIKE TO NO HOW TO MAKE A FERTILIZER BOMB HAVE ANY OF U DONE IT AND WHERE TO PLACE IT FOR MAXIMUM DAMAGE EXAMPLES PLZ

/fed off

If you want that kind of info, you should look to the people who are really good at that kind of thing...the US government.

TM 31-210  IMPROVISED MUNITIONS HANDBOOK (http://www.scribd.com/doc/16615897/Tm-31210-Improvised-Munitions-Handbook-v3)

Sections 1.6 and 1.8 cover ferilizer explosives.

Quote
1.6 Fertilizer Explosive An explosive munition can be made from fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate and either fuel oil or a
mixture of equal parts of motor oil and gasoline. When properly prepared, this explosive munition can be detonated with a blasting cap.

Materials Required
 Ammonium nitrate (not less than 32% nitrogen)
Fuel oil or gasoline and motor oil 1:1 ratio)
Two flat boards. (At least one of these should be comfortably held in the hand, i.e. 2 x 4 and 36 x 36.)
Bucket or other container for mixing ingredients
Iron or steel pipe or bottle, tin can or heavy-walled cardboard tube
Blasting cap
Wooden rod – 1/4 inch diameter
Spoon or similar measuring container



Procedure

1. Spread a handful of the ammonium nitrate on the large flat
board and rub vigorously with the other board until the large
particles are crushed into a very fine powder that looks like
flour (approximately 10 minutes).
Note: Proceed with step 2 as soon as possible since the powder may take moisture from the air and become spoiled.


2. Mix one measure (cup, tablespoon, etc.) of fuel oil with 16
measures of the finely ground ammonium nitrate in a dry
bucket or other suitable container and stir with the wooden
rod. If fuel oil is not available, use one half measure of
gasoline and one half measure of motor oil. Store in a
waterproof container until ready to use.

3. Spoon this mixture into an iron or steel pipe which has an end cap threaded on one end. If a pipe is not available, you may use a dry tin can, a glass jar or a heavy-walled cardboard tube.

Note: Take care not to tamp or shake the mixture in the pipe. If mixture becomes tightly packed, one cap will not be sufficient to initiate the explosive

4. Insert blasting cap just beneath the surface of the explosive mix.

Note: Confining the open end of the container will add to the effectiveness of the explosiv




1.8 Fertilizer AN-Al Explosive

A dry explosive mixture can be made from ammonium nitrate fertilizer combined with fine aluminum powder. This explosive can be detonated with a blasting cap.

Procedure

1. Method I – To Obtain a Low Velocity Explosive

a. Use measuring container to measure four parts fertilizer to one part aluminum powder and pour into the mixing container. (Example: 4 cups of fertilizer to 1 cup aluminum powder.

b. Mix ingredients well with the wooden rod.


2. Method II – To Obtain a Much Higher Velocity Explosive

a. Spread a handful at a time of the fertilizer on
the large flat board and rub vigorously with the
other board until the large particles are crushed
into a very fine powder that looks like flour
(approximately 10 minutes per handful).

Note: Proceed with step b below as soon as possible since the powder may take moisture from the air and become spoiled.


b. Follow steps a and b of Method I.

3. Store the explosive mixture in a waterproof container, such as glass jar, steel pipe, etc., until ready to use



Tannerite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tannerite) is basically AN-AL with some sensitizers. You can buy the stuff legally, and set it off by shooting it with a high powered rifle.



As far as placement, it depends what you are trying to blow up. See FM 5-25 for details.

FM 5-25  Explosives and Demolitions (http://www.scribd.com/doc/9307742/FM-525-Explosives-and-Demolitions-1967)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on October 08, 2010, 12:27:24 AM
When did bicycle tires start having two types of valves? I guess one is the normal valve for off road type bikes and another for street bikes. When and why did this happen? Is that asshole Lance Armstrong behind it?

Before I was born.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Ecolitan on October 08, 2010, 12:30:38 AM
and has never committed a crime.  It's just a thought is all.   :lol:

lolololol

Three felonies a day. (http://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594032556)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 08, 2010, 12:42:49 AM
Yeah, I thought that crap about never committing a crime was pretty far out there too.  I'm pretty sure we've all committed felonies we were unaware were even crimes.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 08, 2010, 12:01:29 PM
and has never committed a crime.  It's just a thought is all.   :lol:

lolololol

Three felonies a day. (http://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent/dp/1594032556)

Interesting.  I'll have to give it a read.  I suppose I should correct myself.  Occasionally I do 5 over the speed limit, and I don't have a front license plate on my car.  It's not like most of us wake up and decide to commit any kind of crime today, and certainly not a violent one.  Guess it doesn't matter. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 09, 2010, 04:40:49 PM
It's not like most of us wake up and decide to commit any kind of crime today, and certainly not a violent one. 

Some of us decide not to.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Lindsey on October 09, 2010, 07:54:15 PM
It's not like most of us wake up and decide to commit any kind of crime today, and certainly not a violent one. 

Some of us decide not to.



I do my best not to.   :lol:
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 09, 2010, 08:02:06 PM
Say what again.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on October 10, 2010, 04:01:16 AM
what
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: TimeLady Victorious on October 10, 2010, 04:05:12 AM
wat
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on October 10, 2010, 04:10:52 AM
What aint no country I've ever heard of, they speak english in what?
(http://www.watchmojo.com/blogs/images/samuelljackson.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on October 10, 2010, 03:14:56 PM
Whhawha?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 10, 2010, 07:40:38 PM
Where can I buy adult-sized superhero pajamas?

I want either Captain America, or Spiderman from Marvel, or Batman, or Superman from DC.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 10, 2010, 08:37:14 PM
Where can I buy adult-sized superhero pajamas?

I want either Captain America, or Spiderman from Marvel, or Batman, or Superman from DC.



all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e


i might actually buy some of these myself
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on October 10, 2010, 08:44:22 PM
Are you going for this look?
(http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f278/mustang830/superjew_jpgkpaaub.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 10, 2010, 08:50:37 PM
all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e

i might actually buy some of these myself

I'm not a big fan of briefs, really, but if guys are going to wear them...don't go for the tighty whities.  Wear these:

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ErraUIqWL._SX300_SY390_CR,0,0,300,390_.jpg)

Win.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 10, 2010, 09:52:34 PM
all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e

i might actually buy some of these myself

I'm not a big fan of briefs, really, but if guys are going to wear them...don't go for the tighty whities.  Wear these:



Win.


these

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61kHWXkEFEL._SX300_SY390_CR,0,0,300,390_.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 11, 2010, 12:49:33 AM
Probly leave some heinous skid marks in those, never get noticed. 

Thats the kind of shorts you want to wear when you'll be taking off your pants in a beer pong tourney, and theres cunts around.  You can dig away at your ass with wing sauce on your fingers, and let the good times roll.   Balls to the wind, just sailin'.

.  Fuck yeah
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 11, 2010, 01:00:59 AM
lol
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 11, 2010, 01:28:49 AM
Where can I buy adult-sized superhero pajamas?

I want either Captain America, or Spiderman from Marvel, or Batman, or Superman from DC.



all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e


i might actually buy some of these myself

I was looking for pj's, not underwear.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on October 11, 2010, 01:45:43 AM
Where can I buy adult-sized superhero pajamas?

I want either Captain America, or Spiderman from Marvel, or Batman, or Superman from DC.



all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e


i might actually buy some of these myself

I was looking for pj's, not underwear.

Same thing.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 11, 2010, 02:12:21 AM
(http://www5.scholastic.co.uk/zone/images/book%20zone/fiction8-12/captain-underpants_logo.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 11, 2010, 02:24:19 AM
Ugh. I want this

http://www.amazon.com/Superman-Wormser-Boys-Sleeved-Pajamas/dp/B000PEMLXA

in my size.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 11, 2010, 09:19:51 PM
Ugh. I want this

http://www.amazon.com/Superman-Wormser-Boys-Sleeved-Pajamas/dp/B000PEMLXA

in my size.

I'd like a pair of oilcloth coveralls, high bib.  A thigh length jungle coat.  12-eye Carolina loggers boots.  Leather work gloves.  Hockey mask. 

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 11, 2010, 09:29:29 PM
I'd like a pair of oilcloth coveralls, high bib.  A thigh length jungle coat.  12-eye Carolina loggers boots.  Leather work gloves.  Hockey mask. 

Hot.

I mean, literally, that sounds really hot....leave off the coat at least. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 11, 2010, 10:40:11 PM
Does college ever end?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on October 11, 2010, 11:59:30 PM
all matter of weird underpants here......

http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=superhero+underwear&tag=googhydr-20&index=apparel&hvadid=4267674381&ref=pd_sl_3pgiyaksg1_e

i might actually buy some of these myself

I'm not a big fan of briefs, really, but if guys are going to wear them...don't go for the tighty whities.  Wear these:

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51ErraUIqWL._SX300_SY390_CR,0,0,300,390_.jpg)

Win.

What about boxer briefs?

(http://s8.thisnext.com/media/largest_dimension/7604EB57.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 12, 2010, 12:26:20 AM
What about boxer briefs?

Better.  In my estimation boxer briefs are actually most attractive, followed by boxers, followed by briefs.  But for some reason briefs are the only ones that guys seem to feel comfortable just wearing in all of their plain white vanilla bland British-accountant-or-eight-year-old glory. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 15, 2010, 08:55:36 PM
I'd like a pair of oilcloth coveralls, high bib.  A thigh length jungle coat.  12-eye Carolina loggers boots.  Leather work gloves.  Hockey mask. 

Hot.

I mean, literally, that sounds really hot....leave off the coat at least. 

Thats the price you pay for invulnerability. 



Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 20, 2010, 02:51:27 PM
Need some quick general advice on vaporizers. Like where to purchase (online, head shop), are they illegal to take across state lines and are they easy to use?. Those that feel uncomfortable responding please don't. I know I would not if I had the knowledge. I am in a jam with a family member and I will not go into specifics but he needs a reliable cheap appetite stimulant.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on October 20, 2010, 06:29:31 PM
never used a vap...yet


does the early bird really get the worm?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 20, 2010, 07:10:57 PM
Need some quick general advice on vaporizers. Like where to purchase (online, head shop), are they illegal to take across state lines and are they easy to use?. Those that feel uncomfortable responding please don't. I know I would not if I had the knowledge. I am in a jam with a family member and I will not go into specifics but he needs a reliable cheap appetite stimulant.

eBay

Don't know legal, but usually seems to have something to do with whether there's any residue in it--that makes it paraphernalia.

You want one that uses convection (rather than direct heat as from a modified soldering iron) and that you can vary the temperature on.  Basically, humidity, altitude, etc., have and effect on how it vaporizes, so you want to be able to adjust.  190C or 365F is about what you want.  I think the vertical air delivery from the bottom is the best way to go.  Here are some brands that do that.

arizer (extreme vaporizer)
herbalaire
vapor tower
volcano (storz and bickle)
vapir (a couple models do it)
happy vappy (crossed out because I remembered it has no heat control)

Don't much like vapir, and don't think the vapor tower delivers value for the money, compared to the herbalaire and the extreme vaporizer.  The volcano is the industry heavyweight and really expensive.  There are some knock-offs, such as the Fuji, but reviews on that are mixed.  Bottom line, I'd recommend Herbalaire for ease and quickness of use, or the Arizer Extreme Vaporizer for taste (it's all glass), but the Extreme seems to only work its best after a long (like 45 minute) warm-up period.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 21, 2010, 11:28:32 AM
Need some quick general advice on vaporizers. Like where to purchase (online, head shop), are they illegal to take across state lines and are they easy to use?. Those that feel uncomfortable responding please don't. I know I would not if I had the knowledge. I am in a jam with a family member and I will not go into specifics but he needs a reliable cheap appetite stimulant.

eBay

Don't know legal, but usually seems to have something to do with whether there's any residue in it--that makes it paraphernalia.

You want one that uses convection (rather than direct heat as from a modified soldering iron) and that you can vary the temperature on.  Basically, humidity, altitude, etc., have and effect on how it vaporizes, so you want to be able to adjust.  190C or 365F is about what you want.  I think the vertical air delivery from the bottom is the best way to go.  Here are some brands that do that.

arizer (extreme vaporizer)
herbalaire
vapor tower
volcano (storz and bickle)
vapir (a couple models do it)
happy vappy

Don't much like vapir, and don't think the vapor tower delivers value for the money, compared to the herbalaire and the extreme vaporizer.  The volcano is the industry heavyweight and really expensive.  There are some knock-offs, such as the Fuji, but reviews on that are mixed.  Bottom line, I'd recommend Herbalaire for ease and quickness of use, or the Arizer Extreme Vaporizer for taste (it's all glass), but the Extreme seems to only work its best after a long (like 45 minute) warm-up period.

Thanks
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on October 21, 2010, 07:43:29 PM
anyone ever cultivate mushrooms?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 23, 2010, 02:02:57 PM
I'm driving from Dallas to Atlanta next week.  It's an estimated 13 hour drive and since I don't like driving for that long at a stretch, thought I'd stop somewhere in between and look around and spend the night.  Any recommendations?  My experience of traveling in that part of the country is zero, and I'm planning to take I-20 all of the way. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 23, 2010, 03:03:08 PM
I'm driving from Dallas to Atlanta next week.  It's an estimated 13 hour drive and since I don't like driving for that long at a stretch, thought I'd stop somewhere in between and look around and spend the night.  Any recommendations?  My experience of traveling in that part of the country is zero, and I'm planning to take I-20 all of the way. 

Im going to Atlanta in 2 weeks from Illinois, but will be flying. I do my fair share of driving trips in unknown areas and I usually just pick a Fairfield Inn, Comfort Inn, or Courtyard Marriott. Havent gone wrong with any of those yet.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 23, 2010, 03:05:02 PM
None of my business, but I'd suggest leaning towards the upscale side of cities and attractions.  You can unexpectedly find yourself in some pretty crummy parts of town if you're not a native, and there is a lot of gang activity in midwest cities.  Like St Louis, for example.  Maybe a good midpoint, possibly, without consulting a map (I donno if I-20 runs through there).  Interesting things to do and see, like the Arch.  But bad crime, according to some documentaries I've seen.  

Maybe one of those paddlewheel gambling boats on the Miss would be nice.  Professional security, professionally managed hotels nearby.  They're all about the tourist.  Have a few White Russians, play the nickle slots, stay at the Radisson.  Historically accurate paddlewheels on the 'Ole Miss? - shit.  That'd be my pick.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 23, 2010, 03:14:27 PM
Also, if you see this clown anywhere near where you are staying, GTFO quick, or you'll be in for one hell of a night. Stay somewhere else.


(http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2005/10/12/devils_rejects_big_051012044813066_wideweb__300x328.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 23, 2010, 08:53:45 PM
I'm driving from Dallas to Atlanta next week.  It's an estimated 13 hour drive and since I don't like driving for that long at a stretch, thought I'd stop somewhere in between and look around and spend the night.  Any recommendations?  My experience of traveling in that part of the country is zero, and I'm planning to take I-20 all of the way. 

http://www.roadtripusa.com/routes/southernpacific/southernpacific.html

This is the website my friends and I use when we plan roadtrips around the country.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on October 24, 2010, 02:45:11 PM
I'm driving from Dallas to Atlanta next week.  It's an estimated 13 hour drive and since I don't like driving for that long at a stretch, thought I'd stop somewhere in between and look around and spend the night.  Any recommendations?  My experience of traveling in that part of the country is zero, and I'm planning to take I-20 all of the way.  

http://www.roadtripusa.com/routes/southernpacific/southernpacific.html

This is the website my friends and I use when we plan roadtrips around the country.

AAA has apps out there which are great on the road. It's not just the map & directions - also has options to turn on nearby hotels, restaurants, etc with ratings & links all from the same screen. We used it a lot during our trip this summer: Atlanta - St Louis - Kansas City - Alma (BFW Nebraska) - Chicago - HOME!

If you'll be driving through Louisiana during daylight, there are some amazing BBQ joints in some of the small towns on the highway which runs parallel to I-20, just a couple miles north. Don't know much about Alabama.

Edit: Sorry. Meant to type I-20, since that's the Interstate which runs directly from Dallas to Atlanta. A weekend of camping with six other families (total of 15 kids!) left me a little brain dead.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on October 24, 2010, 03:42:25 PM
if you go to new orleans, you HAVE-TA go to larry flynt's hustler club
right there on bourbon st.
nasty fucking hole.
but fun for the whole family
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 26, 2010, 08:24:30 PM
http://www.roadtripusa.com/routes/southernpacific/southernpacific.html

This is the website my friends and I use when we plan roadtrips around the country.

Oooh, thank you. That looks really useful. 

AAA has apps out there which are great on the road. It's not just the map & directions - also has options to turn on nearby hotels, restaurants, etc with ratings & links all from the same screen.

Sounds lovely, but while I have an AAA membership, I have neither smartphone nor iPod touch nor iPad.  Maybe someday....

It's looking like Jackson MI will be the overnight point, but I might stop at few places before and after to stretch my legs and look at things, and maybe scope out one of those BBQ places for lunch. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 26, 2010, 11:36:52 PM
Where did I leave my goddamn sandals?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 27, 2010, 12:27:57 AM
Where did I leave my goddamn sandals?

They are behind the couch, silly.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 27, 2010, 05:21:46 PM
I used them to scrub my workbench.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on October 27, 2010, 06:02:31 PM
Where did I leave my goddamn sandals?

At least this isn't an issue of knowing where one's towel is...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: mrapplecastle on October 27, 2010, 09:07:59 PM
anyone else think aunt jemima is the shit?


(http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/documents/image/ucm163105.jpg)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on October 27, 2010, 09:47:47 PM
She's a cunt.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 28, 2010, 01:42:54 PM
What do people mean when they say they're spiritual?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 28, 2010, 02:18:47 PM
What do people mean when they say they're spiritual?

(http://wiki.freetalklive.com/images/9/98/Popcorn.gif)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on October 28, 2010, 02:36:43 PM
What do people mean when they say they're spiritual?

I take it to be code for they like to smoke dope, have rejected organized religion but still believe in a god and try to live life being "good" people.  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on October 28, 2010, 04:08:49 PM
What do people mean when they say they're spiritual?

I take to be code for they like to smoke dope, have rejected organized religion but still believe in a god and try to live life being "good" people. 
I take it to be either that or that they believe in nutty mysticism nonsense.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 28, 2010, 04:18:49 PM
What do people mean when they say they're spiritual?

I take to be code for they like to smoke dope, have rejected organized religion but still believe in a god and try to live life being "good" people. 
I take it to be either that or that they believe in nutty mysticism nonsense.

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on October 28, 2010, 05:56:57 PM
I knew this would be fun.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 28, 2010, 09:21:16 PM
anyone else think aunt jemima is the shit?


(http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/documents/image/ucm163105.jpg)

I think Thomas Jefferson sired 12 children with her. Thats what my great great great grandpa said.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on October 28, 2010, 09:53:09 PM
Where did I leave my goddamn sandals?

At least this isn't an issue of knowing where one's towel is...

I guess y'all ain't hip.

"Knowing where one's towel is" :

Quote
... a towel has immense psychological value. For some reason, if a strag (strag: nonhitchhiker) discovers that a hitchhiker has his towel with him, he will automatically assume that he is also in possession of a toothbrush, washcloth, soap, tin of biscuits, flask, compass, map, ball of string, gnat spray, wet-weather gear, space suit etc., etc. Furthermore, the strag will then happily lend the hitchhiker any of these or a dozen other items that the hitchhiker might accidentally have "lost". What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is, is clearly a man to be reckoned with.

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy y'see.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on October 28, 2010, 10:52:40 PM
Where did I leave my goddamn sandals?

At least this isn't an issue of knowing where one's towel is...

I guess y'all ain't hip.

"Knowing where one's towel is" :

Quote
... a towel has immense psychological value. For some reason, if a strag (strag: nonhitchhiker) discovers that a hitchhiker has his towel with him, he will automatically assume that he is also in possession of a toothbrush, washcloth, soap, tin of biscuits, flask, compass, map, ball of string, gnat spray, wet-weather gear, space suit etc., etc. Furthermore, the strag will then happily lend the hitchhiker any of these or a dozen other items that the hitchhiker might accidentally have "lost". What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is, is clearly a man to be reckoned with.

Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy y'see.

IRL I'm a frood, and a user on here is named Trillian, so yeah, we are as hoopy as they come.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on October 28, 2010, 11:32:00 PM
Yeah, I know.

Holed up in Jackson MS tonight.  Tragedy nearly happened when somebody failed to secure a herd of longhorn cattle outside of Tyler, TX.  The whole bunch of them plus a donkey buddy decided it would be a brilliant idea to go explore the big speeding metal things going by on I-20.   Luckily the speeding metal things didn't collide with bovine flesh at high velocity, at least not while I was there.  I worry occasionally about hitting a deer....the possibility of hitting a cow had never occurred to me. 

Got a late start so no fun on the Mississippi river....maybe on the return trip. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on October 28, 2010, 11:36:38 PM
I hit a rabbit going about 80mph once. That nearly tore my spoiler off.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 02, 2010, 10:12:40 PM
I hit a rabbit going about 80mph once. That nearly tore my spoiler off.

Your spoiler?  Did it flip up when it passed under the car or something?

I just spotted this on my hotel door.  I didn't know such laws existed:

(http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u29/Rillion12/MShotellaws.jpg)

Pretty sure there are hotels in Mississippi which charge more than $200 a night.  Why are they allowed to, but not the one I'm staying in apparently?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on November 03, 2010, 01:18:52 AM
Whatever they call that decorative piece of plastic that is under the front of the car.

The maximum rate is for that particular room. That's the disaster/event rate...heh.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2010, 01:32:07 AM
Exceeding that would be price gouging, if seventy million people suddenly moved north from a cataclysmic event.  

That document would prevent unlawfulness. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2010, 01:36:18 AM
No, not prevent.  Prohibit. 

Its a writ, not a shield.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2010, 01:37:27 AM
Its a proclamation.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on November 03, 2010, 01:38:04 AM
We'll slap your wrist, we promise.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2010, 01:40:19 AM
Its a picture of Barbara Streisand.

Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on November 03, 2010, 01:49:50 AM
Whatever they call that decorative piece of plastic that is under the front of the car.

Oh.  I know what you mean, but I don't know what the hell that's called.

Quote
The maximum rate is for that particular room. That's the disaster/event rate...heh.

This room has a king bed, sofa bed, bar with sink and mini fridge, and microwave in addition to the standard stuff.  I can imagine someone being quite happy to spend more than $200 for it even if there wasn't a hurricane on their ass.  That seems pretty messed up that they wouldn't be allowed to even if they wanted.

Of course, it's late and I've been driving all day, then had a few beers, watching election coverage on MSNBC which would break anyone's brain.....basically I'm none too bright at this point. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: hellbilly on November 03, 2010, 06:42:42 PM
They're "Splash Guards".
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on November 19, 2010, 10:58:33 AM
How much per bird does a turkey farmer(?) make?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on November 19, 2010, 03:31:11 PM
How much per bird does a turkey farmer(?) make?

Depends on breed, weight, and number of birds. If you sell one bird of a rare breed alive to someone the price will be different than the super fat food birds butchered en mass.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on November 19, 2010, 04:21:17 PM
How much per bird does a turkey farmer(?) make?

I'm guessing around 50 cents a piece. The profit margins on factory farming are depressing.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Riddler on November 19, 2010, 05:20:52 PM
if they're columbian turkey farmers & stuff them w/ coke & weed, they aren't depressed at all
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 28, 2010, 11:48:03 PM
Who here still cares about American debt?

With insolvency looming for the Euro, and entire nations defaulting on debt obligations (Iceland, Seychelles, Greece, and now Ireland) and more following their lead, it seems to me that the idea of currency is due for a change. Doom and gloom, sky will fall, and cash will be worthless. etc.

Except for the fact that forex exists.

Every currency is traded around the clock and a loss in value for one means a raise in the value of another. Since the Euro zone is hell bent on bankrupting itself, and many other nations are following suit, and they're doing it faster than we are, all America has to do is slow down on using the printing press, and our currency will avoid default.

Just a thought.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on November 29, 2010, 08:47:54 AM
Currencies can't default, and if you're referring to defaulting on our debt then slowing the printing presses down would make that more likely.  US debt is denominated in US dollars and is payable in the same.

It would be interesting to see some countries start defaulting on their debts.  That seems more likely in the Euro-zone since countries using the Euro are not able to singlehandedly manipulate their money supply...they can't inflate their way out of debt.  I'm not sure how much longer the bailout mania can continue.

As far as the US debt goes, I still care about it.  I don't imagine that anyone will be happy with the results of a default on the part of the US government.  It is not clear at all that it would actually cause the government to change in any major, much less fundamental, way.  At this point, I much prefer a stable and planned reduction of government rather than a collapse.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on December 01, 2010, 10:20:33 PM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: freeAgent on December 01, 2010, 11:04:03 PM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

I'd guess the Euro given Greece, Ireland, and the rest of the countries which are quickly headed down the toilet.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 01, 2010, 11:06:14 PM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

What is the significance of December 7th?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on December 02, 2010, 05:09:20 AM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

What is the significance of December 7th?


Nothing, just that some euro twits picked that date, they are supposedly being led by former football star Catona, bunch of nitwits.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on December 02, 2010, 10:03:21 AM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

What is the significance of December 7th?


Nothing, just that some euro twits picked that date, they are supposedly being led by former football star Catona, bunch of nitwits.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html)


Guy claims it will take 3 million to sink the banks, yet less than 200,000 counts on the video. Soccer boy better get his ass moving.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 03, 2010, 05:58:31 PM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

What is the significance of December 7th?


Nothing, just that some euro twits picked that date, they are supposedly being led by former football star Catona, bunch of nitwits.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html)


Guy claims it will take 3 million to sink the banks, yet less than 200,000 counts on the video. Soccer boy better get his ass moving.

Well, you know what typically comes out of a horse's ass. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on December 03, 2010, 08:13:20 PM
Does anyone think the euros will do a bank run on December 7th? Which currency will be used as toilet paper first, the Euro or the American dollar?

What is the significance of December 7th?


Nothing, just that some euro twits picked that date, they are supposedly being led by former football star Catona, bunch of nitwits.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html (http://www.lewrockwell.com/rep/eric-cantona-peaceful-revolution.html)


Guy claims it will take 3 million to sink the banks, yet less than 200,000 counts on the video. Soccer boy better get his ass moving.

Well, you know what typically comes out of a horse's ass. 



Hey, I was completely loco on Jose Cuervo when that happened, and it only happened once. Judge thee not lest ye be judged......... so sayeth the Lord.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bill Brasky on December 04, 2010, 05:33:02 PM
Thats your business. 

I was talking about the Guy Fawkes wannabe who thinks he's gonna cause a revolution by having a few people make a MAC withdrawal.  They are printing money on an industrial scale, like Charmin.  Here, there, wherever.  If you take it all out, they'll simply put more in.  Like Chuck E. Cheese tickets. 

The headline will be "Bank Temporarily Ran Short Of Funds.  More Was Delivered." 




Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on December 17, 2010, 12:05:54 AM
Have been postponing a full physical for a three years now. Am not in bad shape, but not in great.
Ran 2nd marathon last weekend. Have burning curiosity figure out which of these things will be found wrong with me tomorrow:

High Cholesterol
Heart Murmur
Weight/BMI too high.
Abnormally low blood pressure
B12 deficiency
Iron deficiency
Serious irregularities on the bloodwork.
Knee damage requiring trip to orthopedic doc / therapist.
Suspicious moles, freckles, etc from all the time outdoor on bike or foot over last 3 years.

I'm betting on at least 4 of 9, with a scheduled trip for ultrasound, screening with dermatologist and a follow up for second round of bloodwork.

Yes, I do realize this is less of a question, and more the venting of the stuff that goes through my head & leads me to delay scheduling appts.  Because (here comes my question)... if I don't go to the doctor, he/she can't tell me there's something wrong with me, meaning that I'm perfectly healthy, yes?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on December 17, 2010, 02:01:18 AM
I'm gonna say rickets and scurvy........... and maybe a bad case of the vapors as well.

Let us know what they find out.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: blackie on December 17, 2010, 11:27:56 AM
Have been postponing a full physical for a three years now.
That's not too bad. I'm not even sure when I had my last one. Probably over 10 years ago. I don't go to the doctor unless I think something is really wrong.


Quote
Heart Murmur
I've got this, but it has never caused me any issues, unless you count having to get a waiver to join the Army. I didn't even know until I had the Army physical.


Quote
Knee damage requiring trip to orthopedic doc / therapist.
My 7yo has an issue going on with his knee right now. He has a lump and is limping around, so we took him to the orthopedic doctor. They did x-rays, but couldn't tell what it is. Then he had an MRI done, and they still aren't sure what it is. My wife tried to get them to do a biopsy, but they didn't want to. I have to take him to Children's Hospital in Boston next week to see a bone and soft tissue tumor specialist.

Anyone know what cancer looks like on an MRI?

Quote
Because (here comes my question)... if I don't go to the doctor, he/she can't tell me there's something wrong with me, meaning that I'm perfectly healthy, yes?
Pretty much. I figure you will know when something is wrong.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on December 17, 2010, 08:56:00 PM
Quote
Heart Murmur
I've got this, but it has never caused me any issues, unless you count having to get a waiver to join the Army. I didn't even know until I had the Army physical.


Be careful with this sort of thing. We lost an immediate family member to this sort of thing last right around this time. His murmur/defect caused him to drift off to sleep while at work. He never woke up.

I'm sure you will be fine Laetitia. You take care of yourself with excercise and eating right. No need to fret. Now if you will excuse me, I got a case of the vapors and must fan myself and sip on some iced tea on the porch til they pass.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on December 17, 2010, 10:11:34 PM
Quote
Heart Murmur
I've got this, but it has never caused me any issues, unless you count having to get a waiver to join the Army. I didn't even know until I had the Army physical.
Mine is pretty mild. Have known about it my whole life. About once a decade, somebody will send me off for an echocardiogram. Not because I'm exhibiting any signs of trouble... just checking.

Quote
My 7yo has an issue going on with his knee right now. He has a lump and is limping around, so we took him to the orthopedic doctor. They did x-rays, but couldn't tell what it is. Then he had an MRI done, and they still aren't sure what it is. My wife tried to get them to do a biopsy, but they didn't want to. I have to take him to Children's Hospital in Boston next week to see a bone and soft tissue tumor specialist.

Anyone know what cancer looks like on an MRI?

My mother's tumors - which are not classified as cancerous - show up on MRIs exactly the same as cancerous growths. The difference is seen during biopsy.

MRI before biopsy is a good idea. You want them to have as much information about the area of concern before exploring sharp implements. I hope it turns out to be something odd, as opposed to something harmful. Odd growths, inflammation and suchare annoying as hell, but I'll take a lot of annoying over illness any day.

I'm sure you will be fine Laetitia. You take care of yourself with excercise and eating right. No need to fret. Now if you will excuse me, I got a case of the vapors and must fan myself and sip on some iced tea on the porch til they pass.

I "appear to be healthy" but wont be told for sure until next Wednesday, after the PA gets back results all the bloodwork. Until then, I'm going with dyspesia and melancholia as my primary complaints.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: yamnuska on December 29, 2010, 05:10:55 AM
Laetitia, you okay?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Laetitia on December 29, 2010, 07:06:07 PM
Laetitia, you okay?

I think so - Thanks for asking. Found out Christmas Eve:

Vitamin D deficiency - seems insane, with all the time I spend outside
Cholesterol is 207, and they want me to get it below 200. But...
HDL (good) score is 78 (60 is considered high),
Tri is 73
LDL (bad) 56 (anything below 100 is considered optimal)

The ratio is weighted much more to the good for me to worry about "managing" my cholesterol through diet. I'm not giving up butter & whole milk... cravings for sweets would go thru the roof.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: BonerJoe on December 29, 2010, 07:36:43 PM
Watch the polunsaturated fats and your cholesterol should be fine.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Bradley on January 09, 2011, 08:50:09 AM
I want to atleast try to convince my boss of stop paying taxes on my labour.

How do I brush the subject of tax evasion to my boss?

Any resources? Any advice?

Appreciate it.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: davann on January 09, 2011, 12:07:10 PM
I want to atleast try to convince my boss of stop paying taxes on my labour.

How do I brush the subject of tax evasion to my boss?

Any resources? Any advice?

Appreciate it.

My advice is to not even try. No matter where you work the business is in business to make money not break the law. In the end even bringing the subject up might have a negative effect on how your boss views you. You are there to work not make statements. A better option is to start your own business and gauge for yourself if the risk is worth it. Even a part time one on the side might be enough to give you some relief knowing you have at least one foot off the plantation.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 09, 2011, 05:27:25 PM
My iron is fairly new, and it keeps doing a couple of weird things I can't really figure out.

For one, every time I press the steam button, a bunch of gravel comes out of the holes. How the fuck did that get in there? Was this thing assembled in a dust factory or something?

 Another thing is that there is a white crust forming on the holes where the steam comes out of. I can't figure out if its from the spray-on starch, or residue from the fluoride they put into the water.

What thinks you?
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Cognitive Dissident on January 10, 2011, 02:33:39 PM
My iron is fairly new, and it keeps doing a couple of weird things I can't really figure out.

For one, every time I press the steam button, a bunch of gravel comes out of the holes. How the fuck did that get in there? Was this thing assembled in a dust factory or something?

 Another thing is that there is a white crust forming on the holes where the steam comes out of. I can't figure out if its from the spray-on starch, or residue from the fluoride they put into the water.

What thinks you?

My money is on calcium deposits.  Try using distilled water...oh, and to get out all the crap, add vinegar and let it boil the crap out a few times, then rinse well.

http://www.google.com/search?q=steam%20iron%20vinegar (http://www.google.com/search?q=steam%20iron%20vinegar)
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 10, 2011, 02:36:33 PM
My iron is fairly new, and it keeps doing a couple of weird things I can't really figure out.

For one, every time I press the steam button, a bunch of gravel comes out of the holes. How the fuck did that get in there? Was this thing assembled in a dust factory or something?

 Another thing is that there is a white crust forming on the holes where the steam comes out of. I can't figure out if its from the spray-on starch, or residue from the fluoride they put into the water.

What thinks you?

My money is on calcium deposits.  

Or Anthrax.
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 23, 2011, 02:14:51 PM
A few years ago on Free Talk Live Ian and Mark played an audio recording of a man being tortured by police.  They had come to arrest him for violating his parole, I think, and beat the crap out of him while unknowingly being taped doing it by his wife.  It was somewhere in the South, and the recording was just brutal.  Does anybody remember that guy's name?  
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Fred on January 23, 2011, 02:23:56 PM
A few years ago on Free Talk Live Ian and Mark played an audio recording of a man being tortured by police.  They had come to arrested him for violating his parole, I think, and beat the crap out of him while unknowingly being taped doing it by his wife.  It was somewhere in the South, and the recording was just brutal.  Does anybody remember that guy's name? 

Lester Eugene something:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mg1gY6OliCE
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Rillion on January 23, 2011, 02:52:54 PM
Thank you!  I needed it for a pro-recording the police argument. 
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 24, 2011, 03:01:55 PM
My iron is fairly new, and it keeps doing a couple of weird things I can't really figure out.

For one, every time I press the steam button, a bunch of gravel comes out of the holes. How the fuck did that get in there? Was this thing assembled in a dust factory or something?

 Another thing is that there is a white crust forming on the holes where the steam comes out of. I can't figure out if its from the spray-on starch, or residue from the fluoride they put into the water.

What thinks you?
My money is on calcium deposits.  Try using distilled water...oh, and to get out all the crap, add vinegar and let it boil the crap out a few times, then rinse well.

http://www.google.com/search?q=steam%20iron%20vinegar (http://www.google.com/search?q=steam%20iron%20vinegar)

Thanks man
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: anarchir on January 25, 2011, 10:44:36 PM
Recently I've been working on a small ebook for Voluntaryists and liberty minded folk. I've finally got a firm idea of what the structure of the book will be and have the table of contents mostly completed. This is as good of a time as any to reveal a bit of it to you guys and get your opinions. Would you be interested in reading something like this? Would you be willing to purchase it in hardcover? What tips, suggestions or constructive criticism do you have?

Anarchir's voluntaryist book (name hidden)
Table of Contents:
Part I: Tactics and Activism
Part II: Culinary Agorism
Part III: Bonus Pages
etc. More parts and subsections to come...
Title: Re: The Question Thread
Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 25, 2011, 11:24:01 PM
Recently I've been working on a small ebook for Voluntaryists and liberty minded folk. I've finally got a firm idea of what the structure of the book will be and have the table of contents mostly completed. This is as good of a time as any to reveal a bit of it to you guys and get your opinions. Would you be interested in reading something like this? Would you be willing to purchase it in hardcover? What tips, suggestions or constructive criticism do you have?

Anarchir's voluntaryist book (name hidden)
Table of Contents:
    Part I: Tactics and Activism
    • Alternatives to Government Services
    • Making Money the Sneaky Way
    • Peaceful Guerilla Anti-State Activism
    • Dealing with the Police
    • Handling Retaliation
    Part II: Culinary Agorism
    • Explanation
    • Examples
    • Set-Up
    • Gear
    • Recipes & Ingredient Pricing
    Part III: Bonus Pages
    • Printable Voluntaryism Flier
    etc. More parts and subsections to come...

    Id definitely read it, but only buy it because I "know" you.[/list]
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on January 25, 2011, 11:49:48 PM
    Thanks for the response! I'm considering offering it as a free ebook, maybe trying to put some advertising on there somewhere. I realize hardcover wouldnt work for this sort of book anyhow.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on January 26, 2011, 04:55:53 PM
    Self-publish it if there's a demand (and I think there might be). I'd be interested for sure.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 01, 2011, 07:24:31 PM
    Who is Jesus' Grandpa on his Dad's side?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Ecolitan on February 01, 2011, 07:27:10 PM
    The only religion I know of which believes there is an answer to that also believes that it's none of our damn business.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on February 06, 2011, 09:39:20 AM
    Who is Jesus' Grandpa on his Dad's side?

    With their low-price introductory offer, you could join Ancestry.com and find out within minutes. 
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on February 10, 2011, 04:32:44 AM
    Who is Jesus' Grandpa on his Dad's side?

    With their low-price introductory offer, you could join Ancestry.com and find out within minutes. 

    Jesus would find out he's related to Triddle.

    http://wiki.freetalklive.com/Image:Triddle.jpg (http://wiki.freetalklive.com/Image:Triddle.jpg)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 14, 2011, 08:26:26 AM
    Recently I got into a discussion with what seemed like a statist.

    We got into the subject of guns and self defence. I stated that it's my right to have a gun, in order to defend myself. If it's morally right for a so called police to have a gun, then it's morally right for me as well.

    He then played the atom-bomb card. "So where's the line? Why stop with guns? Is everyone allowed to have their own atombomb? Do you have the right to acquire an atom bomb as well?."

    Now this is ridiculous because an atombomb can't arguably be used in self defense without killing lots of innocent people as well. And without governments the atom bomb wouldn't exist to begin with. So in a way it's a highly hypothetical scenario, and those are generally useless to discuss.

    I asked him "what hell would I need an atom bomb for?!"

    And I have to admit what he did then got me cornered, because he simply took it back to argument from morality.

    "Yes but are you allowed to have an atom bomb, is it your right??"

    Me: Yes.

    So guys I'd appreciate some help here. How is it morally logically consistent, coming from the volountarist/scientifically viewpoint of morality (Stefan Molyneux style) to say that it's ok to have a gun, but not an atom bomb? (Not that I said that)

    If you say that everyone has a right to their own gun, doesn't that also mean, if one is logically consistent, that atomb bombs are ok as well? Mustn't everyone be allowed to own their own atomb bomb if they'd like, and no one has the right to stop them from constructing one?

    If it's true that atom bombs are OK, sure that makes me a bit nervous. However, it makes me more nervous that some have the right to have atom bombs, and some have not, as is currently the case. Maybe it's not a right to own an atom bomb, but it's not anyone else's right to come take it away from you? Two wrongs doesn't make one right.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on February 14, 2011, 09:03:25 AM
    Atomic weapons are they only way you can defend yourself against your own government, so why not? It's technically not illegal to have them, per the Constitution.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on February 14, 2011, 01:29:40 PM
    Recently I got into a discussion with what seemed like a statist.

    We got into the subject of guns and self defence. I stated that it's my right to have a gun, in order to defend myself. If it's morally right for a so called police to have a gun, then it's morally right for me as well.

    He then played the atom-bomb card. "So where's the line? Why stop with guns? Is everyone allowed to have their own atombomb? Do you have the right to acquire an atom bomb as well?."

    Now this is ridiculous because an atombomb can't arguably be used in self defense without killing lots of innocent people as well. And without governments the atom bomb wouldn't exist to begin with. So in a way it's a highly hypothetical scenario, and those are generally useless to discuss.

    I asked him "what hell would I need an atom bomb for?!"

    And I have to admit what he did then got me cornered, because he simply took it back to argument from morality.

    "Yes but are you allowed to have an atom bomb, is it your right??"

    Me: Yes.

    So guys I'd appreciate some help here. How is it morally logically consistent, coming from the volountarist/scientifically viewpoint of morality (Stefan Molyneux style) to say that it's ok to have a gun, but not an atom bomb? (Not that I said that)

    If you say that everyone has a right to their own gun, doesn't that also mean, if one is logically consistent, that atomb bombs are ok as well? Mustn't everyone be allowed to own their own atomb bomb if they'd like, and no one has the right to stop them from constructing one?

    If it's true that atom bombs are OK, sure that makes me a bit nervous. However, it makes me more nervous that some have the right to have atom bombs, and some have not, as is currently the case. Maybe it's not a right to own an atom bomb, but it's not anyone else's right to come take it away from you? Two wrongs doesn't make one right.


    Two answers off the top of my head:

    1) You don't have to be consistent, and have every right to draw a line in the sand arbitrarily with what you think people should be allowed to own.

    2) The Principle of the Helicopter Seatbelt. Nifty sounding, yes? I made it up myself. The premise is that no one who is in a helicopter would wear a seatbelt because the probability of death is so high in a real accident. Meaning to say that the people in the helicopter have little incentive to protect themselves in case something goes wrong, and less so for others because if they themselves are dead, they do not have to worry about others they killed in an accident.

    The rule of thumb then becomes that in a situation where a person could harm others as a result of a situation where the incentive for protecting others from harm is low as a consequence of a lack of safety for the self can be regulated.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: TimeLady Victorious on February 14, 2011, 01:34:51 PM
    Dmitri Ravinoff had an a-bomb wired to explode in case he died.

    Get like him.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 14, 2011, 01:41:18 PM
    Atomic weapons are they only way you can defend yourself against your own government, so why not? It's technically not illegal to have them, per the Constitution.

    Can't do it without killing/hurting countless people who have not aggressed against you.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 14, 2011, 06:17:55 PM
    Atomic weapons are they only way you can defend yourself against your own government, so why not? It's technically not illegal to have them, per the Constitution.

    Can't do it without killing/hurting countless people who have not aggressed against you.

    You can still have countless victims, it'd just take longer.

    It's a tricky question, but just another one of those "so far out there" that it ultimately makes little difference.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 14, 2011, 06:20:09 PM
    You're sitting in a restaurant and your child has been screaming for 15 minutes. Everyone around is obviously annoyed.

    A person approaches you and suggests that you could try taking the child outside (it's a nice day) for a bit to let her cry it out.

    What's your response?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on February 14, 2011, 06:21:02 PM
    I'd have already thought the same  thing - cunt.. go away!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 14, 2011, 06:50:09 PM
    Atomic weapons are they only way you can defend yourself against your own government, so why not? It's technically not illegal to have them, per the Constitution.

    Can't do it without killing/hurting countless people who have not aggressed against you.

    You can still have countless victims, it'd just take longer.

    It's a tricky question, but just another one of those "so far out there" that it ultimately makes little difference.

    You do the violence, you're responsible for it.  Setting off an a-bomb makes you responsible for the lives of everyone you kill--and certainly those you killed who weren't involved.  You can't duck that.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 14, 2011, 06:51:34 PM
    You're sitting in a restaurant and your child has been screaming for 15 minutes. Everyone around is obviously annoyed.

    A person approaches you and suggests that you could try taking the child outside (it's a nice day) for a bit to let her cry it out.

    What's your response?

    You shouldn't be there to hear it.  You should already be outside disciplining your child.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 14, 2011, 10:48:55 PM
    Ugh, I hear ya. Ate at the Golden Corral (american buffet) tonight with my woman. It reminded me of why sometimes people suck, and why my girlfriend and I never want to have kids. Teach your kid how to fucking behave itself! Also, I saw a woman at the buffet cough into her hands, then lick her fingers, then go around putting food on her plate. UGH INDEED  Not to mention the kids wandering out of control, coughing and sneezing and eating around the buffet. Wouldnt be surprised if I got really fucking sick after eating there.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on February 14, 2011, 11:27:13 PM
    I wouldn't do that again.
    I cut out the buffet years ago.
    Not worth it.
    Having worked food and bev. myself, don't think behind kitchen doors there is necessarily a high degree of sanitation.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 14, 2011, 11:33:15 PM
    You're sitting in a restaurant and your child has been screaming for 15 minutes. Everyone around is obviously annoyed.

    A person approaches you and suggests that you could try taking the child outside (it's a nice day) for a bit to let her cry it out.

    What's your response?

    You shouldn't be there to hear it.  You should already be outside disciplining your child.

    Agreed.

    Instead though, when I pointed out everyone complaining, the woman said "Let them complain." Then when the kid stopped crying to listen to the strange man talking to her mom, the other lady said "See? She stop cryin'." I pointed out that it was because there was a diversion. Then I had to explain what "diversion" meant. Then the other lady said "I don't want to go to jail today." Then I rolled my eyes and left the two ladies (I'm guessing their combined weight to be about 600 pounds) finish their meal. Then I made some new friends with the people at the next table. Then I had a muffin.

    I don't think I was out of line but the ladies seemed irate with me.

    - this was actually at a buffet. A soup n' salad place. Been a regular for a decade and the nice Russian ladies run a clean shop!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: LTKoblinsky on February 15, 2011, 01:45:12 AM
    You're sitting in a restaurant and your child has been screaming for 15 minutes. Everyone around is obviously annoyed.

    A person approaches you and suggests that you could try taking the child outside (it's a nice day) for a bit to let her cry it out.

    What's your response?

    You shouldn't be there to hear it.  You should already be outside disciplining your child.

    a buffet sounds nice right now. I've got a young son (look left) and we went to Outback once. Just as our food arrived, he started fussing. Did we let him fuss and annoy everyone else in the crowded restaurant? No, we got to-go boxes, packed up, went back home and ate it cold. Why am I blowing my own trumpet? To let you know that for every visible kid screaming in public there are other parents who make good neighbors.

    Agreed.

    Instead though, when I pointed out everyone complaining, the woman said "Let them complain." Then when the kid stopped crying to listen to the strange man talking to her mom, the other lady said "See? She stop cryin'." I pointed out that it was because there was a diversion. Then I had to explain what "diversion" meant. Then the other lady said "I don't want to go to jail today." Then I rolled my eyes and left the two ladies (I'm guessing their combined weight to be about 600 pounds) finish their meal. Then I made some new friends with the people at the next table. Then I had a muffin.

    I don't think I was out of line but the ladies seemed irate with me.

    - this was actually at a buffet. A soup n' salad place. Been a regular for a decade and the nice Russian ladies run a clean shop!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on February 15, 2011, 05:27:48 AM
    With respect to the question on what to do about atom bombs, I would be fine keeping them illegal.  There are really no legitimate self-defense uses for such a weapon.  If the statist wants to go after you for being logically inconsistent based on your stated principles, it shouldn't be hard to come up with examples of statist inconsistencies to counter with.  I come at libertarianism from a more utilitarian perspective, which doesn't make support of a ban on weapons of mass destruction a logically inconsistent position in the first place.  That's not to say that utilitariansim is without fault, but it does a pretty good job in these kinds of scenarios.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 15, 2011, 05:33:07 AM
    With respect to the question on what to do about atom bombs, I would be fine keeping them illegal.  There are really no legitimate self-defense uses for such a weapon.  If the statist wants to go after you for being logically inconsistent based on your stated principles, it shouldn't be hard to come up with examples of statist inconsistencies to counter with.  I come at libertarianism from a more utilitarian perspective, which doesn't make support of a ban on weapons of mass destruction a logically inconsistent position in the first place.  That's not to say that utilitariansim is without fault, but it does a pretty good job in these kinds of scenarios.

    Much like abortions, I doubt they can be effectively (or, practically) banned, in a truly free society.  However, I think they're immoral (which wasn't all that clear to me until someone pointed out how indiscriminately they kill), and if there is no state, there doesn't seem to be much point in it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 15, 2011, 06:06:16 AM
    Recently I got into a discussion with what seemed like a statist.

    We got into the subject of guns and self defence. I stated that it's my right to have a gun, in order to defend myself. If it's morally right for a so called police to have a gun, then it's morally right for me as well.

    He then played the atom-bomb card. "So where's the line? Why stop with guns? Is everyone allowed to have their own atombomb? Do you have the right to acquire an atom bomb as well?."

    Now this is ridiculous because an atombomb can't arguably be used in self defense without killing lots of innocent people as well. And without governments the atom bomb wouldn't exist to begin with. So in a way it's a highly hypothetical scenario, and those are generally useless to discuss.

    I asked him "what hell would I need an atom bomb for?!"

    And I have to admit what he did then got me cornered, because he simply took it back to argument from morality.

    "Yes but are you allowed to have an atom bomb, is it your right??"

    Me: Yes.

    So guys I'd appreciate some help here. How is it morally logically consistent, coming from the volountarist/scientifically viewpoint of morality (Stefan Molyneux style) to say that it's ok to have a gun, but not an atom bomb? (Not that I said that)

    If you say that everyone has a right to their own gun, doesn't that also mean, if one is logically consistent, that atomb bombs are ok as well? Mustn't everyone be allowed to own their own atomb bomb if they'd like, and no one has the right to stop them from constructing one?

    If it's true that atom bombs are OK, sure that makes me a bit nervous. However, it makes me more nervous that some have the right to have atom bombs, and some have not, as is currently the case. Maybe it's not a right to own an atom bomb, but it's not anyone else's right to come take it away from you? Two wrongs doesn't make one right.


    Two answers off the top of my head:

    1) You don't have to be consistent, and have every right to draw a line in the sand arbitrarily with what you think people should be allowed to own.


    Isn't this what we are all against? Isn't that what the state is doing currently? They say you own your property, unless you stop paying property taxes. You either own something or you don't, there's no in between. Dosen't what you are saying make you morally corrupt?

    I want to be logically consistent. Being logically consistent is good, inconsistency is bad, we all know that. It's called double standards. How can you persuade others if your moral is not true?

    Or, when you are saying "think", do you mean that I can say I think someone shouldn't be allowed to own atom bombs, but that I doesn't give me the right to forcily steal it from someone if he chooses to own/build one?

    If so that's useful and I will use it next time the atom-bomb card is played.

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 15, 2011, 09:11:24 AM
    I recently got to know that my little brother, 15, is considering police-high school. Basically it prepares the students as a life of cop, military. It's for those that has that that a goal, not just to learn leadership in itself. Not that cops are true leaders. My brother has been talking about wanting to become a cop, but I can tell he is uncertain.

    Obviously time is of the essence guys, I'm travelling to my parents house in under 2h to be able tp speak to him face to face tonight.

    How do I convince him not to?

    My plan is to use the argument from morality as my major tool. To point out the immorality, control and double standard the government has. Recently there was also an incident in school were the teachers and principals really overplayed what happened and blamed him. It was about obedience. I know how this made him feel.  

    edit: also to ask him what his definition of what a police is, and then compare that to the most correct definition. then he will realise it's not what he thinks, and immoral
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on February 15, 2011, 10:49:18 AM
    Encourage him to become a peace officer.  We need good guys on the inside too.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 15, 2011, 10:56:05 AM
    Interesting. And I'm glad that it's you Sam I'm having the conversation with.

    What's the difference? Wikipedia "police officer" redirects to Law enforcement officer. Is a security guard at a mall a police officer? Or a bouncer at a night club?

    Have I understand you correctly that you are saying that I shouldn't even try to persuade him out of going to this school?



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 15, 2011, 11:24:10 AM
    What's the difference? Wikipedia "police officer" redirects to Law enforcement officer. Is a security guard at a mall a police officer? Or a bouncer at a night club?

    Met someone locally studying criminal justice to get a peace officer license to become a bail bounty hunter.  I can respect that.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on February 15, 2011, 11:32:06 AM
    Encourage him to become a peace officer.  We need good guys on the inside too.

    Agreed!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 15, 2011, 08:14:53 PM
    a buffet sounds nice right now. I've got a young son (look left) and we went to Outback once. Just as our food arrived, he started fussing. Did we let him fuss and annoy everyone else in the crowded restaurant? No, we got to-go boxes, packed up, went back home and ate it cold. Why am I blowing my own trumpet? To let you know that for every visible kid screaming in public there are other parents who make good neighbors.

    Absolutely. I have a couple kids of my own. Whenever they acted out I took them outside and let them cry it out. Usually took about 5 minutes and they were done. Every kid is gonna have a bad day, so it ain't the crying, it's the parents who just sit there.. worse when they sit there smugly, knowing that everyone around is annoyed.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on February 16, 2011, 03:34:56 AM



    Two answers off the top of my head:

    1) You don't have to be consistent, and have every right to draw a line in the sand arbitrarily with what you think people should be allowed to own.


    Isn't this what we are all against? Isn't that what the state is doing currently? They say you own your property, unless you stop paying property taxes. You either own something or you don't, there's no in between. Dosen't what you are saying make you morally corrupt?

    I want to be logically consistent. Being logically consistent is good, inconsistency is bad, we all know that. It's called double standards. How can you persuade others if your moral is not true?

    Or, when you are saying "think", do you mean that I can say I think someone shouldn't be allowed to own atom bombs, but that I doesn't give me the right to forcily steal it from someone if he chooses to own/build one?

    If so that's useful and I will use it next time the atom-bomb card is played.



    I think finding a reductio ad absurdum just as often is a problem with the argument of the person who made as it is with the person who found it.

    For instance, Utilitarianism states that what is good is that which brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest amount of people. Well, doesn't that sound reasonable enough?

    If everyone would be happier if the government cut taxes, shouldn't they do it, even if a few defense contractors would be out of jobs?

    Well, what if you're in the Roman Coliseum, and they're about to feed a Christian to a lion? The majority of the people want it to happen, and only one person doesn't. In a Utilitarian system, it would be moral to feed the person to the lion. I know Jeremy Bentham had a counter-argument to this but I forgot it.

    Anyways, that fact doesn't in my mind cancel out the entirety of Utilitarianism. Maybe it can be used in any general case that doesn't violate a persons natural rights.

    A professor of mine, Dr. Furrow even wrote a book on this called Against Theorystating that moral theory cant be used. He is right in a lot of ways. Moral theories can't be consistent. There are way too many exceptions for any one to be right in all cases. But if not one, how about all of them, as they work best?

    So, I don't think you have any obligation to be consistent. You can draw a line in the sand arbitrarily. Don't paint yourself into a philosophical corner where you will be beaten in an argument from tenaciously holding onto a bad idea.

    These opinions are mine alone. They're not something that came out of any book, because almost all will disagree with me.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 16, 2011, 05:41:16 AM



    Two answers off the top of my head:

    1) You don't have to be consistent, and have every right to draw a line in the sand arbitrarily with what you think people should be allowed to own.


    Isn't this what we are all against? Isn't that what the state is doing currently? They say you own your property, unless you stop paying property taxes. You either own something or you don't, there's no in between. Dosen't what you are saying make you morally corrupt?

    I want to be logically consistent. Being logically consistent is good, inconsistency is bad, we all know that. It's called double standards. How can you persuade others if your moral is not true?

    Or, when you are saying "think", do you mean that I can say I think someone shouldn't be allowed to own atom bombs, but that I doesn't give me the right to forcily steal it from someone if he chooses to own/build one?

    If so that's useful and I will use it next time the atom-bomb card is played.



    I think finding a reductio ad absurdum just as often is a problem with the argument of the person who made as it is with the person who found it.

    For instance, Utilitarianism states that what is good is that which brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest amount of people. Well, doesn't that sound reasonable enough?

    If everyone would be happier if the government cut taxes, shouldn't they do it, even if a few defense contractors would be out of jobs?

    Well, what if you're in the Roman Coliseum, and they're about to feed a Christian to a lion? The majority of the people want it to happen, and only one person doesn't. In a Utilitarian system, it would be moral to feed the person to the lion. I know Jeremy Bentham had a counter-argument to this but I forgot it.

    Anyways, that fact doesn't in my mind cancel out the entirety of Utilitarianism. Maybe it can be used in any general case that doesn't violate a persons natural rights.

    A professor of mine, Dr. Furrow even wrote a book on this called Against Theorystating that moral theory cant be used. He is right in a lot of ways. Moral theories can't be consistent. There are way too many exceptions for any one to be right in all cases. But if not one, how about all of them, as they work best?

    So, I don't think you have any obligation to be consistent. You can draw a line in the sand arbitrarily. Don't paint yourself into a philosophical corner where you will be beaten in an argument from tenaciously holding onto a bad idea.

    These opinions are mine alone. They're not something that came out of any book, because almost all will disagree with me.


    I agree with the reductio ad absurdum, and I've realised there's validity to the suggestion that I'm leaning towards that to much in my conversations, because this is not the first time I've heard it as a critique.  

    "Only a Sith deals in absolutes." Obi Wan Kenobi http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgpytjlW5wU

    "Either you're with us, either you love freedom, and with nations which embrace freedom, or your with the enemy. There's no inbetween."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-23kmhc3P8U

    GW Bush intimidation rhetoric to get the world to support the invasion of Iraq. And it worked. What does it imply when the western states comply with that? What kind of moral prejudice does that propagate in the world when the so called international community agrees to that frame by doing what he says? What kind of moral does that create in millions of people who believe in their respective states? How much moral corruption is created? How much cognitive dissonance appears in peoples minds when they support bush in this statement and when I question that this moral is true? Does that mean I'm forcing their mind to approximate reality more accurately? Does it mean their mind realises I'm doing a reality check that seem to work and that in turn suggests that what they thought were 100% true beliefs are not?

    Can a person faint from cognitive dissonance, like Neo in the Matrix when he wakes up in the "real" world?  Does asking these questions make my mind spin and make me feel an increase in temperature as my blood starts flowing to different parts of my brain, in a faster way? Does it feel like I might faint or overstrain my brain if I continue pusing my mind further down the rabbit hole I'm exploring right now? It sure feels like it, that's why I'm stopping here.

    Or does this make me crazy?

    What I'm saying is that we can use the scientific method, or skeptical science if you may, to find which moral is most true, the best, which one produces the best situation for everyone, win-win. Just like we are stating that the free market in theory produces the best possible world for everyone, and hence the closer real world conditions approach this the more it will be true. Will it be 100% true? That's impossible. Am I saying we can get to 99% or 90%? We might quibble on the actual number, but we can all agree we can come real close.

    Naturally you would continuously need to reapply the scientific method on every new unique situation (which virtually all human interactions are). After a while one will detect patterns that makes one being able to predict the consequences of X action more accurately.

    Just like we can use the scientific method to find out which method is working best in a given area, say medicine. Like which kind of way of treating cancer is best for cancer X, in person Ys body.

    Yes it's based on a map. But the map is not the territory, because reality is infinitely complex, and the map isn't. Are there more accurate maps than others? My statement is yes there are.

    Would you agree?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: blackie on February 16, 2011, 08:29:15 AM

    Instead though, when I pointed out everyone complaining, the woman said "Let them complain."
    The lady was right. If you don't like the atmosphere that a business keeps, you leave, or complain to the owners/workers. If the owners/workers have a problem with the kid, they would say something to the lady.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 16, 2011, 12:45:13 PM

    Instead though, when I pointed out everyone complaining, the woman said "Let them complain."
    The lady was right. If you don't like the atmosphere that a business keeps, you leave, or complain to the owners/workers. If the owners/workers have a problem with the kid, they would say something to the lady.

    I know from personal experience that the owners/workers usually "hope the problem will go away" or are unaware of it, unless contention occurs.  Usually, they don't want to confront their customers, even when they're aware.

    The ultimate arbiter is the business, but it doesn't mean the operators of the business should be dragged into it just because someone insists on being an asshole publicly--unless of course a plea for simple human decency is ignored or replied to with scorn.

    I've asked to be re-seated when it was necessary, but I try not to "escalate" such a situation.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on February 16, 2011, 07:26:40 PM

    Instead though, when I pointed out everyone complaining, the woman said "Let them complain."
    The lady was right. If you don't like the atmosphere that a business keeps, you leave, or complain to the owners/workers. If the owners/workers have a problem with the kid, they would say something to the lady.

    I know from personal experience that the owners/workers usually "hope the problem will go away" or are unaware of it, unless contention occurs.  Usually, they don't want to confront their customers, even when they're aware.

    The ultimate arbiter is the business, but it doesn't mean the operators of the business should be dragged into it just because someone insists on being an asshole publicly--unless of course a plea for simple human decency is ignored or replied to with scorn.

    I've asked to be re-seated when it was necessary, but I try not to "escalate" such a situation.

    Yeah, that.

    I don't think it's necessary for there to be an official arbiter. What's wrong with people interacting directly? ..I thought that's kinda the underlying motivation for most everything that's discussed here.

    I guess that's where the "private property" argument may be made, but it's not like the establishment advertised "Tuesdays - Screaming Kids Eat FREE".
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: davann on February 16, 2011, 07:34:41 PM
    I recently got to know that my little brother, 15, is considering police-high school. Basically it prepares the students as a life of cop, military. It's for those that has that that a goal, not just to learn leadership in itself. Not that cops are true leaders. My brother has been talking about wanting to become a cop, but I can tell he is uncertain.

    Obviously time is of the essence guys, I'm travelling to my parents house in under 2h to be able tp speak to him face to face tonight.

    How do I convince him not to?

    My plan is to use the argument from morality as my major tool. To point out the immorality, control and double standard the government has. Recently there was also an incident in school were the teachers and principals really overplayed what happened and blamed him. It was about obedience. I know how this made him feel. 

    edit: also to ask him what his definition of what a police is, and then compare that to the most correct definition. then he will realise it's not what he thinks, and immoral


    It is more then likely too late but I’d suggest forgoing all the talk and reasoning. He is 15 after all. Reason has little effect on 15 year olds.

    Instead, play a game of football with him and attempt to break is collar bone “by accident”. The military will not take him and I doubt the police would either. Problem solved.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on February 16, 2011, 10:27:58 PM
    I recently got to know that my little brother, 15, is considering police-high school. Basically it prepares the students as a life of cop, military. It's for those that has that that a goal, not just to learn leadership in itself. Not that cops are true leaders. My brother has been talking about wanting to become a cop, but I can tell he is uncertain.

    Obviously time is of the essence guys, I'm travelling to my parents house in under 2h to be able tp speak to him face to face tonight.

    How do I convince him not to?

    My plan is to use the argument from morality as my major tool. To point out the immorality, control and double standard the government has. Recently there was also an incident in school were the teachers and principals really overplayed what happened and blamed him. It was about obedience. I know how this made him feel. 

    edit: also to ask him what his definition of what a police is, and then compare that to the most correct definition. then he will realise it's not what he thinks, and immoral


    It is more then likely too late but I’d suggest forgoing all the talk and reasoning. He is 15 after all. Reason has little effect on 15 year olds.

    Instead, play a game of football with him and attempt to break is collar bone “by accident”. The military will not take him and I doubt the police would either. Problem solved.


    It's quite likely that a semester or two in the school will change his mind without you causing your family the stress which comes with a long argument. Total immersion will:
    1) cause him to begin questioning becoming part of The Authority, or
    2) reaffirm his belief that he's pursuing worthwhile goals, in which case there's nothing you could have done  - can't change the mind of a true believer.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on February 17, 2011, 04:22:23 AM
    Is it wrong for me to get all hot and bothered when I hear music like this? It's just so hot! And where can I find more of it? I love slide guitar. I wanna do a road trip down south.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PADfOighk4k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PADfOighk4k)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0fEWekE2P0&playnext=1&list=PL4CD4FAE8D37A4733 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0fEWekE2P0&playnext=1&list=PL4CD4FAE8D37A4733)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: davann on February 17, 2011, 04:40:49 PM
    can't change the mind of a true believer.

    Yep, that is why a broken collar bone might be more effective.

    I look at this way. If I know an immediate relative was about to rape someone I would do what I had to to stop them. Cops/military about the same as rape in mind.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 18, 2011, 05:33:14 AM
    can't change the mind of a true believer.

    Yep, that is why a broken collar bone might be more effective.

    I look at this way. If I know an immediate relative was about to rape someone I would do what I had to to stop them. Cops/military about the same as rape in mind.

    My statement is that he isn't a true believer at this point. I'm also stating that I did just enough probing, enough pushing, to plant a seed of truth, or a greater truth than the one he previously had. In theory he is the one that best can know this (that he now has a better version of the truth). I'm the second best one, in theory, because I only talked to him with no one else hearing our conversation.

    Therefore it's logical to assume this is the case, since I strive to only make statements that I do not know are true. This is my theory, does it mean that I might at some point in my life made statements that I knew wasn't true? For sure, that is true. Am I saying the pendulum is slowly turning to the other side of the scale, yes. Especially after the revelations the liberty movement brings about statism? And these reinforced I've gained recently after watching Stefan Molyneux Statism is dead part 1-5? Yes.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 18, 2011, 06:51:11 AM
    I want to prepare if the dollar is crashing. Most of my capital is in another currency, but if I know the governors of that currency they will lend their currency to the american govt, thus decreasing the value of my money. I want to buy gold to protect myself. I'm not prepared yet to go to the same degrees of measures that Sam did, ensuring self sufficiency and all that, and having my own gold vault (?) , that would be quite some gold.

    Which company can I trust best that if the crash occurs they will hold my gold beholdent to me and not "give" to a government? Are there any counter-measures being taken by some companies that makes me as a customer trust them? Will they be able to protect it from robbers? Be it the military or civilians. If you have more knowledge than me, which makes you better able to predict the future, which company do you think fits best for what is going to happen?  Which company should I choose?  What should I do? As you can see I have a lot of questions about this, so if you know another resource I should turn to (book, another internet forum, etc), which one? Can anyone point me in the rigth direction?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Terror Australis on February 18, 2011, 08:06:27 AM
    I want to prepare if the dollar is crashing. Most of my capital is in another currency, but if I know the governors of that currency they will lend their currency to the american govt, thus decreasing the value of my money. I want to buy gold to protect myself. I'm not prepared yet to go to the same degrees of measures that Sam did, ensuring self sufficiency and all that, and having my own gold vault (?) , that would be quite some gold.

    Which company can I trust best that if the crash occurs they will hold my gold beholdent to me and not "give" to a government? Are there any counter-measures being taken by some companies that makes me as a customer trust them? Will they be able to protect it from robbers? Be it the military or civilians. If you have more knowledge than me, which makes you better able to predict the future, which company do you think fits best for what is going to happen?  Which company should I choose?  What should I do? As you can see I have a lot of questions about this, so if you know another resource I should turn to (book, another internet forum, etc), which one? Can anyone point me in the rigth direction?


    http://bitcoin.org 

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on February 18, 2011, 08:20:56 AM
    I want to prepare if the dollar is crashing. Most of my capital is in another currency, but if I know the governors of that currency they will lend their currency to the american govt, thus decreasing the value of my money. I want to buy gold to protect myself. I'm not prepared yet to go to the same degrees of measures that Sam did, ensuring self sufficiency and all that, and having my own gold vault (?) , that would be quite some gold.

    Which company can I trust best that if the crash occurs they will hold my gold beholdent to me and not "give" to a government? Are there any counter-measures being taken by some companies that makes me as a customer trust them? Will they be able to protect it from robbers? Be it the military or civilians. If you have more knowledge than me, which makes you better able to predict the future, which company do you think fits best for what is going to happen?  Which company should I choose?  What should I do? As you can see I have a lot of questions about this, so if you know another resource I should turn to (book, another internet forum, etc), which one? Can anyone point me in the rigth direction?


    http://bitcoin.org 




    Would you please stop that shit.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on February 18, 2011, 08:48:11 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 18, 2011, 10:05:22 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    I dont know if I fall into this description, but I do believe we are in for some major changes in the structure of this country in the next few years. Im not talking about a Mad Max scenario where everyone is eating dogs and siphoning gas out of wrecked cars and all that nonsense, but I really think the system the way it is set up now is doomed to have a falling out.

    When you have a system that has been built on bullshit go on for that kind of extended length of time, something bad is bound to take place when it can no longer sustain itself. The transition period for this might get a little messy. The pension and welfare queens that believe they are protected are going to be the first ones to realize what kind of a mess we're/they're in. Do you really think this subsidized economy can unravel itself without any kind of pain for the people who sponge off of it? I dont. Interesting times ahead, thats for sure.

    Just sayin'.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on February 18, 2011, 10:30:23 AM
    ditto
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 18, 2011, 01:32:41 PM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    I dont know if I fall into this description, but I do believe we are in for some major changes in the structure of this country in the next few years. Im not talking about a Mad Max scenario where everyone is eating dogs and siphoning gas out of wrecked cars and all that nonsense, but I really think the system the way it is set up now is doomed to have a falling out.

    When you have a system that has been built on bullshit go on for that kind of extended length of time, something bad is bound to take place when it can no longer sustain itself. The transition period for this might get a little messy. The pension and welfare queens that believe they are protected are going to be the first ones to realize what kind of a mess we're/they're in. Do you really think this subsidized economy can unravel itself without any kind of pain for the people who sponge off of it? I dont. Interesting times ahead, thats for sure.

    Just sayin'.

    Also, dont forget it has happened to other countries from which we can take example from. It is preparing for an economic collapse and reset. Simple as that. We need to look at making sure that we are not experiencing a normalcy bias about the situation and are able to plan for a likely scenario.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normalcy_bias

    Heres the blog of a guy who survived the Argenina 2001 Economic Collapse:
    http://ferfal.blogspot.com/

    And a great post by him:
    http://ferfal.blogspot.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-urban-survival-2005.html
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on February 18, 2011, 02:15:27 PM
    Yeah, I'm of the opinion we're in for a "new normal," and it's not hyperbole.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bradley on February 19, 2011, 01:09:20 PM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Did you just now not in fact bunch me into the same category with the "obsessed" ones? Did you just now in fact come from a collectivst frame? If that was an implication that I'm obsessed, because looking at the evidence it sure do looks like it, yes you are, because I'm not obsessed with that. My proof? Because I say so, got it?! I know ME better than you. Do you know me? No you don't. You've read at the top 15 posts that you know come from me, because I know I've made max 15 posts on this forum. To even think that you somehow can even begin to make correct assumptions or conclusions about me.

    Look Mr Meister. You tried to "analyze" (you didn't follow the correct procedure of analysis, if you had even thought of the correct proecdure you'd realise you don't have enough info about me to justify an analysis) me.

    Now I'm going to make my own analyze of YOU, if not for the point to show you how your post make me feel, and it's going to be based on more science than yours. Am I saying this is 100% true? No. See I'm just assuming, imagining, in my head, without labeling you as this. You labeled me, or at least the evidence points to it.

    This is what I'm thinking you were thinking when you read my post:
    "Ok, someone who is talking about gold. Ok he needs some information about gold. Do I have any useful information to post in reply to say about that or what I guess he was meaning? No. Something actually relevant? No... hmm... what if....what if gold~fiat money~bitcoins. Yes! This gives me the excuse to promote bitcoins. Because I think bitcoins is a good idea, I want to spread it to as many people as possible! I want them to realize how GOOD this idea is! It will change the world SO MUCH!

    What did I base this on, where's my evidence? In your profile it says "bitcoins evangelist". This implies that you see yourself in the role as the bitcoin evangelist. What does an evangelist do? Preech. Again, not saying anything of this necessarily is true. See that's the difference between you and me, buddy.

    Furthermore BonerJoe, which is a global moderator, replied "would you please stop that shit", probably because he was annoyed (since you've been "spamming" this idea in other threads or this thread already)

     In you're profile it says "Evangelist". Who is the one obsessed with an idea?

    Where's your evidence? What did you base your "conclusion" (you made it into a conclusion in your head), which really is an opinion on?

    Why do so many people posting on internet forums make assumptions, which they then in turn, through some kind of mysterious magic, make into a conclusion?  

    And yes I know about bitcoins already, ok?. Did i say that I wanted to buy gold or bitcoins? Are you trying to help me or not? It doesn't seem like it. Don't make statements and "help" someone if you're not sure you know what kind of help they need or want. Capisce? If I was interested in someone helping me with bitcoins, I'd ask for it. Or I read all about it, because that information I know where to find.  

    Look, ask yourself, what value did you add with your post? Did you add more than you took? Or did you in fact decrease the value, because you created slight annoyance within both me and BonerJoe? Is annoyance a negative feeling? Yes, yes it is. What does this mean? Does this mean that you are a valuetaker in other relationships of your life? If so, ask yourself, "Do I want to be a valuetaker, or a valueadder?"

    Look, listen, hear me out, if your goal is to spread the idea of bitcoin and you know bitcoins is a good idea, good for you. I'm not critiqing that.

    When your first impression on me is poor, which it was, and rightly so it actually acts AGAINST your intention of spreading the idea of bitcoins. Why? I think you know why, but I'm spelling it out, just in case. It makes me associate bitcoins to a negative feeling, to a bad impression, to bad behaviour. Are you a bad person? Was it bad behaviour? If this texts resonates with you in any way that's a clue what I'm saying might be true.

    If so I'm advicing (yes I'm the one giving the advice this time, and it is genuine, [yours wasnt]) you, because I'm pretty good at understanding frames and understanding people, I have a way of getting into their heads, maybe you noticed,
    reflect on what you were thinking when you wrote that post, and what just happened when you read this post.

    Why did I just spend a couple of minutes on this post? What's my motivation? You have shown evidence contrary to the premise that mine and yours relationship would be meaningful in any way, that it would add value to both participants (win-win).

    If what all I said was true and this post makes you change your behaviour slightly, or even realise something new about yourself, it was worth it for me, that's my motivation. Because we are all in this libertymovement (making the assumption that you share the major points and goals of the movement) together. We need to be better than the statists, we need to love each other, even them.

    The choice is up to you, I can not make it for you, nor do I want to. Even if I could through some kind of sick mind control, I wouldn't. The statists would, if a chip was invented that could make a choice inside the human brain, or change choices when it detects it's a choice that the government doesn't like, they would try to implement this chip on all the slaves on the planet. Not in their own brains though, although they would make all the slaves believe they also have this chip and the same configuration.    

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on February 19, 2011, 06:45:40 PM
    What the fuck?  I think you have somehow combined Terror Australis' post with mine (as I have never talked about, much less advocated, bitcoin).  That was a nice, crazy rant though.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on February 19, 2011, 07:16:02 PM
    Is it wrong for me to get all hot and bothered when I hear music like this? It's just so hot! And where can I find more of it? I love slide guitar. I wanna do a road trip down south.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PADfOighk4k (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PADfOighk4k)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0fEWekE2P0&playnext=1&list=PL4CD4FAE8D37A4733 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0fEWekE2P0&playnext=1&list=PL4CD4FAE8D37A4733)

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZdyblPuJeY[/youtube]
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Terror Australis on February 20, 2011, 07:38:49 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Did you just now not in fact bunch me into the same category with the "obsessed" ones? Did you just now in fact come from a collectivst frame? If that was an implication that I'm obsessed, because looking at the evidence it sure do looks like it, yes you are, because I'm not obsessed with that. My proof? Because I say so, got it?! I know ME better than you. Do you know me? No you don't. You've read at the top 15 posts that you know come from me, because I know I've made max 15 posts on this forum. To even think that you somehow can even begin to make correct assumptions or conclusions about me.

    Look Mr Meister. You tried to "analyze" (you didn't follow the correct procedure of analysis, if you had even thought of the correct proecdure you'd realise you don't have enough info about me to justify an analysis) me.

    Now I'm going to make my own analyze of YOU, if not for the point to show you how your post make me feel, and it's going to be based on more science than yours. Am I saying this is 100% true? No. See I'm just assuming, imagining, in my head, without labeling you as this. You labeled me, or at least the evidence points to it.

    This is what I'm thinking you were thinking when you read my post:
    "Ok, someone who is talking about gold. Ok he needs some information about gold. Do I have any useful information to post in reply to say about that or what I guess he was meaning? No. Something actually relevant? No... hmm... what if....what if gold~fiat money~bitcoins. Yes! This gives me the excuse to promote bitcoins. Because I think bitcoins is a good idea, I want to spread it to as many people as possible! I want them to realize how GOOD this idea is! It will change the world SO MUCH!

    What did I base this on, where's my evidence? In your profile it says "bitcoins evangelist". This implies that you see yourself in the role as the bitcoin evangelist. What does an evangelist do? Preech. Again, not saying anything of this necessarily is true. See that's the difference between you and me, buddy.

    Furthermore BonerJoe, which is a global moderator, replied "would you please stop that shit", probably because he was annoyed (since you've been "spamming" this idea in other threads or this thread already)

     In you're profile it says "Evangelist". Who is the one obsessed with an idea?

    Where's your evidence? What did you base your "conclusion" (you made it into a conclusion in your head), which really is an opinion on?

    Why do so many people posting on internet forums make assumptions, which they then in turn, through some kind of mysterious magic, make into a conclusion?  

    And yes I know about bitcoins already, ok?. Did i say that I wanted to buy gold or bitcoins? Are you trying to help me or not? It doesn't seem like it. Don't make statements and "help" someone if you're not sure you know what kind of help they need or want. Capisce? If I was interested in someone helping me with bitcoins, I'd ask for it. Or I read all about it, because that information I know where to find.  

    Look, ask yourself, what value did you add with your post? Did you add more than you took? Or did you in fact decrease the value, because you created slight annoyance within both me and BonerJoe? Is annoyance a negative feeling? Yes, yes it is. What does this mean? Does this mean that you are a valuetaker in other relationships of your life? If so, ask yourself, "Do I want to be a valuetaker, or a valueadder?"

    Look, listen, hear me out, if your goal is to spread the idea of bitcoin and you know bitcoins is a good idea, good for you. I'm not critiqing that.

    When your first impression on me is poor, which it was, and rightly so it actually acts AGAINST your intention of spreading the idea of bitcoins. Why? I think you know why, but I'm spelling it out, just in case. It makes me associate bitcoins to a negative feeling, to a bad impression, to bad behaviour. Are you a bad person? Was it bad behaviour? If this texts resonates with you in any way that's a clue what I'm saying might be true.

    If so I'm advicing (yes I'm the one giving the advice this time, and it is genuine, [yours wasnt]) you, because I'm pretty good at understanding frames and understanding people, I have a way of getting into their heads, maybe you noticed,
    reflect on what you were thinking when you wrote that post, and what just happened when you read this post.

    Why did I just spend a couple of minutes on this post? What's my motivation? You have shown evidence contrary to the premise that mine and yours relationship would be meaningful in any way, that it would add value to both participants (win-win).

    If what all I said was true and this post makes you change your behaviour slightly, or even realise something new about yourself, it was worth it for me, that's my motivation. Because we are all in this libertymovement (making the assumption that you share the major points and goals of the movement) together. We need to be better than the statists, we need to love each other, even them.

    The choice is up to you, I can not make it for you, nor do I want to. Even if I could through some kind of sick mind control, I wouldn't. The statists would, if a chip was invented that could make a choice inside the human brain, or change choices when it detects it's a choice that the government doesn't like, they would try to implement this chip on all the slaves on the planet. Not in their own brains though, although they would make all the slaves believe they also have this chip and the same configuration.    




    Wat - the - fuck ?????

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Terror Australis on February 20, 2011, 07:41:47 AM
    I want to prepare if the dollar is crashing. Most of my capital is in another currency, but if I know the governors of that currency they will lend their currency to the american govt, thus decreasing the value of my money. I want to buy gold to protect myself. I'm not prepared yet to go to the same degrees of measures that Sam did, ensuring self sufficiency and all that, and having my own gold vault (?) , that would be quite some gold.

    Which company can I trust best that if the crash occurs they will hold my gold beholdent to me and not "give" to a government? Are there any counter-measures being taken by some companies that makes me as a customer trust them? Will they be able to protect it from robbers? Be it the military or civilians. If you have more knowledge than me, which makes you better able to predict the future, which company do you think fits best for what is going to happen?  Which company should I choose?  What should I do? As you can see I have a lot of questions about this, so if you know another resource I should turn to (book, another internet forum, etc), which one? Can anyone point me in the rigth direction?


    http://bitcoin.org 




    Would you please stop that shit.


    Wat


    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on February 23, 2011, 09:59:55 PM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on February 23, 2011, 10:56:18 PM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.

    Another good point (about thinking you'll survive such an event).  If the world essentially ended and I had to survive on the leftover rubble of civilization, I'd probably use any gun in my possession to shoot myself.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on February 24, 2011, 01:27:35 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.

    Another good point (about thinking you'll survive such an event).  If the world essentially ended and I had to survive on the leftover rubble of civilization, I'd probably use any gun in my possession to shoot myself.
    That's sad.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 24, 2011, 08:54:23 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.

    Another good point (about thinking you'll survive such an event).  If the world essentially ended and I had to survive on the leftover rubble of civilization, I'd probably use any gun in my possession to shoot myself.

    The fuck?

    Will Smith and Charlton Heston both did it. You saying they're better than you?

    Come on man, have some pride.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 25, 2011, 10:26:32 PM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.

    Another good point (about thinking you'll survive such an event).  If the world essentially ended and I had to survive on the leftover rubble of civilization, I'd probably use any gun in my possession to shoot myself.

    The fuck?

    Will Smith and Charlton Heston both did it. You saying they're better than you?

    Come on man, have some pride.

    The people get into the survivalism, but in the wrong way. They should plan for possible local disasters (tornado, floods,etc) and personally I believe an Economic disaster. What it seems they dont understand is that not all SHTF scenarios are the same, and an economic disaster doesnt mean chaos.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on March 02, 2011, 03:05:43 AM
    Why is it that so many libertarians are obsessed with disaster scenarios that will almost certainly never occur, barring some catastrophic natural disaster that wipes out most of humanity?  The opportunity cost of preparing for such things seems to far outweigh any expected benefit.

    Because they are stupid enough to think they will just happen to be some of the few who will survive. I see a lot of libertarians as the Sheldon guy off of the Big Bang Theory.

    Another good point (about thinking you'll survive such an event).  If the world essentially ended and I had to survive on the leftover rubble of civilization, I'd probably use any gun in my possession to shoot myself.

    The fuck?

    Will Smith and Charlton Heston both did it. You saying they're better than you?

    Come on man, have some pride.

    The people get into the survivalism, but in the wrong way. They should plan for possible local disasters (tornado, floods,etc) and personally I believe an Economic disaster. What it seems they dont understand is that not all SHTF scenarios are the same, and an economic disaster doesnt mean chaos.

    Yes, I think we will see prison and labour camps before we ever see a Mad Max type scenario. I often wonder just how little shit needs to hit the fan though before a total collapse happens. Sometimes I think naughty thoughts of the human race, that we would go ape shit on each other, especially after I travel to messed up African ountries, I mean really, are we that different from that situation? I don't think so. Roving armed gangs forcing unarmed statist dipshits to be their slaves is a real possibility.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 08, 2011, 09:05:22 PM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on March 08, 2011, 11:58:57 PM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    truecredit.com - it's by transunion
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on March 09, 2011, 01:03:45 AM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    That site exists because it is mandated by the government.  You can get one free credit report per year.  I'd say you should go there.  I've done it, and you don't get signed up for shady services or anything.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 09, 2011, 01:06:43 AM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    That site exists because it is mandated by the government.  You can get one free credit report per year.  I'd say you should go there.  I've done it, and you don't get signed up for shady services or anything.

    Thanks man, but I was looking for the score, not the report.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 09, 2011, 01:21:23 AM
    Used freecreditreport.com last week and it costs a buck.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 09, 2011, 01:21:42 AM
    Who likes feminists?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on March 09, 2011, 08:23:00 PM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    That site exists because it is mandated by the government.  You can get one free credit report per year.  I'd say you should go there.  I've done it, and you don't get signed up for shady services or anything.

    Thanks man, but I was looking for the score, not the report.

    Your score is on the report.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 09, 2011, 08:47:32 PM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    That site exists because it is mandated by the government.  You can get one free credit report per year.  I'd say you should go there.  I've done it, and you don't get signed up for shady services or anything.

    Thanks man, but I was looking for the score, not the report.

    Your score is on the report.

    Well then, thank you very much.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on March 12, 2011, 01:56:48 AM
    Where is a good website to go to for me to get my credit score?

    All the ones I've seen in a google search seem pretty scammy, and I am willing to pay for it if that means I don't have to sign up for any reoccurring services that I don't actually want.

    https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp

    That site exists because it is mandated by the government.  You can get one free credit report per year.  I'd say you should go there.  I've done it, and you don't get signed up for shady services or anything.

    Thanks man, but I was looking for the score, not the report.

    Your score is on the report.

    Well then, thank you very much.

    Glad to be of assistance :)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on March 23, 2011, 01:33:31 AM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 23, 2011, 07:25:43 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?

    <-- at 16 when I got kicked outta the house.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on March 23, 2011, 09:33:10 PM
    I felt like I needed my independence in my teens and would have left home if I could. At about 19 I felt truly like an adult. I had a job that paid all my bills and everything in my life was finally in my control (as much as any adult). Still is, and it makes me very happy.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on March 24, 2011, 12:45:49 AM
    I felt like a grownup when I started paying all of my own bills.  That happened immediately after graduating college (22 years old).
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Riddler on March 24, 2011, 08:22:48 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?


    when ken stops harrassing me for using the word , ''nigga/er''
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on March 24, 2011, 08:41:35 PM
    don't sweat it coon
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 24, 2011, 09:53:17 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?


    when ken stops harrassing me for using the word , ''nigga/er''

    Fuck you.  You go around using racial epithets, I'm going to fucking tell you you're a piece of shit for doing so.  This is beside the fact that this is what made it an issue at all:

    Quote
    You wonder why ghettos became ghettos...I'm not talikn bout low-income-housing shit...I'm talkin' whole cities & sections thereof.
    they started out with WHITE immigrants & prospered.

    Oh, and I wasn't the only one, and there was this issue about "chimping out."
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 24, 2011, 11:17:17 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?


    when ken stops harrassing me for using the word , ''nigga/er''

    Fuck you.  You go around using racial epithets, I'm going to fucking tell you you're a piece of shit for doing so.  This is beside the fact that this is what made it an issue at all:

    Quote
    You wonder why ghettos became ghettos...I'm not talikn bout low-income-housing shit...I'm talkin' whole cities & sections thereof.
    they started out with WHITE immigrants & prospered.

    Oh, and I wasn't the only one, and there was this issue about "chimping out."


    I'm unsure of what your disagreeing with here, Ken.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 25, 2011, 03:13:39 AM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?


    when ken stops harrassing me for using the word , ''nigga/er''

    Fuck you.  You go around using racial epithets, I'm going to fucking tell you you're a piece of shit for doing so.  This is beside the fact that this is what made it an issue at all:

    Quote
    You wonder why ghettos became ghettos...I'm not talikn bout low-income-housing shit...I'm talkin' whole cities & sections thereof.
    they started out with WHITE immigrants & prospered.

    Oh, and I wasn't the only one, and there was this issue about "chimping out."


    I'm unsure of what your disagreeing with here, Ken.

    How about the assertion that I'm harassing him over his use of "nigger?"  Miss that somehow?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on March 25, 2011, 09:49:36 AM
    Fuckin' honkeys.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on March 25, 2011, 10:42:34 AM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 25, 2011, 12:25:58 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?

    If referring to an animal with hands, it's just peachy.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on March 25, 2011, 01:08:26 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?

    If referring to an animal with hands, it's just peachy.
    Well allrighty then.
    Yeah ah WTFK.....you might just want to edit that there post a bit.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 25, 2011, 02:51:30 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?

    If referring to an animal with hands, it's just peachy.
    Well allrighty then.
    Yeah ah WTFK.....you might just want to edit that there post a bit.

    Which one?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 25, 2011, 07:13:50 PM
    Fuckin' honkeys.

    You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on March 25, 2011, 11:35:52 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?

    If referring to an animal with hands, it's just peachy.
    Well allrighty then.
    Yeah ah WTFK.....you might just want to edit that there post a bit.

    Which one?



    Why are you guys whispering?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 26, 2011, 01:04:32 PM
    At what point do you feel like a "grownup"?
    I don't, and I plan to die in a blaze of glory with a pinwheel hat on at around 2069.
    You never answered is "coon" o.k. WTFK ?

    If referring to an animal with hands, it's just peachy.
    Well allrighty then.
    Yeah ah WTFK.....you might just want to edit that there post a bit.

    Which one?


    Why are you guys whispering?

    The like response was out of sarcasm.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on March 27, 2011, 02:40:09 AM


    dingdong

    LOOK WHOOS AT THE DOORRR!!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on March 27, 2011, 04:43:03 AM
    People raft when I embraced the way of the Samurai.  

    You raft at Bracktorn.  

    And now you must die.  
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Riddler on March 27, 2011, 08:16:49 AM
    Fuckin' honkeys.

    You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?


    no.
    shitting on the white man helps ken w/ his white guilt.
    i hafta find the post where he puffs up about his using the word & its somehow OK when he does it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 28, 2011, 02:05:11 AM
    Fuckin' honkeys.

    You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?


    no.
    shitting on the white man helps ken w/ his white guilt.
    i hafta find the post where he puffs up about his using the word & its somehow OK when he does it.

    Fuck your "white guilt."  That's bullshit.  You're talking about using the word "nigger," I presume.  I have no problem with using the word.  I have a problem with people calling others niggers.

    Now go fuck yourself.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 28, 2011, 07:01:18 PM
    Fuckin' honkeys.

    You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?


    no.
    shitting on the white man helps ken w/ his white guilt.
    i hafta find the post where he puffs up about his using the word & its somehow OK when he does it.

    Fuck your "white guilt."  That's bullshit.  You're talking about using the word "nigger," I presume.  I have no problem with using the word.  I have a problem with people calling others niggers.

    Now go fuck yourself.

    The challenge was why you aren't as reactive of people calling other people honkeys.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 28, 2011, 09:13:10 PM
    Fuckin' honkeys.

    You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?


    no.
    shitting on the white man helps ken w/ his white guilt.
    i hafta find the post where he puffs up about his using the word & its somehow OK when he does it.

    Fuck your "white guilt."  That's bullshit.  You're talking about using the word "nigger," I presume.  I have no problem with using the word.  I have a problem with people calling others niggers.

    Now go fuck yourself.

    The challenge was why you aren't as reactive of people calling other people honkeys.

    Funny how that is not what was stated. As stupid as it sounds for a white guy to call other white guys "honkey" it doesn't mean any more to me than it does when a black guy calls another a "nigger." I find it stupid and distasteful, but obviously not racist--particularly in comparison with the diction AND attitude of the aforementioned thread.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on March 28, 2011, 09:46:20 PM
    "You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?"

    It was stated right there.

    I think it's laughable that it's OK to use slurs against people as long as it's coming from someone within the same racial group. It's a cop out, but I know what you mean.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: The ghost of a ghost of a ghost on March 28, 2011, 11:28:20 PM
    Why you gotta go bring the 'cops' into this shit.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on March 29, 2011, 04:47:09 AM
    "You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?"

    It was stated right there.

    I think it's laughable that it's OK to use slurs against people as long as it's coming from someone within the same racial group. It's a cop out, but I know what you mean.

    No, it was not stated right there.  The thing I said was not stated was "The challenge was why you aren't as reactive of people calling other people honkeys."  That is different from "You keep that up and WTFK will get really upset. It's obvious he is frenzied by the use of all slurs, right WTFK?"

    I also was clear that I do not "think it's okay."  My exact words were "As stupid as it sounds for a white guy to call other white guys "honkey" it doesn't mean any more to me than it does when a black guy calls another a 'nigger.'  I find it stupid and distasteful, but obviously not racist--particularly in comparison with the diction AND attitude of the aforementioned thread."
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Riddler on March 29, 2011, 06:52:14 AM
    now that that's cleared up..........
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on April 10, 2011, 06:41:09 PM
    (http://image.spreadshirt.com/image-server/image/composition/3661319/view/1/type/png/width/178/height/178/khaki-nigga-peas-t-shirts-short-sleeve_design.png)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on May 11, 2011, 12:35:25 PM
    I understand this post'll make me look like an arrogant asshole. I'm fine with that.

    What should I do for money over the summer?

    I assumed from the beginning that my business would be up and running by now, but it looks like that wont happen. I got a guaranteed internship, paid, at a think tank in D.C., and it starts next summer.

    I ran out of cash, because someone who owes me money isn't forthcoming, meaning, I am broke as a motherfucker. Other things aren't panning out in terms of self-employment. It looks like I will have to get a job, I guess. Its just that I don't have any skills, experience, or training, and I talked my way into every job I ever had, even tho I was always under-qualified.

    Any suggestions? Limit suggestions to things that pay well, and aren't physically exhausting.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on May 11, 2011, 07:59:48 PM
    I know a fella who sells insurance by phone. Makes decent $$ and also has a way with words.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on May 19, 2011, 07:51:13 PM
    Answer me this.....



    Why do people sometimes say "Well, you cant have your cake and eat it too."


    WHY-IN-THE-FUCK would you even want cake if you cant eat it?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Riddler on May 19, 2011, 08:17:15 PM
    I understand this post'll make me look like an arrogant asshole. I'm fine with that.

    What should I do for money over the summer?

    I assumed from the beginning that my business would be up and running by now, but it looks like that wont happen. I got a guaranteed internship, paid, at a think tank in D.C., and it starts next summer.

    I ran out of cash, because someone who owes me money isn't forthcoming, meaning, I am broke as a motherfucker. Other things aren't panning out in terms of self-employment. It looks like I will have to get a job, I guess. Its just that I don't have any skills, experience, or training, and I talked my way into every job I ever had, even tho I was always under-qualified.

    Any suggestions? Limit suggestions to things that pay well, and aren't physically exhausting.


    are you even fucking kidding a little here?
    Let me get this completely straight.

    you have ZERO qualifications for anything pertinent in life, vis-a-vis skills,  AND (the bonus) are unwilling to do anything that might cause you to strain yourself in any way, AND, if that weren't enough, you demand an elevated pay rate, certainly above the levels of the great unwashed, uneducated, lower-caste rif-raff you look down your nose at, on a daily basis...................

    you pompous, nauseating shitbag.

    LEARN THESE WORDS:

    ''VENTE OR GRANDE.......or....WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT, SIR''

    now i know where i stand with you, when you critique ME.....loser.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on May 20, 2011, 01:10:12 AM
    Answer me this.....



    Why do people sometimes say "Well, you cant have your cake and eat it too."


    WHY-IN-THE-FUCK would you even want cake if you cant eat it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_them_eat_cake

    Your question is basically a rebuttal to the (alleged) Antoinette quip, an aristocratic faux pas in ignorance of socioeconomic conditions.   

    You can't have your cake and eat it, too, is like saying "How are we to rise in society, if we're living hand-to-mouth?"

    --

    Somewhere along the line, it bastardized to become an all-encompassing non sequitur, another way to say "you can't do both". 



    I like how the dollar became to be called a 'buck'.

    Passing the buck, the poker table, and the dealer. 

    In place of the knife, sometimes they'd use a silver dollar.  Started calling it a 'buck'.  Now, its indistinguishable. 


    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: yamnuska on May 31, 2011, 07:56:54 PM
    I want to know who coined the phrase, "Size doesn't matter." I can assure you it does, I like well hung men and only well hung men and let me tell you size does matter! Who even came up with "coined the phrase?" Did they pay somebody for a phrase?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on May 31, 2011, 08:20:14 PM
    I want to know who coined the phrase, "Size doesn't matter." I can assure you it does, I like well hung men and only well hung men and let me tell you size does matter! Who even came up with "coined the phrase?" Did they pay somebody for a phrase?

    Prob the same asshole who said that you cant have your cake and eat it too.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on June 01, 2011, 12:55:43 PM
    If you eat your cake you don't have it anymore. Goddammittohell !!!!!
    And size matters?
    FUCK!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 01, 2011, 01:48:40 PM
    I want to know who coined the phrase, "Size doesn't matter." I can assure you it does, I like well hung men and only well hung men and let me tell you size does matter! Who even came up with "coined the phrase?" Did they pay somebody for a phrase?

    Wait, did you get your surgery?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on June 02, 2011, 09:04:35 AM
    It was probably some woman who didn't want her boyfriend or husband to feel bad.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: blackie on June 03, 2011, 03:29:16 PM
    What's a good way to clean lichen off of a grave stone?

    Plastic brushes didn't work well. I'm thinking wire brush, but maybe that is too harsh.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on June 03, 2011, 06:36:43 PM
    Might spray some acid on it..
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on June 04, 2011, 02:00:46 AM
    Apparently that's a popular enough question to have a whole eHow article written up on it: http://www.ehow.com/how_5842684_remove-lichen-tombstones.html

    I like the snail method.  Step one, "build a miniature greenhouse over the tombstone..."  Awesome.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on June 04, 2011, 11:05:16 AM
    What's a good way to clean lichen off of a grave stone?

    Plastic brushes didn't work well. I'm thinking wire brush, but maybe that is too harsh.
    What about a soft brass wire brush?  Those aren't too harsh at all.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on June 04, 2011, 11:21:21 AM
    Personally, I think lichen looks good on a gravestone. Gives it character.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on June 04, 2011, 09:19:05 PM
    What's a good way to clean lichen off of a grave stone?

    Plastic brushes didn't work well. I'm thinking wire brush, but maybe that is too harsh.
    What about a soft brass wire brush?  Those aren't too harsh at all.

    The eHow article recommended against metal brushes, but I have zero experience cleaning gravestones so take that for what it's worth.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 04, 2011, 11:18:23 PM

    are you even fucking kidding a little here?
    Let me get this completely straight.

    you have ZERO qualifications for anything pertinent in life, vis-a-vis skills,  AND (the bonus) are unwilling to do anything that might cause you to strain yourself in any way, AND, if that weren't enough, you demand an elevated pay rate, certainly above the levels of the great unwashed, uneducated, lower-caste rif-raff you look down your nose at, on a daily basis...................

    you pompous, nauseating shitbag.

    LEARN THESE WORDS:

    ''VENTE OR GRANDE.......or....WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT, SIR''

    now i know where i stand with you, when you critique ME.....loser.

    I left this simmering a while before an answer because my own answer is difficult to give.


    I didn't grow up in the same culture you did. I grew up in a VERY Persian society where social standing matters more than in American culture. More than half of my second generation cousins have PhD's. More than half, and not the b.s. type degrees either. I had to live with that level of competition, and pressure my entire life.

    And, I'm friends with some pretty successful guys. Of my three closest friends, one works for a major financial firm, another is a commercial real estate agent in Manhattan, and the third learns full time with his wife's support.

    With all that, I couldn't be happy on 10 bucks an hour.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on June 04, 2011, 11:26:31 PM
    So are you happy with what you make right now?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on June 04, 2011, 11:43:37 PM
    So are you happy with what you make right now?

    I'm a college student at the moment. Off for summer, and I'm couch surfing at a friends house.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on June 05, 2011, 03:30:19 AM
    So you know all these rich folks and the world is full of people willing to work, why don't you start a small firm maintaining forclosed houses or something? Plenty of struggling people who just need connections. Find the people who are willing to do things people to invest in them.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on June 05, 2011, 12:13:21 PM
    Diogenes, nothing entitles you to make more than you're worth as an employee and you're making an ass of yourself.  You probably don't know anything about the background of most people here and to say that you come from a different culture and that they therefore don't understand your feeling of entitlement is bullshit.  If you can't get a job you like based on your academic performance or connections, then stay unemployed and lazy and continue to hope that your parents and friends support you.

    There's no need to come to an internet forum and whine about it.  I went to UChicago and majored in economics, but up until the summer between 3rd and 4th year I was either unemployed (first summer) or working for $10/hour doing (relatively) unskilled labor.  My immediate family is very wealthy, but they didn't get that way by being lazy and refusing to do hard work.  Hopefully you learn this before you end up broke as an adult and still refusing to take jobs that are "beneath" you.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on June 05, 2011, 07:12:19 PM
    I grew up in a VERY Persian society ...

    Is is a sort of appearance over substance sort of situation?

    Used to work with a Persian guy. Went to his house a couple of times, regular looking suburbia sort of house on the outside. The interior had been refashioned into a gaudy Taj Mahal looking palace with everything gold & ornate.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on June 19, 2011, 02:36:29 AM
    Spray bleach on it. 
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Lindsey on June 28, 2011, 02:39:00 PM
    Oh G-d.   :x
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 24, 2011, 12:38:15 AM
    Anyone actually know how often the TSA catches something worth looking for, like a gun, or explosives?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on July 24, 2011, 05:10:27 AM
    A U.S. soldier had some contraband c4 he was trying to smuggle home. They got him.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on July 27, 2011, 10:14:50 AM
    A U.S. soldier had some contraband c4 he was trying to smuggle home. They got him.

    He shoulda smuggled it in his ass.

    Thats how the pro's do it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on July 27, 2011, 12:24:44 PM
    What happens to the USPS "Forever Stamps" if the govt goes belly up?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on July 27, 2011, 01:20:52 PM
    What happens to the USPS "Forever Stamps" if the govt goes belly up?

    I think when Fedex buys and fixes the post office, they'll probably honor them.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on July 27, 2011, 10:03:19 PM
    What happens to the USPS "Forever Stamps" if the govt goes belly up?

    I think when Fedex buys and fixes the post office, they'll probably honor them.

    I doubt that'll ever happen.  In any case, I have no idea why anyone would keep a stockpile of stamps lying around...
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on July 27, 2011, 11:50:02 PM
    ..I have no idea why anyone would keep a stockpile of stamps lying around...

    For myself, it'd be a good idea.  I mail a letter about once a year.  It'd be kinda nice to buy $10 worth, stick 'em in my desk, and not worry if they're still honored.  I usually have no clue what a current postage stamp is worth.  So if I stick a stamp on a letter, I never know if it's the appropriate postage.

    I think its 42c, right?




    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on July 28, 2011, 12:01:55 AM
    ..I have no idea why anyone would keep a stockpile of stamps lying around...

    For myself, it'd be a good idea.  I mail a letter about once a year.  It'd be kinda nice to buy $10 worth, stick 'em in my desk, and not worry if they're still honored.  I usually have no clue what a current postage stamp is worth.  So if I stick a stamp on a letter, I never know if it's the appropriate postage.

    I think its 42c, right?

    The longer you hang onto them, the greater the odds of losing them.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on July 28, 2011, 12:12:50 AM
    I mail like 2 letters a year. I don't buy stamps anymore. I just go up to the clerk and waste $3 of the governments money by having them weigh and apply a meter strip to it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on July 28, 2011, 12:24:41 AM

    For myself, it'd be a good idea.  I mail a letter about once a year.  It'd be kinda nice to buy $10 worth, stick 'em in my desk, and not worry if they're still honored. I think its 42c, right?

    44c currently

    Pretty much the same deal with me. I use maybe 3 a year, other than that, im usually shipping something Priority with oddball sizes and weights, so the FC stamp doesnt really come into play.

    Reason I asked the ? in the first place, was because I bought a roll of 100 stamps off ebay for 39 bucks shipped, so 39c each for the forever ones. Wont ever have to worry about buying stamps again, unless of course something causes them to renig on their deal.


    Just nice to have em if I need to mail something, or the gf has some bullshit papers to mail to her aunt in Cali. Its there....boom, no worries about picking up a stamp or wondering if yours are still good.

    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 28, 2011, 12:24:59 AM
    I mail like 2 letters a year. I don't buy stamps anymore. I just go up to the clerk and waste $3 of the governments money by having them weigh and apply a meter strip to it.

    Haha. Awesome!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on July 28, 2011, 12:32:50 AM
    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!

    I'd invest in Bitcoins before I'd buy those silly Forever Stamps.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on July 28, 2011, 12:39:45 AM
    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!

    I'd invest in Bitcoins before I'd buy those silly Forever Stamps.

    But..... they're forever..... and ever  and ever  and ever
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on July 28, 2011, 12:50:35 AM
    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!

    I'd invest in Bitcoins before I'd buy those silly Forever Stamps.

    But..... they're forever..... and ever  and ever  and ever

    Would you like to buy some Enron stock?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on July 28, 2011, 12:54:27 AM
    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!

    I'd invest in Bitcoins before I'd buy those silly Forever Stamps.

    But..... they're forever..... and ever  and ever  and ever

    Would you like to buy some Enron stock?
    Can I pay with bitcoins, or forever stamps?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on July 28, 2011, 01:01:48 AM
    Of course, if a FC stamp shoots up to say 4.00 each, I could make myself a nice hefty profit reselling them. I'll be chicken rich!!

    I'd invest in Bitcoins before I'd buy those silly Forever Stamps.

    But..... they're forever..... and ever  and ever  and ever

    Would you like to buy some Enron stock?
    Can I pay with bitcoins, or forever stamps?

    Paper Liberty Dollars.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on July 28, 2011, 01:31:25 AM

    Its ten fuckin' dollars. 

    I'd pay ten dollars to be not-inconvenienced once, let alone a dozen times.


    And losing them?  No.  It goes into the box. 



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on July 28, 2011, 09:08:02 AM
    Oh christ.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on July 28, 2011, 12:15:33 PM
    That sounds perfectly legitimate. I want to give you my money!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on July 28, 2011, 09:42:22 PM
    ..I have no idea why anyone would keep a stockpile of stamps lying around...

    For myself, it'd be a good idea.  I mail a letter about once a year.  It'd be kinda nice to buy $10 worth, stick 'em in my desk, and not worry if they're still honored.  I usually have no clue what a current postage stamp is worth.  So if I stick a stamp on a letter, I never know if it's the appropriate postage.

    I think its 42c, right?


    That's exactly where I sit.  I got tired of my book of stamps getting outdated, and was relieved they went to the "forever stamp" so now I don't have to buy fixer stamps for the original stamps when they go up.  As you say later, it's all about the convenience.  Don't tell them, but they could probably sell them at a premium (maybe $.05 more each) for that feature.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 01, 2011, 05:48:07 AM
    Is damage to government property a legitimate form of civil disobedience?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Ecolitan on August 01, 2011, 10:24:57 AM
    Is damage to government property a legitimate form of civil disobedience?

    No, that's half of the two part recipe for warfare.  Kill people, break their stuff. 
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on August 01, 2011, 06:09:26 PM
    Is damage to government property a legitimate form of civil disobedience?

    government property

    Does not compute.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on August 09, 2011, 08:10:34 AM


    Looks around.




    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 09, 2011, 10:12:45 PM
    Why should we buy postage stamps?
    We can make our own.

    I dont know if they've gotten wise to this scam yet, but you used to be able to send something to someone free, by putting the intended recipients address as the return address.  That way when USPS saw no postage on the envelope, they send it to the return address on the envelope, which is the guy you wanted to get it to in the first place.

    Its been over 15 years since I did it, so who knows.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on August 10, 2011, 12:54:31 AM
    Why should we buy postage stamps?
    We can make our own.

    I dont know if they've gotten wise to this scam yet, but you used to be able to send something to someone free, by putting the intended recipients address as the return address.  That way when USPS saw no postage on the envelope, they send it to the return address on the envelope, which is the guy you wanted to get it to in the first place.

    Its been over 15 years since I did it, so who knows.

    Just dont drop it directly into your own house mailbox of course, but I've never tried it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on September 01, 2011, 08:52:20 PM
    Why do they call it a one night stand when most of what you're doing is lying down?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on September 10, 2011, 10:48:35 PM
    Think I'll make NH my pick for next year's fall race. Judging by the 2010-11 calendars, it looks like the choices are probably going to be Keene in September, Bristol in October, or Manchester in November.

    The question: Which is going to be the prettier course - Keene or Bristol? I know what I'll be getting if I run Manchester, but is there a significant difference in foliage during that 2-3 week period between the middle of September and beginning of October?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on September 11, 2011, 12:43:37 AM
    I would pay close attention to the websites and the local chatters forums related to the events.  There's a lot of storm damage - washed out little bridges and stuff like that. 

    So, they may be flying by the seat-of-their-ass to re-route an event, which could be beneficial, or disastrous topography.

    In any case --  as always, admirable and good luck. 

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on September 11, 2011, 07:41:26 AM
    I would pay close attention to the websites and the local chatters forums related to the events.  There's a lot of storm damage - washed out little bridges and stuff like that. 

    So, they may be flying by the seat-of-their-ass to re-route an event, which could be beneficial, or disastrous topography.

    In any case --  as always, admirable and good luck. 



    I'm looking at 2012, so courses should be back to normal by then. Need plenty of time to sell my little group of running 40-ish girlfriends on the location. We're flying up to Minneapolis Oct 1 for this year's running trip. I think they're going to love the real fall weather, which should make NH an easy sell.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on September 11, 2011, 05:28:10 PM
    Thanks, Blackie!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on September 11, 2011, 05:53:22 PM
    I would pay close attention to the websites and the local chatters forums related to the events.  There's a lot of storm damage - washed out little bridges and stuff like that. 

    So, they may be flying by the seat-of-their-ass to re-route an event, which could be beneficial, or disastrous topography.

    In any case --  as always, admirable and good luck. 



    I'm looking at 2012

    Oh.  Its quite possible the municipalities will have uncorked their heads from their collective asses by then, and have thirty-seven eight-by-ten color glossy photos with circles and arrows (in red) with a paragraph on the back of each one. 

    I have a bridge out here since '07, which they've remedied by putting an orange sign in front of which says "Bridge Out".  I keep waiting for somebody important to buy a house nearby, so it can be repaired.

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on September 12, 2011, 12:16:56 AM
    I would pay close attention to the websites and the local chatters forums related to the events.  There's a lot of storm damage - washed out little bridges and stuff like that. 

    So, they may be flying by the seat-of-their-ass to re-route an event, which could be beneficial, or disastrous topography.

    In any case --  as always, admirable and good luck. 



    I'm looking at 2012

    Oh.  Its quite possible the municipalities will have uncorked their heads from their collective asses by then, and have thirty-seven eight-by-ten color glossy photos with circles and arrows (in red) with a paragraph on the back of each one. 

    I have a bridge out here since '07, which they've remedied by putting an orange sign in front of which says "Bridge Out".  I keep waiting for somebody important to buy a house nearby, so it can be repaired.



    Do you live in a bumblefuck town?

    I remember when a bridge was washed away from Monsey for a few years. If you downloaded the patch for your GPS, it would automatically reroute you.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on September 12, 2011, 12:34:42 AM

    Do you live in a bumblefuck town?

    I remember when a bridge was washed away from Monsey for a few years. If you downloaded the patch for your GPS, it would automatically reroute you.

    Yeah, sorta. 

    Its a suburb of a bumblefuck city, which housed one of the largest crime syndicates outside of the "five boroughs".

    Most of the people here have no clue. 

    Those sorts of projects are all racketed, and sometimes when something (as mentioned) gets "undone" or never happens, it's because of weird reasons.  That bridge could stay broken for another ten years.  Then someone will buy a piece of property nearby, and it'll suddenly get fixed.

    Naturally, the property would be cheap because the bridge was a problem.



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on September 17, 2011, 05:33:26 AM
    *nods appreciously from Olympus*










    (sir, system says appreciously is not a word)


    Tell it to go fuck itself, and get me an Amstel.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 22, 2011, 11:04:52 PM
    How do fighter-jets fly? Their wings don't look curved at the top at all.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on October 23, 2011, 12:38:49 AM
    How do fighter-jets fly? Their wings don't look curved at the top at all.

    IIRC, they're just there for stability and steering. A plane that size with that much jet power doesn't really need wings.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on October 23, 2011, 12:42:33 AM
    How do fighter-jets fly? Their wings don't look curved at the top at all.

    IIRC, they're just there for stability and steering. A plane that size with that much jet power doesn't really need wings.

    So, thrust?

    Thank you Mr. Boner.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 25, 2011, 09:31:36 PM
    I think my dog ate zombie barf.


    Is he gonna be ok, or should I start thinkin' about getting out the shotgun?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on October 25, 2011, 10:48:14 PM
    I think my dog ate zombie barf.


    Is he gonna be ok, or should I start thinkin' about getting out the shotgun?

    He is mans best friend, your most loyal companion! You need to quarantine him by himself like they did with the guy at the end of Shaun of the Dead. I am sure games of fetch and positioning him to remain your guard dog can be worked out, despite his zombification.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 25, 2011, 10:58:04 PM
    Yeah, I could never do the little guy in. I'll just wear some heavy duty oven mitts when we play fetch.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: hellbilly on October 25, 2011, 11:37:19 PM
    Damn Mike. That's gonna cut in to your food supply during the apocalypse.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on October 25, 2011, 11:46:37 PM
    Damn Mike. That's gonna cut in to your food supply during the apocalypse.

    Im thinking there'll be plenty of ripe flesh to go around when that happens.

    I hope.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on October 27, 2011, 05:15:05 PM
    I have so many lemmings running around the house I have started to take my dog out to kill and eat them. I usually stop him at 4 or so. Is this any danger?
    (He kinda chomps them down whole)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on October 27, 2011, 05:36:36 PM
    I have so many lemmings running around the house I have started to take my dog out to kill and eat them. I usually stop him at 4 or so. Is this any danger?
    (He kinda chomps them down whole)

    As long as he's current on shots and taking medication to prevent worms, I wouldn't think so.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on October 28, 2011, 01:31:57 AM
    I have so many fraggles running around the house I have started to take my dog out to kill and eat them. I usually stop him at 4 or so. Is this any danger?
    (He kinda chomps them down whole)

    No I hear they are good for the digestive tract.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on October 31, 2011, 07:51:57 PM
    cat stevens - Where Do The Children Play - Tea For The Tille (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPr_WQm0-UY#)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 01, 2011, 11:14:46 PM
    I've often wondered......................





    How in the fuck does Brendan Fraser get leading roles in movies?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on November 03, 2011, 08:00:13 PM
    I've often wondered......................





    How in the fuck does Brendan Fraser get leading roles in movies?

    He's tall.

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on November 03, 2011, 09:53:45 PM
    I've often wondered......................





    How in the fuck does Brendan Fraser get leading roles in movies?
    I quite like the campy B movies Fraser has starred in. First two mummy movies, dudley do right, journey to the center of the earth, stuff like that.
    It's when he does serious stuff that I think WTF.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 03, 2011, 10:15:35 PM
    I've often wondered......................





    How in the fuck does Brendan Fraser get leading roles in movies?
    I quite like the campy B movies Fraser has starred in. First two mummy movies, dudley do right, journey to the center of the earth, stuff like that.
    It's when he does serious stuff that I think WTF.

    Ok, I'll give you Encino Man, The Mummy movies n' stuff......thats where he belongs. Serious leading roles, like you said....... WTF???
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 04, 2011, 06:37:31 PM
    I've often wondered......................





    How in the fuck does Brendan Fraser get leading roles in movies?

    Ever notice how often he plays monkey-men in his films?

    Encino Man, George of the Jungle, and Monkeybone?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on November 04, 2011, 07:19:05 PM
    Could it be he has that "monkey look," kinda like the chick that did "V" had the "lizard look?"
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on November 08, 2011, 10:10:43 PM
    I saw someone on a late-night talk show (where I mostly extract my entertainment) make the observation Branden Frasier's movies always feature him being underground.



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 12, 2011, 12:33:32 PM
    I saw someone on a late-night talk show (where I mostly extract my entertainment) make the observation Branden Frasier's movies always feature him being underground.





    Tempted...............teeempteeeed............not gonna do it.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on November 12, 2011, 08:56:20 PM
    If you were 10-12 and woke up the morning after watching a Doctor Who marathon to find this, would you have thought it was pretty darn cool, or shrugged and grabbed the orange juice?
    (https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/297933_2644981530036_1420580231_33027610_1906086297_n.jpg)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 12, 2011, 10:47:54 PM
    I was a huge doctor who fan when I was that age.


    I'd say somewhere between the two.


    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on November 17, 2011, 02:11:49 PM
    I knew what Doctor Who was at that age, glimpsed a few episodes, read one book about Cybermen, but wouldnt have cared. These days however, I would find it totally awesome to have a fridge like that.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on November 19, 2011, 08:12:06 AM

    You've cleverly disguised your tardis as a refrigerator.




    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on November 19, 2011, 10:13:07 AM

    You've cleverly disguised your tardis as a refrigerator.


    Like the tardis, it's bigger on the inside, which is a good thing right now. The stockpiling for the annual turkeyfest has begun.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on November 27, 2011, 11:05:05 PM
    When high school football players pray before their game together, what are they praying for?

    If they pray to win, aren't they also then praying for the other side to lose? Isn't the other side also praying going to counteract them?

    How do they think this will work?

    Do they pray for a good time for all? Has anyone ever done this?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 27, 2011, 11:21:10 PM
    If they pray to win, aren't they also then praying for the other side to lose? Isn't the other side also praying going to counteract them?

    Im fairly certain it works like this....

    God gets the call that theres prayer going on down on the field, he then does a background check of each player on each team, stuff like: whos masturbated the most, whos cheated on tests, finger f-ed the most girls......ya know, basic HS shenanigans. Then, he takes this info and averages it all out (in his head, mind you.....he's god) and the team with the lowest number of transgressions gets the gawd power put into them for a couple of hours and the team with the most transgressions gets stuff like broken knee-caps, pulled muscles, sprained ankles, fumble-fingers,  etc etc.

    Baseball? God hates baseball, so when both teams pray, he just laughs and does nothing.


    Thats pretty much how it works.

    I went to Catholic school until 6th grade...... I know what im talking about here.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on November 28, 2011, 05:36:17 PM
    When high school football players pray before their game together, what are they praying for?

    If they pray to win, aren't they also then praying for the other side to lose? Isn't the other side also praying going to counteract them?

    How do they think this will work?

    Do they pray for a good time for all? Has anyone ever done this?

    If I recall correctly, they pray for strength, courage, and help to be good and faithful representatives of Christ in their contest.  At least that's the gist of what I remember from Lutheran school.

    However, I wouldn't put it past the Catholics....

     :lol: (jk)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on November 28, 2011, 06:36:43 PM

    However, I wouldn't put it past the Catholics....

     :lol: (jk)

    I'll pit my Penguins (Catholic nuns) against your Lutheran priests in a cage match anyday!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on December 05, 2011, 08:36:54 PM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on December 05, 2011, 10:21:34 PM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.


    A Lego helicopter to take them away?

    The release of political Legos? I don't know how to form that into a joke.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on December 05, 2011, 10:37:19 PM
    A Lego helicopter to take them away?

    The release of political Legos? I don't know how to form that into a joke.

    I'm not sure how to use the political lego prisoner thing, but I do like the lego escape vehicle!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on December 08, 2011, 10:24:23 PM
    Why do they make toasters with a number setting of 8 that burns anything you put in it into ash? Nobody could eat something cooked at 8 on a toaster.


    Who uses this setting?

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: SeanD on December 09, 2011, 12:02:54 AM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.

    The answer is obvious.  Hookers and blow.  But since they are Lego's you can MAKE the hookers and it won't take much blow.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BadQuakerBen on December 09, 2011, 06:00:16 PM
    Why do they make toasters with a number setting of 8 that burns anything you put in it into ash? Nobody could eat something cooked at 8 on a toaster.


    Who uses this setting?


    My toaster goes to 11.
     :D
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on December 09, 2011, 08:44:41 PM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.

    The answer is obvious.  Hookers and blow.  But since they are Lego's you can MAKE the hookers and it won't take much blow.
    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    On a more serious note, I saw the following question posed today during my run:
    What is pure religion?

    It was on the sign outside a church of christ, and it annoyed the heck out of me.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: SeanD on December 09, 2011, 10:45:25 PM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.

    The answer is obvious.  Hookers and blow.  But since they are Lego's you can MAKE the hookers and it won't take much blow.
    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    On a more serious note, I saw the following question posed today during my run:
    What is pure religion?

    It was on the sign outside a church of christ, and it annoyed the heck out of me.

    Religion either unmoderated by or in concert with the secular government.

    Think Shi'aria Law.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on December 09, 2011, 11:34:13 PM
    Religion either unmoderated by or in concert with the secular government.

    Think Shi'aria Law.

    Not even that is "pure". Religion, based on a perfect deity (or deities), is still man's interpretation of the divine.
    Man is imperfect, so religion cannot be pure.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on December 10, 2011, 11:17:22 AM
    Why do they make toasters with a number setting of 8 that burns anything you put in it into ash? Nobody could eat something cooked at 8 on a toaster.


    Who uses this setting?


    My toaster goes to 11.
     :D


    If 8 burns it to a crisp, 11 would send your shit back in time.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 10, 2011, 11:18:05 AM
    Religion either unmoderated by or in concert with the secular government.

    Think Shi'aria Law.

    Not even that is "pure". Religion, based on a perfect deity (or deities), is still man's interpretation of the divine.
    Man is imperfect, so religion cannot be pure.

    perhaps it could be religion without a church.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: SeanD on December 10, 2011, 03:13:42 PM
    Religion either unmoderated by or in concert with the secular government.

    Think Shi'aria Law.

    Not even that is "pure". Religion, based on a perfect deity (or deities), is still man's interpretation of the divine.
    Man is imperfect, so religion cannot be pure.


    But the deity is not pure.  A perfect deity wouldn't create something as flawed and fucked up as man.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on December 10, 2011, 04:42:54 PM
    How the fuck would "you" know>?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on December 10, 2011, 08:47:34 PM
    Religion either unmoderated by or in concert with the secular government.

    Think Shi'aria Law.

    Not even that is "pure". Religion, based on a perfect deity (or deities), is still man's interpretation of the divine.
    Man is imperfect, so religion cannot be pure.


    But the deity is not pure.  A perfect deity wouldn't create something as flawed and fucked up as man.
    I don't understand what you're talking about.  A perfect deity would create a system that allows for self improvement...i.e. evolution.  Man is just a piece of the universe, not it's totality.  And the human race is continually evolving, as do all species.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on December 10, 2011, 09:59:58 PM
    (http://thecia.com.au/reviews/n/images/no-country-for-old-men-4.jpg)
    (http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/files/2008/12/javier-bardem.jpg)
    (http://thecia.com.au/reviews/n/images/no-country-for-old-men-4.jpg)
    (http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/files/2008/12/javier-bardem.jpg)
    (http://thecia.com.au/reviews/n/images/no-country-for-old-men-4.jpg)
    (http://blog.newsok.com/staticblog/files/2008/12/javier-bardem.jpg)
    (http://images.smarter.com/blogs/janet%20leigh%20pyscho%20scream.jpg)

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on December 10, 2011, 10:43:34 PM
    If lego mini figs were to kidnap and hold a worker elf hostage, what would the ransom demands be?

    "Buy More Legos" is the obvious choice, but I'm looking for more.

    The answer is obvious.  Hookers and blow.  But since they are Lego's you can MAKE the hookers and it won't take much blow.
    :lol: :lol: :lol:

    On a more serious note, I saw the following question posed today during my run:
    What is pure religion?

    It was on the sign outside a church of christ, and it annoyed the heck out of me.

    Religion without spirituality?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on December 17, 2011, 10:51:35 PM
    Why is it that when someone claims to like honesty, they still get upset with you when you tell them the truth?

    If you ask me (a fat person) if you're fat, and you're fat, then I'm going to tell you that you're fat.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Cognitive Dissident on December 18, 2011, 01:34:56 AM
    I think that's an artifact of Christianity.  The 8th commandment explanation in the Lutheran (and probably Catholic) catechism seems to imply that one should not only avoid lying about other people, but "go the extra mile" to say only good (or at least constructive) things:

    Quote from: Luther's Small Catechism
    The Eighth Commandment

        Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

        What does this mean?  We should fear and love God that we may not deceitfully belie, betray, slander, nor defame our neighbor, but defend him, speak well of him, and put the best construction on everything.

    The italics at the end are mine.

    Understanding Catholic--and Lutheran--doctrine, the emphasis is on doing good works to counteract all the bad works in the world.  Think of it, outside of Christianity, as raising the world's karma level (and yours, in specific.)  

    If you look at it generically like that and in a practical sense, it might be a good idea.  I don't try very hard good at it.  I think people who behave that way gain more respect though.  For example, a salesman who talks down the brands he doesn't sell probably doesn't get as much respect from you as one who recognizes the strong points of the brands he doesn't sell, but emphasizes superior characteristics of the brands he does sell.


    added strike-through
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on December 18, 2011, 04:41:19 PM
    Why is it that when someone claims to like honesty, they still get upset with you when you tell them the truth?

    If you ask me (a fat person) if you're fat, and you're fat, then I'm going to tell you that you're fat.

    Because they are lying to themselves about liking honesty?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on December 18, 2011, 04:45:08 PM
    honest truth is rare in my opinion.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on December 18, 2011, 05:11:28 PM
    Why is it that when someone claims to like honesty, they still get upset with you when you tell them the truth?

    If you ask me (a fat person) if you're fat, and you're fat, then I'm going to tell you that you're fat.
    I like to tell the truth. To avoid people getting angry with me, I try and tell the truth in a very respectful and passive manner so the person doesn't feel I am judging them. This usually helps.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: JDW on December 30, 2011, 07:05:03 AM
    Why are all the marriage announcements in the New York Times from people who are doctors and lawyers? And Jewish? Are there no honky Catholic garbage men getting married in New York? And I like sitting down to read a big ass newspaper on the weekends, got into the habit after living in the UK and reading the Observer, Sunday Times and Sunday Torygraph. Aside from the Sunday New York Times, are there any other nice heavy weekend papers I can plow through with a few pots of coffee? I hate those fuckin e-readers so don't even go there.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on December 30, 2011, 06:07:18 PM
    Why are all the marriage announcements in the New York Times from people who are doctors and lawyers? And Jewish? Are there no honky Catholic garbage men getting married in New York? And I like sitting down to read a big ass newspaper on the weekends, got into the habit after living in the UK and reading the Observer, Sunday Times and Sunday Torygraph. Aside from the Sunday New York Times, are there any other nice heavy weekend papers I can plow through with a few pots of coffee? I hate those fuckin e-readers so don't even go there.

    They're attention whores, thats why they submit their marriage to the NYT.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on January 03, 2012, 06:02:54 PM
    honest truth is rare in my opinion.

    Yeah.  They fuckin' hate that here. 
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 03, 2012, 09:47:36 PM
    honest truth is rare in my opinion.

    I dont believe you.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 05, 2012, 06:26:51 AM
    Why aren't babies born with more instincts?

     How does instinct work?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 05, 2012, 08:53:23 AM
    They are. Their brains just haven't developed to the point of realizing them yet.

    Its like having a nitro system on your car without the wires hooked up.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on January 05, 2012, 01:51:23 PM
    Also humans dont rely on instinct as much as other animals due to our process of teaching our young for many years. It has helped our species adapt better over the years thankfully.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instinct
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_activity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Displacement_activity)
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on January 06, 2012, 07:24:06 AM
    Humans are very instinctual.  Infants rely entirely on instinct to survive, even with nurturing. 

    For instance, they have a suckling instinct.  Without that, they'd starve.  Babies who won't take the nipple WILL die in nature.  That is instinct.

    They have a facial recognition instinct, peoples deepest memories are often their mothers faces.  This is why sometimes kids won't "take" to a babysitter.  It's an instinctual throwback to danger, and not taking nourishment from potentially harmful people.  Their cries are an inarticulate way of saying "rescue me from this foreign tribe". 

    They have a "falling" instinct, which can be seen by playing "whoopsie" with a baby.  They'll fling their arms out in a steadying motion, even before they have the ability to walk or crawl.  Sometimes it'll be observed during dreams, when they fling their arms out like "WOAH!" and then wake up crying.  In nature a simple injury can lead to death. 

    They'll cry when they shit because it can lead to infection if left uncleaned. 

    A lot of the instincts you'd normally recognize as survival instincts are worthless when a child is essentially a human worm.  You can't expect them to get up and walk like an infant Jackie Chan, defending themselves from complicated dangers. 

    The higher primates develop slower because of longevity of the species, and ultimately they aren't viable for reproduction until sexual maturity, which in the physical sense doesn't occur until their early teens.  If they physically can't give birth, everything before that is learning time. 

    And thus, the instinct mechanism is identifying danger and satiating nourishment to allow them to reach that purpose.



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: alaric89 on January 06, 2012, 04:13:26 PM
    Yeah, I never have been able to shake off that tit sucking instinct either.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 17, 2012, 05:46:37 AM
    How do you congratulate a guy who just passed his last kidney stone?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Elitist Bitch on January 17, 2012, 11:13:29 PM
    How do you congratulate a guy who just passed his last kidney stone?

    With a beer, if he's so inclined. I'm sure he'd be relieved to never speak of it again.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: John Shaw on January 17, 2012, 11:14:45 PM
    Things

    Sup yo.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Elitist Bitch on January 18, 2012, 12:19:20 AM
    Sup yo.

    Hi Shaw!
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 20, 2012, 12:55:43 AM
    Is there a real-life porn re-enactment of the joke The Aristocrats?

    If not, why?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: BonerJoe on February 05, 2012, 11:24:09 AM
    Are introverts naturally attracted to extroverts, both in friendship and romantic relationships? I feel like I need someone to get the conversation going, or I'm constantly uncomfortable with the situation.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on February 05, 2012, 01:09:49 PM
    Seems to me, an introvert would be attracted to other introverts as far as romantic relationships go. I'm speaking mainly of introverts who have accepted who they are and have no desire to change. Why would some introvert dude want to date a chick, like some Paris Hilton type cunt who has a million friends who go the the clubs every friday night? Wouldn't that be a nightmare for the introvert? Seems it would be very uncomfortable for him and her as well when her friends are asking her "why is your new bf just hanging out in the corner by himself?"

    I dont know, thats just how it makes sense to me. I myself dont like crowds that much but dont consider myself an introvert. Its not that im intimidated. It irritates me more than anything. I can deal with them and fit in if I have to, but its just not my thing, so I tend to be attracted to more introverted types in both friends and romantic relationships.

     For instance, I could go to a wedding or something of that nature with my gf and after we leave she tells me people say to her, "OMG Mike is such a funny guy, seems like so much fun to be around. A bunch of us should get together and go out sometime." and im sitting there just cringing at the idea in my own head. Sure it was fine that one time, but it was more like work for me than anything. Not something I would want to make a habit of doing. I like small groups of not more than 3 or 4 people. Thats where my comfort zone is.

    I suppose an introvert who wants to change might be attracted to an extrovert, just as someone who they feel might help to bring them out of their shell a bit.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on February 05, 2012, 07:31:05 PM
    Theres usually a dom/sub thing in romantic relationships. 

    In platonic relationships, it's more peer-oriented.  Birds of a feather.

    Its pretty unusual that you'll see two meglo-doms in a romance, they'll probably clash too hard.   But two subs probably not so uncommon.  They'll probably establish a pecking order among themselves, could go either way.  If it's two subs, the dominant sub is probably determined by default, and the lesser just by bein.. lesser of the two. 



    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: dalebert on February 05, 2012, 09:06:43 PM
    It saddens me that you equate submissiveness with being lesser of the two. I guess you mean less dominant. Submissiveness is a very positive trait depending on how you look at it. A very submissive person can inspire the dominance in another just as a very dominant person can inspire the submissiveness in someone.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on February 05, 2012, 11:35:41 PM
    I usually find myself in romantic relationships with extroverted women because things rarely move along with an introverted one.  I'm generally introverted myself (depending on my mood I can be very introverted or bordering extroverted), but I'm not submissive.  I also enjoy being in a relationship with an extroverted woman more because she usually has more friends than I do and they invite her out to do stuff to which I can tag along if I want.  It's like getting surrogate friends without expending any effort finding them.  I have my own friends, but outside of tennis and playing tabletop RPGs we only hang out a few times a year.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on February 06, 2012, 05:01:15 AM
    It saddens me that you equate submissiveness with being lesser of the two. I guess you mean less dominant. Submissiveness is a very positive trait depending on how you look at it. A very submissive person can inspire the dominance in another just as a very dominant person can inspire the submissiveness in someone.
    Theres usually a dom/sub thing in romantic relationships. 

    In platonic relationships, it's more peer-oriented.  Birds of a feather.

    Its pretty unusual that you'll see two meglo-doms in a romance, they'll probably clash too hard.   But two subs probably not so uncommon.  They'll probably establish a pecking order among themselves, could go either way.  If it's two subs, the dominant sub is probably determined by default, and the lesser just by bein.. lesser of the two. 





    Yeah, I meant less dominant, like I said right there.

    It would behoove you to stop being a fuckin' asshole.

    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 11, 2012, 01:34:40 AM
    So, I'm buying a car for pretty much the first time that counts in my life as my car died a couple months ago. Any advice? I have about a grand to spend, just need something to get me to work and back. I have about 1000 to spend (not much sadly).
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 11, 2012, 01:48:00 AM
    http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2832066244.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2832066244.html)

    What if I just get this, and avoid highways? This bike is really old though, but as long as it runs thats what matters right?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on February 11, 2012, 11:09:26 AM
    For a grand you should get an old XR/XL 650/600/500, or something like this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html)  or this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html)  or: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html)

    Those are all freeway useable bikes that should last and are pretty cheap and easy to work on and find parts for.  They all should run you about 50 mpg, be capable of cruising at freeway speeds all day long and be pretty reliable.  Insurance should run about 10-20 bucks a month.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on February 11, 2012, 12:52:25 PM
    For a grand you should get an old XR/XL 650/600/500, or something like this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html)  or this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html)  or: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html)

    Those are all freeway useable bikes that should last and are pretty cheap and easy to work on and find parts for.  They all should run you about 50 mpg, be capable of cruising at freeway speeds all day long and be pretty reliable.  Insurance should run about 10-20 bucks a month.

    I dont have my motorcycle license, but I was kind of just looking at those bikes as a way to bring the cost down since I while having a vehicle for other uses is nice, I really only need this one for my 15 minute commute to work. I'm not sure if I'd want a motorcycle since I'd have to get the license, not necessary for a scooter. I'm just seeing that cars within my price range are so old and junky that I dont even know if its worth buying one just to get a new one as soon as it breaks down.  I'm also thinking with a bike repairs might be cheaper, and I'd be more likely to be able to figure them out myself, since I dont know that much about mechanics.

    Any more thoughts?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Fred on February 11, 2012, 01:05:07 PM
    How bout a bicycle?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Sam Gunn (since nobody got Admiral Naismith) on February 11, 2012, 03:49:38 PM
    For a grand you should get an old XR/XL 650/600/500, or something like this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2828612623.html)  or this: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2838162471.html)  or: http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html (http://appleton.craigslist.org/mcy/2806605220.html)

    Those are all freeway useable bikes that should last and are pretty cheap and easy to work on and find parts for.  They all should run you about 50 mpg, be capable of cruising at freeway speeds all day long and be pretty reliable.  Insurance should run about 10-20 bucks a month.

    I dont have my motorcycle license, but I was kind of just looking at those bikes as a way to bring the cost down since I while having a vehicle for other uses is nice, I really only need this one for my 15 minute commute to work. I'm not sure if I'd want a motorcycle since I'd have to get the license, not necessary for a scooter. I'm just seeing that cars within my price range are so old and junky that I dont even know if its worth buying one just to get a new one as soon as it breaks down.  I'm also thinking with a bike repairs might be cheaper, and I'd be more likely to be able to figure them out myself, since I dont know that much about mechanics.

    Any more thoughts?
    I have a pretty sweet custom truck I built myself.  And 5 motorcycles.  I never drive my truck. I find driving my truck impinges on my budget due to fuel costs.  And I am very strict with my budget.  50 mpg vs. 20 mpg pretty much settles it for me.  I think the only reason I'm able to afford my continual accumulation of property is due to the fact that I ride the motorcycle every day to work instead of the truck.

    Tally up your fuel costs and calculate them over the year and I think you'll be hard pressed to decide not to get the bike, even after paying the state extortion fees for the special license, on a simple financial decision.  That said, it is nice to have an enclosed vehicle for those especially wet and cold days when you're just not feeling like the extra exertion of riding the bike. I do have a soft spot in my heart for those little scooters though, just because they are so fun and small and light.  But I don't see myself buying one any time soon, just because they are not freeway capable, which makes them about next to useless in California.  If it works for you, I think that scooter you picked out is one of the cooler varieties.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on February 17, 2012, 04:10:02 PM
    Planning ahead for PorcFest - think I may signup to be a vendor as DottieBee, and see if I can't sell some homemade toys, pillows, totes, aprons and (big surprise) felted porcupines. I have some standard animals I make, along with a fondness for creating characters in yarn. Are there any specific characters you guys think I should focus on? Always glad to try and figure out something new. Currently working on Dag and Norbert of Angry Beavers and a dragon. (Which I'll get back to after finishing a couple dozen more mini buns for easter.)

    Some examples:
    Star Wars (Classic, of course)
    Gir
    Perry the Platypus
    Mini Ninjas and Zombies
    Angry Birds
    Kirby/Mario
    Plants vs. Zombies
    Ninja/Zombie Bunnies
    Cthulhu
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on April 02, 2012, 06:42:06 PM
    Brush first, or floss first?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on April 02, 2012, 08:01:40 PM
    Floss first, so the mouthwash can get around all the gunk between your teeth. OR, just dont brush or floss at all and wait until your teeth rot, then get dentures.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on April 03, 2012, 12:51:01 AM
    Brush first, or floss first?

    I floss first, but I don't think it makes much of a difference either way, especially if you use mouthwash afterward.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Laetitia on April 03, 2012, 09:56:21 AM
    Brush first, or floss first?

    I floss first. If I brush first, then I have to brush again after flossing, because I've loosed gunk on my teeth... I know, the listerine/scope should kill germs, but I can't stand the thought. Dentist told me to stop that - the double brushing was doing bad things for my enamel.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on April 12, 2012, 02:42:43 PM
    I've wondered this for years, and don't have a good answer. My dad was an agricultural engineer, and he couldn't give me a good answer, nor could my friends wife, who is a soil conservationist. I also asked this of a friend who is a grad student studying something or other about how to feed more people around the world. Nothing doing.

    In small tropical islands, sea foam gets everywhere, and makes everything wet. The sea is salty, and the sun evaporates the water, leaving an increasingly toxic level of salts that would be in too high of a concentration for anything to grow. Yet, things do grow on those islands. How?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on April 12, 2012, 11:36:48 PM
    I've wondered this for years, and don't have a good answer. My dad was an agricultural engineer, and he couldn't give me a good answer, nor could my friends wife, who is a soil conservationist. I also asked this of a friend who is a grad student studying something or other about how to feed more people around the world. Nothing doing.

    In small tropical islands, sea foam gets everywhere, and makes everything wet. The sea is salty, and the sun evaporates the water, leaving an increasingly toxic level of salts that would be in too high of a concentration for anything to grow. Yet, things do grow on those islands. How?

    They also tend to get rainstorms, don't they?  Some of them also have fresh water springs.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on April 14, 2012, 02:17:06 PM
    Animals love salt. Also, the water cycle means that the water will keep being added to the salty areas.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on August 15, 2012, 12:27:46 AM
    Can bonobos and chimpanzees interbreed?

    I mean, they should be closely related enough, but I can't find a definitive answer.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on August 15, 2012, 11:20:09 AM
    Humans have a 99% DNA match with chimps and we cant make babies with them, so I doubt that would work either.

    Good question though.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 07, 2013, 10:10:27 PM
    How come people with chimeral DNA don't have autoimmune disorders?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_%28genetics%29#Human_chimeras (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimera_%28genetics%29#Human_chimeras)

    Would knowledge about this make it possible to do more body transplants without immuno-suppressants? I mean people can get new arms and legs transplanted without the risk of rejection.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 11, 2013, 04:31:16 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Looking from outside on January 12, 2013, 06:51:54 AM
    Quote
    A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure originally described by Freeman Dyson. Such a "sphere" would be a system of orbiting solar power satellites meant to completely encompass a star and capture most or all of its energy output. Dyson speculated that such structures would be the logical consequence of the long-term survival and escalating energy needs of a technological civilization, and proposed that searching for evidence of the existence of such structures might lead to the detection of advanced intelligent extraterrestrial life.


    So, you inhabit the inner surface of that sphere and have a sun in the center. Fine but what would happen if you had a solar flair? :shock:
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on January 12, 2013, 08:58:02 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 12, 2013, 09:48:47 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.

    Problem with that, is they would know where its really going as well. Just sit and wait a few hrs for you to show up and BLAMMO, you're screwed.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Diogenes The Cynic on January 12, 2013, 10:41:40 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.

    Problem with that, is they would know where its really going as well. Just sit and wait a few hrs for you to show up and BLAMMO, you're screwed.

    7-11's started a program where you can have stuff shipped to them for a fee. Then all you would have to look out for is a police car in the parking lot.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: freeAgent on January 15, 2013, 09:17:55 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.

    Problem with that, is they would know where its really going as well. Just sit and wait a few hrs for you to show up and BLAMMO, you're screwed.

    7-11's started a program where you can have stuff shipped to them for a fee. Then all you would have to look out for is a police car in the parking lot.

    ...and the security cameras.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Turd Ferguson on January 15, 2013, 10:48:07 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.

    Problem with that, is they would know where its really going as well. Just sit and wait a few hrs for you to show up and BLAMMO, you're screwed.

    7-11's started a program where you can have stuff shipped to them for a fee. Then all you would have to look out for is a police car in the parking lot.

    ...and the security cameras.


    ...and the plain clothes DEA agents
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: anarchir on January 31, 2013, 10:16:04 PM
    What is stopping some 3 letter govt goon agency from setting up fake shops on Silk Road and sending the cops to someones house instead of the product they ordered?


    In theory, you could order whatever it is you want and have it delivered to an address that doesn't belong to you.  If you have a tracking number, you know when it's going to arrive and can intercept it, etc.

    Problem with that, is they would know where its really going as well. Just sit and wait a few hrs for you to show up and BLAMMO, you're screwed.

    7-11's started a program where you can have stuff shipped to them for a fee. Then all you would have to look out for is a police car in the parking lot.

    ...and the security cameras.


    ...and the plain clothes DEA agents

    Hell it could be the station attendant himself.
    Title: Re: The Question Thread
    Post by: Bill Brasky on February 01, 2013, 12:20:14 AM

    7-11's started a program where you can have stuff shipped to them for a fee. Then all you would have to look out for is a police car in the parking lot.

    I know for a fact I could have anything mailed to half-a-dozen Durk-a-marts. 

    TMYK.

    Tonight, for example, I walked into a Hajib-fest.  One dude is probably about your age, has a beard halfway down to his balls.  He, and three of his cohorts were chattering in Pak, or Farsi, or god-knows what. 

    They sell crack roses, scales, brass brillo, dick pills, counterfeit batteries, glass weed pipes out the ass - pretty much anything.  One extra box from a sketchy location probably doesn't matter, they must get sketch shit alla time.

    Most of that shit comes in bulk, the UPS motherfucker just wheels in a handtruck of shit from China.  I wouldn't be surprised if they had yellowcake uranium and dynamite vests in the back room. 

    In your case, it might not fly.  Nothing personal, but they probably dislike "your kind".  Its all about being pals, regular customers, friendly, and not ripping their balls on the prices of common store goods.  They like having a "crew" of regulars, who come in and out, and serve to be the basic protectorate of a struggling business.  Because people come in there and treat them like shit on a regular basis.

    If you work up that camaraderie, you can get a package sent there.  They'd be happy to do it for ya, for a few bucks. 

    I'd rather have something illicit sent there, than a Mailboxes, Etc location.  Those cunts will rat you out in a minute.  In a MBE or UPS Store, you have to show ID to open a PO box.  They normally don't just take "general delivery".

    I actually used to have a "General Delivery" address at a rural PO location.  This was in the days before sand people blew up the twin towers.  I'm pretty sure the General Delivery addresses are super rare nowadays.  Maybe in DirtRoad, Oklahoma, you could find one.